The outcomes of haemophilia and its treatment: why we need a core set

Outcome measures in hemophilia: current and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia can detrimentally affect patients' quality of life and likelihood of survival. In the evolving landscape of therapies, the therapeutic gain of each treatment must be understood to accurately position it in the therapeutic armamentarium. Accordingly, appropriate outcomes must be measured with appropriate tools.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review (PubMed search for 'hemophilia AND outcome' until June 2023), provides a compendium of outcome measures used in hemophilia clinical research. To define each outcome measure's relative value and applicability, several characteristics are critically discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bleeding assessment, first annual/annualized bleeding rate, remains central in evaluating the efficacy and safety of hemophilia treatments. As modern therapies improve clinical outcomes toward zero bleeding events, this endpoint may become less sensitive to detect differences between therapeutic approaches. Technological advancements necessitate the adaptation of outcome measures to address infrequent bleeding events, age-related comorbidities, and laboratory parameters with limited comparability after different treatments. Considerable effort has been dedicated to the development of tools that comprehensively assess coagulation, such as thrombin generation assays. Patient-reported outcome measures are gaining importance although limited by their subjectivity. A definitive set of research outcome measures remains elusive. Outcomes may need to be tailored to different therapeutic interventions.

Patient-relevant health outcomes for hemophilia care: Development of an international standard outcomes set

BACKGROUND

Patient-relevant health outcomes for persons with hemophilia should be identified and prioritized to optimize and individualize care for persons with hemophilia. Therefore, an international group of persons with hemophilia and multidisciplinary health care providers set out to identify a globally applicable standard set of health outcomes relevant to all individuals with hemophilia.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify possible health outcomes and risk adjustment variables. Persons with hemophilia and multidisciplinary health care providers were involved in an iterative nominal consensus process to select the most important health outcomes and risk adjustment variables for persons with hemophilia. Recommendations were made for outcome measurement instruments.

RESULTS

Persons with hemophilia were defined as all men and women with an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII or IX with plasma activity levels <40 IU/dL. We recommend collecting the following 10 health outcomes at least annually, if applicable: (i) cure, (ii) impact of disease on life expectancy, (iii) ability to engage in normal daily activities, (iv) severe bleeding episodes, (v) number of days lost from school or work, (vi) chronic pain, (vii) disease and treatment complications, (viii) sustainability of physical functioning, (ix) social functioning, and (x) mental health. Validated clinical as well as patient-reported outcome measurement instruments were endorsed. Demographic factors, baseline clinical factors, and treatment factors were identified as risk-adjustment variables.

CONCLUSION

A consensus-based international set of health outcomes relevant to all persons with hemophilia, and corresponding measurement instruments, was identified for use in clinical care to facilitate harmonized longitudinal monitoring and comparison of outcomes.

Clinical outcomes in hemophilia: Towards development of a core set of standardized outcome measures for research

INTRODUCTION

A lack of uniformity in the choice of outcome measurement in hemophilia care and research has led to studies with incomparable results. We identified a need to define core outcome measures for use in research and clinical care of persons with hemophilia.

OBJECTIVE

To move toward a core set of outcome measures for the assessment of persons with hemophilia in research and practice.

METHODS

A modified nominal groups process was conducted with an international group of hemophilia experts, including persons with hemophilia as follows. Step 1: item generation for all potential outcome measures. Step 2: survey where respondents voted on the relative importance and usefulness of each item. Steps 3/4: 2-day meeting where attendees voted for items they valued, followed by open discussion and a second round of voting. Step 5: survey where respondents selected their top five items from those with >50% agreement at the meeting.

RESULTS

The highest ranked items for the pediatric core set (% agreement) are treatment satisfaction (92.7%), joint health (83.3%), a measure of access to treatment (82.5%), a measure of treatment adherence (72.5%), and generic performance based physical function (72.1%). The highest ranked items for the adult core set (% agreement) are total bleeding events (88.1%), EuroQol five dimensions (85.4%), treatment adherence (82.1%), joint health (79.1%), and number/location of bleeds per unit time (78.6%).

CONCLUSION

This process generated a list of preferred outcome measures to consider for assessment in persons with hemophilia. This information now requires refinement to define optimal core sets for use in different clinical/research contexts.