Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia A Treatment in Taiwan: A Discrete Choice Experiment

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued "type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events" as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by "consumption route" (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and "administration frequency" (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). "Monitoring dosing options" was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and caregivers valued "type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events" as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients' preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients' choices when prescribing a treatment.

Quantifying Benefit-Risk Trade-Offs Toward Prophylactic Treatment Among Adult Patients With Hemophilia A in China: Discrete Choice Experiment Study

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A is a chronic condition that requires meticulous treatment and management. Patient preferences for prophylactic treatment can substantially influence adherence, outcomes, and quality of life, yet these preferences remain underexplored, particularly in China.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the preferences for prophylactic treatment among Chinese adult patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors, considering clinical effectiveness, side effects, dosing mode, and dosing frequency.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit patient preferences for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia. The study was conducted across 7 provinces in China with socioeconomic and geographical diversity. Subgroup analysis was performed according to education level, geographic location, and treatment type, alongside the exploration of benefit-risk trade-offs.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients completed the discrete choice experiment questionnaire, and we included 102 responses for analysis based on predetermined exclusion criteria. The study found that patients prioritized reducing annual bleeding times and avoiding the risk of developing inhibitors over treatment process attributes. Subgroup analysis revealed that lower-educated patients and those from rural areas attached more importance to the dosing mode, likely due to barriers to self-administration. Patients demonstrated a clear understanding of benefit-risk trade-offs, exhibiting a willingness to accept an increased risk of developing inhibitors for improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the preferences of patients with hemophilia A for prophylactic treatment in China. Understanding these preferences can enhance shared decision-making between patients and clinicians, fostering personalized prophylactic treatment plans that may optimize adherence and improve clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Real-World Dose and Consumption for Two Extended Half-Life Recombinant Factor VIII Products for the Treatment of Hemophilia A in the United States

Background

US patients with hemophilia A can receive prophylaxis with extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products, including efmoroctocog alfa (fragment crystallizable fusion protein) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (antihemophilic factor [recombinant], PEGylated).

Objective

To evaluate dosing patterns and weekly consumption of extended half-life rFVIII products in the United States.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis using the US Specialty Pharmacy Database (2015–2018). Included patients had a diagnosis of hemophilia A, ≥2 consecutive monthly claims for efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis, and weight data. Outcome measures included weekly dosing frequency and dispensed weekly dose.

Results

The analysis included 774 patients (efmoroctocog alfa, 506; rurioctocog alfa pegol, 268). Mean (SD) age was 24.2 (15.8) and 26.3 (14.9) years for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa and rurioctocog alfa pegol, respectively; mean (SD) weight was 68.4 (36.8) and 79.8 (37.7) kg, respectively. The most frequent efmoroctocog alfa regimen was twice weekly (45.7%), followed by every 4 days (20.6%), every 3 days (9.1%), and 3 times per week (7.5%). The most frequent rurioctocog alfa pegol regimen was twice weekly (72.4%), followed by 3 times per week (8.7%), every 4 days (7.6%), and every 3 days (5.5%). The proportion of efmoroctocog alfa twice-weekly dispensing records increased from 31.5% to 50.9%, and every 4 days dispensing records decreased from 31.3% to 14.5% (2015–2018). The proportion of rurioctocog alfa pegol dispensing records remained broadly stable (2016–2018). Overall, mean (SD; median) weekly prophylactic dose was 105.4 (77.9; 92.6) IU/kg with efmoroctocog alfa, and 96.8 (41.9; 90.9) IU/kg with rurioctocog alfa pegol.

Conclusion

In this database study, the most frequently observed dosing frequency was twice weekly for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol. The observed mean weekly consumption was slightly higher, and variation was greater, in patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa versus rurioctocog alfa pegol.

A Comparison of Caregiver and Patient Preferences for Treating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Background and Objectives

Caregivers routinely inform medical and regulatory decision making in rare pediatric diseases. While differences in treatment preferences across caregivers and patients have been observed for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, this evidence was limited by small samples of patients and results were confounded by patient age and disease progression. We tested caregiver and patient preference concordance for treating Duchenne.

Methods

Preferences and demographic/clinical information from 115 caregivers and 107 patients were collected in an international study (response = 80%) using a previously developed discrete-choice experiment consisting of 12 experimentally controlled choice tasks. Each task presented two profiles that varied across four attributes: disease progression, drug failure probability, kidney damage risk, and fracture risk. Caregivers and patients were matched 1:1 based on patient age. We tested for concordance across each task and by comparing caregivers’ and patients’ maximum acceptable risk of drug failure, kidney damage, and fracture for a slowing of disease progression.

Results

The final analysis included 77 caregivers and 77 patients. No differences were observed in nationality (p = 0.969), disease stage (p = 0.180), or demographic/clinical factors (p = 0.093–0.857); however, patients were more optimistic (p = 0.030). Caregivers and patients chose similarly across tasks (p = 0.101–0.993). To slow disease progression by 1 year, caregivers and patients would tolerate a 9% and 11% increase in drug failure probability, respectively (p = 0.267). Alternatively, they would accept a 3% and 4% increase in the risk of kidney damage (p = 0.719) or a 15% and 20% increase in the risk of fracture (p = 0.534).

Conclusions

Caregivers and patients had concordant preferences for treating Duchenne. Providers and regulators can trust both caregiver and patient report of preferences to inform medical decision making.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-022-00574-y.

Patient preferences and priorities for haemophilia gene therapy in the US: A discrete choice experiment

Introduction

Gene therapy has shown promise in clinical trials for patients with haemophilia, but patient preference studies have focused on factor replacement treatments.

Aim

We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate the relative importance and differential preferences patients provide for gene therapy attributes.

Methods

We surveyed male adults with haemophilia in the United States recruited from patient panels including the National Hemophilia Foundation Community Voices in Research platform using an online survey over 4 months in 2020/21. Participants indicated preferences for gene therapy attributes including dosing frequency/durability, effect on annual bleeding, uncertainty related to side effects, impact on daily activities, impact on mental health, and post‐treatment requirements. The relative importance of each attribute was analysed overall and for subgroups based on haemophilia type and severity.

Results

A total of 183 males with haemophilia A (n = 120) or B (n = 63) were included. Half (47%) had severe haemophilia; most (75%) were White. Overall, participants gave effect on bleeding rate the greatest relative importance (31%), followed by dose frequency/durability (26%), uncertainty regarding safety issues (17%), and impact on daily activities (11%). Dose frequency/durability had the greatest importance for those with haemophilia B (35%).

Conclusion

People with haemophilia prioritised reduced bleeding and treatment burden; the former was more important in haemophilia A and the latter in haemophilia B, followed by safety and impact on daily life in this DCE of gene therapy attributes. These findings and differences can inform clinical and health policy decisions to improve health equity for people with haemophilia.