Molecular mechanisms of dominance evolution in Müllerian mimicry

Dominance mechanisms in supergene alleles controlling butterfly wing pattern variation: insights from gene expression in Heliconius numata

Loci under balancing selection, where multiple alleles are maintained, offer a relevant opportunity to investigate the role of natural selection in shaping genetic dominance: the high frequency of heterozygotes at these loci has been shown to enable the evolution of dominance among alleles. In the butterfly Heliconius numata, mimetic wing color variations are controlled by an inversion polymorphism of a circa 2 Mb genomic region (supergene P), with strong dominance between sympatric alleles. To test how differences in dominance observed on wing patterns correlate with variations in expression levels throughout the supergene region, we sequenced the complete transcriptome of heterozygotes at the prepupal stage and compared it to corresponding homozygotes. By defining dominance based on non-overlapping ranges of transcript expression between genotypes, we found contrasting patterns of dominance between the supergene and the rest of the genome; the patterns of transcript expression in the heterozygotes were more similar to the expression observed in the dominant homozygotes in the supergene region. Dominance also differed among the three subinversions of the supergene, suggesting possible epistatic interactions among their gene contents underlying dominance evolution. We found the expression pattern of the melanization gene cortex located in the P-region to predict wing pattern phenotype in the heterozygote. We also identify new candidate genes that are potentially involved in mimetic color pattern variations highlighting the relevance of transcriptomic analyses in heterozygotes to pinpoint candidate genes in non-recombining regions.

The integrative biology of genetic dominance

Dominance is a basic property of inheritance systems describing the link between a diploid genotype at a single locus and the resulting phenotype. Models for the evolution of dominance have long been framed as an opposition between the irreconcilable views of Fisher in 1928 supporting the role of largely elusive dominance modifiers and Wright in 1929, who viewed dominance as an emerging property of the structure of enzymatic pathways. Recent theoretical and empirical advances however suggest that these opposing views can be reconciled, notably using models investigating the regulation of gene expression and developmental processes. In this more comprehensive framework, phenotypic dominance emerges from departures from linearity between any levels of integration in the genotype‐to‐phenotype map. Here, we review how these different models illuminate the emergence and evolution of dominance. We then detail recent empirical studies shedding new light on the diversity of molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying dominance and its evolution. By reconciling population genetics and functional biology, we hope our review will facilitate cross‐talk among research fields in the integrative study of dominance evolution.

A Comparative Review on Current and Future Drug Targets Against Bacteria & Malaria

Long before the discovery of drugs like 'antibiotic and anti-parasitic drugs', the infectious diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria and parasites remain as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in developing and underdeveloped countries. The phenomenon by which the organism exerts resistance against two or more structurally unrelated drugs is called multidrug resistance (MDR) and its emergence has further complicated the treatment scenario of infectious diseases. Resistance towards the available set of treatment options and poor pipeline of novel drug development puts an alarming situation. A universal goal in the post-genomic era is to identify novel targets/drugs for various life-threatening diseases caused by such pathogens. This review is conceptualized in the backdrop of drug resistance in two major pathogens i.e. "Pseudomonas aeruginosa" and "Plasmodium falciparum". In this review, the available targets and key mechanisms of resistance of these pathogens have been discussed in detail. An attempt has also been made to analyze the common drug targets of bacteria and malaria parasite to overcome the current drug resistance scenario. The solution is also hypothesized in terms of a present pipeline of drugs and efforts made by scientific community.

Unboxing mutations: Connecting mutation types with evolutionary consequences

A key step in understanding the genetic basis of different evolutionary outcomes (e.g., adaptation) is to determine the roles played by different mutation types (e.g., SNPs, translocations and inversions). To do this we must simultaneously consider different mutation types in an evolutionary framework. Here, we propose a research framework that directly utilizes the most important characteristics of mutations, their population genetic effects, to determine their relative evolutionary significance in a given scenario. We review known population genetic effects of different mutation types and show how these may be connected to different evolutionary outcomes. We provide examples of how to implement this framework and pinpoint areas where more data, theory and synthesis are needed. Linking experimental and theoretical approaches to examine different mutation types simultaneously is a critical step towards understanding their evolutionary significance.