Reciprocal relationship between locomotive syndrome and social frailty in older adults

Predicting fragility fractures based on frailty and bone mineral density among rural community-dwelling older adults

OBJECTIVE

We aim to investigate the association between bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and fragility fractures and assess the predictive value of combining BMD measurement and frailty for fracture risk assessment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 5126 rural Koreans in the Chungju Metabolic Disease Cohort study. Frailty was defined using Fried's frailty phenotype. Fractures were assessed via structured medical interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated considering age, sex, body mass index, behavior, BMD, handgrip strength, medications, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 5126 participants comprising 1955 (38.1%) males and 3171 (61.9%) females. Osteoporosis significantly increased the fracture risk across all types, except vertebral fracture, with adjusted OR (95% CI) of 1.89 (1.23-3.47) for any fracture, 2.05 (1.37-2.98) for hip fracture, 2.18 (1.06-4.50) for other fracture, and 1.71 (1.03-3.63) for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Frail individuals exhibited significantly increased risk for any fracture (OR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.21-3.71), vertebral fracture (2.48; 1.84-3.61), hip fracture (2.52; 1.09-3.21), other fracture (2.82; 1.19-8.53), and MOF (1.87; 1.01-3.47). The combination of frailty and BMD further increased the risks, with frail individuals demonstrating elevated ORs across BMD categories. In subgroup analyses, men showed a significant association between frailty with osteoporosis in hip fracture and MOF. Frail women with osteoporosis exhibited the highest risks for all fractures, particularly vertebral (OR 5.12; 95% CI, 2.07-9.68) and MOF (OR 5.19; 95% CI, 2.07-6.61). Age-specific analysis revealed that individuals aged 70 and older exhibited markedly higher fracture risks compared with those under 70. The combination of frailty and low BMD further elevated the fracture risk. Frailty was applied with BMD and demonstrated superior risk prediction for MOF compared with that with either score alone (area under the curve 0.825; P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining frailty with BMD provides a more accurate fracture risk assessment for individuals over 50 years.

Impacts of Negative and Positive Life Events on Development of Social Frailty among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the impact of negative and positive life events on the development of social frailty.

DESIGN

Population-based longitudinal study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study was set in the Japanese community cohort and included 2174 adults aged ≥65 years without social frailty at baseline.

METHODS

We assessed the experiences of 6 negative and positive life events (increase in economic difficulties, illness or injury of spouse, death of family or friends, marriage of children or grandchildren, birth of grandchildren or great-grandchildren, and making new friends) in the 15 months after baseline. We followed the social frailty status of the participants and identified the development of social frailty 48 months after the baseline. Social frailty was operationally defined as having 2 or more of Makizako's 5 items (going out less frequently, rarely visiting friends, not feeling helpful to friends or family, living alone, and not talking to someone daily).

RESULTS

Among 2174 participants without social frailty at baseline, 161 (7.4%) developed social frailty after 48 months. Multivariate logistic regression models on each life event and development of social frailty showed that illness or injury of spouse was significantly associated with a higher risk of subsequent social frailty [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.74; 95% CI, 1.10-2.74] and making new friends was significantly associated with lower risk of subsequent social frailty (adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.27-0.54). No significant ORs of social frailty were found for other life events.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Life events in later life have both positive and negative impacts on the development of social frailty, depending on the nature of the event. To prevent social frailty, it may be important to monitor negative life events and promote positive life events in later life.

Association between frailty and locomotive syndrome in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective longitudinal analysis

AIMS

With the aging society worldwide, lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has become common, and its incidence has been increasing worldwide. Frailty and locomotive syndrome significantly overlap as disorders in older people. The current study aimed to validate the association between frailty and locomotive syndrome in patients with LSS. In particular, the involvement of frailty in locomotive syndrome following surgery was examined.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the time-course data of consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent lumbar spinal surgery for LSS. The locomotive syndrome stages were determined using the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale: stage 0, score ≤6; stage 1, score ≥7; stage 2, score ≥16; and Stage 3, score ≥24. Robust, pre-frailty, and frailty were defined as a modified frailty index-11 score of 0, <0.21, and >0.21, respectively.

RESULTS

This study included 234 patients. All patients except one were diagnosed with locomotive syndrome preoperatively. Approximately 24.8% of participants were diagnosed with frailty. LSS surgery improved locomotive syndrome regardless of frailty severity. Meanwhile, multivariable analysis indicated that frailty could significantly inhibit improvement in locomotive syndrome after surgery in old patients with LSS (estimated relative risk: 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

This study first assessed the association between locomotive syndrome and frailty in patients with LSS. Locomotive syndrome could be managed effectively with surgery regardless of frailty severity in old patients with LSS. However, our findings emphasize the need to screen for frailty preoperatively in this patient group. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 116-122.

Association between oral health and locomotive syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Japanese adults

BACKGROUND

Many studies have examined the association between oral health, care needs, and physical function, but few have focused on the association between oral health and locomotive syndrome (LS). We examined the association between LS and oral-health status, such as the number of teeth and chewing function, in an adult population.

METHODS

The study included 2888 participants who underwent examinations of motor function and oral health. Individuals with LS stage 1 or higher were classified as having LS, while others were classified as not having it. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the presence or absence of LS as the dependent variable and age, sex, smoking status, drinking habit, exercise habit, walking speed, history of stroke, bone density, body mass index, metabolic syndrome, chewing function, and the number of teeth as independent variables to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each independent variable.

RESULTS

When the number of teeth and chewing function were included separately in multivariate analyses, the OR for LS was significantly higher for participants with 0-19 teeth than for those with 28 teeth, and for participants with poor chewing function than for those with good function (adjusted ORs, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.15] and 1.73 [95% CI, 1.37-2.18], respectively). In analyses that included tooth number and chewing function as a combined independent variable, relative to individuals with 28 teeth and good masticatory function, the adjusted ORs were 2.67 (95% CI, 1.57-4.52) for those with 28 teeth and poor chewing function, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.20-2.22) for those with 20-27 teeth and poor chewing function, and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.06-3.18) for those with 0-19 teeth and poor chewing function.

CONCLUSION

Having fewer teeth and poor chewing function may be associated with LS. The maintenance of masticatory function may be important to prevent LS in adulthood.

Social frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the aging of the population, frailty has attracted much attention, and the social dimension of frailty, namely social frailty, has also attracted attention. Studies have shown that social frailty can bring some adverse effects to the elderly, such as physical and cognitive function.

AIMS

To explore the risk of adverse health outcomes in older adults with social frailty compared with older adults with non-social frailty.

METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched from inception to February 28, 2023. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two researchers. The included studies were longitudinal studies of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling socially frail older adults, and the quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included based on the inclusion criteria, of which 4 were subjected to meta-analysis. The mean age of the included population ranged from 66.3 to 86.5 years. According to existing research, social frailty was predictive of some adverse outcomes, such as incident disability, depressive symptoms, and reduced neuropsychological function. The meta-analysis showed that social frailty had a significant predictive effect on mortality among older adults [HR = 2.27, (95% CI = 1.03-5.00)].

CONCLUSION

In community-dwelling older adults, social frailty was a predictor of mortality, incident disability, depressive symptoms and other adverse outcomes. Social frailty had a negative impact on older adults, so it was necessary to strengthen the screening of social frailty to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes.

Clinical characteristics of locomotive syndrome categorised by the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compile the currently available evidence on the clinical characteristics of the locomotive syndrome (LS) categorised by the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) and clarify its clinical usefulness for assessing mobility function.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for the relevant studies on 20 March 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included relevant peer-reviewed articles, available in English language, on clinical LS characteristics categorised with the GLFS-25.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Pooled ORs or mean differences (MDs) of the LS groups were calculated and compared with the non-LS groups for each clinical characteristic.

RESULTS

In total, 27 studies that involve 13 281 participants (LS, n=3385; non-LS, n=9896) were examined in this analysis. Older age (MD 4.71; 95% (CI) 3.97 to 5.44; p<0.00001), female gender (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.71; p<0.00001), higher body mass index (MD 0.78; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; p<0.00001), osteoporosis (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.13; p<0.0001), depression (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.81 to 5.44; p<0.0001), lower lumbar lordosis angle (MD -7.91; 95% CI -10.08 to -5.74; p<0.00001), higher spinal inclination angle (MD 2.70; 95% CI 1.76 to 3.65; p<0.00001), lower grip strength (MD -4.04; 95% CI -5.25 to -2.83; p<0.00001), lower back muscle strength (MD -15.32; 95% CI -23.83 to -6.81; p=0.0004), lower maximum stride (MD -19.36; 95% CI -23.25 to -15.47; p<0.00001), higher timed up-and-go (MD 1.36; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.79; p<0.00001), lower one-leg standing time (MD -19.13; 95% CI -23.29 to -14.97; p<0.0001) and slower normal gait speed (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.22 to -0.18; p<0.0001) were found to be associated with LS. No significant differences were noted in other clinical characteristics between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GLFS-25 is clinically useful for assessing mobility function according to the evidence available on the clinical characteristics of LS categorised by the GLFS-25 questionnaire items until.

The Prevalence of Social Frailty Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the overall prevalence of social frailty among older people and provide information for policymakers and authorities to use in developing policies and social care.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We searched 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) to find articles from inception to July 30, 2022. We included cross-sectional and cohort studies that provided the prevalence of social frailty among adults aged 60 years or older, in any setting.

METHODS

Three researchers independently reviewed the literature and retrieved the data. A risk of bias tool was used to assess each study's quality. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to pool the data, followed by subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression.

RESULTS

From 761 records, we extracted 43 studies with 83,907 participants for meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of social frailty in hospital settings was 47.3% (95% CI: 32.2%-62.4%); among studies in community settings, the pooled prevalence was 18.8% (95% CI: 14.9%-22.7%; P < .001). The prevalence of social frailty was higher when assessed using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (32.3%; 95% CI: 23.1%-41.5%) than the Makizako Social Frailty Index (27.7%; 95% CI: 21.6%-33.8%) or Social Frailty Screening Index (13.4%; 95% CI: 8.4%-18.4%). Based on limited community studies in individual countries using various instruments, social frailty was lowest in China (4.9%; 95% CI: 4.2%-5.7%), followed by Spain (11.6%; 95% CI: 9.9%-13.3%), Japan (16.2%; 95% CI: 12.2%-20.3%), Korea (26.6%; 95% CI: 7.1%-46.1%), European urban centers (29.2%; 95% CI: 27.9%-30.5%), and the Netherlands (27.2%; 95% CI: 16.9%-37.5%). No other subgroup analyses showed any statistically significant prevalence difference between groups.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The prevalence of social frailty among older adults is high. Settings, country, and method for assessing social frailty affected the prevalence. More valid comparisons will await consensus on measurement tools and more research on geographically representative populations. Nevertheless, these results suggest that public health professionals and policymakers should seriously consider social frailty in research and program planning involving older adults.

The prevalence of social frailty among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Social frailty is a geriatric public health problem that deeply affects healthy aging. Currently, evidence on the prevalence and factors associated with social frailty in older adults remains unclear. Our study aims to estimate the prevalence and related factors of social frailty in older adults. This study retrieved nine electronic databases searched through July 5th, 2022. The prevalence of social frailty was pooled using Stata software. It was found that older adults suffered from a "moderate" level of social frailty. We found a higher prevalence of social frailty in the United Kingdom, Greece, Croatia, The Netherlands, and Spain, in people over 75 years, in hospitals, and during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We believed that countries, age, research sites, and the pandemic of COVID-19 were influencing factors of social frailty among older adults. These findings may provide a theoretical basis for the development of ameliorating social frailty among older adults.

Effect of combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise on increasing handgrip strength in elderly with locomotive syndrome: A randomised controlled trial

Background

Elderly with the locomotive syndrome is at high risk for fall and fractures. Thus multimodal therapy is needed to minimize the risk.

Objective

Analyzing the effect of combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise on muscle strength in elderly with locomotive syndrome stage 1.

Methods

This study used a pre-test and post-test design with 20 participants (treatment group = 10 participants and control group = 10 participants). The treatment group was given combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise, while the control group was only given aerobic exercise for eight weeks. Locomotor training was provided three times/week with progressive increase of set and repetition at each activity. Meanwhile, aerobic exercise was given seven times/week for 30 min per session. Participants were examined for muscle strength (handgrip strength) before and after the intervention. The analysis included paired t-test and an independent t-test with a p-value <0.05.

Results

The participants' mean age was 73.85 ± 4.75 years, with treatment group = 75.4 ± 4.88 years and control group = 72.3 ± 4.30 years (t = 1.508; 95% CI = −1.220 – 7420; p = 0.149). The HGS values in the treatment group were 13.89 ± 5.27 (pre-test) and 19.06 ± 4.54 (post-test; t = 11.765; 95% CI = −6.164 to −4.176; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the HGS values in the control group at pre-test and post-test were 11.27 ± 2.17 and 13.03 ± 2.54, respectively (t = 2.057; 95% CI = −1.600 – 0.076; p = 0.070). The ΔHGS values of treatment and control group were 5.17 ± 1.39 and 1.76 ± 2.07, respectively (t = 4.329; 95% CI = 1.755–5.065; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise have increased muscle strength, as proven by increased handgrip strength.

•

Combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise minimize fall risk and fracture in the elderly.

•

Combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise are effective for the management of locomotive syndrome stage 1.

•

Combined locomotor training and aerobic exercise reduce the GLFS-25 score.