What are new treatment concepts in systemic itch?

Chronische Prurigo

Die chronische Prurigo (CPG) ist eine neuroinflammatorische Dermatose, die durch langanhaltenden Pruritus von mehr als 6 Wochen, pruriginösen Hautläsionen und wiederholtem Kratzen gekennzeichnet ist. Patienten mit CPG leiden unter erheblichen psychischen Belastungen und deutlich spürbarer Beeinträchtigung ihrer Lebensqualität. Der am häufigsten vorkommende Subtyp der CPG ist die chronisch noduläre Prurigo (CNPG; auch Prurigo nodularis genannt).

Neben den klinischen Merkmalen der CPG und der Krankheitslast bietet dieser CME‐Artikel einen Überblick über die bedeutenden Fortschritte im Verständnis der Pathophysiologie, einschließlich der damit verbundenen therapeutischen Optionen der CPG. Dupilumab ist die erste zugelassene Therapie für die moderate und schwere CNPG, die bisher von der Europäischen Arzneimittelagentur (EMA) und der US‐amerikanischen Food & Drug Administration (FDA) zugelassen wurde. Des Weiteren werden weitere Wirkstoffe hervorgehoben, die derzeit in klinischen, randomisierten, placebokontrollierten Phase‐II‐ und Phase‐III‐Studien untersucht werden. Dazu gehören Biologika wie Nemolizumab (Anti‐IL‐31‐RA‐mAk), Vixarelimab/KPL‐716 (Anti‐Oncostatin‐M Rezeptor β‐mAk) und Barzolvolimab/CDX‐0159 (Anti‐KIT‐mAK), Januskinase‐Inhibitoren wie Povorcitinib/INCB054707 und Abrocitinib sowie Opiodmodulatoren wie Nalbuphin.

Chronic Prurigo

Chronic prurigo (CPG) is a neuroinflammatory dermatosis characterized by prolonged pruritus lasting more than 6 weeks, pruriginous skin lesions, and repeated scratching. Patients with CPG suffer significantly from psychological distress and a marked impairment in their quality of life. The most common subtype of CPG is chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG, also called prurigo nodularis). In addition to the clinical features of CPG and the burden of disease, this CME article provides an overview of the significant advances in understanding the pathophysiology, including the associated therapeutic options for CPG. Dupilumab is the first approved therapy for moderate and severe CNPG to date from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). It also highlights other agents currently being studied in Phase II and Phase III clinical, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. These include biologics such as nemolizumab (anti-IL-31-RA-mAb), vixarelimab/KPL-716 (anti-Oncostatin-M receptor β-mAb), and barzolvolimab/CDX-0159 (anti-KIT-mAb), as well as Janus kinase inhibitors such as povorcitinib/INCB054707 and abrocitinib, and opioid modulators such as nalbuphine.

Cholestatic Pruritus in Children: Conventional Therapies and Beyond

Pruritus in the setting of cholestatic liver disease is difficult to treat and occurs in patients ranging in age from infancy to adulthood. Likely multifactorial in etiology, this symptom often involves multimodal therapy targeting several pathways and mechanisms proposed in the underlying etiology of cholestatic pruritus. Many patients in both the pediatric and adult populations continue to experience unrelenting pruritus despite maximal conventional therapy. Options are further limited in treating pediatric patients due to sparse data regarding medication safety and efficacy in younger patients. Conventional therapies for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in children include ursodeoxycholic acid, cholestyramine, hydroxyzine, and rifampin. Certain therapies are more routinely used in the adult populations but with limited data available for use in child and adolescent patients, including opioid antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Recently, ileal bile acid transport inhibitors have been shown to alleviate pruritus in many children with Alagille syndrome and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and is an additional therapy available for consideration for these patients. Ultimately, surgical options such as biliary diversion or liver transplantation are considered in specific circumstances when medical therapies have been exhausted and pruritus remains debilitating. While further investigation regarding underlying etiologies and effective therapies are needed to better understand itch pathogenesis and treatment in pediatric cholestasis, current considerations beyond conventional management include the use of opioid antagonists, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, ileal bile acid transport inhibitors, and surgical intervention.

Evaluation and Management of Pruritus in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Chronic pruritus is a classic symptom in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. It affects up to two-thirds of patients in the course of the disease. Efficient therapy consists of topical treatment combined with systemic options such as anion exchangers, rifampicin, bezafibrate, μ-opioid receptor antagonists, selective-serotonin receptor uptake inhibitors, and gabapentinoids. Future therapeutic approaches may contain the selective blockade of the enterohepatic cycle by inhibiting the ileal bile acid transporter, the agonism at κ-opioid receptors, and antagonism of the mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X4. As nondrug treatment, ultraviolet B therapy, albumin dialysis, and biliary drainage are available at specialized centers.

Interest in Micellar Solution to Reduce Unpleasant Skin Sensations

Introduction

The results from the “Objectifs Peau” project showed that approximately 30% of the French population complains of an unpleasant skin sensation at least once a day. Itching was the most frequent complaint (32%), followed by tingling (18.9%) and burning sensation (5.6%), which impact an individual’s daily life. These sensations could be identified, as they were either isolated or associated with each other. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of micellar solution to reduce these sensations, especially on sensitive skin.

Methodology

A questionnaire was administered at Day 0 (D0), D2, D14, and D28 using a mobile phone application to individuals applying micellar solution (Sensibio H2O, Laboratoire Bioderma, NAOS) who spontaneously used micellar solution for sensitive skin and/or spontaneously consulted a health professional. Itching, tightness, tingling and burning sensations were evaluated by means of frequencies (never, rarely, sometimes, often or constantly) at D0, D2, D14 and D28. Responses from the questionnaire were rated (never=0, rarely=1, sometimes=2, often=3 or constantly=4) and allowed us to obtain an overall “unpleasant sensations” score, where a higher score corresponded to a higher degree of unpleasant sensations.

Results

In total, 400 evaluable individuals participated in the study (97% female, average age 38.5±13 years, 82% reported sensitive skin). The “unpleasant sensations” score improved from D2 and continued significantly on D14 and D28. The improvement rates were 47.7%, 57.9% and 62.7% at D2, D14 and D28, respectively, compared to D0. The percentages of improvement at D2, D14 and D28 were 83.2% (95% CI: 79.26; 87.21), 87.54% (95% CI: 84.01; 91.06) and 90% (95% CI: 87.06; 92.94), respectively, compared to D0.

Conclusion

The improvement in the reduction of unpleasant sensations was observed as early as 2 days after using micellar solution and increased over time. The use of this type of micellar solution, especially on sensitive skin, and the guidance of health professionals (dermatologists and pharmacists) may help to reduce the impact of unpleasant skin sensations.

Lysophosphatidic acid activates nociceptors and causes pain or itch depending on the application mode in human skin

ABSTRACT

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is involved in the pathophysiology of cholestatic pruritus and neuropathic pain. Slowly conducting peripheral afferent C-nerve fibers are crucial in the sensations of itch and pain. In animal studies, specialized neurons ("pruriceptors") have been described, expressing specific receptors e.g. from the Mrgpr family. Human nerve fibers involved in pain signaling ("nociceptors") can elicit itch if activated by focalized stimuli such as cowhage spicules.In this study, we scrutinized the effects of LPA in humans by two different application modes on the level of psychophysics and single nerve fiber recordings (microneurography). In healthy human subjects, intracutaneous LPA microinjections elicited burning pain, whereas LPA application via inactivated cowhage spicules evoked a moderate itch sensation. LPA microinjections induced heat hyperalgesia and hypersensitivity to higher electrical stimulus frequencies. Pharmacological blockade of TRPA1 or TRPV1 reduced heat hyperalgesia but not acute chemical pain. Microneurography revealed an application mode-dependent differential activation of mechano-sensitive (CM) and mechano-insensitive (CMi) C-fibers. LPA microinjections activated a greater proportion of CMi and more strongly than CM fibers; spicule-application of LPA activated CM and CMi fibers to a similar extent but excited CM more and CMi fibers less intensely than microinjections.In conclusion, we show for the first time in humans that LPA can cause pain as well as itch dependent on the mode of application and activates afferent human C-fibers. Itch may arise from focal activation of few nerve fibers with distinct spatial contrast to unexcited surrounding afferents, and a specific combination of activated fiber subclasses might contribute.

Itch in Atopic Dermatitis - What Is New?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is among the most frequent inflammatory skin diseases in humans, affecting up to 20% of children and 10% of adults in higher income countries. Chronic pruritus is a disease-defining symptom of AD, representing the most burdensome symptom for patients. Severe chronic pruritus causes significant sleep disturbances and impaired quality of life, as well as increased anxiety, depression and suicidal behavior. Until recently, skin care, topical corticosteroids, and calcineurin-inhibitors were primarily used to treat mild to moderate AD, while phototherapy and immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and methotrexate were used to treat patients with moderate to severe AD. The potential short- and long-term adverse events associated with these treatments or their insufficient therapeutic efficacy limited their use in controlling pruritus and eczema in AD patients over longer periods of time. As our understanding of AD pathophysiology has improved and new systemic and topical treatments have appeared on the market, targeting specific cytokines, receptors, or their intracellular signaling, a new era in atopic dermatitis and pruritus therapy has begun. This review highlights new developments in AD treatment, placing a specific focus on their anti-pruritic effects.

Endogenous Opioid Levels Do Not Correlate With Itch Intensity and Therapeutic Interventions in Hepatic Pruritus

Background: Chronic pruritus affects up to 70% of patients with immune-mediated hepatobiliary disorders. Antagonists of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and agonists of the κ-opioid receptor (KOR) are used to treat hepatic itch, albeit with limited success. An imbalance between ligands of MOR and KOR receptors has recently been suggested as a potential mechanism of hepatic pruritus. In this study, we therefore investigated systemic levels of important endogenous opioids such as β-endorphin, dynorphin A, Leu- and Met-enkephalin in plasma of a large cohort of well-characterized patients with immune-mediated cholestatic disorders, including patients with liver cirrhosis, and during effective anti-pruritic therapy.

Methods: Plasma samples and clinical data were prospectively collected from well-characterized patients with primary/secondary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC/SSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and overlap syndromes suffering from pruritus (n = 29) and age-, gender- and disease-matched controls without pruritus (n = 27) as well as healthy controls (n = 20). General laboratory testing for hepatobiliary and renal function was performed. Levels of β-endorphin, dynorphin A, Leu- and Met-enkephalin were quantified in plasma by ELISA. Intensity of pruritus over the last week was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10).

Results: PBC and PSC patients with or without pruritus did neither differ in disease entity, disease stage, nor in the presence of cirrhosis. While both dynorphin A and β-endorphin concentrations were lower in pruritic patients compared to those without pruritus and healthy controls, the MOR/KOR ligand ratio was unaltered. No significant differences were observed for Leu- and Met-enkephalin concentrations. Opioid levels correlated with neither itch intensity nor stage of disease. Cirrhotic patients displayed higher concentrations of MOR agonist Leu-enkephalin and KOR agonist dynorphin A. Endogenous opioid levels remained largely unchanged after successful treatment with the potent anti-pruritic drugs rifampicin and bezafibrate.

Conclusions: Endogenous opioid levels and the MOR/KOR ligand ratio neither correlate with itch intensity nor differentiate pruritic from non-pruritic patients with immune-mediated liver diseases. Thus, endogenous opioids may modulate signaling pathways involved in hepatic pruritus, but are unlikely to represent the major pruritogens in liver disease.

Central opioid receptors mediate morphine-induced itch and chronic itch via disinhibition

Opioids such as morphine are mainstay treatments for clinical pain conditions. Itch is a common side effect of opioids, particularly as a result of epidural or intrathecal administration. Recent progress has advanced our understanding of itch circuits in the spinal cord. However, the mechanisms underlying opioid-induced itch are not fully understood, although an interaction between µ-opioid receptor (MOR) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in spinal GRPR-expressing neurons has been implicated. In this study we investigated the cellular mechanisms of intrathecal opioid-induced itch by conditional deletion of MOR-encoding Oprm1 in distinct populations of interneurons and sensory neurons. We found that intrathecal injection of the MOR agonists morphine or DAMGO elicited dose-dependent scratching as well as licking and biting, but this pruritus was totally abolished in mice with a specific Oprm1 deletion in Vgat+ neurons [Oprm1-Vgat (Slc32a1)]. Loss of MOR in somatostatin+ interneurons and TRPV1+ sensory neurons did not affect morphine-induced itch but impaired morphine-induced antinociception. In situ hybridization revealed Oprm1 expression in 30% of inhibitory and 20% of excitatory interneurons in the spinal dorsal horn. Whole-cell recordings from spinal cord slices showed that DAMGO induced outward currents in 9 of 19 Vgat+ interneurons examined. Morphine also inhibited action potentials in Vgat+ interneurons. Furthermore, morphine suppressed evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents in postsynaptic Vgat- excitatory neurons, suggesting a mechanism of disinhibition by MOR agonists. Notably, morphine-elicited itch was suppressed by intrathecal administration of NPY and abolished by spinal ablation of GRPR+ neurons with intrathecal injection of bombesin-saporin, whereas intrathecal GRP-induced itch response remained intact in mice lacking Oprm1-Vgat. Intrathecal bombesin-saporin treatment reduced the number of GRPR+ neurons by 97% in the lumber spinal cord and 91% in the cervical spinal cord, without changing the number of Oprm1+ neurons. Additionally, chronic itch from DNFB-induced allergic contact dermatitis was decreased by Oprm1-Vgat deletion. Finally, naloxone, but not peripherally restricted naloxone methiodide, inhibited chronic itch in the DNFB model and the CTCL model, indicating a contribution of central MOR signalling to chronic itch. Our findings demonstrate that intrathecal morphine elicits itch via acting on MOR on spinal inhibitory interneurons, leading to disinhibition of the spinal itch circuit. Our data also provide mechanistic insights into the current treatment of chronic itch with opioid receptor antagonist such as naloxone.