Knowledge and attitudes survey in bleeding disorders providers regarding pain

Understanding the Pain Management Landscape within the US Bleeding Disorder Community: A Multi-Center Survey

Objectives

Pain is a known complication in persons with hemophilia (PWH) as a result of muscle and joint bleeding. Little is known regarding national Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) practice patterns related to pain management. The aim of this study was to: 1) Describe pain management practice patterns of HTC providers, 2) Identify gaps and areas of alignment with the CDC pain guidelines, and 3) Address educational opportunities for pain management. This survey is the first extensive description of multidisciplinary practice patterns of pain management for PWH.

Methods

This descriptive study involved physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, physical therapists, and social workers from federally funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) eligible to complete an online survey exploring pain management practice patterns within the CDC pain guidelines.

Results

Results of this survey shed light on areas of strength and cohesiveness between HTC providers, including the following: dedication to effective pain management, utilization of non-pharmacological pain options, trial of non-opioid medications first before opioids, maintaining follow-up with patients after opioid prescription initiation, recognizing and utilizing clinically important findings before prescribing opioids, and counseling their patients regarding potential risk factors.

Conclusions

There remain opportunities to incorporate into clinical practice consistent use of tools such as formal screening questionnaires, opioid use agreements, written measurable goals, ongoing prescription monitoring, and written plans for discontinuation of opioid therapy. These results provide opportunities for improvement in education of HTC team members thus optimizing pain management in persons with bleeding disorders.

Pain assessment and management in Italian Haemophilia Centres

BACKGROUND

Although the widespread use of factor VIII/IX replacement therapy has significantly reduced the severity of arthropathy in persons with haemophilia (PWH), some develop degenerative joint changes, associated with significant pain. The aim of this survey was to investigate the management and perception of pain among Italian physicians who treat PWH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September and October 2017, a questionnaire was distributed to 35 Italian haemophilia treatment centres (60 physicians).

RESULTS

Fifty-three haemophilia specialists completed the survey. We found that there was good agreement (98.1%) on the need to investigate pain at each clinical visit, but there was heterogeneity in the opinions of haemophilia specialists with regards to the availability of validated guidelines (35.8%) and whether pain specialists should be a part of the comprehensive care team in daily clinical practice (58.5%). Haemophilia specialists also agreed pain should be evaluated using a rating scale validated in PWH (88.7%). Pain was mainly managed by the haemophilia specialists themselves, supported by a physiatrist and physiotherapist, while a pain specialist was only involved in 26.4% of cases. The combination of paracetamol with tramadol or codeine was the most common first-line treatment, while cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids were less commonly used.

DISCUSSION

There are some unmet needs in Italy regarding pain management for PWH and the management of pain in these patients by haemophilia specialists. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for these specialists to use, as well as a reluctance to involve pain specialists. The lack of spontaneous reporting of pain by PWH, despite using pain relief, highlights the need for clinicians to actively ask patients about any pain they may be experiencing.

Factors Related to Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain in Hospitals in Low-Income Areas

BACKGROUND

Effective pain management is closely related to nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pain. Limited studies have been performed related to nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pain in hospitals in low-income areas.

AIMS

This study surveyed the knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pain management in county hospitals from low-income areas in Hunan Province, China.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 4,668 registered nurses working in 48 county hospitals in low-income areas in China.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study examined the knowledge and attitudes of nurses with regard to pain using the Chinese version of the Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) via the WeChat application.

RESULTS

The 4,668 registered nurses completed the survey; of these, 43.6% indicated they had never received continuing education for pain. The mean percentage score for KASRP was (40.3 ± 7.95), and none of the respondents achieved a percentage score of >80%. Further, of the 40 items, only two had a correct rate of >80%. Continuing pain education did not significantly affect KASRP. Multiple stepwise linear regression showed that education level, ethnicity, professional title, position, and department were independent influencing factors for KASRP scores.

CONCLUSION

Almost all nurses in county hospitals of low-income areas had deficiencies in various aspects of pain management knowledge. Better educated nurses with higher professional title or management position, those from the Han ethnicity, and those from the oncology department had higher mean KASRP scores. Current continuing education programs for pain did not improve the pain management capability of the nurse. High-quality and standardized pain educational programs should be implemented to improve pain management.

U.K. hemophilia treaters' knowledge of risk assessment for prolonged bleeding associated with dental procedures

INTRODUCTION

Optimal delivery of dental care for adults with congenital bleeding disorders (CBD) requires close collaboration between hemophilia treaters and dentists.

AIM

To explore U.K. hemophilia treaters' knowledge of dental procedures and associated hemostatic management in adults with CBD.

METHOD

Staff (N = 180) from N = 60 hemophilia facilities in the United Kingdom were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based study using a web-based tool. The questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge, adherence and appropriateness of application of U.K. guidance on hemostatic management of common dental procedures.

RESULTS

The response rate was 23% of treaters (n = 41) from 62% (n = 32) hemophilia facilities. Individual participants (87%; n = 34) reported they adhered to guidelines, though knowledge of guidance was poor with only 36% (n = 15) applying guidance appropriately in 3 common dental scenarios. There was a tendency for participants to assign the use of systemic hemostatic measures independent of the agreed bleeding risk associated with the proposed dental procedure.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

While hemophilia treaters were aware of current guidelines, their knowledge of the guidelines and ability to risk assess dental procedures was poor. There was a tendency to overprescribe systemic hemostatic measures for dental procedures. Education initiatives to aid decision making are needed.