Effectiveness of monthly low dose emicizumab prophylaxis without 4-week loading doses among patients with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors: A case series report

Reduced doses of emicizumab achieve good efficacy: Results from a national-wide multicentre real-world study in China

INTRODUCTION

Reduced doses of emicizumab improve the affordability among patients in developing countries. However, the relationship between variant dose selection and efficacy in the real world of China is still unclear.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of emicizumab especially in those on reduced dose regimens in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We carried out a multicentre study from 28 hospitals between June 2019 and June 2023 in China and retrospectively analysed the characteristics including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, bleeding episodes, and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients with haemophilia A, including 42 with inhibitors, were followed for a median duration of 16.0 (IQR: 9.0-30.0) months. Median age at emicizumab initiation was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0) years. Median (IQR) consumption for loading and maintenance was 12.0 (8.0-12.0) and 4.2 (3.0-6.0) mg/kg/4 weeks, respectively. While on emicizumab, 67 (52.8%) patients had no bleeds, whereas 60 (47.2%) patients had any bleeds, including 26 with treated bleeds. Compared to previous treatments, patients on emicizumab had significantly decreased annualized bleeding rate, annualized joint bleeding rate, target joints and intracerebral haemorrhage. Different dosages had similar efficacy except the proportion of patients with treated spontaneous bleeds and target joints. Adverse events were reported in 12 (9.4%) patients. Postoperative excessive bleeding occurred following two of nine procedures.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study describing patients with HA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis on variant dose regimens in China. We confirmed that nonstandard dose is efficacious and can be considered where full-dose emicizumab is ill affordable.

Haemophilia care in Asia: Learning from clinical practice in some Asian countries

BACKGROUND

The healthcare systems in Asia vary greatly due to the socio-economic and cultural diversities which impact haemophilia management.

METHODS

An advisory board meeting was conducted with experts in haemophilia care from Asia to understand the heterogeneity in clinical practices and care provision in the region.

FINDINGS

The overall prevalence of haemophilia in Asia ranges between 3 and 8.58/100,000 patients. Haemophilia A was more prevalent as compared to haemophilia B with a ratio of around 5:1. There is under-diagnosis in the region due to lack of diagnosis, registries and/or lack of appropriate facilities in suburban areas. Most patients are referred to the haematologists by their families or primary care physicians, while some are identified during bleeding episodes. Genetic testing faces obstacles like resource constraints, services available at limited centres and unwillingness of patients to participate. Prophylaxis is offered for people with haemophilia (PWH) with a severe bleeding phenotype. Recombinant factors are approved in most countries across the region and are the preferred therapy. The challenges highlighted for not receiving a high standard of care include patients' reluctance to use an intravenous treatment, poor patient compliance due to frequency of infusions, budget constraints and lack of funding, insurance, availability and accessibility of factor concentrates. Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies ranged from 5% to 20% in the region. Use of immune tolerance induction and bypassing agents to treat inhibitors depends on their cost and availability.

CONCLUSION

Haemophilia care in Asia has evolved to a great extent. However, some challenges remain for which a strategic approach along with multi-stakeholder involvement are needed.

Low-dose emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A: a retrospective study bringing new hope for our patients

BACKGROUND

Low-dose emicizumab can potentially offer a cost-effective treatment option in persons with hemophilia A, especially in developing countries.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose emicizumab with those on low-dose factor (F)VIII prophylaxis via chart review.

METHODS

After ethics approval, chart data of 2 groups of patients were reviewed: group 1 (low-dose emicizumab, n = 10; 3 mg/kg monthly without a loading dose) and group 2 (low-dose FVIII prophylaxis, n = 10; 10-20 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates twice a week). Outcomes were target joints, annual bleeding rate, annual joint bleeding rate, Hemophilia Joint Health Score, nonactivated thromboelastometry-rotational thromboelastometry clotting time, plasma emicizumab levels, and direct costs of treatment.

RESULTS

All outcome measures were significantly better in the low-dose emicizumab group than in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group. For nonactivated thromboelastometry-rotational thromboelastometry, median values after 6 months in the low-dose emicizumab group were comparable with values seen in patients with mild hemophilia, while the values in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group were similar to those of patients with moderate hemophilia. The direct cost of low-dose emicizumab was found to be approximately US $6000 and that for low-dose recombinant FVIII prophylaxis used in our study was US $6282 (the cost may range from US $3432 to $7920 depending on the type of factor) when compared to approximately US $15 000 for standard-dose emicizumab.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose emicizumab offers a cost-effective treatment option and can improve access in developing countries. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger and better-controlled study.

How much prophylaxis is enough in haemophilia?

INTRODUCTION

Prophylaxis has become standard of care for all persons with haemophilia (PWH) with a severe phenotype. However, 'standard prophylaxis' with either factor or non-factor therapies (currently only emicizumab available) is prohibitively expensive for much of the world. We sought to address the question of 'How much prophylaxis is enough?' and 'Can it be individualized?' and specifically 'Can emicizumab be individualized?'.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on prophylaxis in haemophilia since its inception in the 1950s to the present, the development of more and less intense factor prophylaxis regimens and their outcomes and additionally the published outcomes of prophylaxis with low dose emicizumab.

RESULTS

What these experiences collectively show is that low dose emicizumab does result in significant benefits to patients whilst being much less expensive than a "one size fits all" emicizumab prophylaxis approach. We also took note that some non-factor therapies still in development are individualized given that high doses of these can potentially put patients at risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis is now clearly accepted as standard of care for PWH with a severe phenotype but now in a very short time a large assortment of different treatment options for prophylaxis have become/are becoming available and the haemophilia community will need to determine how to best use these recognizing that no 'one treatment fits all'.

Comparison between natural rubber knee support and sponge knee support on the protection of knee joint: A crossover randomized controlled study among patients with bleeding disorders

Background and Aims

Knee support, frequently made from sponge, is used to reduce injury. Sponge has less elasticity and durability compared with natural rubber. To our knowledge, there was no study that demonstrated the effectiveness of natural rubber and sponge in prevention of injury in children with bleeding disorders. The study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and satisfaction of natural rubber knee support compared with sponge knee support among children with bleeding disorders.

Methods

The study consisted of three phases: (I) measuring reduced compression force, (II) producing size-appropriate knee support prototypes, and (III) conducting a randomized crossover trial, including 8 weeks wearing natural rubber knee support and sponge knee support with a 4-week wash-out period. The number of knee bleeds and user satisfaction were recorded.

Results

A better compression force reduction in natural rubber (60%) than sponge (12%) was demonstrated. Knee support comprised a body part, made from natural-stretchable cotton and a protection part, made from either natural rubber or sponge. They were produced in four sizes: S, M, L, and XL and appropriately applied to 42 patients (21 hemophilia, 21 platelet disorders) with a mean (SD) age of 7.0 (2.9) years. The results from randomization showed no significant difference in the number of knee bleeds between the two knee support groups (10 vs. 7, p = 0.37). In terms of satisfaction score, the natural rubber knee supports were more durable (45.2% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.04) and easier to use (28.5% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.03). In addition, a higher percentage of parents chose natural rubber knee support when compared with sponge knee supports (71.0% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Natural rubber knee support showed comparable effectiveness in the prevention of knee bleeding but was superior to sponge knee support in compression force reduction and satisfaction.

Emicizumab for the Treatment of Acquired Hemophilia A: Consensus Recommendations from the GTH-AHA Working Group

BACKGROUND

 Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a severe bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Standard treatment consists of bleeding control with bypassing agents and immunosuppressive therapy. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of activated FVIII irrespective of the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Recently, the GTH-AHA-EMI study demonstrated that emicizumab prevents bleeds and allows to postpone immunosuppression, which may influence future treatment strategies.

AIM

 To provide clinical practice recommendations on the use of emicizumab in AHA.

METHODS

 A Delphi procedure was conducted among 33 experts from 16 German and Austrian hemophilia care centers. Statements were scored on a scale of 1 to 9, and agreement was defined as a score of ≥7. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement among participants, and strong consensus as ≥95% agreement.

RESULTS

 Strong consensus was reached that emicizumab is effective for bleed prophylaxis and should be considered from the time of diagnosis (100% consensus). A fast-loading regimen of 6 mg/kg on day 1 and 3 mg/kg on day 2 should be used if rapid bleeding prophylaxis is required (94%). Maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg once weekly should be given (91%). Immunosuppression should be offered to patients on emicizumab if they are eligible based on physical status (97%). Emicizumab should be discontinued when remission of AHA is achieved (97%).

CONCLUSION

 These GTH consensus recommendations provide guidance to physicians on the use of emicizumab in AHA and follow the results of clinical trials that have shown emicizumab is effective in preventing bleeding in AHA.

Emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A: Waste estimation and the Brazilian perspective

Costs of hemophilia A treatment are increasing. Waste of clotting products should be avoided. To estimate the first-year waste of emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) who failed immune tolerance induction (ITI), in Brazil. We evaluated the manufacturer and the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) protocol-recommended regimens in a budget impact model. The loading dose consisted of 3.0 mg/kg/Q1W for 4 weeks, for both recommendations. The manufacturer maintenance regimens comprised 1.5 mg/kg/Q1W, 3.0 mg/kg/Q2W, and 6.0 mg/kg/Q4W. The MoH protocol maintenance regimen encompassed a hybrid Q1W/Q2W administration, depending on the body weight. The Q4W regimen was not recommended by the MoH protocol. Analyses were performed to estimate waste given its expense based on the World Health Organization body weight range (percentiles [P] 15, 50, and 85). The first-year emicizumab waste was estimated individually and for the disclosed PwHAi who failed ITI (n = 114). The highest emicizumab waste was estimated for the lowest body weights and the Q1W regimen. The Q4W regimen resulted in the lowest emicizumab waste, followed by the MoH protocol regimen. The total reconstituted costs estimated for the PwHAi who failed ITI according to the hybrid MoH protocol ranged from US$32,858,777 (P15) to US$47,186,858 (P85), with emicizumab waste ranging from 7.9 % (US$2,594,515) to 3.7 % (US$1,738,750), respectively. Lost resources due to current protocols for emicizumab prophylaxis for PwHAi who failed ITI in Brazil are considerable. Waste was more pronounced due to lower body weight and shorter administration intervals.

Paradigm shifts in haemophilia A therapy with emicizumab prophylaxis in Asia

Over the past decade, the development of emicizumab, the first-in-class factor VIII (FVIII), a mimetic monoclonal antibody bispecific to activated factor IX and factor X, has ushered in a significant revolution in non-factor replacement therapy for patients with congenital FVIII deficiency or haemophilia A (HA).

National strategic advocacy to manage patients with inherited bleeding disorders in low and lower-middle income countries

INTRODUCTION

Inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) including hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, platelet disorders, mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and coagulation factor deficiencies are rarely found and under-recognized in low and lower-middle-income countries. Some patients succumbed to serious bleeding without diagnosis and treatment during childhood.

AREA COVERED

Diagnosis, management, and prevention should be integrated into the existing health care system. Although some countries have not implemented appropriate health care infrastructure, an initiative plan should be set up by cooperation of experienced experts and health care providers. Identification of patients with IBDs should be started in the antenatal setting to search for females at risk of carrier state. The investigations include bleeding assessment, mixing venous clotting time, coagulogram, coagulation factor assay and mutation detection. Genotypic analysis is helpful for confirming the definite diagnosis, carrier detection as well as prenatal diagnosis for females at risk of bearing an offspring with severe bleeding manifestations. Management involves replacement therapy ranging from blood component to virus-inactivated factor concentrate. Appropriate research is an essential backbone for improving patients' care.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective national strategic advocacy to manage patients with IBDs requires intensive collaboration among policy makers, health care providers, patients, and family members.

DosEmi study protocol: a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of pharmacokinetic-guided reduced dosing compared with conventional dosing of emicizumab in people with haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab effectively prevents bleeding in people with haemophilia A (PwHA), but is a burden for national healthcare budgets and consequently may limit access. According to the drug label, dosing of emicizumab is based on body weight with fixed intervals of 7, 14 or 28 days, which leads to mean plasma concentrations of 55 µg/mL (SD 15 µg/mL). However, a moderate variability of concentrations and a minimal effective concentration of 30 µg/mL have been suggested in studies. Therefore, a dose of emicizumab that targets a trough concentration of 30 µg/mL is hypothesised to be equally effective as conventional dosing in the prevention of bleeding.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of bleed control of ≥6 months on conventional dosing in comparison to ≥6 months on dose intervention. This dose intervention consists of reducing the dose of emicizumab to target a trough concentrations of 30 µg/mL using individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Ninety-five PwHA aged >1 years who received conventional dosing of emicizumab for ≥12 months with good bleeding control during the last 6 months will be recruited from all Dutch haemophilia treatment centres. The study is powered to detect a clinically relevant decrease (risk difference) of 15% in the proportion of patients without treated bleeds during follow-up. Secondary endpoints are spontaneous joint or muscle bleeds, and annualised treated bleeding rates (using negative binomial regression). Cost-effectivity between conventional dosing and individualised PK-guided dosing of emicizumab will be compared.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The DosEmi study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee NedMec of the University Medical Center of Utrecht, The Netherlands. Study results will be communicated through publications in international scientific journals and presentations at (inter)national conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUCTR2021-004039-10-NL at https://trialsearch.who.int.

PROTOCOL VERSION

V.4.1 on 28 October 2022 (DosEmi protocol_V4.1; NL81112.041.22).

Practices and challenges for hemophilia management under resource constraints in Thailand

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of a specific coagulation factor. Factor VIII deficiency is responsible for hemophilia A while factor IX deficiency is responsible for hemophilia B. As per the 2020 annual global survey by the World Federation of Hemophilia, only 1828 Thai hemophiliacs have been registered to the national healthcare system. The reason for the low number is the underdiagnosis which is a major concern in the real-world practice among Asian countries. In Thailand, most hemophiliacs are diagnosed by general practitioners, pediatricians or internists at rural hospitals and are referred to hemophilia specialists at the Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). Despite the challenges pertaining to infrastructure and cost of treatment, Thailand has progressed substantially in providing the required hemophilia care, as evidenced by an evolution in acquiring and sharing knowledge as well as collaborative efforts among multiple stakeholders over the past three decades. In this letter-to-the-editor, the authors have summarized the practices for and challenges faced with hemophilia management in Thailand.