Hester ET, Santizo KY, Nida AA, Widdowson MA. Hyporheic transverse mixing zones and dispersivity: Laboratory and numerical experiments of hydraulic controls.
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY 2021;
243:103885. [PMID:
34488177 DOI:
10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103885]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Mixing of surface water and groundwater in shallow sediments is important to biogeochemical cycling and contaminant migration, and is often used to define the hyporheic zone. Yet knowledge of mixing processes in hyporheic zones is supported by surprisingly few rigorous lab or field observations, and differ from those in deeper groundwater by presence of enhanced head gradients, sediment heterogeneity, and temporal fluctuations. In a laboratory sediment (sand) tank we photographed a conservative dye to analyze transverse mixing zones between upwelling groundwater and bidirectional hyporheic exchange flows. We then conducted numerical modeling to investigate processes behind observed phenomena and estimate dispersivities. We found that transverse mixing zones were thin (i.e. mixing thickness measured in direction of steepest concentration gradient, δ, less than 5 cm), consistent with a small calibrated transverse dispersivity (~0.1 mm) and prior lab studies conducted at similar scales. In steady-state experiments and simulations, δ and estimated dispersion coefficients increased with the surface water head drop driving exchange flows. Given relatively constant deeper groundwater heads, increased Δh led to increased mixing zone length for both steady-state and transient conditions, indicating larger bedforms or weaker gaining conditions enhance subsurface mixing. However, Peclet number and flux-related dilution index simultaneously increased and decreased, respectively, indicating that enhancement of subsurface advection outpaced that of dispersion. In transient experiments and simulations, δ was greater than for steady-state, probably from temporary addition of longitudinal dispersion. During transient experiments, δ exhibited temporal noise, perhaps due to the mixing zone moving past varying patterns of sediment packing. Our results provide basic knowledge of mixing zone behavior in hyporheic zones with implications for hyporheic zone definitions, solute transport, mixing-dependent reaction, and water quality.
Collapse