Retrospective analysis of the usefulness of a protocol with high-dose methotrexate in polymyalgia rheumatica: Results of a single-center cohort of 100 patients

Rates of glucocorticoid taper in the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: the science behind the "art"

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common and debilitating disease for which glucocorticoids remain the therapeutic mainstay. Guideline recommendations on tapering regimens have been largely based on expert consensus. This exploratory narrative review provides a discussion on the available evidence for the rates of steroid tapering in PMR, as well as relevant pharmacology of corticosteroids. Key studies related to rates of steroid tapering are reviewed. Results favor a slow tapering regimen from a low initial steroid dose (between 10 and 20 mg) to minimize risk of relapse. This should be balanced with the risk of steroid-induced adverse events. Individualization and close monitoring have also been identified as important factors during the steroid-tapering process. There is promising data on the role of steroid-sparing agents, including methotrexate, tocilizumab, and more recently sarilumab. There is individual variability of prednisone pharmacokinetics, and the tapering of prednisone remains an "art" that would benefit from further understanding of the variables involved. Overall, glucocorticoids remain the mainstay therapy for PMR, and there continues to be a lack of robust evidence to guide steroid taper. More research is needed to optimize steroid tapering and regimens, along with the expanding role of steroid-sparing agents such as tocilizumab and sarilumab. Key Points • Polymyalgia rheumatica is a common and debilitating disease for which glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of therapy, and there is a paucity of evidence to guide steroid taper. • Limited available research favors a slow tapering regimen from a low initial steroid dose to minimize risk of relapse and steroid exposure. • The process of steroid taper should be individualized and closely monitored, with growing evidence supporting the addition of steroid-sparing agents. • More research is needed to optimize steroid tapering and regimens, along with the expanding role of steroid-sparing agents such as methotrexate, tocilizumab, and sarilumab.

Steroid-sparing agents in polymyalgia rheumatica: how will they fit into the treatment paradigm?

INTRODUCTION

Polymyalgia rheumatica is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease in subjects aged 50 years or older and classically presents with shoulder and/or pelvic girdle pain and prolonged morning stiffness. Glucocorticoids represent the standard of treatment; glucocorticoid therapy is usually required for 1-2 years and often results in significant glucocorticoid-related side effects, especially in the elderly.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the management of polymyalgia rheumatica, with a particular focus on adjunctive therapies to the standard glucocorticoid treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the high frequency of disease relapses (one-third of patients) and the adverse events related to prolonged glucocorticoid use, the need for glucocorticoid-sparing agents remains an important issue in the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. In selected patients, who are at risk for glucocorticoid-related side effects or in those with glucocorticoid-refractory disease, the addition of a glucocorticoid-sparing agent, either a synthetic or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, may represent a reasonable and effective therapeutic approach.

Does methotrexate have no beneficial effect in reducing flares in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica patients?

We read the article by Marsman et al. regarding the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) with great interest. This study added new insights regarding the use of MTX in a real-world clinical setting and its effect on the incidence rates of flares. However, we would like to voice our concerns regarding the definition of the participants and interventions that were performed in the study, as well as the comparability of the intervention and control groups. Our concerns include the possibility of the inadvertent enrollment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a study on PMR, a lack of a clear definition of glucocorticoid ineffectiveness, a lack of adjustment of glucocorticoid dosages, and a reliance on the judgement of individual medical providers rather than clearly defined investigative guidelines in the study procedures. To summarize, we would like to voice concerns about how and to whom MTX was prescribed, as well as the definition of the control group. These revisions and modifications would clarify the importance of the results regarding the efficacy of MTX administration in the treatment of PMR.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with disease activity in polymyalgia rheumatica

Background

The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are indicators of systemic inflammation and are useful as markers in systemic rheumatic diseases. In this study, we compared the NLR, PLR, and MLR among patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and explored possible associations with clinical features, disease activity, and prognosis in patients with PMR.

Methods

The study enrolled 94 patients with PMR and 242 patients with RA who were initially diagnosed at the rheumatology clinic of a university‐based tertiary hospital. Symptoms, physical examination, and medical histories were collected with the results of laboratory tests.

Results

Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (4.5 ± 3.3 vs 2.8 ± 1.8), PLR (222.7 ± 115.5 vs 159.7 ± 78.1), and MLR (0.4 ± 0.3 vs 0.3 ± 0.2) were higher in patients with PMR compared with patients with RA (all P < .001). NLR, PLR, and MLR were correlated with specific laboratory values, including CRP and albumin, in patients with PMR. After disease activity resolved, NLR (2.95 ± 2.32, P < .001), PLR (137.5 ± 82.3, P < .001), and MLR (0.26 ± 0.16, P < .001) decreased significantly. By comparing patients according to the disease course, swollen joint counts were higher in the chronic course group compared with the remission group (P = .03), while the NLR, PLR, and MLR were similar.

Conclusions

Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio levels were associated with disease activity and specific clinical features, although they could not predict prognosis in patients with PMR.