Real-world evidence on health resource use among patients with haemophilia and inhibitor exhibiting severe bleeding episodes

Eptacog beta for the management of patients with haemophilia A and B with inhibitors: A European perspective

Eptacog beta (activated), a recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 (SEVENFACT®, LFB & HEMA Biologics) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2022 (CEVENFACTA®, LFB). In Europe, eptacog beta is indicated for the treatment of bleeds and the prevention of bleeds during surgery or invasive procedures in adults and adolescents (≥12 years old) with congenital haemophilia A or B with high-titre inhibitors (≥5 BU) or with low-titre inhibitors who are expected to have a high anamnestic response to factor VIII or factor IX, or to be refractory to increased dosing of these factors. The efficacy and safety of eptacog beta were evaluated in three Phase III clinical studies, PERSEPT 1, 2 and 3. For the EMA filing dossier, the analysis of data from PERSEPT 1 and 2 differed from the analysis used to support the filing in the US. In this review, we summarise current data regarding the mode of action, clinical efficacy and safety of eptacog beta for the management of haemophilia A and B in patients with inhibitors from a European perspective. In addition to providing a valuable summary of the analyses of the clinical data for eptacog beta conducted for the EMA, our review summarises the potential differentiators for eptacog beta compared with other current bypassing agents.

National strategic advocacy to manage patients with inherited bleeding disorders in low and lower-middle income countries

INTRODUCTION

Inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) including hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, platelet disorders, mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and coagulation factor deficiencies are rarely found and under-recognized in low and lower-middle-income countries. Some patients succumbed to serious bleeding without diagnosis and treatment during childhood.

AREA COVERED

Diagnosis, management, and prevention should be integrated into the existing health care system. Although some countries have not implemented appropriate health care infrastructure, an initiative plan should be set up by cooperation of experienced experts and health care providers. Identification of patients with IBDs should be started in the antenatal setting to search for females at risk of carrier state. The investigations include bleeding assessment, mixing venous clotting time, coagulogram, coagulation factor assay and mutation detection. Genotypic analysis is helpful for confirming the definite diagnosis, carrier detection as well as prenatal diagnosis for females at risk of bearing an offspring with severe bleeding manifestations. Management involves replacement therapy ranging from blood component to virus-inactivated factor concentrate. Appropriate research is an essential backbone for improving patients' care.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective national strategic advocacy to manage patients with IBDs requires intensive collaboration among policy makers, health care providers, patients, and family members.

Practices and challenges for hemophilia management under resource constraints in Thailand

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of a specific coagulation factor. Factor VIII deficiency is responsible for hemophilia A while factor IX deficiency is responsible for hemophilia B. As per the 2020 annual global survey by the World Federation of Hemophilia, only 1828 Thai hemophiliacs have been registered to the national healthcare system. The reason for the low number is the underdiagnosis which is a major concern in the real-world practice among Asian countries. In Thailand, most hemophiliacs are diagnosed by general practitioners, pediatricians or internists at rural hospitals and are referred to hemophilia specialists at the Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). Despite the challenges pertaining to infrastructure and cost of treatment, Thailand has progressed substantially in providing the required hemophilia care, as evidenced by an evolution in acquiring and sharing knowledge as well as collaborative efforts among multiple stakeholders over the past three decades. In this letter-to-the-editor, the authors have summarized the practices for and challenges faced with hemophilia management in Thailand.

Iliopsoas haemorrhage complicated by femoral neuropathy in patients with haemophilia: a case series report

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the incidence of femoral neuropathy in patients with haemophilia exhibiting iliopsoas haemorrhage.

METHODS

Patients with iliopsoas haemorrhage confirmed by ultrasonography or CT scan were studied retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 44 episodes of iliopsoas haemorrhage occurred in 20 patients with haemophilia (A17, B3). Most episodes in patients without inhibitors (14/16 = 87.5%) were adequately treated followed by prophylaxis. However, 11 of 28 episodes (39.3%) in patients with inhibitors were adequately treated and no prophylaxis was provided. An appropriate rehabilitation programme was arranged during hospitalisation and follow-up. Femoral neuropathy was observed in 28 of 44 episodes, while 16 episodes of persistent femoral neuropathy from previous bleeding were excluded. As a result, 11 of 28 episodes (39.3%) of femoral neuropathy were similarly found amongst patients with and without inhibitors. The mean time of onset and resolution of femoral neuropathy were 3.7 (1.8) and 23.4 (20.5) days after the onset of iliopsoas haemorrhage, respectively. Patients receiving inadequate and delayed replacement had a significantly higher rate of femoral neuropathy than those who received adequate and prompt replacement.

CONCLUSION

Femoral neuropathy following iliopsoas haemorrhage was common in haemophilia patients with and without inhibitors.

Real-world cost estimates of initiating emicizumab in US patients with haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is the first approved non-factor therapy for haemophilia A. It provides superior prophylactic bleeding control compared to other products in both patients with and patients without inhibitors. However, there is no real-world data about the monetary consequences of starting emicizumab.

AIM

To examine the estimated costs of starting emicizumab in a cohort of real-world haemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors.

METHODS

The cost of haemostatic therapy for 6 months before and after initiating emicizumab for participants in a multicentre observational study was calculated based on the type of product and dosing that was used for prophylaxis and treating breakthrough bleeds, the number of treated bleeds and the participant weight.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included, 18 with an active inhibitor. The median age was 8.7 years. The median total cost for all patients decreased from $176,720 to $128,099 (p = .04) after initiating emicizumab, largely because of decrease in the total cost of high-cost outliers. The cost of prophylaxis and the total cost of bleeds also significantly decreased after starting emicizumab, both for patient with and patients without inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Starting or switching to prophylaxis with emicizumab results in decreased costs for the treatment of patients with haemophilia A. This real-world data could inform on payer decisions as well as future cost-effective analysis.