1
|
Arnette SD, Simonitis LE, Egan JP, Cohen KE, Kolmann MA. True grit? Comparative anatomy and evolution of gizzards in fishes. J Anat 2024; 244:260-273. [PMID: 37770122 PMCID: PMC10780153 DOI: 10.1111/joa.13956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Gut morphology frequently reflects the food organisms digest. Gizzards are organs of the gut found in archosaurs and fishes that mechanically reduce food to aid digestion. Gizzards are thought to compensate for edentulism and/or provide an advantage when consuming small, tough food items (e.g., phytoplankton and algae). It is unknown how widespread gizzards are in fishes and how similar these structures are among different lineages. Here, we investigate the distribution of gizzards across bony fishes to (1) survey different fishes for gizzard presence, (2) compare the histological structure of gizzards in three species, (3) estimate how often gizzards have evolved in fishes, and (4) explore whether anatomical and ecological traits like edentulism and microphagy predict gizzard presence. According to our analyses, gizzards are rare across bony fishes, evolving only six times in a broad taxonomic sampling of 51 species, and gizzard presence is not clearly correlated with factors like gut length or dentition. We find that gizzard morphology varies among the lineages where one is present, both macroscopically (presence of a crop) and microscopically (varying tissue types). We conclude that gizzards likely aid in the mechanical reduction of food in fishes that have lost an oral dentition in their evolutionary past; however, the relative scarcity of gizzards suggests they are just one of many possible solutions for processing tough, nutrient-poor food items. Gizzards have long been present in the evolutionary history of fishes, can be found in a wide variety of marine and freshwater clades, and likely have been overlooked in many taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Arnette
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- Friday Harbor Labs, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, Washington, USA
| | - L E Simonitis
- Friday Harbor Labs, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, Washington, USA
- Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - J P Egan
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA
- Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - K E Cohen
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - M A Kolmann
- Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DeHaan LM, Burns MD, Egan JP, Bloom DD. Diadromy Drives Elevated Rates of Trait Evolution and Ecomorphological Convergence in Clupeiformes (Herring, Shad, and Anchovies). Am Nat 2023; 202:830-850. [PMID: 38033182 DOI: 10.1086/726894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
AbstractMigration can have a profound influence on rates and patterns of phenotypic evolution. Diadromy is the migration between marine and freshwater habitats for feeding and reproduction that can require individuals to travel tens to thousands of kilometers. The high energetic demands of diadromy are predicted to select for ecomorphological traits that maximize swimming and locomotor efficiency. Intraspecific studies have shown repeated instances of divergence among diadromous and nondiadromous populations in locomotor and foraging traits, which suggests that at a macroevolutionary scale diadromous lineages may experience convergent evolution onto one or multiple adaptive optima. We tested for differences in rates and patterns of phenotypic evolution among diadromous and nondiadromous lineages in Clupeiformes, a clade that has evolved diadromy more than 10 times. Our results show that diadromous clupeiforms show convergent evolution for some locomotor traits and faster rates of evolution, which we propose are adaptive responses to the locomotor demands of migration. We also find evidence that diadromous lineages show convergence into multiple regions of multivariate trait space and suggest that these respective trait spaces are associated with differences in migration and trophic ecology. However, not all locomotor traits and no trophic traits show evidence of convergence or elevated rates of evolution associated with diadromy. Our results show that long-distance migration influences the tempo and patterns of phenotypic evolution at macroevolutionary scales, but there is not a single diadromous syndrome.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Q, Purrafee Dizaj L, Huang J, Kumar Sarker K, Kevrekidis C, Reichenbacher B, Reza Esmaeili H, Straube N, Moritz T, Li C. Molecular phylogenetics of the Clupeiformes based on exon-capture data and a new classification of the order. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2022; 175:107590. [PMID: 35850406 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The Clupeiformes, including among others herrings, anchovies, shads and menhadens are ecologically and commercially important, yet their phylogenetic relationships are still controversial. Previous classification of Clupeiformes were based on morphological characters or lack of synapomorphic characters. More recent studies based on molecular data as well as new morphological evidence are keeping challenging their phylogenetic relations and there is still no consensus on many interrelationships within the Clupeiformes. In this study, we collected nuclear sequence data from 4,434 single-copy protein coding loci using a gene-capture method. We obtained a robust phylogeny based on 1,165 filtered loci with less than 30 % missing data. Our major findings include: 1) reconfirmation of monophyly of the Clupeiformes, that is, Denticipitidae is sister to all other clupeiforms; 2) the polyphyletic nature of dussumieriids and early branching of Spratelloididae from all other clupeoids were confirmed using datasets curated for less missing data and more balanced base composition in the respective taxa. The next branching clade is the monophyletic Engraulidae. Pristigasteridae also is monophyletic, but it was nested in the previously defined "Clupeidae". Within Pristigasteridae there is no support for monophyletic Pelloninae. Chirocentrus is close to Dussumieria and not to engraulids. The miniaturized Sundasalanx is placed close to the ehiravine Clupeonella, however, with a relatively deep split. The genus Clupea, is not part of the diverse "Clupeidae", but part of a clade containing additionally Sprattus and Etrumeus. Within the crown group clades, Alosidae and Dorosomatidae are retrieved as sister clades. Based on new fossil calibration points, we found that major lineages of the clupeiforms diverged in the late Cretaceous and early Paleogene. The extinction event at the end of the Cretaceous may have created ecological niches, which could have fueled the diversification of clupeiform fishes. Based on the strong evidence of the present study, we propose an updated classification of Clupeiformes consisting of ten families: Denticipitidae; Spratelloididae; Engraulidae (Engraulinae + Coiliinae); Clupeidae; Chirocentridae; Dussumieriidae; Pristigasteridae; Ehiravidae; Alosidae, Dorosomatidae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wang
- East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China; Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
| | - Leyli Purrafee Dizaj
- Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, School of Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Junman Huang
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; Engineering Research Center of Environmental DNA and Ecological Water Health Assessment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
| | - Kishor Kumar Sarker
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; Engineering Research Center of Environmental DNA and Ecological Water Health Assessment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
| | - Charalampos Kevrekidis
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie & Geobiologie, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany.
| | - Bettina Reichenbacher
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie & Geobiologie, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany; GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Hamid Reza Esmaeili
- Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, School of Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Nicolas Straube
- University Museum, Department of Natural History, University of Bergen, Norway.
| | - Timo Moritz
- Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany; Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Chenhong Li
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; Engineering Research Center of Environmental DNA and Ecological Water Health Assessment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Val P, Lyons NJ, Gasparini N, Willenbring JK, Albert JS. Landscape Evolution as a Diversification Driver in Freshwater Fishes. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.788328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The exceptional concentration of vertebrate diversity in continental freshwaters has been termed the “freshwater fish paradox,” with > 15,000 fish species representing more than 20% of all vertebrate species compressed into tiny fractions of the Earth’s land surface area (<0.5%) or total aquatic habitat volume (<0.001%). This study asks if the fish species richness of the world’s river basins is explainable in terms of river captures using topographic metrics as proxies. The River Capture Hypothesis posits that drainage-network rearrangements have accelerated biotic diversification through their combined effects on dispersal, speciation, and extinction. Yet rates of river capture are poorly constrained at the basin scale worldwide. Here we assess correlations between fish species density (data for 14,953 obligate freshwater fish species) and basin-wide metrics of landscape evolution (data for 3,119 river basins), including: topography (elevation, average relief, slope, drainage area) and climate (average rainfall and air temperature). We assess the results in the context of both static landscapes (e.g., species-area and habitat heterogeneity relationships) and transient landscapes (e.g., river capture, tectonic activity, landscape disequilibrium). We also relax assumptions of functional neutrality of basins (tropical vs. extratropical, tectonically stable vs. active terrains). We found a disproportionate number of freshwater species in large, lowland river basins of tropical South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia, under predictable conditions of large geographic area, tropical climate, low topographic relief, and high habitat volume (i.e., high rainfall rates). However, our results show that these conditions are only necessary, but not fully sufficient, to explain the basins with the highest diversity. Basins with highest diversity are all located on tectonically stable regions, places where river capture is predicted to be most conducive to the formation of high fish species richness over evolutionary timescales. Our results are consistent with predictions of several landscape evolution models, including the River Capture Hypothesis, Mega Capture Hypothesis, and Intermediate Capture Rate Hypothesis, and support conclusions of numerical modeling studies indicating landscape transience as a mechanistic driver of net diversification in riverine and riparian organisms with widespread continental distributions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bowen SH. Digestion and assimilation of benthic biofilm by the Sábalo, Prochilodus lineatus. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY 2022; 100:107-116. [PMID: 34648180 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sábalo, Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1837), is one of 270 fish species in the Rio Paraná system, and it comprises >50% of the fish biomass. Its diet is flocculant benthic biofilm comprised of algae, bacteria and non-living organic matter: a food resource apparently of little value to other fishes. Digestion and assimilation of key nutrients from its biofilm diet by P. lineatus were described and quantified in an attempt to discover how this species is so successful. The fish begin a feeding period with empty digestive tracts, accumulate food during the feeding period and then void the gut content at the end of the feeding period. Early in a feeding period, sand accumulates in the gizzard-like pyloric stomach where it serves as both a grinding medium and a sieve. After sufficient sand has been acquired, food particles passed from the pyloric stomach to the intestine are dramatically reduced in size to <20 μ maximum dimension, whereas larger particles including mineral matter and plant fibres are retained. Total ash, hydrolysis-resistant-ash and hydrolysis-resistant-organic-matter were tested as reference materials against which to measure assimilation and hydrolysis-resistant-organic matter best met the assumptions of the technique. Comparison of the first food ingested to food ingested later in the feeding period shows that grinding of food and selective retention of larger particles results in a three-fold increase in the assimilation of ash-free-dry-mass (to 56%) and hydrolysis-labile-organic-matter (to 67%), and a six-fold increase in the assimilation of amino acids (AAs; to 74%). When food quality is assessed in terms of g AA assimilated · kJ-1 energy assimilated, the quality of food ingested by P. lineatus ranges from a maintenance level of 5 to 12 mg AA · kJ-1 , a level expected to produce near maximum growth. Thus, the processing of food in the pyloric stomach is integral to the success of P. lineatus in establishing large populations on a diet of flocculent benthic biofilm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen H Bowen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghilardi M, Schiettekatte NMD, Casey JM, Brandl SJ, Degregori S, Mercière A, Morat F, Letourneur Y, Bejarano S, Parravicini V. Phylogeny, body morphology, and trophic level shape intestinal traits in coral reef fishes. Ecol Evol 2021; 11:13218-13231. [PMID: 34646464 PMCID: PMC8495780 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Trait-based approaches are increasingly used to study species assemblages and understand ecosystem functioning. The strength of these approaches lies in the appropriate choice of functional traits that relate to the functions of interest. However, trait-function relationships are often supported by weak empirical evidence.Processes related to digestion and nutrient assimilation are particularly challenging to integrate into trait-based approaches. In fishes, intestinal length is commonly used to describe these functions. Although there is broad consensus concerning the relationship between fish intestinal length and diet, evolutionary and environmental forces have shaped a diversity of intestinal morphologies that is not captured by length alone.Focusing on coral reef fishes, we investigate how evolutionary history and ecology shape intestinal morphology. Using a large dataset encompassing 142 species across 31 families collected in French Polynesia, we test how phylogeny, body morphology, and diet relate to three intestinal morphological traits: intestinal length, diameter, and surface area.We demonstrate that phylogeny, body morphology, and trophic level explain most of the interspecific variability in fish intestinal morphology. Despite the high degree of phylogenetic conservatism, taxonomically unrelated herbivorous fishes exhibit similar intestinal morphology due to adaptive convergent evolution. Furthermore, we show that stomachless, durophagous species have the widest intestines to compensate for the lack of a stomach and allow passage of relatively large undigested food particles.Rather than traditionally applied metrics of intestinal length, intestinal surface area may be the most appropriate trait to characterize intestinal morphology in functional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Ghilardi
- Reef Systems Research GroupDepartment of EcologyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT)BremenGermany
- Department of Marine EcologyFaculty of Biology and ChemistryUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
| | - Nina M. D. Schiettekatte
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
| | - Jordan M. Casey
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
- Department of Marine ScienceMarine Science InstituteUniversity of Texas at AustinPort AransasTXUSA
| | - Simon J. Brandl
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
- Department of Marine ScienceMarine Science InstituteUniversity of Texas at AustinPort AransasTXUSA
- CESABCentre for the Synthesis and Analysis of BiodiversityInstitut Bouisson BertrandMontpellierFrance
| | - Samuel Degregori
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Alexandre Mercière
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
| | - Fabien Morat
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
| | - Yves Letourneur
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
- UMR ENTROPIE (UR‐IRD‐CNRS‐IFREMER‐UNC)Université de la Nouvelle‐CalédonieNouméa CedexNew Caledonia
| | - Sonia Bejarano
- Reef Systems Research GroupDepartment of EcologyLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT)BremenGermany
| | - Valeriano Parravicini
- PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRSUSR3278 CRIOBEPerpignanFrance
- Laboratoire d’Excellence “CORAIL”PerpignanFrance
- Institut Universitaire de FranceParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|