The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single-dose and multiple-dose recombinant activated factor VII in patients with haemophilia A or B

The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of A Novel Recombinant Activated Human Factor VII, GEN-0828, in Hemophilia B Mice

GEN-0828, a proposed clinical candidate for hemophilia and trauma hemorrhage treatment, is a novel recombinant activated human factor VII (rFVIIa). The purpose of this paper is to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GEN-0828 in hemophilia B mice with those of NovoSeven®, the only marketed rFVIIa product worldwide., GEN-0828 and NovoSeven® showed similar affinity bioactivity to recombinant tissue factor (rTF) in vitro. Pharmacodynamics data indicated a generally similar hemostatic efficacy (ED₅₀) of GEN-0828 (10.91 KIU·kg^-1) and NovoSeven® (18.91 KIU·kg^-1) at the doses studied in hemophilia B mice, while GEN-0828 represented a lower initial effective dosage compared with that of NovoSeven® in terms of both blood loss and APTT. GEN-0828 exhibited linear pharmacokinetic profiles in hemophilia B mice at the 30-338 KIU·kg^-1 dose range, the comparative pharmacokinetic study with NovoSeven® indicated better characteristics than NovoSeven® in terms of the appropriate higher maximal concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_last) and longer mean residence time (MRT). In conclusion, GEN-0828 was a promising new type of rFVIIa compound with favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.

Preclinical studies of a factor X activator and a phase 1 trial for hemophilia patients with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Bleeding episodes in hemophiliacs with inhibitors are difficult to control. Staidson protein-0601 (STSP-0601), a specific factor (F)X activator purified from the venom of Daboia russelii siamensis, has been developed.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of STSP-0601 in preclinical and clinical studies.

METHODS

In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were performed. A phase 1, first-in-human, multicenter, and open-label trial was conducted. The clinical study was divided into parts A and B. Hemophiliacs with inhibitors were eligible for this study. Patients received a single intravenous injection of STSP-0601 (0.01 U/kg, 0.04 U/kg, 0.08 U/kg, 0.16 U/kg, 0.32 U/kg, or 0.48 U/kg) in part A or a maximum of 6 4-hourly injections (0.16 U/kg) in part B. The primary endpoint for each part was the number of adverse events (AEs) from baseline to 168 hours after administration. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT-04747964 and NCT-05027230).

RESULTS

Preclinical studies showed that STSP-0601 could specifically activate FX in a dose-dependent manner. In the clinical study, 16 patients in part A and 7 patients in part B were enrolled. Eight (22.2%) AEs in part A and 18 (75.0%) AEs in part B were reported to be related to STSP-0601. Neither severe AEs nor dose-limiting toxicity events were reported. There were no thromboembolic event. The antidrug antibody of STSP-0601 was not detected.

CONCLUSION

Preclinical and clinical studies showed that STSP-0601 had a good ability to activate FX and had a good safety profile. STSP-0601 could be used as a hemostatic treatment in hemophiliacs with inhibitors.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

Thromboelastography and thrombin generation assessments for pediatric severe hemophilia A patients are highly variable and not predictive of clinical phenotypes

Background

Severe hemophilia A (SHA) patients vary in severity of bleeding, arthropathy, and requirements for replacement factor VIII (FVIII). Baseline hemostatic activity assays using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) and thromboelastography (TEG) may offer insights into the physiological basis of clinical heterogeneity.

Objectives

Use CAT and TEG to measure baseline hemostatic activity in a cohort of 30 pediatric SHA patients with available clinical data. Determine effect of contact activation inhibition with corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI). Assess heterogeneity among patients for baseline hemostatic activity and examine correlations between assay results and clinical parameters including FVIII dosing regimen, von Willebrand factor level, and Pettersson arthropathy score.

Methods

SHA blood after FVIII washout was subjected to TEG, and platelet‐rich (PRP) and platelet‐poor plasma was used for CAT assays. Varying concentrations of tissue factor (TF) were used. Statistical analysis examined relationships between assay results, and clinical parameters.

Results

CTI treatment was required to obtain TEG and CAT results representative of baseline hemostatic activity. Weak activity was observed in assays with low TF concentrations (0.5–2 pM), and most but not all samples approached normal activity levels at high TF concentrations (10–20 pM). A significant positive correlation was observed between results of TEG and CAT‐PRP assays. Correlations were not detected between hemostatic assay results and clinical parameters.

Conclusions

In vitro hemostatic assay results of samples containing platelets showed concordance. Assay results were not predictive of FVIII requirements or correlated with other clinical parameters. SHA patient heterogeneity is influenced by factors other than baseline hemostatic activity.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.

Thrombin Generation in Cardiac Versus Noncardiac Surgical Cohorts

BACKGROUND

Bleeding can be a significant problem after cardiac surgery. As a result, venous thromboembolism (VTE) or anticoagulation or both following mechanical valve implantation are often delayed in these patients. The calibrated automated thrombin (CAT) generation assay has become the gold standard to evaluate thrombin generation, a critical step in clot formation independent of other hemostatic processes (eg, platelet activation, fibrin cross-linking, and fibrinolysis), and is increasingly used to examine thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. No study has currently used this assay to compare the thrombin generation profiles of cardiac surgical patients to noncardiac surgical patients. We hypothesize that noncardiac patients may be less prone to postoperative changes in thrombin generation.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, cohort study was undertaken using blood samples from 50 cardiac and 50 noncardiac surgical patients preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and on postoperative days 1 to 4. Platelet-poor plasma samples were obtained from patients preoperatively, on arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) or intensive care unit (ICU), and daily on postoperative days 1 to 4 if patients remained inpatient. Samples were evaluated for CAT measurements. Patient and surgical procedure characteristics were obtained from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

The primary outcome variable, median endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), measured in nanomolar × minutes (nM × min), was decreased 100% in cardiac surgical versus 2% in noncardiac patients (P < .001). All parameters of thrombin generation were similarly depressed. Cardiac (versus noncardiac) surgical type was associated with -76.5% difference of percent change in ETP on multivariable regression analysis (95% confidence interval [CI], -87.4 to -65.5; P value <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac surgical patients exhibit a profound decrease in thrombin generation postoperatively compared with noncardiac surgical patients evaluated by this study. Hemodilution and coagulation factor depletion likely contribute to this decreased thrombin generation after cardiac surgery.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Viscoelastic testing in benign hematologic disorders: Clinical perspectives and future implications of point-of-care testing to assess hemostatic competence

Viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been used routinely for liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, and trauma, but only recently have found clinical utility in benign hematologic disorders. Therefore, guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these disorders based on viscoelastic variables have been adapted from the existing transplant, cardiothoracic surgery, and trauma resuscitation literature. As a result, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for benign hematologic disorders utilizing VETs are not uniform. Accordingly, even though there has been a recent increase in the utilization of VET for the diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, the literature is still in its early stages. Analysis of point-of-care viscoelastic tracings from benign hematologic disorders has the potential to allow prompt recognition of disease and to guide patient-specific intervention. Here we present a review describing the application of VETs to benign hematologic disorders.

Rotational thromboelastometry can predict the probability of bleeding events in a translational rat model of haemophilia A following gene-based FVIIa prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring of clinical effectiveness of bypassing agents in haemophilia patients is hampered by the lack of validated laboratory assays. Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have been evaluated for predicting clinical effectiveness of bypassing agents, however, with limited success.

AIM

Application of a longitudinal model-based approach may allow for a quantitative characterization of the link between ROTEM parameters and the probability of bleeding events.

METHODS

We analyse longitudinal data from haemophilia A rats receiving gene-based FVIIa prophylaxis in terms of total circulatory levels of FVII/FVIIa, clotting time (CT) measured using ROTEM and the probability of bleeding events.

RESULTS

Using population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling, a PK-CT-repeated time-to-event (RTTE) model was developed composed of three submodels (a) a FVII/FVIIa PK model, (b) a PK-CT model describing the relationship between predicted FVIIa expression and CT and (c) a RTTE model describing the probability of bleeding events as a function of CT. The developed PK-CT-RTTE model accurately described the vector dose-dependent plasma concentration-time profile of total FVII/FVIIa and the exposure-response relationship between AAV-derived FVIIa expression and CT. Importantly, the developed model accurately described the occurrence of bleeding events over time in a quantitative manner, revealing a linear relationship between predicted change from baseline CT and the probability of bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Using PK-CT-RTTE modelling, we demonstrated that ROTEM parameters can accurately predict the probability of bleeding events in a translational animal model of haemophilia A.

The Utility of Thromboelastography to Guide Blood Product Transfusion

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the clot viscoelastic testing technology and to describe its utility in guiding blood product transfusions.

METHODS

A case scenario will be discussed as well as interpretation of thromboelastography (TEG) tracings. In addition, literature examining the utility of viscoelastic testing in guiding patient management and blood product transfusions will be reviewed.

RESULTS

TEG/rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is useful in evaluating clot kinetics in trauma and acutely bleeding patients. TEG/ROTEM parameters are reflective of values measured using standard coagulation assays; however, TEG/ROTEM parameters are more rapidly available and more costly. TEG and ROTEM are used in three main settings: cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and trauma to assess global hemostasis and administration of blood products.

CONCLUSIONS

TEG/ROTEM can be helpful in guiding resuscitation and blood product transfusion. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in transfusion of blood components with TEG/ROTEM; however, other studies have suggested that TEG/ROTEM is not clinically effective in guiding transfusion.

Clinical utility of viscoelastic testing (TEG and ROTEM analyzers) in the management of old and new therapies for hemophilia

Hemophilia A and B are rare inherited bleeding disorders resulting from deficiency of coagulation factors VIII and IX respectively. In the past few decades, the field of hemophilia has witnessed pivotal management challenges and therapeutic advances. Routine coagulation and factor assays, while useful in the classification of severity and treatment monitoring in hemophilia patients, have been shown to be of limited use in managing clinical presentations and outcomes. This prompted the investigation of viscoelastic studies in hemophilia care, which have established their utility in various bleeding and thrombotic states. In this review, we will discuss and critically assess the current literature highlighting the use of viscoelastic studies in various aspects of hemophilia including the determination of clinical phenotype, management of patients with inhibitors, perioperative management, and monitoring of novel agents.