Clinical presentation and evaluation of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia: Results of an international expert consensus panel

EEG in focal and generalized epilepsies: Pearls and perils

Correctly diagnosing and classifying seizures and epilepsies is vital to ensure a tailored approach to patients with epilepsy. The ILAE seizure classification consists of two main groups: focal and generalized. Establishing if a seizure is focal or generalized is essential to classify the epilepsy type and the epilepsy syndrome, providing more personalized treatment and counseling about prognosis. EEG is one of the most essential tools for this classification process and further localization of the epileptogenic focus. However, some EEG findings are misleading and may postpone the correct diagnosis and proper treatment. Knowing the most common EEG pitfalls in focal and generalized epilepsies is valuable for clinical practice, avoiding misinterpretations. Some atypical features can be challenging in focal epilepsies, such as secondary bilateral synchrony, focal epileptiform activity induced by hyperventilation and photic stimulation, and non-focal slowing. On the other hand, more than 60 % of persons with idiopathic generalized epilepsies have at least one type of atypical abnormality. In this manuscript, we describe and illustrate some of the most common EEG findings that can make even experienced epileptologists question not only where the epileptogenic focus is but also if the patient has focal or generalized epilepsy. This review summarizes the perils and provide some pearls to assist EEG readers.

Dissecting genetics of spectrum of epilepsies with eyelid myoclonia by exome sequencing

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM) spectrum is a generalized form of epilepsy characterized by eyelid myoclonia with or without absences, eye closure-induced seizures with electroencephalographic paroxysms, and photosensitivity. Based on the specific clinical features, age at onset, and familial occurrence, a genetic cause has been postulated. Pathogenic variants in CHD2, SYNGAP1, NEXMIF, RORB, and GABRA1 have been reported in individuals with photosensitivity and eyelid myoclonia, but whether other genes are also involved, or a single gene is uniquely linked with EEM, or its subtypes, is not yet known. We aimed to dissect the genetic etiology of EEM.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 105 individuals by using whole exome sequencing. Individuals were divided into two groups: EEM- (isolated EEM) and EEM+ (EEM accompanied by intellectual disability [ID] or any other neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorder).

RESULTS

We identified nine variants classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in the entire cohort (8.57%); among these, eight (five in CHD2, one in NEXMIF, one in SYNGAP1, and one in TRIM8) were found in the EEM+ subcohort (28.57%). Only one variant (IFIH1) was found in the EEM- subcohort (1.29%); however, because the phenotype of the proband did not fit with published data, additional evidence is needed before considering IFIH1 variants and EEM- an established association. Burden analysis did not identify any single burdened gene or gene set.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results suggest that for EEM, as for many other epilepsies, the identification of a genetic cause is more likely with comorbid ID and/or other neurodevelopmental disorders. Pathogenic variants were mostly found in CHD2, and the association of CHD2 with EEM+ can now be considered a reasonable gene-disease association. We provide further evidence to strengthen the association of EEM+ with NEXMIF and SYNGAP1. Possible new associations between EEM+ and TRIM8, and EEM- and IFIH1, are also reported. Although we provide robust evidence for gene variants associated with EEM+, the core genetic etiology of EEM- remains to be elucidated.