Safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with haemophilia

Association of diabetes mellitus with long-term prognosis after ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of ablative treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from HCC patients who underwent ablation between January 2016 and December 2019. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were compared between those with and without DM. Predictive factors associated with survival and recurrence were identified through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 3528 patients enrolled in the study, 588 (16.7%) had concurrent DM. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in patients with DM (73.8%, 33.7%, and 5.8%, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than those in the non-DM patients (70.4%, 37.6%, and 18.6%, respectively). Likewise, significant differences (P < 0.001) in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were observed between the DM (99.9%, 78.1%, and 29.1%, respectively) and non-DM (99.9%, 85.9%, and 54.3%, respectively) patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified DM as an independent risk factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.982; P < 0.001] and RFS (HR, 1.175; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with DM exhibited a poorer oncological prognosis than those without DM following ablation for HCC. DM was identified as an independent factor influencing the prognosis of HCC patients after curative ablation. Thus, active therapies targeting DM might enhance oncological outcomes and facilitate individualized treatment decisions.

Clinical course and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Although patients with haemophilia are known to develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a lower age than patients without, there are few reports on the clinical course and prognosis of HCC.

AIM

We aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognosis of patients with HCC and haemophilia.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with haemophilia, who were initially diagnosed with HCC between 2003 and 2021, were included. Their clinical courses and prognoses were retrospectively analysed. The results were compared with those of the 24th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer.

RESULTS

All 22 patients were male; of these, 20 patients had haemophilia A, and 2 had haemophilia B. The mean age of diagnosis was 63 years (range 45-78 years) which is lower than the mean of 72 years reported in the Nationwide Survey. The mean diameter of the largest tumour was 30 mm (range 11-70 mm), and 18 tumours (82%) were solitary at the initial diagnosis. Standard treatments for HCC were performed in all patients. Sixty-one transarterial chemoembolisation, 28 RFA, 10 hepatectomies, and 2 radiation treatments were performed, and molecular-targeted agents were administered to 5 patients during their clinical courses. No deaths were associated with complications of HCC treatments. The median survival time after initial treatment was 6.4 years (range 0.9-18.7 years) which did not differ much from the median survival time of 5.8 years in the Nationwide Survey.

CONCLUSION

Standard treatment for HCC could improve the prognosis of patients with HCC and haemophilia.

The influence of hepatitis C virus eradication on hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in patients with hemophilia lead to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a relatively younger age than that in patients without hemophilia. Although recent progress in direct-acting-antivirals has facilitated a high rate of sustained virological response (SVR), the clinical influence of HCV eradication in hemophilia patients remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SVR against HCV in patients with and without hemophilia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 699 patients who achieved SVR after HCV antiviral treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: 78 patients with hemophilia (H group) and 621 patients without hemophilia (NH group). We evaluated patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the cumulative incidence of HCC after SVR.

RESULTS

Compared with the NH group, patients in the H-group were significantly younger and had a lower hepatic fibrosis score. No difference was found in the incidence of liver-related disease or overall death between the two groups over a mean follow-up period of 7 years. Four patients in the H group and 36 patients in the NH group were diagnosed with HCC after SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex, age, and cirrhosis were significant risk factors for HCC incidence. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of HCC after propensity-score matching adjusting for the risk factors of HCC between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Hemophilia is not a significant risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis after SVR against HCV.