Pharmacokinetic properties of BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII

Switching from Sucrose-Formulated rFVIII to Octocog Alfa (BAY 81-8973) Prophylaxis Improves Bleed Outcomes in the LEOPOLD Clinical Trials

Introduction

Previous clinical trials established the efficacy and safety of sucrose-formulated recombinant factor (F) VIII (rFVIII-FS/Kogenate FS®/Helixate FS®) and octocog alfa (BAY 81-8973/Kovaltry®; LEOPOLD trials).

Aim

To report the results of a post hoc subgroup analysis assessing efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with hemophilia A who were receiving rFVIII-FS prior to enrolling into the LEOPOLD I Part B and LEOPOLD Kids Part A clinical trials and switching to octocog alfa.

Methods

LEOPOLD I Part B (NCT01029340) and LEOPOLD Kids Part A (NCT01311648) were octocog alfa Phase 3, multinational, open-label studies in patients with severe hemophilia A aged 12-65 years and ≤12 years, respectively. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was the efficacy endpoint for both studies. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and development of FVIII inhibitors.

Results

Of the 113 patients in both LEOPOLD trials, 40 (35.4%) patients received rFVIII-FS prophylaxis pre-study and had data available for pre-study total ABR. In LEOPOLD I Part B (n = 22, 35.5%), median (Q1; Q3) total ABR decreased from 2.5 (0.0; 9.0) pre-study to 1.0 (0.0; 6.8), and from 1.0 (0.0; 6.0) pre-study to 0.0 (0.0; 6.02) in LEOPOLD Kids Part A (n = 18, 35.3%). Octocog alfa was well tolerated, and no patients had drug-related serious AEs or inhibitors.

Conclusion

Treatment with octocog alfa prophylaxis appeared to have a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with rFVIII-FS and thus could be an effective and improved alternative strategy for individualized treatment for children, adolescent and adult patients with severe hemophilia A currently on rFVIII-FS treatment.

Area under the curve: Comparing the value of factor VIII replacement therapies in haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

In factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis for haemophilia A, cost comparisons have used price per international unit (IU) based on the once reasonable assumption of equivalent outcome per IU. Now, with several extended half-life (EHL) products available, new outcome-oriented ways to compare products are needed. Area under the curve (AUC) quantifies FVIII levels over time after infusion providing comparable data.

AIM

To develop a decision analytical model for making indirect comparisons of FVIII replacement products based on AUC.

METHODS

A literature search identified 11 crossover studies with relevant pharmacokinetic data. A common comparator FVIII level curve was calculated using pooled data from selected studies. Absolute curves for other products were estimated based on relative differences to the common comparator (% difference vs the anchor). Three scenarios were investigated: (1) Kogenate^® versus Kovaltry^® and Jivi^® ; (2) Advate^® versus Elocta^® , NovoEight^® , Kovaltry, Adynovate^® , Afstyla^® , and ReFacto^® ; and (3) Jivi versus Elocta, Adynovate, and Kogenate. Sensitivity analyses investigated effects of assay type and dose.

RESULTS

In scenario 1, Jivi (+50%) and Kovaltry (+14%) showed larger AUCs versus Kogenate. In scenario 2, EHL products, Elocta and Adynovate, had the largest AUC (+64% and +58%, respectively) versus Advate. Compared with all other products in scenario 3, Jivi had the largest AUC by +13%-28%.

CONCLUSION

This analysis concludes that EHL products differ in relative AUC, have a larger AUC compared with standard half-life, and thus, different FVIII levels over time after infusion. This model may aid decision makers in the absence of head-to-head data.

Current Understanding of Inherited Modifiers of FVIII Pharmacokinetic Variation

The inherited bleeding disorder hemophilia A involves the quantitative deficiency of the coagulation cofactor factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A patients with FVIII concentrates aims to reduce the frequency of spontaneous joint bleeding and requires personalized tailoring of dosing regimens to account for the substantial inter-individual variability of FVIII pharmacokinetics. The strong reproducibility of FVIII pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics between repeat analyses in the same individual suggests this trait is genetically regulated. While the influence of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) levels, ABO blood group, and patient age on FVIII PK is well established, estimates suggest these factors account for less than 35% of the overall variability in FVIII PK. More recent studies have identified genetic determinants that modify FVIII clearance or half-life including VWF gene variants that impair VWF-FVIII binding resulting in the accelerated clearance of VWF-free FVIII. Additionally, variants in receptors that regulate the clearance of FVIII or the VWF-FVIII complex have been associated with FVIII PK. The characterization of genetic modifiers of FVIII PK will provide mechanistic insight into a subject of clinical significance and support the development of personalized treatment plans for patients with hemophilia A.

Pharmacokinetic parameter driven outcomes model predicts a reduction in bleeding events associated with BAY 81-8973 versus antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method in a Chinese healthcare setting

Background

Long-term prophylactic therapy is considered the standard of care for hemophilia A patients. This study models the long-term clinical and cost outcomes of two factor VIII (FVIII) products using a pharmacokinetic (PK) simulation model in a Chinese population.

Methods

Head-to-head PK profile data of BAY 81–8973 (KOVALTRY®) and antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM, ADVATE®) were applied to a two-state (alive and dead) Markov model to simulate blood FVIII concentrations at a steady state in prophylactically-treated patients with hemophilia A. Worsening of the Pettersson score was simulated and decline was associated with the probability of having orthopaedic surgery. The only difference between the compounds was FVIII concentration at a given time; each subject was treated with 25 IU/kg every 3 days. The model used a lifetime horizon, with cycle lengths of 1 year.

Results

Cumulative bleeding events, joint bleeding events, and major bleeding events were reduced by 19.3% for BAY 81–8973 compared to rAHF-PFM. Hospitalizations and hospitalization days were also reduced by 19.3% for BAY 81–8973 compared to rAHF-PFM. BAY 81–8973 resulted in both cost savings and a gain in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to rAHF-PFM.

Conclusion

Based on modeled head-to-head comparisons, differences in PK-properties between BAY 81–8973 and rAHF-PFM result in a reduced number of bleeding events, leading to reduced costs and increased quality of life for BAY 81–8973. These results should be used to inform clinical practice in China when caring for patients with severe hemophilia A.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01659-w.

Enhanced pharmacokinetics and reduced bleeds in boys with hemophilia A after switching to Kovaltry from other standard half-life factor VIII concentrates

Background

BAY81-8973 (Kovaltry; Bayer, Berkeley, CA, USA) was reported with enhanced pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles compared with some other standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. Limited head-to-head comparative studies were conducted in a real-world setting.

Objective

To make head-to-head comparisons of PK and clinical outcomes between Kovaltry and three other SHL FVIII concentrates.

Methods

Forty-seven boys with severe hemophilia A were enrolled and divided into three groups according to their previously used FVIII concentrates (Kogenate FS, N = 22; Advate, N = 14; GreenMono, N = 11). Two separate PK tests were conducted in each participant with a five-point assay during the study period from 6 months before switching to 6 months after switching. FVIII levels were detected by one-stage assay, and PK profiles were calculated by noncompartmental assay. Annualized bleeding rates were collected through participant' bleed logs.

Results

Longer half-life time (Kogenate FS group: 14.4 vs 11.9 hours, P < .0001; Advate group: 13.4 vs 9.7 hours, P < .0001; GreenMono group: 15.1 vs 10.7 hours, P < .001]) and lower clearance (Kogenate FS group: 3.3 vs 3.9 mL/kg/h, P < .01; Advate group: 3.7 vs 5.9 mL/kg/h, P < .01; GreenMono group: 3.0 vs 5.1 mL/kg/h, P < .01) were observed with Kovaltry. In addition, longer mean residential time (P < .01) and higher area under the curve (P < .01) were demonstrated. No statistical difference was found in in vivo recovery between Kovaltry and the other FVIII products. Participants who switched to Kovaltry from three other FVIII concentrates with the same dosing regimens obtained higher trough FVIII levels and better protection with reduced annualized bleeding rates.

Conclusion

Compared with Kogenate FS, Advate, and GreenMono, Kovaltry showed enhanced PK profiles, which contributed to reduced bleeding rates.

Clinical outcome and adherence rate in Scandinavian patients with intermediate-intensity prophylaxis before and after the switch of standard half-life FVIII products to BAY 81-8973

INTRODUCTION

Treatment optimization in haemophilia A can be achieved by choice of FVIII product and knowledge of pharmacokinetics (PK), phenotype and adherence. A favourable PK profile of BAY 81-8973 (octocog alfa) (Kovaltry, Bayer AB) compared to other standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products has been suggested.

AIM

To evaluate whether the switch to BAY 81-8973, using the same dosing schedule, impact factor consumption and bleed rates, taking arthropathy and adherence into account METHODS: Forty patients on prophylaxis with SHL (median age 40.5 years) attending the haemophilia treatment centres in Malmö and Oslo were enrolled. The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and joint bleeding rate (AJBR) before and after the switch to BAY 81-8973 was calculated. PK analyses were performed with WAPPS-Hemo. Joint health status and treatment adherence were assessed.

RESULTS

The median ABR and AJBR was 0 before and after the switch, at both centres. The median yearly factor consumption was 3,345 IU/Kg/year in the entire study group corresponding to intermediate-intensity prophylaxis in most patients and with significantly more used in Malmö (3,862 IU/Kg/year), compared to Oslo (2,337 IU/Kg/year) (P .006). There was no correlation between arthropathy and bleeding. The median BAY 81-8973 t½ was 20 h (range 7.5-29 h), with significant correlation to VWF levels, and 13.4 h after exclusion of VWF outliers. Adherence to treatment was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrate switch, using mainly intermediate-intensity regimens with high adherence rates, preserves excellent prophylaxis outcome using standard half-life FVIII products, indicating the value of individualized prophylaxis and close follow-up.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Pharmacokinetic study of Kovaltry in thirty-five pediatric patients aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Kovaltry (BAY81-8973) is an unmodified full-length factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate that enhances the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles as compared to some other standard half-life time FVIII concentrates. However, the PK of Kovaltry in haemophiliac patients aged <12 years has not been reported previously.

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of Kovaltry in 35 paediatric patients aged <12 years.

METHODS

A total of 35 boys with severe haemophilia A were enrolled from August 2019 to May 2020 in Beijing Children's Hospital. After 72-hour washout, PK tests were performed post-infusion of 50 IU/kg Kovaltry in a five-timepoint assay. WinNonlin software was used to generate individual PK parameters. The dose, frequency and bleeding details were collected within the first 6 months after switching to Kovaltry from other FVIII concentrates.

RESULTS

Compared to the blood group O, patients with blood group non-O showed longer mean half-life (t_1/2 ) (p < .01), lower mean clearance (CL) (p = .01) and similar in vivo recovery (IVR) (p = .51). Higher von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) level was correlated to longer t_1/2 (p < .0001) and lower CL (p < .01). IVR was correlated to body mass index (BMI) (p < .0001). Patients with trough level >3 IU/dL demonstrated lower annual bleeding rate (ABR) (p < .01), annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) (p < .01) and annual spontaneous bleeding rate (ASBR) (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study firstly reported the PK profiles of Kovaltry in 35 paediatric patients <12 years old. The great inter-individual variability of PK parameters was also confirmed in these patients. VWF:Ag and blood group were major influencing factors of t_1/2 and CL of Kovaltry, while BMI was a vital predictor for IVR. Patients with high trough FVIII level in routine prophylaxis had reduced bleeding rates.

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study

OBJECTIVES

To report interim data from TAURUS, a study assessing real-world prophylactic treatment with unmodified, full-length recombinant FVIII BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry^® ; Bayer) indicated for haemophilia A.

METHODS

TAURUS (NCT02830477) is an international, open-label, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study with a one-year observation period (target N = 350). Patients have moderate or severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤5% or ≤1%) and ≥50 exposure days to any FVIII product. Clinician- and patient-reported outcomes are captured on previous product use, changes in prophylaxis dose and dosing frequency, FVIII consumption, reported bleeding rates, treatment satisfaction and adherence, pharmacokinetic (PK) data (if available) and safety data.

RESULTS

At cut-off, baseline data were available from 160 patients (89 had ≥6 months of follow-up data). Most patients had severe haemophilia A (85%), infused BAY 81-8973 ≥ 3×/wk (59%) and experienced a median number of total bleeds of 2.0 (non-annualised; 246 days median documentation period). Good levels of treatment satisfaction (Hemo-SAT_A,P ) and adherence (VERITAS-Pro) were maintained. TAURUS demonstrated a favourable PK profile of BAY 81-8973 in comparison with other standard half-life rFVIIIs and supported the WAPPS PopPK model. No patients developed inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

TAURUS data demonstrate effective prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973 in the real world without compromising patient satisfaction or adherence.

Continued benefit demonstrated with BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis in previously treated children with severe haemophilia A: Interim analysis from the LEOPOLD Kids extension study

INTRODUCTION

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®), a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product, was efficacious and well tolerated in paediatric previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A for ≥50 exposure days (EDs) in the LEOPOLD Kids study. Because long-term prophylaxis (≥100 EDs) can provide substantial patient benefits, FVIII products should demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy.

AIM

To demonstrate long-term (≥100 EDs) efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 in paediatric PTPs.

METHODS

PTPs aged ≤12 years with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors could continue in the ongoing open-label extension study after completing ≥50 EDs in the LEOPOLD Kids main study. Patients received BAY 81-8973 for prophylaxis (25-50 IU/kg ≥2×/week), bleed treatment, and surgery. Bleeds were documented in electronic patient diaries. Inhibitor development was monitored every 6 months.

RESULTS

At the August 2017 interim data cutoff, 46 patients (median [range] age at enrolment, 6.0 [1.0-11.0] years) had spent a median (range) of 602.5 (148-1069) EDs and 4.6 (1.0-5.9) years in the main plus extension studies. Median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) annualised bleeding rate for bleeds within 48 h after a prophylaxis infusion and total bleeds was 1.0 (0.2; 1.9) and 2.0 (0.4; 3.6), respectively. Most (>94%) bleeds were mild or moderate; 71.8% were treated with ≤1 infusion. BAY 81-8973 was also well tolerated with only one treatment-related adverse event (transient, low-titre inhibitor which did not require treatment adjustment).

CONCLUSION

BAY 81-8973 was efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds during >4.5 years in paediatric PTPs with severe haemophilia A.

BAY 81-8973 demonstrated efficacy, safety and joint status improvement in patients with severe haemophilia A in the LEOPOLD I extension for ≤2 years

OBJECTIVES

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry^® ), a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII, provided excellent bleeding control for patients with haemophilia A in the pivotal 1-year LEOPOLD I trial. The LEOPOLD I extension evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis.

METHODS

After completing LEOPOLD I, patients continued receiving 20-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 two- or three-times weekly in the extension. Outcomes included annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and haemostasis during surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients aged 12-65 years participated in the extension. Median (range) exposure days during the 2-year total study period was 309 (115-355). No patient switched regimens. Median (Q1; Q3) ABR for all bleeds was 2.0 (1.0; 6.1) during the pivotal study, 2.0 (0.0; 5.2) during the extension, and 2.0 (0.5; 5.5) combined. The proportion of joint bleeds affecting target joints decreased (pivotal study: 90.9%, extension: 60.0%). Haemostasis was assessed as excellent/good in all five major surgeries. One serious adverse event (myocardial infarction) occurred in a patient with cardiovascular risk factors. No patients developed inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis efficacy outcomes in the pivotal study were maintained or, in the case of joint protection, improved during the extension, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with previous experience.

Status of Recombinant Factor VIII Concentrate Treatment for Hemophilia a in Italy: Characteristics and Clinical Benefits

The current interest in recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products stems from the fact that they offer a technological solution to prolonging the half-life of and reducing the risk of formation of alloantibodies (inhibitors) against FVIII in treated patients with hemophilia A (HA). The Italian health care system has authorized the use of a wide range of rFVIII concentrates of the first, second, and third generation, as well as new innovative rFVIII preparates with an extended half-life (EHL) (Kogenate FS®-Bayer, belonging to the second generation and replaced since 2017 by a product consisting of the same modified molecule; because it is only available until the end of the current year, it will not be considered in this review). Some of these products have unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, including an EHL. The first-generation full-length rFVIII (FL-rFVIII), octocog alfa (Recombinate® Baxter/BIOVIIIx), although the oldest rFVIII product, has several desirable features. Third-generation products include two modified octocog alfa molecules (Advate®, Shire; Kovaltry®, Bayer) as well as the B domain-deleted rFVIII (BDD-rFVIII) moroctocog alfa (ReFacto®-Pfizer). The B domain-truncated (BDT-rFVIII) turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®, Novo Nordisk), the BDD-rFVIII simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®, Kedrion), the single-chain BDT-rVIII lonoctocog alfa (Afstyla®, CSL Behring), and the BDD-rFVIIIFc efmoroctocog alfa (Elocta®, Sobi-Biogen) are new, innovative products. Simoctocog alfa, because its peculiarities, is considered a fourth-generation rFVIII concentrate. Turoctocog alfa, simoctocog alfa, and lonoctocog alfa have a high affinity for von Willebrand factor (vWF) that reduces renal clearance and prolongs the half-life of rFVIII. Efmoroctocog alfa, a first-in-class rFVIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), has a half-life 1.5–1.8 times longer than that of conventional plasma-derived FVIII (pd-rFVIII) and other rFVIII products. Clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy, safety, and inhibitor development of all these innovative concentrates in both previously treated (PTPs) and untreated patients (PUPs). This review considers the rFVIII products that are indicated for the treatment of patients with severe HA, focusing on those that are commercially available in Italy. Their PK characteristics, immunogenicity, and clinical benefits are discussed and compared.

Clinical practice of personalized prophylaxis in hemophilia: Illustrations of experiences and benefits from two continents

These cases of people with hemophilia (PWH) illustrate the importance of understanding the patient's expectations and desires and adapting treatment to meet these needs, in addition to traditional clinical targets. Population PK modeling and FVIII products with improved PK profiles provide the opportunity to individualize care and improve long-term outcomes.

Increased branching and sialylation of N-linked glycans correlate with an improved pharmacokinetic profile for BAY 81-8973 compared with other full-length rFVIII products

Background

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry) is an unmodified full-length recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) for treatment of hemophilia A. The BAY 81-8973 manufacturing process results in a product of enhanced purity with a consistently high degree of branching and sialylation of N-linked glycans. This study evaluated whether a relationship exists between N-linked glycosylation patterns of BAY 81-8973 and two other rFVIII (sucrose-formulated rFVIII [rFVIII-FS; Kogenate FS]) and antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM; Advate) and their pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics.

Materials and methods

N-linked glycans or terminal carbohydrates were enzymatically removed from immobilized BAY 81-8973, rFVIII-FS, and rAHF-PFM proteins and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography to determine the percentage of individual N-linked glycan structures and degree of sialylation of each structure. PK data were available from two separate phase 1 crossover studies in which the PK profile of BAY 81-8973 was compared with that of rFVIII-FS (n=26) and rAHF-PFM (n=18) in patients with severe hemophilia A who received a single 50 IU/kg dose of each product.

Results

BAY 81-8973 and rFVIII-FS had increased N-linked glycan branching with higher levels of sialylation compared with rAHF-PFM. Levels of trisialylated glycans were 29.0% for BAY 81-8973 vs 11.5% for rFVIII-FS and 4.8%-5.5% for rAHF-PFM; tetrasialylated glycans were 12.0% vs 2.8% and 0.6%, respectively. Degree of sialylation was 96% for BAY 81-8973, 94% for rFVIII-FS, and 78%-81% for rAHF-PFM. Based on chromogenic assay results from the single-dose phase 1 PK studies, BAY 81-8973 half-life was 15% longer than that for rFVIII-FS and 16% longer than rAHF-PFM.

Conclusion

Increased N-glycan branching and sialylation were seen for BAY 81-8973 vs rFVIII-FS and rAHF-PFM. Improved PK for BAY 81-8973 relative to rFVIII-FS and rAHF-PFM as seen in single-dose crossover PK studies might be related to this greater level of branching and sialylation, which can prolong the time BAY 81-8973 remains in the circulation.

BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A: product review

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry^®) is an unmodified, full-length recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) approved for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. The amino acid sequence for BAY 81-8973 is identical to that of sucrose-formulated rFVIII (rFVIII-FS; Kogenate^® FS/KOGENATE^®, Bayer), but the two products differ in their manufacturing approaches. The manufacture of BAY 81-8973 includes several modifications and enhancements, such as the introduction of the gene for human heat shock protein 70, a molecular chaperone protein that facilitates folding of proteins; no addition of human- or animal-derived proteins in the cell culture, purification process, or final formulation; and use of a 20-nm filter to remove any potential aggregates and pathogens. BAY 81-8973 was extensively studied in the LEOPOLD clinical development program, which enrolled participants of all age groups (children, adolescents, and adults) with severe hemophilia A. The pharmacokinetic profile of BAY 81-8973 was shown to be noninferior to, and for some variables more favorable than, rFVIII-FS and another commercial full-length rFVIII product. BAY 81-8973 was shown to be efficacious when used for prophylaxis, on-demand treatment, and perioperative hemostasis. The efficacious prophylaxis dose of BAY 81-8973 was approximately 20-40 IU/kg given two or three times per week, which achieved low annualized bleeding rates. Either the one-stage or the chromogenic assay provides accurate measurements for postinfusion monitoring of BAY 81-8973 levels, with no product-specific calibration standard needed. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was ⩽7% across all LEOPOLD studies, and no previously treated patient developed anti-BAY 81-8973 inhibitors in the completed primary studies.

Improved Pharmacokinetics with BAY 81-8973 Versus Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) Plasma/Albumin-Free Method: A Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Background

BAY 81-8973 is a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM)

Patients/Methods

In this phase I, open-label, crossover study, men aged 18–65 years with severe hemophilia A and ≥150 exposure days to FVIII were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or rAHF-PFM, followed by crossover to a single infusion of the other treatment. FVIII levels were measured in plasma over 48 h using one-stage and chromogenic assays. PK parameters, including area under the curve from time zero to the last data point (AUC_last; primary outcome) and half-life (t_½) were calculated. A population PK model was developed to simulate various treatment scenarios.

Results

Eighteen patients were randomized and analyzed. Using both assays, geometric mean (coefficient of variation [%CV]) AUC_last was significantly higher, and t_½ was significantly longer, for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM (one-stage, AUC_last: 1660 IU·h/dL [29.4] vs. 1310 IU·h/dL [29.0], p < 0.0001; one-stage, t_½: 14.5 [25.7] vs. 11.7 h [27.3], p < 0.0001). Simulations showed that median time to 1 IU/dL was approximately 27% longer for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM over doses of 25–50 IU/kg; plasma levels >1 IU/dL could be maintained with 14.4 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or 39.1 IU/kg rAHF-PFM 3×/week.

Conclusions

BAY 81-8973 showed a superior PK profile versus rAHF-PFM. The same FVIII trough threshold level could be achieved with lower doses of BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02483208.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The prevention of bleeding by prophylactic factor replacement is the recommended approach for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis should be individualized to provide the best clinical benefit to each patient. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic approach is crucial. Areas covered: This review aims to concisely describe the basic principles of pharmacokinetics of FVIII, the role of population pharmacokinetic, the available different recombinant FVIII concentrates and the new extended half-life FVIII molecules with possible improvement in hemophilia A treatment. Expert opinion: Pharmacokinetic is a useful tool to predict the outcome of replacement therapy, even though a large inter-individual variability exists, becauseof several factors: age, weight, von Willebrand factor level, blood group, active bleed, presence of inhibitors to FVIII, FVIII concentrate. Among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates pharmacokinetic differences are minor and clinically not significant. The extended half-life FVIII products brings only moderate advances, as half life extension is limited to 1.5-1.8-fold in comparison to that of native FVIII. Thus, infusions could be done every fourth, rarely fifth day to ensure a safe through level and a significant benefit can be offered only to patients treated every other day or three times weekly.

Current and emerging factor VIII replacement products for hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is a congenital X-linked bleeding disorder caused by coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. Routine infusion of factor replacement products is the current standard of care; however, the development of alloantibodies against FVIII remains a challenge. The treatment of hemophilia has undergone major advances over the past century to improve safety, effectiveness, manufacturing, and convenience of factor products. Major recent advances in the treatment of hemophilia A include the emergence of extended half-life products, factor VIII orthologs, and gene therapy products. Extended half-life products were designed to decrease the frequency of infusions, but only modest half-life extension is achieved. Factor VIII orthologs featuring lower cross-reactivity with anti-FVIII antibodies may be less susceptible to inactivation by inhibitors. Meanwhile, gene therapy may potentially provide a cure for hemophilia A, thus abrogating the need for protein-based factor replacement. This review aims to discuss current and emerging FVIII replacement products for hemophilia A.

Population pharmacokinetic characterization of BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII: lessons learned - importance of including samples with factor VIII levels below the quantitation limit

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and efficacy of BAY 81-8973, a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII), were evaluated in the LEOPOLD trials.

AIM

The aim of this study was to develop a population PK model based on pooled data from the LEOPOLD trials and to investigate the importance of including samples with FVIII levels below the limit of quantitation (BLQ) to estimate half-life.

METHODS

The analysis included 1535 PK observations (measured by the chromogenic assay) from 183 male patients with haemophilia A aged 1-61 years from the 3 LEOPOLD trials. The limit of quantitation was 1.5 IU dL^-1 for the majority of samples. Population PK models that included or excluded BLQ samples were used for FVIII half-life estimations, and simulations were performed using both estimates to explore the influence on the time below a determined FVIII threshold.

RESULTS

In the data set used, approximately 16.5% of samples were BLQ, which is not uncommon for FVIII PK data sets. The structural model to describe the PK of BAY 81-8973 was a two-compartment model similar to that seen for other FVIII products. If BLQ samples were excluded from the model, FVIII half-life estimations were longer compared with a model that included BLQ samples.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to assess the importance of BLQ samples when performing population PK estimates of half-life for any FVIII product. Exclusion of BLQ data from half-life estimations based on population PK models may result in an overestimation of half-life and underestimation of time under a predetermined FVIII threshold, resulting in potential underdosing of patients.

BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII: manufacturing processes and product characteristics

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry^® , Bayer, Berkeley, CA, USA) is an unmodified, full-length recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) approved for prophylaxis and on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A. The BAY 81-8973 manufacturing process is based on the process used for sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS), with changes and enhancements made to improve production efficiency, further augment pathogen safety, and eliminate animal- and human-derived raw materials from the production processes. The baby hamster kidney cell line used for BAY 81-8973 was developed by introducing the gene for human heat shock protein 70 into the rFVIII-FS cell line, a change that improved cell line robustness and productivity. Pathogen safety was enhanced by including a 20-nm filtration step, which can remove viruses, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents and potential protein aggregates. No human- or animal-derived proteins are added to the cell culture process, purification or final formulation. The BAY 81-8973 manufacturing process results in a product of enhanced purity with a consistently high degree of sialylation of N-linked glycans on the molecular surface. The innovative manufacturing techniques used for BAY 81-8973 yield an effective rFVIII product with a favourable safety profile for treatment of haemophilia A.

Analysis of the Japanese subgroup in LEOPOLD II: a phase 2/3 study of BAY 81-8973, a new recombinant factor VIII product

BAY 81-8973, a new full length recombinant FVIII product, has been developed for prophylaxis and on-demand therapy in patients with hemophilia A. LEOPOLD II was a phase 2/3 study comparing prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with BAY 81-8973. The analysis herein evaluated the clinical profile in Japanese subjects enrolled in LEOPOLD II. The LEOPOLD II was an open-label randomized crossover study. Our analysis evaluated the efficacy using the annualized bleeding rate, safety, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese subjects with severe hemophilia A enrolled in LEOPOLD II. The median annualized bleeding rate was 59.9/year in the on-demand group and 1.9/year in the prophylaxis group for Japanese subjects. There were no study drug-related adverse events in the Japanese subjects. None of the subjects developed FVIII inhibitors. There were no apparent clinical differences in efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics between the Japanese and the non-Japanese subjects. Data for the Japanese subjects showed annualized bleeding rates to be remarkably lower in the prophylaxis group compared to the on-demand group and that BAY 81-8973 exhibited a good safety profile and tolerability. These results were similar for the non-Japanese subjects. The results support adoption of BAY 81-8973 for treatment of Japanese subjects with severe hemophilia A.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of hemophilia A and B

INTRODUCTION

Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates is the most appropriate and effective way to treat bleedings of Hemophilia A&B to prevent chronic arthropathy. Unfortunately, the short half-life (HL) of FVIII/IX concentrates obliges the patients to receive frequent infusions, a big concern for children. The development of inhibitors in about 30-45% of hemophilia A and in 3-5% of hemophilia B patient is the major adverse event of replacement therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In the last few years, new rFIX have been developed with HL. New rFVIII concentrates are displaying small increase of PK characteristics. The new bio-engineering methods allowed the production of molecules fused with Fc fragment of IgG or Albumin or linked to PEG. A new approach to improve hemostasis is represented by Mab against TFPI and small RNA interfering with Antithrombin synthesis. Another innovative drug seems to be the new bi-specific antibody which mimics FVIII function in linking FXa and FX to tenase production.

EXPERT OPINION

The emerging drugs for hemophilia treatment seem to be very promising. The extended half-life will improve the adherence of patients to therapy. Accurate post-marketing surveillance studies will be necessary to check the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of these new molecules.

BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII: Human heat shock protein 70 improves the manufacturing process without affecting clinical safety

BAY 81-8973 is a full-length, unmodified recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) approved for the treatment of hemophilia A. BAY 81-8973 has the same amino acid sequence as the currently marketed sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) product and is produced using additional advanced manufacturing technologies. One of the key manufacturing advances for BAY 81-8973 is introduction of the gene for human heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) into the rFVIII-FS cell line. HSP70 facilitates proper folding of proteins, enhances cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis, and potentially impacts rFVIII glycosylation. HSP70 expression in the BAY 81-8973 cell line along with other manufacturing advances resulted in a higher-producing cell line and improvements in the pharmacokinetics of the final product as determined in clinical studies. HSP70 protein is not detected in the harvest or in the final BAY 81-8973 product. However, because this is a new process, clinical trial safety assessments included monitoring for anti-HSP70 antibodies. Most patients, across all age groups, had low levels of anti-HSP70 antibodies before exposure to the investigational product. During BAY 81-8973 treatment, 5% of patients had sporadic increases in anti-HSP70 antibody levels above a predefined threshold (cutoff value, 239 ng/mL). No clinical symptoms related to anti-HSP70 antibody development occurred. In conclusion, addition of HSP70 to the BAY 81-8973 cell line is an innovative technology for manufacturing rFVIII aimed at improving protein folding and expression. Improved pharmacokinetics and no effect on safety of BAY 81-8973 were observed in clinical trials in patients with hemophilia A.

Efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII: results from the LEOPOLD I trial

INTRODUCTION

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry(®) ) is a full-length, unmodified recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) with the same amino acid sequence as sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII and is produced using additional advanced manufacturing technologies.

AIM

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of BAY 81-8973 for treatment of bleeds and as prophylaxis based on two different potency assignments.

METHODS

In LEOPOLD I (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01029340), males aged 12-65 years with severe haemophilia A and ≥150 exposure days received BAY 81-8973 20-50 IU kg(-1) two or three times per week for 12 months. Potency was based on chromogenic substrate assay per European Pharmacopoeia and label adjusted to mimic one-stage assay potency. Patients were randomized for potency sequence and crossed over potency groups after 6 months, followed by an optional 12-month extension. Primary efficacy endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Patients also received BAY 81-8973 during major surgeries.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients received BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and were included in the analysis. Median ABR was 1.0 (quartile 1, 0; quartile 3, 5.1) without clinically relevant differences between potency periods. Median ABR was similar for twice-weekly vs. three times-weekly dosing (1.0 vs. 2.0). Haemostasis was maintained during 12 major surgeries. Treatment-related adverse event (AE) incidence was ≤7% overall; no patient developed inhibitors. One patient with risk factors for cardiovascular disease developed a myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

BAY 81-8973 was efficacious in preventing and treating bleeding episodes, irrespective of the potency assignment method, with few treatment-related AEs. Caution should be used when treating older patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Chromogenic assay for BAY 81-8973 potency assignment has no impact on clinical outcome or monitoring in patient samples

Essentials Discrepancies can exist in factor VIII activity measured by the one-stage or chromogenic assays. LEOPOLD trial data were used to assess clinical impact of BAY 81-8973 potency assignment assay. Efficacy was not affected by the assay used for potency assignment and dosing of BAY 81-8973. Either assay may be used to measure factor VIII activity after BAY 81-8973 infusion.

SUMMARY

Background Product-specific discrepancies have been reported for factor VIII (FVIII) activity determined with one-stage or chromogenic assays. Objective To assess the clinical impact of potency assignment of BAY 81-8973, a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human FVIII, by use of the chromogenic assay or chromogenic assay adjusted to mimic results obtained with the one-stage assay Patients/methods Patients aged 12-65 years with severe hemophilia A received BAY 81-8973 in LEOPOLD I (20-50 IU kg(-1) two or three times weekly [investigator decision]) and LEOPOLD II (randomized to 20-30 IU kg(-1) twice weekly, 30-40 IU kg(-1) three times weekly, or on-demand treatment). Both trials included two 6-month crossover periods in which potency labeling was determined with the chromogenic substrate assay as per the European Pharmacopoeia (CS/EP) or the chromogenic substrate assay adjusted to mimic results obtained with the one-stage assay (CS/ADJ). The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and FVIII incremental recovery were assessed by the use of pooled data. Results The analysis was perfomed on 121 patients. Median (quartile [Q] 1; Q3) ABRs during the CS/EP and CS/ADJ periods were 1.98 (0; 5.92) and 1.98 (0; 7.34), respectively. The mean incremental recovery was > 2 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) in both periods with the use of either assay for postinfusion FVIII measurements. The median (Q1; Q3) chromogenic/one-stage assay recovery ratio was 1.054 (0.892; 1.150) for the CS/EP period when a plasma standard was used for calibration. Conclusions No impact on the ABR was observed with chromogenic-based as compared with one-stage assay-based potency and dosing. Either assay may be used to determine FVIII plasma activity after infusion of BAY 81-8973 without the need for a product-specific standard.