Inhibition of organic cation transporter 3 activity by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

An anti-neoplastic tale of metformin through its transport

Metformin is an attractive candidate drug among all the repurposed drugs for cancer. Extensive preclinical and clinical research has evaluated its efficacy in cancer therapy, revealing a mixed outcome in clinical settings. To fully exploit metformin's therapeutic potential, understanding cellular factors relevant to its transport and accumulation in cancer cells needs to be understood. This review highlights the relevance of metformin transporter status towards its anti-cancer potential. Metformin transporters are regulated at pre-transcriptional, transcriptional, and post-translational levels. Moreover, the tumour microenvironment can also influence metformin accumulation in cancer cells. Also, Metformin treatment can regulate its transporters by altering global DNA methylation, protein acetylation, and transcription factors. Importantly, metformin transporters not only influence chemotherapeutic drug toxicity but are also associated with the prognosis and survival of individuals having cancer. Strategic decisions based on the expression and regulation of metformin transporters holds promise for its therapeutic implications and relevance.

Quantitative prediction of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions using the mechanistic static pharmacokinetic (MSPK) model

Guidance/guidelines on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have been issued in Japan, the United States, and Europe. These guidance/guidelines provide decision trees for conducting metabolizing enzyme-mediated clinical DDI studies; however, the decision trees for transporter-mediated DDIs lack quantitative prediction methods. In this study, the accuracy of a net-effect mechanistic static pharmacokinetics (MSPK) model containing the fraction transported (ft) of transporters was examined to predict transporter-mediated DDIs. This study collected information on 25 oral drugs with new active reagents that were used in clinical DDI studies as perpetrators (42 cases) from drugs approved in Japan between April 2016 and June 2020. The AUCRs (AUC ratios with and without perpetrators) of victim drugs were predicted using the net-effect MSPK model. As a result, 83 and 95% of the predicted AUCRs were within 1.5- and 2-fold error in the observed AUCRs, respectively. In cases where the victims were statins in which pharmacokinetics several transporters are involved, 70 and 91% of the predicted AUCRs were within 1.5- and 2-fold errors, respectively. Therefore, the net-effect MSPK model was applicable for predicting the AUCRs of victims, which are substrates for multiple transporters.

Interaction of ALK Inhibitors with Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters and the Impact of Substrate-Dependent Inhibition on the Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions

Small molecules targeting aberrant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are active against ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancers and neuroblastoma. Several targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to interact with polyspecific organic cation transporters (pOCTs), raising concerns about potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The purpose of this study was to assess the interaction of ALK inhibitors with pOCTs and the impact of substrate-dependent inhibition on the prediction of DDIs. Inhibition assays were conducted in transporter-overexpressing cells using meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG), metformin, or 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) as the substrate. The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of brigatinib and crizotinib for the substrates tested were used to predict their potential for in vivo transporter mediated DDIs. Here, we show that the inhibition potencies of brigatinib and crizotinib on pOCTs are isoform- and substrate-dependent. Human OCT3 (hOCT3) and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (hMATE1) were highly sensitive to inhibition by brigatinib and crizotinib for all three tested substrates. Apart from hMATE1, substrate-dependent inhibition was observed for all other transporters with varying degrees of dependency; hOCT1 inhibition showed the greatest substrate dependency, with differences in IC50 values of up to 22-fold across the tested substrates, followed by hOCT2 and hMATE2-K, with differences in IC50 values of up to 16- and 12-fold, respectively. Conversely, hOCT3 inhibition only showed a moderate substrate dependency (IC50 variance < 4.8). Among the substrates used, metformin was consistently shown to be the most sensitive substrate, followed by mIBG and MPP+. Pre-incubation of ALK inhibitors had little impact on their potencies toward hOCT2 and hMATE1. Our results underscore the complexity of the interactions between substrates and the inhibitors of pOCTs and have important implications for the clinical use of ALK inhibitors and their DDI predictions.

Quantitative Consideration of Clinical Increases in Serum Creatinine Caused by Renal Transporter Inhibition

Creatinine is a common biomarker of renal function and is secreted in the renal tubular cells via drug transporters, such as organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1/2-K. To differentiate between drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and drug interactions through the renal transporter, it has been examined whether these transporter inhibitions quantitatively explained increases in serum creatinine (SCr) at their clinically relevant concentrations using drugs without any changes in renal function. For such renal transporter inhibitors and recently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), this mini-review describes clinical increases in SCr and inhibitory potentials against the renal transporters. Most cases of SCr elevations can be explained by considering the renal transporter inhibitions based on unbound maximum plasma concentrations, except for drugs associated with obvious changes in renal function. SCr increases for cobicistat, dolutegravir, and dronedarone, and some TKIs were significantly underestimated, and these underestimations were suggested to be associated with low plasma unbound fractions. Sensitivity analysis of SCr elevations regarding inhibitory potentials of MATE1/2-K demonstrated that typical inhibitors such as cimetidine, DX-619, pyrimethamine, and trimethoprim could give false interpretations of AKI according to the criteria based on relative or absolute levels of SCr elevations. Recent progress and current challenges of physiologically-based pharmacokinetics modeling for creatinine disposition were also summarized. Although it should be noted for the potential impact of in vitro assay designs on clinical translatability of transporter inhibitions data, mechanistic approaches could support decision-making in clinical development to differentiate between AKI and creatinine-drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Serum creatinine (SCr) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but it increases due to inhibitions of renal transporters, such as multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K despite no functional changes in the kidney. Such SCr elevations were quantitatively explained by renal transporter inhibitions except for some drugs with high protein binding. The present analysis demonstrated that clinically relevant inhibitors of the renal transporters could cause SCr elevations above levels corresponding to acute kidney injury criteria.

The Role of Organic Cation Transporters in the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) decisively contributed in revolutionizing the therapeutic approach to cancer, offering non-invasive, tolerable therapies for a better quality of life. Nonetheless, degree and duration of the response to TKI therapy vary depending on cancer molecular features, the ability of developing resistance to the drug, on pharmacokinetic alterations caused by germline variants and unwanted drug-drug interactions at the level of membrane transporters and metabolizing enzymes. A great deal of approved TKIs are inhibitors of the organic cation transporters (OCTs). A handful are also substrates of them. These transporters are polyspecific and highly expressed in normal epithelia, particularly the intestine, liver and kidney, and are, hence, arguably relevant sites of TKI interactions with other OCT substrates. Moreover, OCTs are often repressed in cancer cells and might contribute to the resistance of cancer cells to TKIs. This article reviews the OCT interactions with approved and in-development TKIs reported in vitro and in vivo and critically discusses the potential clinical ramifications thereof.

Substrates and Inhibitors of the Organic Cation Transporter 3 and Comparison with OCT1 and OCT2

Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad in vitro screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.

High Throughput Screening of a Prescription Drug Library for Inhibitors of Organic Cation Transporter 3, OCT3

INTRODUCTION

The organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3, SLC22A3) is ubiquitously expressed and interacts with a wide array of compounds including endogenous molecules, environmental toxins and prescription drugs. Understudied as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, OCT3 has the potential to be a major determinant of drug absorption and disposition and to be a target for drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

GOAL

The goal of the current study was to identify prescription drug inhibitors of OCT3.

METHODS

We screened a compound library consisting of 2556 prescription drugs, bioactive molecules, and natural products using a high throughput assay in HEK-293 cells stably expressing OCT3.

RESULTS

We identified 210 compounds that at 20 μM inhibit 50% or more of OCT3-mediated uptake of 4-Di-1-ASP (2 μM). Of these, nine were predicted to inhibit the transporter at clinically relevant unbound plasma concentrations. A Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) model included molecular descriptors that could discriminate between inhibitors and non-inhibitors of OCT3 and was used to identify additional OCT3 inhibitors. Proteomics of human brain microvessels (BMVs) indicated that OCT3 is the highest expressed OCT in the human blood-brain barrier (BBB).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest screen to identify prescription drug inhibitors of OCT3. Several are sufficiently potent to inhibit the transporter at therapeutic unbound plasma levels, potentially leading to DDIs or off-target pharmacologic effects.

MPP+-Induced Changes in Cellular Impedance as a Measure for Organic Cation Transporter (SLC22A1-3) Activity and Inhibition

The organic cation transporters OCT1-3 (SLC22A1-3) facilitate the transport of cationic endo- and xenobiotics and are important mediators of drug distribution and elimination. Their polyspecific nature makes OCTs highly susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Currently, screening of OCT inhibitors depends on uptake assays that require labeled substrates to detect transport activity. However, these uptake assays have several limitations. Hence, there is a need to develop novel assays to study OCT activity in a physiological relevant environment without the need to label the substrate. Here, a label-free impedance-based transport assay is established that detects OCT-mediated transport activity and inhibition utilizing the neurotoxin MPP⁺. Uptake of MPP⁺ by OCTs induced concentration-dependent changes in cellular impedance that were inhibited by decynium-22, corticosterone, and Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors. OCT-mediated MPP⁺ transport activity and inhibition were quantified on both OCT1-3 overexpressing cells and HeLa cells endogenously expressing OCT3. Moreover, the method presented here is a valuable tool to identify novel inhibitors and potential DDI partners for MPP⁺ transporting solute carrier proteins (SLCs) in general.

Differential Inhibition of Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (ENT1) Activity by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Background and Objectives

Equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) 1 is a widely-expressed drug transporter, handling nucleoside analogues as well as endogenous nucleosides. ENT1 has been postulated to be inhibited by some marketed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To obtain insights into this point, the interactions of 24 TKIs with ENT1 activity have been analyzed.

Methods

Inhibition of ENT1 activity was investigated in vitro through quantifying the decrease of [³H]-uridine uptake caused by TKIs in HAP1 ENT2-knockout cells, exhibiting selective ENT1 expression. TKI effects towards ENT1-mediated transport were additionally characterized in terms of their in vivo relevance and of their relationship to TKI molecular descriptors. Putative transport of the TKI lorlatinib by ENT1/ENT2 was analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

Results

Of 24 TKIs, 12 of them, each used at 10 µM, were found to behave as moderate or strong inhibitors of ENT1, i.e., they decreased ENT1 activity by at least 35%. This inhibition was concentration-dependent for at least the strongest ones (IC₅₀ less than 10 µM) and was correlated with some molecular descriptors, especially with atom-type E-state indices. Lorlatinib was notably a potent in vitro inhibitor of ENT1/ENT2 (IC₅₀ values around 1.0–2.5 µM) and was predicted to inhibit these nucleoside transporters at relevant clinical concentrations, without, however, being a substrate for them.

Conclusion

Our data unambiguously add ENT1 to the list of drug transporters inhibited by TKIs, especially by lorlatinib. This point likely merits attention in terms of possible drug–drug interactions, notably for nucleoside analogues, whose ENT1-mediated uptake into their target cells may be hampered by co-administrated TKIs such as lorlatinib.