von Willebrand disease Outreach into Integrated Care Education (VOICE): a call to action

Patient-centered care in von Willebrand disease: are we there yet?

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand Disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Paradoxically, affected individuals are often misdiagnosed and experience substantial diagnostic delay. There are sex-specific health disparities in VWD rooted in the stigmatization of vaginal bleeding, which leads to symptom dismissal, lack of timely access to care and lower health-related quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Following the core elements of patient-centered care - respect for patient preferences, values, and needs, we describe the current state of VWD care. Challenges of diagnostic delay, serial misrecognition of abnormal bleeding, and symptom dismissal are barriers that disproportionately affect women with VWD. These negative effects are further amplified in individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We describe the importance of coordinated multidisciplinary care, as well as the need for patient education and empowered self-advocacy.

EXPERT OPINION

While tremendous work has been done to improve the diagnosis and management of VWD, timely and high-quality research is urgently needed to address care gaps. Systemic changes such as resource investment, dedicated research funding for novel treatment modalities, and effective knowledge translation strategies to address structural barriers are needed to facilitate effective patient-centered care for VWD.

Quality of periprocedural care in patients with von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

While it has been shown that haemophilia patients receiving care at Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) experience decreased morbidity and mortality, little research has been done on the outcomes of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

AIM

To compare the quality of periprocedural care received by patients with VWD at HTCs and non-HTCs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review on all adult VWD patients undergoing an invasive procedure from 2015 to 2017. Quality of periprocedural care was measured using the following surrogate outcomes: periprocedural VWD-specific therapy use per 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines, procedural estimated blood loss (EBL), and post-procedure bleeding. Comparisons were performed according to the setting of care at the time of the invasive procedure, HTC versus non-HTC.

RESULTS

There were 668 invasive procedures performed on 305 patients, of which 8.2% were HTC cases. Non-type 1 VWD was more likely in HTC cases. VWD-specific therapy was used per NHLBI guidelines in 100% of HTC cases compared with 10.6% of non-HTC cases. Procedural EBL > = 100 ml was more likely to occur in HTC differences cases (OR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.25). There was no difference in post-procedure bleeding between the two groups (OR = 1.26, 95% CI, .20- 7.86).

CONCLUSION

Despite widespread periprocedural use of VWD-specific therapy outside established guidelines at non-HTCs, there was no difference in periprocedural bleeding. Possible explanations include diagnostic error, in disease severity and procedure types, and dataset limitations. Additional studies are needed to investigate this further and compare other patient care outcomes between HTCs and non-HTCs.

Potential Undiagnosed VWD Or Other Mucocutaneous Bleeding Disorder Cases Estimated From Private Medical Insurance Claims

Introduction

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder, but awareness among health care professionals is low. We estimated the number of cases of undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders among commercially insured patients in the United States with a recent history of bleeding events.

Methods

Patients with a VWD diagnosis who were users of or candidates for von Willebrand factor replacement were identified from the IMS PharMetrics Plus Database (2006–2015). We constructed a unary patient-finding model based on 12 prediagnosis variables that best defined this population, and applied this to undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events from the same database. Cases of symptomatic undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders in the commercially insured population were estimated from the “best fit” (positive predictive value [PPV] 83%) and “good fit” (PPV 75%) patients thus identified.

Results

Overall, 507,668 undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events were identified (86% female, 14% male). Application of the VWD model identified 3318 best-fit and 37,163 good-fit patients; 91% of best-fit patients were females aged <46 years, with heavy menstrual bleeding as the most common claim. Projection to the full commercially insured US population suggested that 35,000–387,000 patients may have symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders.

Discussion

Computer modeling suggests there may be a significant number of patients with symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorder in the commercially insured population. Enhanced awareness of VWD symptoms and their impact, and of screening and testing procedures, may improve the diagnosis of VWD and reduce disease burden.