1
|
Gonzalez-Martinez A, Sanz-García A, García-Azorín D, Rodríguez-Vico J, Jaimes A, Gómez García A, Casas-Limón J, Díaz de Terán J, Sastre-Real M, Membrilla J, Latorre G, Calle de Miguel C, Gil Luque S, Trevino-Peinado C, Quintas S, Heredia P, Echavarría-Íñiguez A, Guerrero-Peral Á, Sierra Á, González-García N, Porta-Etessam J, Gago-Veiga AB. Effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of preventive anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients over 65 years old: a multicenter real-world case-control study. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2024; 25:194-202. [PMID: 37847661 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical characteristics, effectiveness, and tolerability of preventive anti- calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the elderly. Anti-CGRP mAbs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with migraine although there is limited information regarding the elderly. DESIGN We performed a multicenter case-control study of cases (patients over 65 years old) and controls (sex-matched patients under 55 years old) with migraine receiving anti-CGRP mAbs. METHODS We included the demographic characteristics, effectiveness-reduction in the number of monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD), 30%, 50%, and 75% responder rates-and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The primary endpoint was the 50% response rate regarding MHD at weeks 20-24; exploratory 50% response predictors in the elderly were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 228 patients were included: 114 cases , 114 controls-. Among cases 84.2% (96/114) were women, 79.8% (91/114) CM; mean age of cases 70.1 years old (range: 66-86); mean age of controls was 42.9 years old(range: 38-49). Cases had a higher percentage of vascular risk factors (P < .05),older age of onset (P < .001) and more reported prior preventive treatments (P < .001). Regarding effectiveness in cases, 50% response rate was achieved by 57.5% (42/73) at 20-24 weeks, with lower reduction in the MHD at 8-12 weeks (5 [7.2], 8 [9.1]; P = .001) and a higher reduction in MMD at 20-24 weeks (10.7 [9.1], 9.2 [7.7]; P = .04) compared to the control group. The percentage of TEAEs was similar in the 2 groups. Diagnosis of episodic migraine (EM) (P = .03) and lower number of MHD at baseline (P = .001) were associated with a 50% response in the elderly in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides real world evidence of effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients without upper age-limit and possible predictors of anti-CGRP response in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| | - Ancor Sanz-García
- Data Analysis Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Jaime Rodríguez-Vico
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Alex Jaimes
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Andrea Gómez García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Javier Casas-Limón
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
| | - Javier Díaz de Terán
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - María Sastre-Real
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Javier Membrilla
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Germán Latorre
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Carlos Calle de Miguel
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Sendoa Gil Luque
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Castilla y León 09006, Spain
| | - Cristina Trevino-Peinado
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid 28914, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Patricia Heredia
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Ana Echavarría-Íñiguez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Ángel Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Nuria González-García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Jesús Porta-Etessam
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
AIM Migraine has been associated with stroke as well as with several non-atherosclerotic vascular conditions leading to discussions about the potential role of endothelium in the etiopathogenesis of migraine and migraine-associated stroke. We present a systematic review of the literature on vascular biomarkers in migraine, including those suggesting endothelial activation and damage. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search from 1990 to 2013 using multiple research databases with the keywords "migraine," "headache," "vascular," and "biomarkers." We used selected inclusion and exclusion criteria to create a final pool of studies for this review. RESULTS The literature search identified a total of 639 citations of which 129 were included in our review. The final pool of clinical- and population-based studies assessed the level of various biomarkers (e.g. inflammatory, prothrombotic, endothelial activation, endothelial repair) in migraineurs of varying ages, gender, and demographic characteristics. Although for each biomarker there is at least one study suggesting an association with migraine, in many cases the quality of evidence is poor and there are conflicting studies showing no relationship. The results were, therefore, in each case inconclusive. CONCLUSION This systematic review indicated that in migraine populations there are a number of positive vascular biomarker studies, including some involving novel biomarkers such as endothelial microparticles and endothelial precursor cells. These lend insight into possible pathophysiological mechanisms by which migraine may be associated with stroke. More high-quality studies are needed to establish whether a true association between promising vascular biomarkers and migraine exists.
Collapse
|