Optimization of home treatment in haemophilia: effects of transmural support by a haemophilia nurse on adherence and quality of life

The role of the specialist nurse in comprehensive care for bleeding disorders in Europe: An integrative review

INTRODUCTION

Managing bleeding disorders (BDs) is complex, requiring a comprehensive approach coordinated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Haemophilia nurses (HNs) play a central role in the MDT, frequently coordinating care. As novel treatments bring change to the treatment landscape, ongoing education and development is key. However, understanding of the roles and tasks of HNs is lacking.

AIM

The EAHAD Nurses Committee sought to identify and describe the roles and tasks of the European HN.

METHODS

A five-step integrative review was undertaken, including problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data synthesis and presentation. Relevant literature published from 2000 to 2022 was identified through database, hand and ancestry searching. Data were captured using extraction forms and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and seventy-seven articles were identified; 43 were included. Five main roles were identified, with varied and overlapping associated tasks: Educator, Coordinator, Supporter, Treater and Researcher. Tasks related to education, coordination and support were most frequently described. Patient education was often 'nurse-led', though education and coordination roles concerned both patients and health care practitioners (HCPs), within and beyond the MDT. The HN coordinates care and facilitates communication. Long-term patient care relationships place HNs in a unique position to provide support. Guidelines for HN core competencies have been developed in some countries, but autonomy and practice vary.

CONCLUSION

As the treatment landscape changes, all five main HN roles will be impacted. Despite national variations, this review provides a baseline to anticipate educational needs to enable HNs to continue to fulfil their role.

Quality of life in children and adolescents with hemophilia A: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various instruments have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents with hemophilia A.

Objective

We systematically reviewed the literature to summarize HRQoL measurement instruments and outcomes in this population.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS databases were searched. Studies published from 2010 to 2021, reporting HRQoL assessed by generic or hemophilia-specific instruments in individuals aged 0 to 18 years were included. Two independent reviewers performed screening, selection, and data abstraction. Data were meta-analyzed using the generic inverse variance method with the random-effects model for single-arm studies reporting instrument-specific mean total HRQoL scores. Prespecified subgroup meta-analyses were performed. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I 2 statistic.

Results

Six instruments were identified in 29 studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 4 generic instruments (PedsQL [5 studies], EQ-5D-3L [3 studies], KIDSCREEN-52 [1 study], and KINDL [1 study]) and 2 hemophilia-specific instruments (Haemo-QoL [17 studies] and CHO-KLAT [3 studies]). The overall risk of bias was moderate to low. There was a substantial variability in the primary outcome (mean total HRQoL score) among studies using the same instrument (Haemo-QoL), with scores ranging from 24.10 to 89.58 on a scale from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicating higher HRQoL). Meta-regression with 14 studies using the Haemo-QoL questionnaire demonstrated that 79.34% (R 2 ) of the observed 94.67% total heterogeneity (I 2 ) was explained by the proportion of patients receiving effective prophylactic treatment.

Conclusion

HRQoL assessment in young people with hemophilia A is heterogeneous and context specific. The proportion of patients on effective prophylactic treatment is positively correlated with HRQoL. The review protocol was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42021235453).

Nurse-led education of people with bleeding disorders and their caregivers: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

People with bleeding disorders (PwBd) and their caregivers face many challenges in developing viable self-management strategies for living with the condition. Nurse-led education can support them to overcome these challenges. However, it is often unclear what educational needs are addressed, how nurses educate PwBd and what didactic concepts they follow.

AIM

To gain deeper insights into nurse-led patient education in haemophilia care and provide a basis for a more systematic and evidence-based approach to this task.

METHODS

A scoping review methodology was used. A systematic search for relevant publications on this topic was conducted in various databases between November 2020 and April 2021. Data sets were analysed following the PRISMA-ScR-checklist and using content analysis.

RESULTS

Of 588 studies identified, 23 sources of evidence met the inclusion criteria. The educational needs of PwBd and their families are extensive, multifaceted, and variable but rarely assessed systematically. These needs were met at certain times throughout their lifetimes. Nurse-led education differed in content, duration, and modality, including interventions such as information, consultation and instruction. An improvement in treatment-oriented self-management and self-efficacy was the most reported outcome. The didactic concepts on which the educational interventions were based were rarely specified.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of systematic approaches in assessing and addressing the educational needs of PwBd and their caregivers. High variability was found in the literature regarding nurse-led patient education in haemophilia care. This suggests that more research is needed on this topic - not least on the interventions' conceptual foundations and impact models.

A tailored intervention for illness acceptance improves adherence and quality of life in adults with haemophilia using prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to prophylactic treatment (prophylaxis) in persons with haemophilia is challenging and has been reported at only ±50%. Acceptance problems are one of the main reasons for non-adherence in haemophilia. An evidence-based intervention was developed based on an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) approach.

AIM

To evaluate a tailored intervention focused on illness acceptance in adults with haemophilia who were prescribed prophylaxis.

METHODS

A pre-post study was executed in adults with haemophilia who were prescribed prophylaxis. A series of 8 2-hour group trainings were held, including 3-8 participants/series. Adherence (VERITAS-Pro, optimum 0), health-related quality of life (HRQoL, SF-36, optimum 100) and illness perception (BIPQ, optimum 0) were measured at start, after six months and 12 months and analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (median age 47 years, range 27-74) were included. After 12 months, adherence improved in 68% of patients, quality of life in 48% and illness perception in 31%. Adherence (total score) improved from 35 to 25 (P<0.01). HRQoL showed clinically relevant improvement in domains of social-functioning (P = 0.04), role-emotional, physical-functioning, role-physical and bodily pain. Illness perception improved statistically significant on domains of affect (P = 0.01), concern (P = 0.01) and understanding (P = 0.04). Patients evaluated the training useful, an eye-opener, a personal enrichment and insightful.

CONCLUSION

The tailored group intervention resulted in significant improvement of adherence, quality of life and illness perception. Based on our current experience, we have implemented it in clinical practice and collaborate with the patient association to make it available for all Dutch people with haemophilia.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Non-Malignant Hematology: A Systematic Review

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are questionnaires completed by patients or caregivers without influence by health care professionals. As such, PROMs show subjective health experiences, enhance the clinical information available to providers, and inform clinical action. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and list which validated PROMs have been used to monitor health-related quality of life in pediatric patients with nonmalignant hematology (hemophilia, immune thrombocytopenia, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia). Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, HaPI, CINAHL, and PsycTESTS) were searched to identify publications that validated or used PROMs as an outcome measure in the 4 disease groups. Overall, 209 articles met the inclusion criteria, identifying 113 PROMs. Of the 113 identified PROMs, 95 are generic and can be used in multiple disease groups. The Pediatric Quality of Life Generic Core Scales was the most frequently used generic PROM (68 studies). The 18 remaining PROMs were disease specific. The results of this review, together with the COSMIN tool for selecting outcome measures, will allow clinicians to evaluate the PROMs that are best suited to their patient population. In addition, the focus groups are currently being conducted with patients, parents, and clinicians to determine the optimal use of PROMs in the clinical environment.

Hemophilia prophylaxis adherence and bleeding using a tailored, frequency-escalated approach: The Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study

BACKGROUND

Standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A includes regular replacement of factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylaxis regimens using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII concentrates, while effective, are costly and require frequent intravenous infusions.

AIM

This study evaluated the adherence of 56 boys with severe hemophilia A to tailored, frequency-escalated prophylaxis with an SHL recombinant FVIII concentrate.

METHODS

We reviewed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of study subjects. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was calculated on a weekly basis, and bleeding rates were determined from self/proxy-reported bleeding logs. The primary outcome was adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen.

RESULTS

The median (range of values [ROV]) weekly adherence to prophylaxis was 85.7% (37.4%-99.8%). The median (ROV) adherent weeks on steps 1 (weekly), 2 (twice weekly), and 3 (alternate-day) were 92.9% (50%-100%), 80.3 (32%-96%), and 72.6% (14%-98%); relative to step 1, subjects were less likely to be adherent on steps 2 and 3 (P < 0.00). On step 1, our cohort had higher adherence than previously reported rates. The median (ROV) adherence to the breakthrough bleeding protocol was 47.1% (0%-100%). At any given time, bleeding risk was reduced by 15% for each 10% increase in adherence during the preceding 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90).

CONCLUSION

This cohort had high rates of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Initiating prophylaxis with once-weekly infusions facilitated adherence to the prophylaxis regimen in this cohort of boys with severe hemophilia A started on primary prophylaxis at a very young age.

Measuring therapeutic relationship in the care of patients with haemophilia: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a scoping review of the tools used to measure therapeutic relationship in patients with haemophilia.

BACKGROUND

Haemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of a clotting factor in the blood. Therapeutic relationship is foundational to the management of patients with chronic diseases like haemophilia. A reliable and valid measurement tool for assessing therapeutic relationship is needed to evaluate the quality of care received by these patients, and to rigorously study the association between therapeutic relationship and the outcomes of treatment.

METHODS

We adopted the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping studies. The following electronic databases were searched for studies that measured a construct related to therapeutic relationships in haemophilia care: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus. We inventoried these studies, identified the measurement tools used, and described each tool by purpose, content, measurement properties and target population. We identified gaps in the current evidence and directions for future research.

RESULTS

There were 253 unique records retrieved in the search, and twenty studies were deemed relevant. Ten measurement tools were identified. None of the tools measured therapeutic relationship as a single entity; however, six tools measured constructs considered part of patient-provider relationship (eg trust, communication, working alliance). There has been little validation testing of these tools in haemophilia patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for a validated tool for measuring therapeutic relationship in the care of patients with haemophilia. This review provides a foundation for future research in this area.

Categorizing factors of adherence to parenteral treatment in growth hormone deficiencies and hemophilia: What should be the targets for future research?

Adherence to treatment regimens in growth hormone dysregulations and hemophilia is related to better outcome and fewer complications over time. Subcutaneous growth hormone injection and intravenous blood factor replacement therapies are parenteral treatments with a comparable regimen calling for similar behavioral processes. Although we have lists of possible factors influencing adherence in these conditions, the evidence is scattered. The objective of this study was to systematically review empirical studies linking factors of adherence with measures of adherence. To categorize the factors, we used a taxonomy from the diabetes literature. We used four major electronic databases to identify articles. We synthesized 27 articles dated 2011-2017 corresponding to inclusion criteria. Results showed a consistent proportion of 20%-25% participants with adherent issues. Strong arguments pointed to the transition to self-care in pediatrics as a vulnerability period (7/27 reports). We found the domains of individual factors (<30% reports), relational factors (<13%), health care (<30%), to be understudied in comparison with that of demographic or clinical context (>74%), and practical issues (>37%). The results suggest that future research should focus on modifiable factors of adherence, with appropriate measurement and intervention strategies. One central methodological limitation of reviewed reports was the lack of longitudinal designs, and the quasi absence of behavioral trial targeting modifiable factors of adherence. A new research agenda should be set in these rare diseases as higher adherence should translate into improved outcome and better quality of life for patients and their families.