Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for evaluation of early blood-induced joint changes: Comparison with MRI

Intensive FVIII replacement in hemophilia patients with hypertrophic synovium: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic synovium (HS) is a marker of disease activity in persons with hemophilia (PwH). Although some recommendations suggest intensifying prophylaxis in PwH with HS, no validated schedules are available.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the efficacy of intensive factor VIII (FVIII) replacement treatment in PwH with HS.

METHODS

In a randomized, open-label study, PwH with HS were randomized to receive pharmacokinetics-driven prophylaxis targeting a FVIII trough level of 8% to 12% (intensive treatment arm [ITA]) or 3% to 5% (standard treatment arm [STA]). The primary outcome was HS reduction/resolution in the 2 treatment arms.

RESULTS

A total of 39 PwH were randomized to ITA and 36 to STA. During the study, we found a lower annual bleeding rate and a higher rate of annual bleeding rate zero in the ITA than in the STA. HS reduction/resolution was reported in 35.9% of cases in the ITA and 8.4% in the STA. In detail, in the ITA ,10.3% achieved HS reduction and 25.6% complete HS resolution, as compared to 5.6% and 2.8% in the STA. Cox regression showed that ITA was associated with HS reduction/resolution (hazard ratio: 4.75; 95% CI: 1.36-16.57; P = .014) and HS complete resolution (hazard ratio: 10.79; 95% CI: 1.38-84.45; P = .023). The analysis of the 127 joints with HS (54 elbows, 41 knees, and 32 ankles) consistently confirmed similar results.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized study, we found a ∼5-fold higher rate of HS reduction/resolution and a ∼10-fold higher rate of HS resolution in the ITA than in the STA.

The Health-Related Quality of Life scores and joint health in children and young adults with hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Patients with hemophilia should be evaluated for joint health and overall health in their visits. The aims of this study were to evaluate joint health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with mild, moderate, and severe hemophilia; determine which patient groups to focus on and whether there are any neglected patient groups.

METHODS

This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Patients were evaluated by ultrasonography (Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound [HEAD-US]), physical examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 [HJHS-2.1]), and HRQoL scales (EQ-5D/EQ-VAS and Haemo-QoL).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with regular follow-up were evaluated for a total of 234 joints. When hemophilia severity was compared with the HEAD-US and HJHS-2.1, a significant difference was found between severe and non-severe hemophilia. On the other hand, when patients' total HEAD-US scores were compared with total HJHS-2.1 scores, no statistically significant correlations were found; only a statistically significant but negligible correlation was detected when HEAD-US and HJHS-2.1 scores were examined at joint level. No significant difference was found when mild, moderate or severe hemophilia were compared with the HRQoL scores. Also, HEAD-US scores and HRQoL scores were not correlated, showing that the HRQoL score did not change whether the patient has arthropathy or not.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent advances in treatment options for hemophilia, arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia remains challenging. For the follow-up of pediatric hemophilia, the HEAD-US and HJHS should be used together because their correlation was weak. Although patients with severe hemophilia are at higher risk in terms of arthropathy, patients with mild/moderate hemophilia should not be ignored because their HRQoL is not different from that of severe hemophilia.

Assessment of haemophilic joints in a low-resourced area using clinical tools: The effect of different types of prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilic arthropathy (HA) is the most frequent complication in people with haemophilia (PWH). MRI is the gold standard to assess HA, however, there are limitations to its use in low-resourced areas.

AIM

Primary; to compare clinical-functional, laboratory, and ultrasonographic joint scores with MRI scores to determine a reasonable alternative to MRI. Secondary; to identify the effect of various replacement therapies on the degree of joint involvement.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Fifty PWH with at least one affected joint, with or without inhibitors, and receiving either on-demand treatment or secondary prophylaxis, were included. All participants had a joint assessment by clinical HJHS 2.1, functional FISH, HEAD-US, and MRI DENVER scores. Also, serum COMP level was assessed by ELISA for the PWH and 50 healthy subjects as control.

RESULTS

The HJHS 2.1 scores had a significant positive correlation with HEAD-US and the MRI DENVER scores. The FISH score had a significant negative correlation with HJHS 2.1, HEAD-US, and MRI DENVER Scores. The serum COMP level was comparable between the PWH and the controls. The HEAD-US score had a significant positive correlation with the MRI score. All of the joints' scores for the PWH on Emicizumab prophylaxis showed significantly lower HJHS 2.1 and MRI DENVER scores but higher FISH score than the joint scores of the patients receiving other types of prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical-functional joints assessment scores (HJHS 2.1, FISH) were objective tools that correlated significantly with the HEAD-US and the Denver MRI scores. Emicizumab prophylaxis led to better joint status.

Self-conducted sonographic monitoring of the knee in patients with haemophilia-A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION/AIM

To evaluate whether patients with haemophilia (PwH) can be enabled to perform ultrasonography (US) of their knees without supervision according to the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) protocol and whether they would be able to recognize pathologies.

METHODS

Five PwH (mean age 29.6 years, range 20-48 years) were taught the use of a portable US device and the HEAD-US protocol. Subsequently, the patients performed US unsupervised at home three times a week for a total of 6 weeks with a reteaching after 2 weeks. All images were checked for mapping of the landmarks defined in the HEAD-US protocol by a radiologist. In a final test after the completion of the self-sonography period, participants were asked to identify scanning plane and potential pathology from US images of other PwH.

RESULTS

On the images of the self-performed scans, 82.7% of the possible anatomic landmarks could be identified and 67.5% of the requested images were unobjectionable, depicting 100% of the required landmarks. There was a highly significant improvement in image quality following reteaching after 2 weeks (74.80 ± 36.88% vs. 88.31 ± 19.87%, p < .001). In the final test, the participants identified the right scanning plane in 85.0% and they correctly identified pathology in 90.0% of images.

CONCLUSION

Appropriately trained PwH can perform the HEAD-US protocol of their knee with high quality and are capable to identify pathologic findings on these standardized images. Asynchronous tele-sonography could enable early therapy adjustment and thereby possibly reduce costs.

Integrating musculoskeletal ultrasound as a shared decision-making tool in hemophilia care: observations from a 3-year study

Background

Hemophilia significantly impacts joint health, necessitating innovative strategies for early detection and management of joint damage.

Objectives

This study assessed the impact of incorporating musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) into shared decision-making processes on prophylaxis regimens for patients with hemophilia over a 3-year period.

Methods

The "Joint Damage Monitoring by Ultrasonography in Patients with Hemophilia in Japan" study was a long-term prospective observational study conducted at Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. It enrolled 174 participants with moderate-to-severe hemophilia A or B. Participants underwent 6 monthly MSKUS evaluations, generating 3582 images from 682 joints; the findings guided adjustments of prophylaxis.

Results

Over the 3-year period, 69.3% of participants adjusted their prophylaxis regimen at least once. Adherence, defined as the ratio of the prescribed to the actual frequency of prophylaxis administration as agreed upon by physicians and patients, was high at the beginning of the study, with an average of 91.6%, and remained high after 3 years at 94.7%. The HEAD-US scores for elbows, knees, and ankles significantly improved (all P < .0001). The spontaneous annual joint bleeding rate and Hemophilia Joint Health Scores also significantly improved (P = .001 and P = .004, respectively). Synovitis detection decreased from 12.9% to 1.6%, with the majority of identified synovitis being subclinical (11.7%) and not associated with bleeding events in the 6 months preceding detection.

Conclusion

Integrating MSKUS into hemophilia care as a shared decision-making tool significantly facilitates the early detection of joint damage and supports personalized prophylaxis adjustments, markedly improving patient outcomes.

Primary prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint outcomes in Swedish haemophilia A patients

INTRODUCTION

Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard in severe haemophilia A (SHA) but time to escalate the prophylaxis regimen varies.

AIM

Assess prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint health outcomes in SHA with primary prophylaxis.

METHODS

Adult male patients born after 1980, with SHA on primary prophylaxis, started before the age of 3 years and second joint bleed, and no history of FVIII inhibitors, were enrolled. Repeated joint-health examinations were performed with HJHS or HEAD-US; VERITAS-PRO assessed adherence.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled with, at inclusion, median age 33.5 years, annualized bleed rate and joint bleed rate 0, and FVIII consumption 4232 IU/kg/year, respectively. The median age was 1.2 years, at prophylaxis start once weekly with a median FVIII dose of 47.7 IU/kg, and 1.7 years, by the time escalation to a final regimen had occurred, with a median infusion frequency of thrice weekly and FVIII dose 41.7 IU/kg, respectively. Older age correlated with later transition to escalated prophylaxis (p < .001). Longer time to escalated prophylaxis correlated to more bleeds (p < .001). Median HJHS increased slowly, reaching 4 at 35-40 years. HJHS at 15-20 years correlated with higher HJHS afterwards. Median total HEAD-US score was 1 and correlated with HJHS (p < .001). Median VERITAS-PRO score was 36, indicating good treatment adherence.

CONCLUSION

Primary prophylaxis is effective but does not completely prevent the gradual development of arthropathy in SHA. Joint assessments with HJHS should start at an early age, as they correlate with arthropathy in later life. Prophylaxis escalation should proceed expeditiously to prevent bleeds.

Haemophilic arthropathy: Diagnosis, management, and aging patient considerations

Gene therapy and universal use of safer, more effective, and personalised prophylactic regimens (factor, and nonfactor) are expected to prevent joint bleeding and promote joint health in persons with haemophilia (PwH). Growing evidence suggests that subclinical bleeding, with active and inactive synovial proliferation, continues and haemophilic arthropathy remains a major morbidity in PwH despite early institution of joint prophylaxis. Joint health assessment is evolving with physical examination scores complementing imaging scores. Point-of-care ultrasound is emerging as a safe, cost-effective, and readily available tool for acute determination of musculoskeletal abnormalities, serial evaluation of joints for sonographic markers of haemophilic arthropathy, and in providing objective insight into the efficacy of new therapies. In acute haemarthrosis, arthrocentesis expedites recovery and prevent the vicious cycle of bleed-synovitis-rebleed. When synovial proliferation develops, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical with haematology, orthopaedics, and physiotherapy involvement. Synovectomy is considered for patients with chronic synovitis that fail conservative management. Non-surgical and minimally invasive procedures should always be offered and considered first. Careful patient selection, screening and early intervention increase the success of these interventions in reducing bleeding, pain, and improving joint function and quality of life. Chemical synovectomy is practical in developing countries, but radioactive synovectomy appears to be more effective. When surgical synovectomy is considered, arthroscopic/minimally invasive approach should be attempted first. In advanced haemophilic arthropathy, joint replacement and arthrodesis can be considered. While excited about the future of haemophilia management, navigating musculoskeletal challenges in the aging haemophilia population is equally important.

A post hoc comparative real-world analysis of HEAD-US score for joint health assessment of patients with severe haemophilia A and B in Spain

AIM

Joint damage due to haemarthrosis can be effectively monitored with point-of care ultrasound using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with US (HEAD-US) scoring system. A post hoc comparative analysis of the joint status of patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) was performed.

METHODS

The databases of two observational, cross-sectional studies that recruited patients with HA or HB from 12 Spanish centres were analysed to compare the status of the elbows, knees and ankles in patients with severe disease according to treatment modality. The HEAD-US score was calculated in both studies by the same trained operators.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 HA and 41 HB severe patients were included, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 11.8 and 32.7 ± 14.2 years, respectively. The percentage of patients who received prophylaxis, over on-demand (OD) treatment, was much higher in HA (91.6%) than in HB (65.8%) patients. With a similar number of target joints, the HEAD-US score was zero in 6.3% HA and 22.0% HB patients (p < .01), respectively. The HA population showed significantly worse HEAD-US scores. Whilst osteochondral damage occurred more frequently in patients OD or tertiary prophylaxis, our data suggest that articular damage is less prominent in primary/secondary prophylaxis, regardless of the type of haemophilia. These latter treatment modalities were also associated with a lower prevalence of synovial hypertrophy, particularly in HB patients.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis indicates that joint status seems to be significantly influenced by haemophilia type (HA or HB) and treatment modality in these severe Spanish populations with severe disease. Continuing HEAD-US monitoring for the early detection and management of intra-articular abnormalities, as well as more efficiently tailored therapies should be warranted.

Diagnostic Value of the HEAD-US-C Scale for the Knees of Severe Hemophilia A Patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the reliability of the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound in China (HEAD-US-C) scale for the knees of severe hemophilia A (SHA) patients and to determine its diagnostic accuracy for assessments of knee-joint lesions in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We collected data from 32 knee joints of 21 patients diagnosed with SHA. The knees were evaluated based on the HEAD-US-C scale and the results were compared with the International Prevention Study Group (IPSG) scale. The HEAD-US-C scale was applied independently by two trained ultrasonographers blinded to the MRI results. The IPSG scale was applied independently by two radiologists blinded to the clinical data and ultrasound (US) results.

RESULTS

The IPSG and HEAD-US-C scales exhibited good to excellent inter-rater reliability. Additionally, there was good to excellent agreement between the US and MRI results for the detection of knee lesions in SHA patients. The sensitivities of US for joint effusion, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage loss, and bone-surface irregularities in the knees of patients were 92.59, 100, 95.45, and 87.50%, respectively. The HEAD-US-C scale was positively correlated with the IPSG scale.

CONCLUSIONS

US is important for evaluating knee lesions in patients with SHA and may potentially replace MRI.

Ultrasound in addition to clinical assessment of acute musculoskeletal complaints in bleeding disorders: impact on patient management

Background

Ultrasound is increasingly used for musculoskeletal assessment in hemophilia care.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound added to clinical assessment for diagnosis and treatment of acute musculoskeletal episodes in a heterogeneous cohort of children and adults with hemophilia and von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study consecutively included children and adults with hemophilia or VWD who visited the outpatient clinic with acute musculoskeletal complaints between March 2020 and May 2023. For all episodes, initial diagnosis and treatment determined by clinical assessment were recorded on a case report form. Subsequently, a physiotherapist (M.A.T. and J.B.) with knowledge of the clinical diagnosis performed point-of-care ultrasound. After ultrasound, updated diagnosis and treatment were recorded. Diagnosis and treatment before and after ultrasound were compared, and proportions of change with 95% CIs were determined.

Results

We evaluated 77 episodes in 67 patients (median age, 24 years; IQR, 13-42 years). Before ultrasound, 37 joint bleeds, 13 muscle bleeds, and 27 other diagnoses were diagnosed. After ultrasound, 33 joint bleeds, 11 muscle bleeds, and 33 other diagnoses were confirmed. The diagnosis changed in 28 of 77 episodes (36%; 95% CI, 26%-48%). Nine joint bleeds and 2 muscle bleeds were missed by clinical assessment. Ultrasound findings changed treatment strategy in 30 of 77 episodes (39%; 95% CI, 28%-51%).

Conclusion

Ultrasound in addition to clinical assessment of acute musculoskeletal complaints in people with hemophilia and VWD has an impact on diagnosis (36%) and treatment (39%), which supports the use of ultrasound in acute musculoskeletal complaints in hemophilia and VWD.

Subclinical synovial proliferation in patients with severe haemophilia A: The value of ultrasound screening and biochemical markers

AIM

Subclinical bleeding and inflammation play a role in progression of haemophilic arthropathy. Synovial proliferation is predictive of joint bleeding and its early detection may guide treatment changes and prevent arthropathy progression. This study evaluated the prevalence of active and inactive subclinical synovial proliferation and investigated potential biochemical blood/urine markers to identify patients with active subclinical synovial proliferation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients with severe haemophilia A born 1970-2006 who were evaluated during routine clinic visits. Patients with (a history of) inhibitors or recent joint bleeding were excluded. Elbows, knees and ankles were examined for subclinical synovial proliferation by ultrasound and physical examination. Active synovial proliferation was distinguished from inactive synovial proliferation using predefined criteria. Blood/urine biochemical markers (serum osteopontin, sVCAM-1, Coll2-1, COMP, CS846, TIMP, and urinary CTX-II) were compared individually and as combined indexes between patients with and without active synovial proliferation.

RESULTS

This cohort consisted of 79 patients with a median age of 31 years (range 16.5-50.8 years) with 62/79 (78%) of the patients using continuous prophylaxis. The annualized joint bleeding rate over the last 5 years was .6 (.2-1.1). Active (17/79, 22%) and inactive subclinical synovial proliferation (17/79, 22%) were both prevalent in this cohort. Biochemical markers were not correlated with active subclinical synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical synovial proliferation, both active and inactive, was prevalent in patients with severe haemophilia A with access to prophylaxis and would be overlooked without routinely performed ultrasounds. Biochemical markers were unable to identify patients with active subclinical synovial proliferation.

The hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis

Prophylaxis is the gold standard treatment for children with haemophilia (CWH). MRI studies revealed joint damage, even with this treatment; this suggests the presence of subclinical bleeding. In the case of children with haemophilia, it is relevant to detect early signs of joint damage, as this allows the medical team to provide the appropriate treatment and follow-up, in order to avoid arthropathy development and its consequences. The aim of this study is to detect the hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis (CWHP) and analyse, by age group, which joint is the most affected. We define the hidden joint in CWH on prophylaxis as the joint that presents joint damage secondary to repetitive bleeding episodes and is detected in the joint evaluation, despite being asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. It is most commonly caused by repetitive subclinical bleeding.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study of 106 CWH on prophylaxis treated in our centre. Patients were divided according to age and type of treatment. Joint damage was defined as a HEAD-US score ≥ 1.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 12 years. All had severe haemophilia. The median age of onset of prophylaxis was 2.7. Forty-seven (44.3 %) patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 59 (55.7 %), secondary prophylaxis. Six hundred and thirty-six joints were analysed. Type of prophylaxis and joint involvement showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). However, patients on PP had a greater number of damaged joints at older ages. Twenty-two % (140) of the joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. Cartilage was most frequently involved, followed by synovitis, and bone damage. We observed a greater frequency and degree of arthropathy in subjects aged 11 and above. Sixty (12.7 %) joints showed a HEAD-US score ≥ 1, with no history of bleeding. The ankle was the most affected joint, representing the hidden joint according to our definition.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis is the best treatment for CWH. However, symptomatic or subclinical joint bleeding may occur. The routine evaluation of joint health is relevant, particularly, of the ankle. In our study, early signs of arthropathy according to age and type of prophylaxis were detected by HEAD-US.

How mild is mild haemophilia?

INTRODUCTION

People with mild haemophilia (PWMH) experience sporadic bleeds and are less likely to receive an early diagnosis, appropriate treatment and medical care. Arthropathy is a key determinant of health-related quality of life (QoL), producing pain, limitations in mobility and daily activities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and QoL associated with arthropathy in PWMH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional cohort study. Data were collected in a single interview and evaluated by a physiotherapist and an orthopaedist and analysed on demographics; baseline factor levels; as well as clinical (Haemophilia Joint Health Score [HJHS]), ultrasound (Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound [HEAD-US]), radiological (Pettersson score [PS]), pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]) and QoL evaluations. We defined arthropathy when at least one of the joints shown with a HEAD-US score ≥ 1.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients and 510 joints were included. Patients' mean age was 35.9 years-old. Median age was 44.2 in patients with arthropathy versus 14.9 in patients without; the difference was statistically significant (p < .001). In patients over 20 years old, 90.5% shown arthropathy. Only 24 (28%) patients had no joint damage (HEAD-US = 0), and 61 (72%) had at least one joint with a HEAD-US ≥ 1. The ankle was the most affected joint. Patient age was found to be the most important risk factor associated with the development of arthropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint damage as a result of prior hemarthrosis was the most relevant factor associated with lower QoL, and emphasised the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management in this particular population.

Screening for subclinical synovial proliferation in haemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing physical examination and ultrasound

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound is increasingly used as addition to physical examination for detection of subclinical joint changes in haemophilia. However, the added value of ultrasound to physical examination for detecting synovial proliferation is not fully established.

AIM

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of swelling at physical examination for ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation in haemophilia.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to 2 August 2022. Studies reporting original data on occurrence of swelling at physical examination and synovial proliferation on ultrasound of index joints in persons with haemophilia were included. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Diagnostic accuracy parameters of swelling at physical examination for ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation were determined. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reporting on swelling at physical examination and synovial proliferation on ultrasound in 2890 joints of 627 patients were included. Prevalence of subclinical synovial proliferation ranged between 0% and 55%. Sensitivity of swelling was low [summary estimate .34; 95% confidence interval (CI) .24-.46], while specificity was high (summary estimate .97; CI .92-.99). Predictive values varied widely due to inter-study differences in prevalence of synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Joint swelling has low sensitivity for presence of ultrasound-detected synovial proliferation in haemophilia, suggesting underestimation of synovial proliferation by physical examination alone. Consequently, ultrasound screening may generate important information on synovial changes which would otherwise remain undetected.

How to assess, detect, and manage joint involvement in the era of transformational therapies: Role of point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Patients with haemophilia experience recurring hemarthroses, mainly involving knees, elbows and ankles, which lead to haemophilic arthropathy, the major chronic complication of haemophilia. With new approaches to haemophilia treatment leading to fewer joint bleeds and, in some cases, no bleeding events, assessing whether current outcome assessment tools provide adequate sensitivity and specificity for management and care of patients with haemophilia is needed.

METHODS

An overview of current imaging tools for monitoring joint health, novel osteochondral damage and synovial proliferation biomarkers, and the relationship between assessments for functionality and imaging modalities is provided. Usefulness and sensitivity of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to complement other assessments and use of ultrasound to monitor haemophilic arthropathy are also examined.

RESULTS

This review provides rationale for haemophilia teams to move beyond traditional outcomes in joint imaging, as well as guidance and evidence on assessment of joint health for potential new treatment modalities, such as gene therapy. The role of POCUS in the existing paradigm for haemophilia care and management along with the use of ultrasound as a complement to other outcome assessment tools are also discussed. Finally, the clinical effects of subclinical bleeding on joint function are described, to motivate screening for synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

POCUS can facilitate the early detection of joint damage and can monitor disease progression while providing insights into the efficacy of treatment regimens, and should be considered as an essential assessment tool for managing the care of patients with haemophilia.

Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As standard care of severe haemophilia A (SHA), prophylaxis should be individualised.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this new-proposed individualised prophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

Boys with SHA were enrolled and followed a PK-guided, trough-level escalating protocol of prophylaxis after a six-month observational period. In the next 2 years, clinical assessments including joint bleeds, ultrasound (US) scores and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in both sides of ankles, knees and elbows were conducted every 6 months as a scoring system, which determined whether the trough level's escalation. Adjustment of dosing regimen was based on WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight SHA boys were finally analysed. Their age and bodyweight were 5.3(2.8,6.9) years and 21.5(16,25) kg. During the study, 47 escalations were conducted. At study exit, the patient number and proportion of different trough level groups were: < 1 IU/dl, 17.2% (10/58); 1-3 IU/dl, 53.5% (31/58); 3-5 IU/dl, 15.5% (9/58); > 5 IU/dl, 13.8% (8/58). Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rate [4(0,8) to 0(0,2), p < .0001] and annualised joint bleeding rate [2(0,4) to 0(0,.25), p < .0001] was observed at study exit as well as the continuous trend of increased zero bleeding proportion (ZBP) (27.6%-69.0%) and zero joint bleeding proportion (46.5%-81.3%). Besides, 85% (6/7) of the target joints vanished. Statistical improvements of US scores (p = .04) and HJHS (p = .02) were also reported at study exit.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the effectiveness of our protocol based on individualised target trough level and emphasise the importance of personalised prophylaxis.

The Limitations and Unmet Needs of the Five Cornerstones to Guarantee Lifelong Optimization of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients

Prophylaxis to prevent bleeding is highly recommended for hemophilia patients. The development of new drugs and tools for modeling personalized prophylaxis provides the means for people with hemophilia to lead active lives with a quality of life comparable to that of nonhemophilic individuals. The choice of regimens must be made on a highly individual basis. Unfortunately, reference guides neither always concur in their recommendations nor provide directions to cover all possible scenarios. In this review, a group of experts identify the significant limitations and unmet needs of prophylaxis, taking advantage of their clinical experience in the disease, and supported by a rigorous literature update. To perform a more systematic and comprehensive search for gaps, the main cornerstones that influence decisions regarding prophylactic patterns were first identified.

Bleeding phenotype, joint status, physical activity, pharmacokinetics/medication properties, and adherence to treatment were considered as the primary mainstays that should allow physicians guiding prophylaxis to secure the best outcomes. Several challenges identified within each of these topics require urgent attention and agreement. The scores to assess severity of bleeding are not reliable, and lead to no consensus definition of severe bleeding phenotype. The joint status is to be redefined in light of new, more efficient treatments with an agreement to establish one scale as the unique reference for joint health. Further discussion is needed to establish the appropriateness of high-intensity physical activities according to patient profiles, especially because sustaining trough factor levels within the safe range is not always warranted for long periods. Importantly, many physicians do not benefit from the advantages provided by the programs based on population pharmacokinetic models to guide individualized prophylaxis through more efficient and cost-saving strategies. Finally, ensuring correct adherence to long-term treatments may be time-consuming for practitioners, who often have to encourage patients and review complex questionnaires.

In summary, we identify five cornerstones that influence prophylaxis and discuss the main conflicting concerns that challenge the proper long-term management of hemophilia. A consensus exercise is warranted to provide reliable guidelines and maximize benefit from recently developed tools that should notably improve patients' quality of life.

Clinical assessment and point of care ultrasonography: How to diagnose haemophilic synovitis

BACKGROUND

The ability of clinical tools to identify early joint changes is limited. Synovitis is a fundamental finding in understanding haemophilia activity and the response to its therapies; thus, there is a need for sensitive methods to better diagnose subclinical synovitis early.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare the frequency with which clinical assessment and ultrasound detected synovial hypertrophy in the most frequently affected joints in patients with haemophilia (elbows, knees and ankles).

METHODS

We analysed patients with haemophilia older than 16 years who came to the haemophilia centre for routine follow-up. From the clinical assessment carried out in the consultation, the swelling, pain and history of haemarthrosis were evaluated and compared with the findings of synovial hypertrophy detected by ultrasound. This comparison was also analysed independently for elbows, knees and ankles.

RESULTS

A total of 203 joints of 66 patients with haemophilia (mean age 34 years), most of them on secondary, tertiary prophylaxis or on demand treatment, were included. In joints with swelling, pain and history of haemarthrosis, 78% of the joints showed synovial hypertrophy on ultrasound. However, in joints with no swelling, no pain and no history of haemarthrosis, 40% presented subclinical synovial hypertrophy on ultrasound. This percentage was higher in elbows than in knees and ankles.

CONCLUSION

In adults with haemophilia, physical examination and point-of-care ultrasound study provide complementary data on their joint disease. However, without ultrasound, the ability to detect subclinical synovitis is considerably reduced, especially in the elbows.

Detecting low blood concentrations in joints using T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5, 3, and 7 T: an in vitro study

Background

Intra-articular blood causes irreversible joint damage, whilst clinical differentiation between haemorrhagic joint effusion and other effusions can be challenging. An accurate non-invasive method for the detection of joint bleeds is lacking. The aims of this phantom study were to investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 and T2 mapping allows for differentiation between simple and haemorrhagic joint effusion and to determine the lowest blood concentration that can be detected.

Methods

Solutions of synovial fluid with blood concentrations ranging from 0 to 100% were scanned at 1.5, 3, and 7 T. T1 maps were generated with an inversion recovery technique and T2 maps from multi spin-echo sequences. In both cases, the scan acquisition times were below 5 min. Regions of interest were manually drawn by two observers in the obtained T1 and T2 maps for each sample. The lowest detectable blood concentration was determined for all field strengths.

Results

At all field strengths, T1 and T2 relaxation times decreased with higher blood concentrations. The lowest detectable blood concentrations using T1 mapping were 10% at 1.5 T, 25% at 3 T, and 50% at 7 T. For T2 mapping, the detection limits were 50%, 5%, and 25%, respectively.

Conclusions

T1 and T2 mapping can detect different blood concentrations in synovial fluid in vitro at clinical field strengths. Especially, T2 measurements at 3 T showed to be highly sensitive. Short acquisition times would make these methods suitable for clinical use and therefore might be promising tools for accurate discrimination between simple and haemorrhagic joint effusion in vivo.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-021-00251-z.

Impact of the HEAD-US Scoring System for Observing the Protective Effect of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Objective:

This study aimed to observe the preventive effect of prophylactic treatment on joint health in people with hemophilia (PwH) and to investigate the importance of integration of ultrasonographic examination into clinical and radiological evaluation of the joints.

Materials and Methods:

This national, multicenter, prospective, observational study included male patients aged ≥6 years with the diagnosis of moderate or severe hemophilia A or B from 8 centers across Turkey between January 2017 and March 2019. Patients were followed for 1 year with 5 visits (baseline and 3^rd, 6^th, 9^th, and 12^th month visits). The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was used for physical examination of joints, the Pettersson scoring system was used for radiological assessment, point-of-care (POC) ultrasonography was used for bilateral examinations of joints, and the Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score was used for evaluation of ultrasonography results.

Results:

Seventy-three PwH, of whom 62 had hemophilia A and 11 had hemophilia B, were included and 24.7% had target joints at baseline. The HJHS and HEAD-US scores were significantly increased at the 12^th month in all patients. These scores were also higher in the hemophilia A subgroup than the hemophilia B subgroup. However, in the childhood group, the increment of scores was not significant. The HEAD-US total score was significantly correlated with both the HJHS total score and Pettersson total score at baseline and at the 12^th month.

Conclusion:

The HEAD-US and HJHS scoring systems are valuable tools during follow-up examinations of PwH and they complement each other. We suggest that POC ultrasonographic evaluation and the HEAD-US scoring system may be integrated into differential diagnosis of bleeding and long-term monitoring for joint health as a routine procedure.

MRI predicts 5-year joint bleeding and development of arthropathy on radiographs in hemophilia

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered as the reference standard to assess early joint changes in hemophilia. However, the clinical relevance of MRI findings is still unknown. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the predictive value of MRI for 5-year joint bleeding and progression of arthropathy in patients with hemophilia. Both knees and ankles of patients with hemophilia and absent or limited arthropathy on radiographs were assessed by using MRI and radiographs. MRI scans were scored according to the International Prophylaxis Study Group MRI score for hemophilic arthropathy. Patients were followed up for 5 years, including assessment of joint bleeding and repeated radiographic assessment. Associations between baseline MRI findings with 5-year bleeding and progression of arthropathy were expressed as odds ratios (OR), adjusted for severity of disease and joint bleeding history. Baseline assessment included 104 joints of 26 patients with hemophilia (median age, 21 years). Four ankles with severe joint changes were excluded. Follow-up was available for 96 (92%) of 104 joints. During 5 years of follow-up, bleeding was reported for 36% of joints. Five-year bleeding was significantly increased in joints with synovial hypertrophy at 80% vs 27% in joints without synovial hypertrophy (OR, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-31.3). In joints with normal baseline radiographs, any osteochondral or synovial changes on MRI were associated with radiographic changes 5 years later (positive predictive value, 75%; negative predictive value, 98%). Joints with synovial hypertrophy on MRI had a significantly higher chance of 5-year bleeding. All MRI changes, except effusion, were strong predictors for development of arthropathy on radiographs.

Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of patients with haemophilia on prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Primary prophylaxis is the current gold standard in haemophilia care for the prevention of bleeding and ensuing joint damage. Early detection of joint bleeding, whether symptomatic or subclinical, preferably during childhood, helps prevent joint deterioration and subsequent disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between the Haemophilia Joint Health Score and the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound tools in children with severe haemophilia on primary and secondary prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were followed up regularly at our centre. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by physical examination using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1), and by ultrasound with HEAD-US score.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children with haemophilia on prophylaxis were included in this study. Mean age was 10.8 years (range 4-18). We evaluated 480 joints, of which 423 (88.1%) were concordant with both tools, whereas 57 (11.9%) were discordant; 377 (78.5%) joints scored 0 on HJHS, 370 (77%) on HEAD-US and 345 (72%) on both tools. The overall Kappa concordance coefficient was .656. For elbows, knees and ankles the respective values were .783, .522 and .589. For HJHS scores greater than 3, all joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

HJHS and HEAD-US are used to assess joint health in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis. In this study, the level of agreement between both tools was consistent with literature values only for the elbow joint.

Asymptomatic Joint Bleeding and Joint Health in Hemophilia: A Review of Variables, Methods, and Biomarkers

Joint health is a key contributor to quality of life in patients with hemophilia. However, variables that impact long-term joint outcomes have not been comprehensively defined. A systematic literature search identified publications relating to joint health in patients with hemophilia. Studies clearly show that early, sustained prophylaxis with factor replacements improves long-term joint outcomes. However, a subset of patients appear to develop arthropathy despite maintaining excellent bleeding outcomes, which suggests possible recurrent asymptomatic bleeding into the joints in these patients. Furthermore, limited data are available on how long-acting factor VIII and factor IX replacement therapies could impact long-term joint outcomes. Many variables were identified as potential indicators that a patient may develop hemophilic arthropathy, including genetic mutations, endogenous factor VIII and IX levels, bone health, and physical activity levels. Tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of hemophilic arthropathy are critical to detect early joint damage, so that management can be adjusted accordingly. Imaging techniques, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, can detect synovial changes, a strong predictor for the future development of hemophilic arthropathy. In addition, several biomarkers associated with cartilage and bone formation, vascularization, and angiogenesis could potentially identify the onset and progression of early joint damage. Since the development of hemophilic arthropathy is complex, a comprehensive therapeutic approach is necessary for the effective prevention of arthropathy in patients with hemophilia.

Hemophilia Gene Therapy: Approaching the First Licensed Product

The clinical potential of hemophilia gene therapy has now been pursued for the past 30 years, and there is a realistic expectation that this goal will be achieved within the next couple of years with the licensing of a gene therapy product. While recent late phase clinical trials of hemophilia gene therapy have shown promising results, there remain a number of issues that require further attention with regard to both efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach. In this review, we present information relating to the current status of the field and focus attention on the unanswered questions for hemophilia gene therapy and the future challenges that need to be overcome to enable the widespread application of this treatment paradigm.

Haemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound and haemophilia joint health score in the moderate haemophilia (MoHem) study

INTRODUCTION

Detection of early arthropathy is crucial for the management of haemophilia, but data on moderate haemophilia are limited. Therefore, we evaluated joint health and treatment modalities in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A (MHA) and B (MHB).

AIM

To explore and compare the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) to detect early arthropathy in moderate haemophilia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicentre study covering Nordic patients with MHA and MHB. Arthropathy was evaluated by HEAD-US and HJHS 2.1.

RESULTS

We assessed 693 joints in 118 patients. HEAD-US scores (medians [interquartile ranges]) were as follows: elbows 0 points (0-0), knees 0 (0-0) and ankles 0 (0-1). Respectively, by HJHS: elbows 0 (0-1), knees 0 (0-1) and ankles 0 (0-1). Cartilage (14%) and bone (13%) were most commonly affected by HEAD-US. Frequent HJHS findings were crepitus on motion in knees (39%), and loss of flexion (23%) and extension (13%) in ankles. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS (elbows r = .70, knees r = .60 and ankles r = .65), but 24% had discordant scores. Joints with HJHS zero points, 5% captured HEAD-US ≥1 point. Moreover, 26% had HJHS findings without HEAD-US pathology. Notably, 31% of knees had crepitus on motion and normal HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the joints attained low scores implying good joint health. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS. In 5%, HEAD-US detected subclinical pathology. Crepitus on motion was frequently reported despite normal HEAD-US, thus not necessarily reflecting arthropathy. HEAD-US therefore improves the joint assessment in moderate haemophilia.

Biochemical marker research in hemophilic arthropathy: A systematic review

Hemophilic arthropathy (HA) causes major morbidity. Breakthrough therapies reduce the bleeding frequency tremendously, but well-defined joint outcome assessments with a focus on early changes and subclinical damage are lacking. Biomarkers reflecting joint tissue turnover/inflammation might be useful to predict invalidating arthropathy. This systematic review summarized and categorized publications on blood/urinary biomarkers in HA to provide leads for implementation. A PubMed/EMBASE search was performed on September 9, 2019. All publications were assessed and allocated to one or several BIPED-categories, based on the utility of biomarkers. Of the initial 1307 publications found, 27 were eligible for inclusion. The majority (81%, n = 32/42) was cross-sectional in design, including relatively small numbers of patients (median 44, interquartile range 35-78). Fourteen percent (n = 6/42) investigated dynamic changes around a bleeding or treatment. Only two studies investigated the prognostic value of biomarkers. Most promising biomarkers were serum Coll2-1, COL-18N, COMP, C1,2C, C2M, CS846, MIF, plasma sVCAM-1 and urinary CTX-II. Comparing performances and pooling data was not possible due to heterogeneity. Currently, biomarker research in HA is still in an explorative stage and not yet sufficient for translation into daily practice. Clearly, larger homogeneous longitudinal studies in well-defined populations should be performed for further development.

Detection and evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: Which tools may be considered more reliable

INTRODUCTION

Progressive arthropathy is the main cause of morbidity in patients with severe haemophilia. Diagnostic imaging can detect even subclinical arthropathy and impact prophylactic treatment. However, in most clinical settings the regular joint evaluation and follow-up are based on clinical evaluation and patient's personal reporting of problems, while diagnostic imaging is not regularly employed.

AIM

The aim of our prospective study was to assess how ultrasound (US), clinical examination, patient's subjective assessment and certain laboratory biomarkers correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection and evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy in order to determine which tool is the most reliable.

METHODS

The study included 30 patients with severe haemophilia (age range 16-49 years). MRI (IPSG), US (HEAD-US), clinical examination (HJHS 2.1) and patient's subjective assessment of elbows, knees and ankles were performed; additionally, blood samples for laboratory analysis were taken (s-25-OH vitamin D, s-ferritin, s-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, s-N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and s-cartilage oligomeric matrix protein). MRI results were used as a reference standard for joint status. Pearson's r was used to assess correlation of other methods with MRI.

RESULTS

The correlation with MRI was the highest for US (r = .92), considerably higher than for clinical evaluation (r = .62) and patient's subjective assessment (r = .66). There was no correlation between the presence or degree of haemophilic arthropathy and any of the laboratory biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study warrant the inclusion of US into the regular follow-up of patients with severe haemophilia, where the equipment and staffing permit.

HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US assessment in the hemophilic joints: How do their findings compare?

: In hemophilic patients methods are needed to better diagnose joint damage early, so that treatments can be adjusted to slow the progression of hemophilic arthropathy. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 (HJHS 2.1) and hemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US) scales, as well as each of their individual items, to better understand the value each provides on the joint condition of patients with hemophilia. The study included data from patients with hemophilia older than 16 years of age, who attended a routine check-up. HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US assessments were performed on the elbows, knees and ankles. We studied the correlations and agreements between the two scales and analyzed the relationship between the various items of the HJHS 2.1 (inflammation, duration, atrophy, crepitation, flexion deficit, extension deficit, pain, strength, gait) and HEAD-US (synovitis, cartilage and bone). The study included 203 joints from 66 patients with hemophilia (mean age, 34 years). We found a good correlation between the two scales (r = 0.717). However, HJHS 2.1 revealed only 54% of the cases with synovitis and 75% of the cases with osteochondral damage. HEAD-US detected several relevant physical and functional aspects in less than 53% of the cases. HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US provide complementary data on joint disease in adults with hemophilia; both assessments should therefore, be made available. HEAD-US presented the added value of detecting early joint changes (synovitis and osteochondral damage), while HJHS 2.1 showed the added value of detecting relevant physical and functional changes.

Merging into the mainstream: the evolution of the role of point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound in hemophilia

Bleeding with resultant hemophilic arthropathy constitutes the largest cause of morbidity in patients with hemophilia. It results from repeated bleeding episodes in the joint and is characterized by synovial hypertrophy and cartilage and bony destruction. Hemophilic arthropathy assessment is a continually evolving process and is particularly challenging in children and young adults in whom joint disease may be missed or underestimated as obtaining serial "baseline" magnetic resonance imaging scans of multiple clinically asymptomatic or nearly asymptomatic joints may be unjustifiable and cost-ineffective. Musculoskeletal ultrasound-particularly, point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound-has emerged as a promising imaging modality for the early detection and management of hemophilic arthropathy, and for the evaluation of hemarthrosis and painful musculoskeletal episodes in patients with hemophilia. This review summarizes currently available data on the emerging role of this new imaging modality, its limitations, and gaps in knowledge. The review also raises unanswered questions, highlights the need for consolidated research efforts, and delineates future directions expected to advance this technology and optimize its use in this patient population.

Diagnostic accuracy of haemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US): a comparative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study

Background

Repeated haemarthroses affect approximately 90% of patients with severe haemophilia and lead to progressive arthropathy, which is the main cause of morbidity in these patients. Diagnostic imaging can detect even subclinical arthropathy changes and may impact prophylactic treatment. Magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) is generally the gold standard tool for precise evaluation of joints, but it is not easily feasible in regular follow-up of patients with haemophilia. The development of the standardized ultrasound (US) protocol for detection of early changes in haemophilic arthropathy (HEAD-US) opened new perspectives in the use of US in management of these patients. The HEAD-US protocol enables quick evaluation of the six mostly affected joints in a single study. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the HEAD-US protocol for the detection and quantification of haemophilic arthropathy in comparison to the MRI.

Patients and methods

The study included 30 patients with severe haemophilia. We evaluated their elbows, ankles and knees (overall 168 joints) by US using the HEAD-US protocol and compared the results with the MRI using the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI score.

Results

The results showed that the overall HEAD-US score correlated very highly with the overall IPSG MRI score (r = 0.92). Correlation was very high for the evaluation of the elbows and knees (r ≈ 0.95), and slightly lower for the ankles (r ≈ 0.85).

Conclusions

HEAD-US protocol proved to be a quick, reliable and accurate method for the detection and quantification of haemophilic arthropathy.

Radiosynovectomy in haemophilia

Radiosynovectomy (RS) is a simple, effective and safe procedure for the control of haemophilic synovitis that causes repetitive haemarthrosis. It must be done after confirming clinically (hard and painless mass on palpation) and by ultrasonography the existence of synovitis in a joint with recurrent haemarthrosis. RS should be the first invasive option (instead of arthroscopic synovectomy) for treatment of chronic synovitis. The technique is highly cost effective in comparison to arthroscopic synovectomy. The indication for RS is the presence of repeated haemarthroses associated with synovitis (confirmed clinically and by imaging techniques) that cannot be controlled by means of haematological treatment. No increase in the risk of cancer has been published and the dose of radiation utilized in RS is minimal. In haemophilic patients with recurrent haemarthrosis, RS should be performed under factor coverage as soon as possible, once the existence of synovitis has been confirmed by ultrasonography. RS should really be considered as a useful adjunctive procedure to the primary intervention, which is intensive replacement therapy.