Evaluation of the relaxant effect of levetiracetam on isolated rat duodenum

The Obstetrical Care and Delivery Experience of Women with Epilepsy in the MONEAD Study

OBJECTIVE

We examined mode of delivery among pregnant women with epilepsy (PWWE) versus pregnant controls (PC). We hypothesize that PWWE are more likely to deliver by cesarean.

STUDY DESIGN

The Maternal Outcomes and Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (MONEAD) study is an observational, prospective, multicenter investigation of pregnancy outcomes funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH). MONEAD enrolled patients from December 2012 through January 2016. PWWE were matched to PC in a case:control ratio of 3:1. This analysis had 80% power to detect a 36% increase in cesarean frequency assuming a baseline rate of 30% among PC at an α = 0.05.

RESULTS

This report analyzed 331 PWWE (76%) and 102 PC (24%) who gave birth while enrolled in the study. PWWE and PC had similar rates of cesarean delivery (34.7 vs. 28.6%; p = 0.27). Of women with cesarean, rates of cesarean without labor were similar between groups for those delivering in recruitment hospitals (48.2 vs. 50.0%) but in nonrecruitment hospitals, cesarean rates without labor were over two-fold higher among PWWE than those of PC (68.8 vs. 30.8%; p = 0.023). Receipt of a cesarean after labor did not differ for PWWE compared to PC or by type of antiepileptic drug among the PWWE.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the obstetrical experiences of PWWE and PC are similar. An interesting deviation from this observation was the mode of delivery with higher unlabored cesarean rates occurring among PWWE in nonrecruitment hospitals. As the study recruitment hospitals were tertiary academic centers and nonrecruitment hospitals tended to be community-based institutions, differences in perinatal expertise might contribute to this difference.

KEY POINTS

· Unlabored cesarean rates higher among women with epilepsy.. · Provider preference may influence delivery mode among women with epilepsy.. · Type and amount of antiepileptic drug was not associated with mode of delivery..

Decreased Systemic Busulfan Exposure After Oral Dosing With Concomitant Levetiracetam Compared With Phenytoin

BACKGROUND

Busulfan (Bu) conditioning used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may induce seizures, and prophylactic antiepileptic treatment is recommended. Following updated guidelines, in August 2019, the adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation department of the Rambam Health Care Campus (Haifa, Israel) switched the antiepileptic prophylaxis protocol from phenytoin to oral levetiracetam during oral Bu conditioning. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of Bu after oral dosing between patients receiving phenytoin and those receiving levetiracetam prophylaxis.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study in adults undergoing myoablative conditioning with oral Bu between August 2018 and August 2020. Bu pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-6, C0, Cmax, and Tmax) were compared in patients treated with phenytoin comedication (during the year before the change in policy) and levetiracetam comedication (during the year after the change). Potential confounders were accounted for including age, azole comedication, and body weight.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical parameters or weight-corrected Bu dose between the phenytoin group (n = 28) and the levetiracetam group (n = 25). There was no difference in the rate of voriconazole comedication, but fluconazole was more common in the phenytoin group (P = 0.026). The median AUC0-6 was significantly lower in the levetiracetam group (949 μM*min; IQR = 806 to 1101 μM*min) than in the phenytoin group (1208 μM*min; IQR = 1087 to 1389 μM*min; P < 0.001). This is a clinically significant difference of 258 μM*min (21%). Azole use was not associated with Bu exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that, after treatment with oral Bu, oral levetiracetam comedication is associated with reduced systemic exposure compared with phenytoin comedication, possibly because of decreased bioavailability.

Anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects of carbamazepine-levetiracetam adjunctive treatment in convulsive status epilepticus rat model: Inhibition of cholinergic transmission

This study evaluated the anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), levetiracetam (LEV), and CBZ + LEV adjunctive treatment in convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) rat model. Twenty-five male Wistar rats were randomized into five groups (n = 5). Groups I and II received 0.2 ml of normal saline intraperitoneally (i.p), while groups III-V received CBZ (25 mg/kg i.p), LEV (50 mg/kg i.p) or combination of sub-therapeutic doses of CBZ (12.5 mg/kg i.p) and LEV (25 mg/kg i.p). Thirty minutes later, seizure was kindled with pilocarpine hydrochloride (350 mg/kg) in group II-V rats. Seizure indices, markers of excitotoxicity, and astroglioses were determined, while the hippocampal morphometry was also evaluated. The data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while the results were presented as mean ± SEM in graphs or tables, and the level of significance was taken at p < 0.05. The anticonvulsant treatments delayed the inception of seizure indices (p = 0.0006), while the percentage mortality decreased significantly (p = 0.0001) in all the treatment groups. The hippocampal concentrations of acetylcholine, malondialdehyde, and tissue necrotic factor-alpha decreased significantly (p = 0.0077) in all the treated group relative to the positive control. The reactive astrogliosis in the hippocampus (CA 1) increased significantly (p = 0.0001) compared with the control but abrogated in all the treatment groups relative to the positive control. The anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects are in this order: LEV < CBZ + CBZ < CBZ. The drug efficacy is attributable to the inhibition of cholinergic transmission.

Antiepileptic Drugs Impair Shortening of Isolated Cardiomyocytes

Background

Most antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) inhibit seizure generation by acting on voltage-dependent ion channels. Voltage-dependent sodium and calcium channels are commonly expressed in brain and heart, suggesting that AEDs may have considerable cardiodepressive effects, thereby facilitating sudden cardiac death as a potential cause of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Here, we investigated the effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), and levetiracetam (LEV) alone and in combination on the shortening properties of isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes of wild-type mice.

Methods

Properties of murine cardiomyocytes were determined by recording the sarcomere shortening with a video imaging system before, during, and after administration of AEDs in different concentrations and combinations. We assessed (i) the number of successful shortenings during continuous electrical stimulation (electromechanical coupling) and (ii) the shortening amplitude as well as other shortening-related properties upon repetitive electrical stimulation at 4 Hz. Data are given as mean ± SEM.

Results

At 100 μM, CBZ (10 cells), LTG (11 cells), and LEV (11 cells) alone had no effect on the electromechanical coupling but reversibly reduced shortening amplitudes by 15 ± 4, 24 ± 3, and 11 ± 3%, respectively. Increasing the LTG concentration to 250 (21 cells) and 500 μM (4 cells) reversibly inhibited the electromechanical coupling in 62 and 100% of the experiments. Importantly, simultaneous application of CBZ, LTG, and LEV at 100 μM also impaired the electromechanical coupling in 8 of 19 cardiomyocytes (42%) and reduced the shortening amplitude by 21 ± 4%.

Conclusion

Our data show that AEDs reversibly impair cardiac excitation and contraction. Importantly, the blocking effect on electromechanical coupling appears to be additive when different AEDs are simultaneously applied. The translational value of these experimental findings into clinical practice is limited. Our results, however, suggest that rationale AED therapy may be important with respect to cardiac side effects and potential facilitation of serious cardiac dysfunction especially when AEDs are used in combination or at very high doses.