Impact of bariatric surgery on oral anticoagulants pharmacology, and consequences for clinical practice: a narrative review

Full-dose rivaroxaban in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: bridging the knowledge gap through a phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery (BS) induces significant changes in gastrointestinal anatomy, potentially influencing the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs such as rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVES

This phase 1 study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of full-dose rivaroxaban in post-BS patients.

METHODS

The ABSORB (Rivaroxaban Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Bariatric Surgery and in Morbid Obesity) study was a single-center, nonrandomized, multiple-dose, parallel-design bioequivalence trial. Adult patients with stable weight after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were compared with subjects with class III obesity and healthy controls. Participants received 20 mg of rivaroxaban daily for 8 days.

RESULTS

Post-BS patients exhibited altered rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, suggesting reduced absorption. Mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours after the first dose (RYGB, 1806.8 ng.h/mL; SG, 1648.9 ng.h/mL) was lower compared with that in controls (1893.5 ng.h/mL). At steady state, the area under the concentration-time curve values remained lower in BS groups (RYGB, 2129.9 ng.h/mL; SG, 1946.4 ng.h/mL) than in controls (2224.8 ng.h/mL). The maximum concentration after the first dose was lower in post-RYGB subjects (214.9 ng/mL) than in controls (264.1 ng/mL). This difference was less pronounced at steady state (RYGB, 256.9 ng/mL vs controls, 288.8 ng/mL). Neither BS group met bioequivalence criteria compared with controls, whereas the group with class III obesity met bioequivalence criteria compared with controls at steady state.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban displayed minor pharmacokinetic variations in post-BS patients. Given reported interindividual variability in the general population, these variations are unlikely to be of clinical significance. Our findings support rivaroxaban use in BS patients, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.

Molecular Mechanisms Affecting Statin Pharmacokinetics after Bariatric Surgery

According to recent data, one in eight people in the world struggle with obesity. Obesity management is increasingly dependent on bariatric surgical interventions, as the combination of lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy could have a modest long-term effect. Surgery is recommended only for individuals whose body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 and ≥ 35 kg/m2 in the presence of weight-related comorbidities. The most commonly performed procedures are sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations occur as a result of the anatomical and physiological changes caused by surgery, which further differ depending on physicochemical drug factors and factors related to the dosage form. The following modifications are distinguished based on the type of bariatric surgery performed. Most bariatric patients have accompanying comorbidities, including dyslipidemia treated with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors or statins. Significant improvements in the lipid profile are observed early in the postoperative period. The data reported in this review on statin pharmacokinetic alterations have demonstrated substantial inter- and intravariability, making it difficult to adopt clear guidelines. Based on the current literature review, reducing the statin dose to the lowest effective with continuous monitoring is considered an optimal approach in clinical practice.

A Pilot Study Describing DOAC Level Results and Association With Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: Describe direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) level ordering and interpretation practices in association with clinical outcomes at a vascular medicine clinic. Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational study including patients who had a DOAC level ordered and assessed while on DOAC therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of DOAC levels within previously reported ranges. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, and the proportion of DOAC level results which prompted a change in the therapeutic plan. Results: A total of 43 patients who had a DOAC level ordered while on DOAC therapy were included in the study. More patients were on apixaban than other DOACs, and the most common indication for anticoagulation was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The most common reasons for ordering DOAC levels included history of gastric bypass (n = 20) and drug-drug interactions (n = 8). Most patients on apixaban had in-range levels (n = 24) compared to out of-range levels (5 patients). More patients on rivaroxaban had a level out-of-range (n = 10) than in-range (n = 4). One patient had a DVT, resulting in hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. Two patients had bleeding events, with 1 hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. DOAC level results also prompted changes in therapeutic plans for 9 of the patients. Conclusion: DOAC level results did not always correlate with expected outcomes, and further research is warranted to clarify which clinical situations may benefit from ordering DOAC levels.

Long-Term Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3% of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (CAT) prior to operation. The management of these patients is complex, as it involves balancing the potential risk of thrombosis against that of bleeding. Our primary objective is to assess the long-term bleeding risk in patients undergoing MBS. We also aim to observe the trends in anticoagulant dosing after MBS.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent either primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with preoperative CAT between 2008 and 2022 was performed. Data on baseline demographics, indication for anticoagulation, type of CAT, and dosing were collected. Events of bleeding and the CAT at event were subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (82 RYGB and 50 SG) initially on CAT were identified, with atrial fibrillation being the most common indication. Incidence of long-term bleeding was significantly higher in the RYGB group (18.3%) compared to the SG group (4%) (p = 0.017) over a total of 5.2 ± 3.8 years. Bleeding marginal ulcer (MU) was the most common cause of bleeding in the RYGB group (13.4%). 84.2% of all bleeding events occurred in patients on chronic Warfarin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term CAT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding in RYGB patients, particularly MU bleeds. Patients on CAT seeking MBS should be counseled regarding this risk and potential implications. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants offer promise as an alternative to Warfarin in these patients; further research is necessary to better understand their safety.

Apixaban Use in Obese Patients: A Review of the Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the influence of extreme body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety of drugs used in many disease states. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have an advantage over warfarin in that they do not require routine drug monitoring, some may regard this convenience as less compelling in obese patients. Some consensus guidelines discourage using DOACs in patients weighing > 120 kg or with a body mass index > 35–40 kg/m², given a sparsity of available data in this population and the concern that fixed dosing in obese patients might lead to decreased drug exposure and lower efficacy. Per the prescribing information, apixaban does not require dose adjustment in patients weighing above a certain threshold (e.g., ≥ 120 kg). Data from healthy volunteers and patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) have shown that increased body weight has a modest effect on apixaban’s PK. However, the paucity of exposure data in individuals > 120 kg and the lack of guideline consensus on DOAC use in obese patients continue to raise concerns about potential decreased drug exposure at extreme weight. This article is the first to comprehensively review the available PK data in obese individuals without NVAF or VTE, and PK, PD, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety data for apixaban in obese patients with either NVAF or VTE, including subgroup analyses across randomized controlled trials and observational (real-world) studies. These data suggest that obesity does not substantially influence the efficacy, effectiveness, or safety of apixaban in these patients.

Trial Registration ARISTOTLE: NCT00412984; AVERROES: NCT00496769; AMPLIFY: NCT00643201; AMPLIFY-EXT: NCT00633893; ADVANCE-1: NCT00371683; ADVANCE-2: NCT00452530; ADVANCE-3: NCT00423319

Video abstract

Treatment Algorithm in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Updated Canadian Expert Consensus

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding complications. Risks vary significantly between individuals based on cancer status, treatment, and other characteristics. To facilitate the evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy in this patient population, a committee of 11 Canadian clinical experts updated a consensus-based algorithm for the acute and extended treatment of symptomatic and incidental CAT that was developed in 2018. Following a systematic review of the literature, updates to the algorithm were discussed during an online teleconference, and the algorithm was subsequently refined based on feedback from committee members. Clinicians using this treatment algorithm should consider bleeding risk, type of cancer, and drug-drug interactions, as well as patient and clinician preferences, in tailoring anticoagulation for patients with CAT. Anticoagulant therapy should be adapted as the patient's cancer status and management change over time.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Gastrectomy on the Absorption of Drugs, Vitamins, and Mineral Elements

Bariatric surgery, which is an effective treatment for obesity, and gastrectomy, which is the primary treatment method for gastric cancer, alter the anatomy and physiology of the digestive system. Weight loss and changes in the gastrointestinal tract may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral medications. Both bariatric and cancer patients use drugs chronically or temporarily. It is important to know how surgery affects their pharmacokinetics to ensure an effective and safe therapy. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched independently by two authors. The search strategy included controlled vocabulary and keywords. Studies show that bariatric surgery and gastrectomy most often reduce the time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max) and decrease the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) in comparison with the values of these parameters measured in healthy volunteers. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are also observed. The effect depends on the type of surgery and the properties of the drug. It is recommended to use the drugs that have been tested on these groups of patients as it is possible to monitor them.

Anti-Xa Levels in Morbidly Obese Patients Using Apixaban or Rivaroxaban, Before and After Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite limited evidence about the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in patients post bariatric surgery, both vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed.

AIM

To evaluate plasma anti-Xa levels of DOACs in morbidly obese (MO) patients before and after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study of anti-Xa activity of apixaban or rivaroxaban in MO patients (N = 41).

RESULTS

Preoperative analysis of plasma anti-Xa levels were within the normal range in patients using apixaban (n = 29; body mass index [BMI] 44.5 ± 5.1 kg/m²) as well as those using rivaroxaban (n = 12; BMI 42.6 ± 5.9 kg/m²). Postoperative anti-Xa levels of apixaban were all within the therapeutic range, whereas anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban were subtherapeutic in nine out of 14 (64%) patients. Perioperative longitudinal follow-up in patients using apixaban (n = 18) showed no significant change in anti-Xa levels after RYGB.

CONCLUSION

Plasma anti-Xa levels of apixaban in MO patients remained within the therapeutic range up to a body weight of 144 kg. In patients using rivaroxaban, no statistically significant relation between anti-Xa levels and bodyweight was found. After RYGB, plasma anti-Xa levels of apixaban were unaffected, whereas plasma anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban tended to become subtherapeutic.

Adverse events in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban who have undergone bariatric surgery: a retrospective case series

Clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to warfarin excluded patients with a history of bariatric surgery. The anatomic changes from bariatric procedures have several effects on drug absorption which can have serious consequences for these patients. We sought to describe real-world use of DOACs among adults that had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients, at a large academic medical center, who initiated any DOAC in 2016 thru 2019 and had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. Thrombotic and bleeding events were described using summary statistics and bleeding severity was described using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria of having bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy or gastric band) and receiving a DOAC. Twenty (71.4%) were prescribed apixaban and eight (28.6%) were prescribed rivaroxaban. Seven patients (25%) experienced at least one clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, including one patient (3.6%) that had a major bleeding event. Two patients (7.1%) had a thromboembolic event. Coagulation laboratory studies were infrequently performed at the time of the bleeding or clotting events. Among patients with a history of bariatric surgery, use of DOACs were commonly associated with clinically relevant non-major bleeding events and less commonly associated with major bleeding and thromboembolic events. Larger studies may offer further insight into the overall safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in patients that have undergone bariatric surgery. The specific role of coagulation laboratory studies warrants further evaluation.