Management of patients with long-term inhibitors: is immune tolerance an underestimated life-long solution?

Low-dose immune tolerance induction alone or with immunosuppressants according to prognostic risk factors in Chinese children with hemophilia A inhibitors

BACKGROUND

In developing countries, children with hemophilia A (HA) with high-titer inhibitor and poor immune tolerance induction (ITI) prognostic risk(s) cannot afford the recommended high- or intermediate-dose ITI.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of low-dose ITI (plasma-derived factor VIII [FVIII]/von Willebrand factor at 50 FVIII IU/kg every other day) by itself (ITI-alone) or combined with immunosuppressants rituximab and prednisone (ITI-IS) in children with HA with high-titer inhibitor.

METHODS

All enrolled patients had pre-ITI inhibitor ≥10 BU. We used ITI-alone if inhibitor titer was <40 BU pre-ITI and during ITI, and ITI-IS if titer was ≥100 BU (historic) or ≥40 BU (pre- or during ITI) or if the patient was nonresponsive on ITI-alone.

RESULTS

Fifty-six children were analyzable, with median historic peak inhibitor titer 48.0 BU and followed for median 31.4 months. Overall, 35 (62.5%) achieved phase 2 success with negative inhibitor and normal FVIII recovery. The phase 2 success rate was 95% for the 20 patients receiving ITI-alone. For the 36 patients receiving ITI-IS, the phase 2 success rate was 44.4%, but would increase to 63.6% if the 14 patients with historic peak inhibitor titer ≥100 BU (and having phase 2 success rate of only 14.3%) were excluded. One patient developed repeated infection after IS treatment. Relapse occurred in 11.4% (4/35) patients with phase 2 success associated with rapid ITI dose reduction or irregular post-ITI FVIII prophylaxis. Our strategy reduced the cost from high-dose ITI by 74% to 90%.

CONCLUSION

The use of low-dose ITI with or without immunosuppressants according to ITI prognostic risk(s) is a clinically and economically feasible strategy for eradicating inhibitors in children with HA, particularly for those with historic peak inhibitor titer <100 BU.

Hemophilia A with inhibitor: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) in the mirror of time

Inhibitor (neutralizing antibodies) development remains the most significant complication in patients with severe congenital hemophilia A receiving exogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Although our understanding of the pathophysiology of inhibitor development has advanced, the knowledge gained has not yet translated into a robust decline in incidence, with the overall risk remaining at ∼30%. Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) is the only current method to successfully eradicate an inhibitor and achieve long-term tolerance. Although current practice utilizes a wide variety of ITI regimens, identification of an optimal regimen has not emerged. Over the last decade, the number of replacement products available in hemophilia has greatly expanded. The cumulative evidence with each product for use in ITI is often lacking. Most recently emicizumab, a humanized monoclonal bi-specific antibody that substitutes for the scaffolding effect of FVIIIa was approved; this agent prevents bleeding in both inhibitor and non-inhibitor patients. The use of emicizumab will bring about a new era in care that will require clinicians to challenge current practice paradigms including use and administration of ITI. This review will summarize the main clinical ITI data and practices for patients with severe congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAwI) over the last four decades and will highlight current studies in the field, with attention to open questions.

Low-dose Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitors against factors VIII/IX is the most serious complication in hemophilia. The best treatment strategy for inhibitor eradication is immune tolerance induction (ITI). The aim of this study was to evaluate patients treated with low-dose ITI at a single center with limited resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 29 (8.05%) of 360 hemophilia A patients exhibited inhibitors. The data from hemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing ITI between 1999 and 2017 were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen ITIs administered to 15 hemophilia A patients with inhibitors were analyzed, and the data from 13 ITIs conducted in 12 patients were evaluated. The median age at ITI onset was 10 years (range: 1.25 to 52 y). The maximum inhibitor titer before ITI was 30 Bethesda Units (BU) (range: 4.48 to 135), and the median inhibitor titer was 1.25 BU (range: 0 to 5.6) at the onset of ITI. The median time interval between the inhibitor development and ITI onset was 60 months (range: 7 to 264 mo). The median inhibitor titer during ITI was 3.4 BU (range: 0 to 158.7). At the end of the treatment, 4 of the 12 patients (33.3%) exhibited a complete response, 4 (33.3%) had partial responses (with continuing ITI), and 4 (33.3%) exhibited ITI failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors is challenging, and ITI is the best treatment method; however, a high-dose daily ITI regimen cannot be given to every patient in every country due to its high cost. Our results show that low-dose ITI may be a choice for selected patients with inhibitors.

Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment-related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult-to-treat patients. Some alternative, non-ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.

HaemoPREF: Further evaluation of patient perception and preference for treatment in a real world setting

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to haemophilia A (HA) treatment may be influenced by patients' beliefs about their condition and treatment. Furthermore, difficulties administering treatment may lead to poor adherence. New treatment strategies aim to reduce the burden associated with administration and to improve patient perception of treatment, which, in turn, increase adherence levels.

AIMS

This study aimed to examine patient perception of HA treatment and related factors using patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and to confirm the psychometric properties of a recently developed questionnaire, the HaemoPREF.

METHODS

A non-interventional, cross-sectional, questionnaire study was conducted with adult HA patients in Spain (n=31), Germany (n=10) and Italy (n=48), who were using ReFacto AF with the FuseNGo administration device. Patients completed the HaemoPREF and other questionnaires measuring related constructs: treatment adherence, satisfaction and well-being, online at two time points. Correlational, regression and psychometric analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

PRO scores indicated that patients are satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. Multivariate regression of the HaemoPREF global score identified a number of significant predictors (P≤.05). The HaemoPREF Global Score had a moderate relationship with subscales on the related questionnaires (mean correlation=0.43; range=0.39-0.48). The HaemoPREF demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.82), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha range=0.69-0.82) and convergent validity with measures of treatment satisfaction (Spearman correlation coefficient, r=.48) and well-being (r=.41).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that patients using ReFacto AF with FuseNGo were satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. The HaemoPREF can identify important concepts relating to patient treatment experience in HA.

The burden of inhibitors in haemophilia patients

The burden of disease in haemophilia patients has wide ranging implications for the family and to society. There is evidence that having a current inhibitor increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity is increased by the inability to treat adequately and its consequent disabilities, which then equates to a poor quality of life compared with non-inhibitor patients. The societal cost of care, or `burden of inhibitors', increases with the ongoing presence of an inhibitor. Therefore, it is clear that successful eradication of inhibitors by immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the single most important milestone one can achieve in an inhibitor patient. The type of factor VIII (FVIII) product used in ITI regimens varies worldwide. Despite ongoing debate, there is in vitro and retrospective clinical evidence to support the use of plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates in ITI regimens in order to achieve early and high inhibitor eradication success rates.

[Study on risk factors and follow-up of 26 hemophilia A children with inhibitors]

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors, characteristics and treatment of factor Ⅷ (F Ⅷ) inhibitor in Chinese children with hemophilia A (HA) through a retrospective case-control survey; To investigate the bleeding phenotype before and after inhibitor formation.

METHODS

The clinical data of outpatients and inpatients with HA children from January 2010 to December 2014 were collected. A case control study was performed to investigate the risk factors for inhibitor formation.

RESULTS

A total of 445 HA children were enrolled with 82(18.4%) severe, 269(60.5%) moderate, and 94(21.1%) mild cases; 26(5.8% ) patients, among whom 13 were severe HA and 13 moderate HA, had inhibitor (9 low titer inhibitors, and 17 high titer inhibitors). No inhibitor was found in mild HA patients. Intensive treatment (P= 0.030, HR=4.435, 95% CI 1.150-17.094) was a risk factor for inhibitor generation. After inhibitor formation, 2 patients received small dose rituximab for inhibitor eradication, and one of them also received ITI therapy. When bleeding, 65.2% (15/23) inhibitors received PCC treatment to stop the bleeding, 8.7% (2/23) inhibitors didn't receive any medication, and 26.1% (6/23) inhibitors chose intermittent small dose FⅧ treatment; Among those patients who didn't received inhibitor eradication, 87.5%(7/8) patients with low titer inhibitor showed gradual disappearance, and the median time was 3 months; 84.6% (11/13) patients with high-titer inhibitors remained positive in 12-48 months showing a gradual decrease with time; 7.7% (1/13) high titer inhibitors showed gradual disappearance in 2 years. The annual traumatic and provoked bleeding frequency for joints, skin and soft tissue showed no difference after inhibitor formation.

CONCLUSION

Intensive F Ⅷ treatment was a risk factor for inhibitor formation. The inhibitor didn' t increase bleeding frequency in HA children.

First prospective report on immune tolerance in poor risk haemophilia A inhibitor patients with a single factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate in an observational immune tolerance induction study

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Development of neutralizing inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A treatment.

AIM

The ongoing, international, open-label, uncontrolled, observational immune tolerance induction (ObsITI) study evaluates ITI, the standard of care in patients with inhibitors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Forty-eight prospective patients in this interim analysis received a single plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized, FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) for ITI. According to recommended Bonn protocol, 'low responders' at ITI start (<5 BU) received 50-100 IU FVIII kg(-1) daily, or every other day; 'high responders' (≥5 BU) received 100 IU FVIII kg(-1) every 12 h.

RESULTS

Forty of 48 patients (83.3%), had at least one risk factor for poor ITI-prognosis at ITI start (i.e. age ≥7 years, >2 years since inhibitor diagnosis, inhibitor titre ≥10 BU at the start of ITI, or prior ITI failure). Nonetheless, 34 patients (70.8%) achieved complete success, 3 (6.3%) partial success, 1 (2.1%) partial response; ITI failed in 10 patients (20.8%), all with poor prognosis factors. All six low responders achieved complete success. ITI outcome was significantly associated with inhibitor titre level at ITI start (P = 0.0068), number of poor prognosis factors for ITI success (P = 0.0187), monthly bleeding rate during ITI (P = 0.0005) and peak inhibitor titre during ITI (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two of 35 high responder patients (62.9%) with ≥1 poor prognosis factor achieved complete success.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a single pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors and poor prognosis for ITI success.

Immune tolerance induction using a factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate (BIOSTATE), with or without immunosuppression, in Australian paediatric severe haemophilia A patients with high titre inhibitors: a multicentre, retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

It has been postulated that factor VIII (FVIII) products containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) may improve immune tolerance induction (ITI) success rate in patients with haemophilia A and poor prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a FVIII/VWF concentrate (BIOSTATE) for ITI in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA) and inhibitors, from January 2003 to December 2011 at 3 paediatric-only Haemophilia Treatment Centres in Australia. Response to ITI was assessed at or before 33 months and at completion of ITI. Fifteen male patients with SHA were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

BIOSTATE was used for primary ITI in 8 patients (2 years, range 1.1-11.5 years) and for salvage ITI in 7 patients (9.9 years, range 1.1-15.4). At the end of the observation period there were 11 patients who achieved a complete response with BIOSTATE after a median duration of 21 months (range 5-85 months); a partial response was achieved in 2 patients in whom ITI is ongoing. Therefore, the overall response rate was 86.6%. Two patients were deemed treatment failures: one due to non-compliance after 18 months of ITI and another in whom a partial response had not been achieved after 22 months of ITI.

CONCLUSION

BIOSTATE was well-tolerated and effective when used for primary or salvage ITI in this cohort of paediatric patients with SHA and a high-level inhibitor.