Treatment of pelvic haemophilic pseudotumour: A retrospective study

Surgical treatment for pelvic haemophilic pseudotumour: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases

Background

Due to the rarity of pelvic haemophilic pseudotumour (PHPT) and demanding surgical technique for PHPT excision, no study reports the mid-term follow-up outcomes of surgical treatment of PHPT in a relatively large cohort. PHPT with varying degrees of bony pelvic involvement and infection status necessitates different operative procedures, yet there is currently no classification system for PHPT based on surgical practice.

Methods

The study was conducted between June 25, 2004 and July 18, 2023, in Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Nanfang Hospital in China. We performed a retrospective analysis involving 21 patients with 24 PHPTs with a mean follow-up period of 7.1 years. The demographic information, PHPT characteristics, surgical data, and perioperative complications were analysed.

Findings

21 consecutive male patients with 24 PHPTs (21 primary PHPTs and three recurrent PHPTs) that underwent surgical treatment were involved in the study. A classification system including four subtypes was introduced as (I) PHPT confined to soft tissue; (II) PHPT involving bony pelvic without pelvic discontinuity; (III) PHPT causing pelvic discontinuity; (IV) Infectious PHPT. Of the 24 PHPTs, 11 (45.8%) were identified as Type I, five (20.8%) as Type II, three (12.5%) as Type III, and five (20.8%) as Type IV. At the time of surgery, the patients had a mean age of 37.0 ± 9.5 years (Range, 24-52 years). The mean maximum diameter of PHPTs upon surgery was 17.0 ± 7.7 cm (Range, 4.3-40.0 cm). The mean surgical duration was 192 ± 77 min (Range, 60-330 min) and the median intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (IQR, 225-950 mL, Range, 100-3000 mL). One patient (4.8%) underwent intraoperative cardiopulmonary arrest and expired the following week. Four PHPTs (16.7%) presented postoperative wound infections and poor wound healing. During the follow-up period, five PHPTs (20.8%) experienced pseudotumour recurrence.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that surgical treatment for PHPTs is feasible and relatively safe. Symptomatic and progressive PHPTs should undergo surgical intervention as early as possible to minimise the surgical risks. Intraoperative use of abundant gelatin sponges in PHPT excision draws attention to severe embolism complications.

Funding

There are no sources of funding for this manuscript.

Management of abdominal pseudotumours in haemophilia: a systematic review

AIM

Haemophilic pseudotumours are complications in patients with haemophilia A or B and result from locally repetitive bleeding, mainly in the musculoskeletal system. Abdominal haemophilic pseudotumours are exceptionally rare but may cause severe complications. This systematic review aimed to evaluate therapy strategies for symptomatic abdominal haemophilic pseudotumours.

METHODS

We systematically searched three databases (Medline [PubMed], Web of Science and EMBASE) for publications published between 1995 and 2023. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data and performed a quality assessment using the JBI critical appraisal checklist.

RESULTS

From a total of 1199 articles, 39 articles describing 41 cases were included for final analysis. Conservative or interventional treatment was performed in 12 cases. In eight cases, a step-up to surgical therapy after interventional treatment was indicated. Primary surgical therapy was performed in 21 cases. Failure to cure was documented in 50% (n = 6) of patients treated in the first group, with a mortality rate of 16.6% (n = 2). Interventional therapy with a step-up to surgery showed no morbidity or mortality. Primary surgical resection documented favourable results in 66.6% (n = 14), with failure to cure in 9.5% (n = 2) and a mortality rate of 14.3% (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Primary surgical resection can be a first-line therapy for symptomatic, abdominal haemophilic pseudotumours, whereas preoperative embolisation could be used as a bridging therapy before surgery, especially in emergency settings. Diagnostic biopsy and percutaneous drainage should be avoided to prevent complications.

A Novel Surgical Classification for Extremity and Pelvic Hemophilic Pseudotumors: The PUMCH Classification

BACKGROUND

A hemophilic pseudotumor (HPT) is a rare and challenging complication of hemophilia for which there is no classification system that provides uniformity of descriptions or that can be used to guide management. We have developed such a classification based on anatomical site, HPT severity, and corresponding surgical treatment.

METHODS

The PUMCH (Peking Union Medical College Hospital) classification was developed on the basis of clinical manifestations and imaging features. Extremity and pelvic HPTs were divided into 4 types and 6 subtypes according to anatomical site and whether or not there was destruction of adjacent bone. Associations between the PUMCH classification and surgical treatment, preoperative comorbidities, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complication rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with 53 HPTs that were treated at PUMCH between December 2005 and October 2021 were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.4 ± 11.9 years, and the median follow-up duration was 60.3 months. Twenty-eight HPTs were classified as type I (13 IA, 7 IB, 8 IC); 3, as type II; 6, as type III; and 16, as type IV. All 20 type-IA and IB HPTs were treated with excision, and the 3 type-II HPTs were treated with curettage and bone grafting. Fourteen type-IV pelvic HPTs underwent excision, 2 of which needed concomitant pelvic reconstruction. Six type-IC HPTs and 1 type-III HPT underwent excision and osseous reconstruction. Amputation was required for 1 type-IC and 3 type-III HPTs. Type-IC HPTs had the longest mean operative time (194.3 ± 28.2 minutes) and the greatest intraoperative bleeding (2,000 mL [interquartile range, 1,100 to 3,000 mL]). Postoperative infection was more common in patients with type-III (50.0%) and type-IC (28.6%) HPTs, but not significantly so.

CONCLUSIONS

The PUMCH classification is based on the anatomic pathology and surgical strategy for HPTs. The classification of HPTs corresponds to surgical outcomes, and may be helpful for decision-making regarding their surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.