Effectiveness of radiotherapy for elderly patients with non-melanoma skin cancer of the head

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for head and neck skin cancer

AIM

To report outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for head and neck skin cancer (HNSC) patients treated at a high-volume center.

MATERIALS

A retrospective review of HNSC SBRT patients from 2012 to 2019 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC) outside of SBRT field, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and late toxicity (LT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

RESULTS

One hundred and six medically unfit HNSC patients (112 lesions) were included. Median follow-up was 8 months. Median patient age at diagnosis was 86 years (range: 56-102 years). The majority of patients had advanced disease (overall stage III-IV [n = 90, 85%]) with median gross tumor volumes (GTV) of 31 cm³ (range: 17-56 cm³). Treated sites were: primary (n = 51), nodal (n = 47) or primary plus nodal (n = 8). SBRT doses ranged from 32-50 Gy delivered twice weekly in 4-6 fractions to the gross tumor volume (GTV). One and 2-year LC rates were 78% (69-88) and 67% (53-82), respectively. One-year LRC outside of SBRT field, OS, PFS and LT rates were 72% (62-84), 53% (43-65), 52% (40-62), and 7% (2-17), respectively. Thirty-three patients (31%) developed acute grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity, most commonly dermatitis (n = 31). Nine patients (8%) experienced late grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 7 grade 3 fibrosis, 1 grade 3 bone radionecrosis and 1 grade 4 skin ulceration. No treatment-related deaths (grade 5) were observed.

CONCLUSION

SBRT provides durable disease control with acceptable toxicity for medically unfit high-risk HNSC patients unable to undergo standard of care curative treatment approaches.

Hyperspectral imaging assessment for radiotherapy induced skin-erythema: Pilot study

Skin cancer (SC) is a widely spread disease in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Skin cancer patients may be treated by many different techniques including radiation therapy. However, radiation therapy has side effects, which may range from skin erythema to skin necrosis. As erythema is the early evidence of exposure to radiation, monitoring erythema is important to prevent more severe reactions. Visual assessment (VA) is the gold standard for evaluating erythema. Nevertheless, VA is not ideal, since it depends on the observer's experience and skills. Digital photography and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) are optical techniques that provide an opportunity for objective assessment of erythema. Erythema indices were computed from the spectral data using Dawson's technique. The Dawson relative erythema index proved to be highly correlated (97.1 %) with clinical visual assessment scores. In addition, on the 7th session of radiation therapy, the relative erythema index differentiates with 99 % significance between irradiated and non-radiated skin regions. In this study, HSI is compared to digital photography for skin erythema statistical classification.

Effectiveness of radiotherapy for head and neck skin cancers: a single-institution study

Purpose

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a useful option to treat head and neck skin cancer patients who are not indicated for surgery. In this study, we evaluated the treatment outcomes of EBRT in an Asian population.

Materials and Methods

The records from 19 head and neck skin cancer patients (10 with squamous cell carcinoma and 9 with basal cell carcinoma) who were treated with definitive or adjuvant EBRT from 2009 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiotherapy doses administered ranged from 50 to 66 Gy (median, 55 Gy) with 2.0–2.75 Gy per daily fraction (median, 2.5 Gy). The T stage at presentation was as follows: Tis (1 patient), T1 (11 patients), T2 (6 patients), and T3 (1 patient). None had regional lymph node disease or distant metastasis at presentation. The local failure-free survival (LFFS) rates, toxicity, and cosmetic results were analyzed.

Results

The median age was 75.5 years (range, 52.6 to 92.5 years). The median follow-up duration from the completion of radiotherapy was 44.9 months (range, 5.8 to 82.6 months). One local failure occurred in a patient with a 2.1-cm posterior neck squamous cell carcinoma at 32.5 months after radiotherapy (1/19, 5.3%). The 3-year LFFS rate was 91.7%. No patients died from skin cancer during follow-up, and no grade 3 complications occurred. The cosmetic outcomes were excellent for 16 (84.2%) and good for 3 (15.8%) of the 19 patients.

Conclusion

EBRT offers good local control and cosmetic outcomes in patients with head and neck skin cancer, with no grade 3 complications.

Clinical comparison of brachytherapy versus hypofractionated external beam radiation versus standard fractionation external beam radiation for non-melanomatous skin cancers

Purpose

Non-melanomatous skin cancer (NMSC) is the single most common cancer in the US. Radiation therapy is an excellent treatment alternative to surgery. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are commonly used radiation treatment modalities but little data is published comparing these modalities. We present our institution's experience and outcomes with these therapeutic options.

Material and methods

From June 2005 to March 2013, 61 patients were treated with HDR brachytherapy (n = 9), hypofractionated EBRT (n = 30), or standard fractionation EBRT (n = 22) for NMSC. The primary outcome measure was local control at most remote follow-up and secondary outcome measures were overall survival, cosmetic outcome, and toxicity. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival.

Results

Median follow-up was 30 months. The most common histologies were BCC (47%) and SCC (44%); mean patient age was 83.3 years. Local control was 81% and 2-year actuarial overall survival was 89%. There was no statistical difference in local control or overall survival between treatment modalities. There was no statistical difference in cosmetic outcome or toxicity between treatment modalities, although five of six “poor” cosmetic outcomes and the only grade 3 toxic events were found in the standard fractionation EBRT group.

Conclusions

All modalities investigated represent effective treatments for NMSC and have good cosmetic outcomes and acceptable toxicity profiles. The finding of higher grade toxicity and a greater portion of patients experiencing toxicity among standard fractionation therapy is counter to expectations. There was no statistical significance to the finding and it is not likely to be meaningful.

Efficacy and safety of electronic brachytherapy for superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma

Purpose

Surface electronic brachytherapy (EBT) is an alternative radiotherapy solution to external beam electron radiotherapy and high-dose-rate radionuclide-based brachytherapy. In fact, it is also an alternative solution to surgery for a subgroup of patients. The objective of this work is to confirm the clinical efficacy, toxicity and cosmesis of a new EBT system, namely Esteya^® in the treatment of nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

Material and methods

This is a prospective single-center, non-randomized pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of EBT in nodular and superficial BCC using the Esteya^® system. The study was conducted from June 2014 to February 2015. The follow up time was 6 months for all cases.

Results

Twenty patients with 23 lesions were included. A complete response was documented in all lesions (100%). A low level of toxicity was observed after the 4^th fraction in all cases. Erythema was the most frequent adverse event. Cosmesis was excellent, with more than 60% of cases without skin alteration and with subtle changes in the rest.

Conclusions

Electronic brachytherapy with Esteya^® appears to be an effective, simple, safe, and comfortable treatment for nodular and superficial BCC associated with excellent cosmesis. It could be a good choice for elderly patients, patients with contraindications for surgery (due to comorbidities or anticoagulant drugs) or patients where surgery would result in a more disfiguring outcome. A longer follow-up and more studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.