Study of prescription-indication of tetracyclines in a population in Colombia

An Analysis of the Use of Topical Ocular Anti-Infectives in Galicia (Spain) between 2020 and 2023

Eye infections are a global health and economic problem that affect people of both sexes at any age. Topical application of anti-infectives is widely used in the treatment of these types of infections. However, little is known about the current status and trends of the use of topical ocular anti-infectives in Spain. In the present work, we evaluated the use of this type of drug in the Spanish autonomous community of Galicia and described the variability in its consumption between Galician provinces between 2020 and 2023. In addition, the possible existence of a deviation in consumption at a seasonal level was evaluated, as well as possible changes during the study period. A descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study of the use of drugs belonging to the subgroups S01A (anti-infectives) and S01C (anti-inflammatory agents and anti-infectives in combination) of the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical Classification was carried out. This work demonstrated that the most used topical ocular anti-infective in Galicia was tobramycin and that the use of these types of drugs in our region varied according to the provinces. This study also revealed that the consumption of these medications has remained stable during the period 2020-2023, with no significant seasonal differences observed.

Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Hand Surgeries in Colombia

PURPOSE

The aim of the investigation was to determine the rate of prophylactic antibiotic use in hand surgeries and the factors related to their use in a group of Colombian patients.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study of patients undergoing hand surgery between January 2021 and December 2022. Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables were analyzed. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean wounds was considered inappropriate except in those who needed placement of an internal fixation implant. Variables related to inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 523 patients were reviewed, with an average age of 44.3 years; 51.2% were men. Most of the patients had a diagnosis of hand fracture (28.7%), trigger finger (24.5%), or ganglion (18.5%). The surgical wound was considered clean in 79.0% of cases. A total of 91.0% received prophylactic antibiotics, mostly cefazolin (63.3%). Some 55.7% were considered inappropriate by our criteria. Women (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-5.47), middle-low to high socioeconomic status (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.05-3.38), treatment in clinic #1 (OR, 9.67; 95% CI, 4.81-19.43), history of diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.07-7.86), and diagnosis of trigger finger (OR, 19.92; 95% CI, 9.95-39.88), ganglion (OR, 24.53; 95% CI, 11.72-51.34), or tenosynovitis (OR, 19.61; 95% CI, 6.78-56.73) were associated with receiving inappropriate prophylactic antibiotics. At hospital discharge, 60.6% received prophylactic antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

In a low-middle income country, the use of inappropriate antibiotics in hand surgical procedures is as common as in higher-income countries. The causes appear multifactorial, including the characteristics of the health systems, doctors, and patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Antibiotic Management of Uncomplicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Real World

Background: Skin and soft tissue infections are one of the main causes of consultations worldwide. The objective was to determine the treatment of a group of patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in Colombia. Methods: Follow-up study of a cohort of patients with skin infections who were treated in the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were identified. Treatments were evaluated using clinical practice guidelines for skin infections. Results: A total of 400 patients were analyzed. They had a median age of 38.0 years and 52.3% were men. The most commonly used antibiotics were cephalexin (39.0%), dicloxacillin (28.0%) and clindamycin (18.0%). A total of 49.8% of the subjects received inappropriate antibiotics, especially those with purulent infections (82.0%). Being cared for in an outpatient clinic (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.06-4.12), presenting pain (OR: 3.72; 95% CI: 1.41-9.78) and having a purulent infection (OR: 25.71; 95% CI: 14.52-45.52) were associated with a higher probability of receiving inappropriate antibiotics. Conclusions: Half of patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections were treated with antibiotics that were not recommended by clinical practice guidelines. This inappropriate use of antibiotics occurred in the vast majority of patients with purulent infections because the antimicrobials used had no effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Indication-prescription study for the management of conjunctivitis in a Colombian population

PURPOSE

Conjunctivitis is one of the most common ocular pathologies. Its treatment depends on its etiology, but an excessive use of antibiotics and corticosteroids, which in many cases are contraindicated, has been described. The objective was to describe the prescription patterns of medications used to treat conjunctivitis in a Colombian population.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study on the pharmacological treatment of patients diagnosed with conjunctivitis between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021; based on a drug-dispensing database of approximately 8.5 million people affiliated with the Colombian Health System. Some sociodemographic and pharmacological variables and comorbidities were considered. A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 8708 patients were identified; they had a median age of 44.7 years, and 59.3% were women. The most common causes of conjunctivitis were unspecified (53.1%) and allergic (37.4%). The most commonly used drug was olopatadine (26.1%), followed by dexamethasone with neomycin and polymyxin B (25.0%). A total of 97.0% of the patients received ophthalmic prescriptions, while 12.8% received systemic medications. Glucocorticoids (40.3%), antibiotics (37.7%) and antihistamines (31.7%) were the most commonly used groups of ophthalmic drugs. Glucocorticoids and ophthalmic antibiotics were the medications most frequently prescribed by general practitioners for the treatment of viral or bacterial conjunctivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients with conjunctivitis are not being managed according to the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, which highlights that the widespread use of antibiotics with ophthalmic glucocorticoids could be considered potentially inappropriate prescriptions in many cases.

Study of Prescription-Indication of Outpatient Systemic Anti-Fungals in a Colombian Population. A Cross-Sectional Study

The inappropriate use of antifungals is associated with greater antimicrobial resistance, costs, adverse events, and worse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine prescription patterns and approved and unapproved indications for systemic antifungals in a group of patients in Colombia. This was a cross-sectional study on indications for the use of systemic antifungals in outpatients from a drug dispensing database of approximately 9.2 million people affiliated with the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were considered. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 74,603 patients with antifungal prescriptions were identified; they had a median age of 36.0 years (interquartile range: 22.0−53.0 years), and 67.3% of patients were women. Fluconazole (66.5%) was the most prescribed antifungal for indications such as vaginitis, vulvitis, and vulvovaginitis (35.0%). A total of 29.3% of the prescriptions were used in unapproved indications. A total of 96.3% of ketoconazole users used the medication in unapproved indications. Men (OR: 1.91; CI95%: 1.79−2.04), <18 years of age (OR: 1.20; CI95%: 1.11−1.31), from the Caribbean region (OR: 1.26; CI95%: 1.18−1.34), with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 1.80; CI95%: 1.27−2.54), prescriptions made by a general practitioner (OR: 1.17; CI95%: 1.04−1.31), receiving comedications (OR: 1.58; CI95%: 1.48−1.69), and the concomitant use of other antimicrobials (OR: 1.77; CI95%: 1.66−1.88) were associated with a higher probability that the antifungal was used for unapproved indications; deep mycosis (OR: 0.49; CI95%: 0.41−0.58), prescribing fluconazole (OR: 0.06; CI95%: 0.06−0.06), and having diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.33; CI95%: 0.29−0.37), cancer (OR: 0.13; CI95%: 0.11−0.16), or HIV (OR: 0.07; CI95%: 0.04−0.09) reduced this risk. Systemic antifungals were mostly used for the management of superficial mycoses, especially at the gynecological level. In addition, more than a quarter of patients received these medications in unapproved indications, and there was broad inappropriate use of ketoconazole.

Use of antibiotics in patients who were attacked by animals that can transmit rabies

Animal bites have a high probability of becoming infected. In high-risk wounds, the use of antibiotics that kill the associated microorganisms is recommended. The aim of this study was to determine the use of inappropriate antibiotics in patients in different regions of Colombia who were attacked in 2020 by animals that can transmit rabies. This was a retrospective follow-up study of a cohort of patients with wounds caused by animals; the patients were affiliated with the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological data were collected. A total of 280 patients were analysed. The median age was 28.0 years, and 52.1% were men. The attacks were attributed to dogs (85.0%) and cats (15.0%), and 9.6% were classified as severe exposure. Antibiotics were used in 71.1% of cases for prophylaxis and in 4.3% of the cases for the treatment of superinfection; cephalexin (37.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (15.7%) and dicloxacillin (10.4%) were the predominant antibiotics used. A total of 72.0% of patients who received antibiotics received inadequate prescriptions, and 49.2% had no indication to receive prophylaxis. Being treated in the Caribbean region (OR: 4.09; 95% CI: 1.79-9.30) and receiving analgesics (OR: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.25-7.94) were associated with a greater probability of being prescribed antibiotics inadequately; attacks resulting in severe exposure were associated with a lower probability (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.16-0.98). A significant proportion of patients had no indication for prophylactic antibiotics or was prescribed antibiotics not recommended by clinical practice guidelines. There was a low prevalence of prescriptions for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, the most recommended antibiotic.

Study of the indications for macrolide prescriptions in a Colombian population

Introduction

The inappropriate use of antibiotics is associated with a greater risk for antimicrobial resistance, high health care costs, adverse events, and worse clinical outcomes.

Objective

To determine the prescription patterns and approved and nonapproved indications for macrolides in a group of patients from Colombia.

Materials and methods

This was a cross-sectional study on the indications for the use of macrolides in outpatients registered in a drug-dispensing database of approximately 8.5 million people affiliated with the Colombian health system. Sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were considered.

Results

A total of 9.344 patients had received a macrolide prescription; their median age was 40.1 years (interquartile range: 27.1-53.3 years) and 58.3% were women. The most commonly prescribed macrolide was azithromycin (38.8%) most frequently for Helicobacter pylori infection (15.9%) and pneumonia treatment (15.8%). A total of 31.3% of the prescriptions were used for unapproved indications: common cold (7.8%), COVID-19 (4.0%), and acute bronchitis (3.5%). Residence in the Caribbean region (OR=1.17; 95%CI 1.05-1.31), dental prescriptions (OR=2.75; 95%CI 1.91-3.96), presence of chronic respiratory comorbidities (OR=1.30; 95%CI 1.08-1.56), and prescription of erythromycin (OR=3.66; 95%CI 3.24-4.14) or azithromycin (OR=2.15; 95%CI 1,92-2.41) were associated with a higher probability of macrolide use for unapproved indications while being 18-64 years old (OR=0.81; 95%CI 0.71-0.93) or 65 years or older (OR=0.77; 95%CI 0.63-0.94) and residing in Bogotá-Cundinamarca (OR=0.74; 95%CI 0.65-0.85) were associated with reduced risk.

Conclusions

Most patients received macrolides for respiratory tract infections; erythromycin and azithromycin were used for unapproved indications in people under 18 years of age and those with chronic respiratory diseases.

Prescription Patterns of Drugs Given to Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Colombia

The impact of COVID-19 prompted a race to find a treatment that would reduce its mortality. Most studies have not shown favorable results for many of these drugs, but they are still used. The aim as to determine the differences and similarities in the hospital pharmacological management of patients with COVID-19 according to sex, age group, and geographical region of Colombia, 2020–2021. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on the prescription patterns of the medications given to patients diagnosed with COVID-19 treated in eight clinics in Colombia between 6 March 2020 and 31 May 2021. We performed a descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables of the patients. A total of 8596 patients from 170 cities were identified, with a median age of 53.0 years and 53.3% of them men. A total of 24.3% required care in the intensive care unit, and 18.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation. The most commonly used drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 were systemic corticosteroids (63.6%), followed by colchicine (12.8%), azithromycin (8.9%), and ivermectin (6.4%). Corticosteroids, anticoagulants, colchicine, azithromycin, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine were prescribed more frequently in men, and their overall use increased with age. There were differences in prescriptions between geographic regions. The majority of patients were managed with medications included in the management guidelines. There were differences between sexes, age groups, and geographical regions.