Objectively measured and self-reported nonadherence among Jordanian patients receiving hemodialysis

The worldwide prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions among hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in hemodialysis (HD) patients can lead to undesired health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to estimate the pooled prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in HD patients.

METHODS

Research papers from PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar on non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in HD patients published between 2000 and 2020 were selected for this study. The methodological quality of each study was graded, and the estimates were pooled using the random-effects model of meta-analysis. Analyses of subgroups and meta-regression were carried out. Egger's test and visual analysis of the symmetry of funnel plots were used to assess the publication bias.

RESULTS

Eight hundred sixty-eight potential records were identified during the search. Twenty-three studies that met inclusion criteria were considered for meta-analysis and comprised 11,209 HD patients (mean age 55.85 years± SD 6.86, males 57.74%). The estimated worldwide prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions was 60.2% (95% CI: 47.3- 72.5) and 60.6% (95% CI: 50- 70.7), respectively. The meta-regression found that the income category was negatively, and the risk of bias score was positively associated with the prevalence of non-adherence to fluid restrictions (p<0.05). The funnel plot of studies included pooling the prevalence of non-adherence to fluid restrictions revealed asymmetry, and a significant publication bias was also noted as assessed by Egger's test (P = 0.004). However, the pooled estimate should be interpreted with caution because the prevalence of individual studies varies considerably due to methodological or measurement discrepancies.

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence of non-adherence to diet (47.3 - 72.5%) and fluid (50 - 70.7%) restrictions were substantially high. The health care team must recognize the factors and barriers influencing adherence behavior and develop holistic interventions to improve it.

Non-adherence to hemodialysis regimens among patients on maintenance hemodialysis in sub-Saharan Africa: an example from Cameroon

Background

Non-adherence (NA) to hemodialysis regimens is one of the contributors to the high morbidity and mortality observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of NA to hemodialysis (HD) regimens among patients on maintenance HD in Cameroon.

Methods

A cross-sectional study in two HD centers in Cameroon was conducted from January to February 2016. Consenting patients on HD for ≥3 months were included. NA to fluid restriction was defined as a mean interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) in the past month >5.7% of the dry weight, NA to dietary restriction as a pre dialysis serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dl in a patient on phosphate binders and who is well-nourished, and NA to HD sessions as skipping at least one session in the past month. The study was approved by the institutional ethics board.

Results

A total of 170 (112 males) participants with a median age of 49 years (range 14–79) were included. The median dialysis vintage was 35 months (range 3–180 months). The prevalence of NA was 15.3% to fluid restriction, 26.9% to dietary restriction, and 21.2% to dialysis sessions. Age ≤49 years (p = .006, OR: 5.07, 95% CI: 1.59–16.20) and unmarried status (p = .041, OR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.04–6.66) were independently associated with NA to fluid restrictions. No factor was associated with NA to dietary restrictions and HD sessions.

Conclusions

NA to HD regimens is common amongst patients in Cameroon. Younger age and being unmarried were the predictors of NA to fluid restriction.

Comparison of the effect of educational and self-management interventions on adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management is very important in hemodialysis patients. Educational and self-management interventions are frequently used to improve adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize a comparison of the effect of educational and self-management interventions on adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using 11 multidisciplinary databases in June 2020. The PRISMA checklist was used. The subgroup analysis was used to compare the effect of educational and self-management interventions on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management.

RESULTS

In the included studies, educational interventions were performed ranging from 15 to 60 minutes, in 1-72 sessions. Self-management interventions were performed ranging from 10 to 120 minutes, in 1-84 sessions. The overall effect of educational interventions was small on adherence to fluid intake (P = .019, Hedges' g = -0.39), diet in serum phosphorus level (P = .001, Hedges' g = -0.35), drug management (P = .002, Hedges' g = -0.44), and not significant on adherence to diet in serum potassium level (P = .181). The overall effect of self-management interventions was small on adherence to fluid intake (P = .001, Hedges' g = -0.19) and diet in serum phosphorus level (P < .001, Hedges' g = -0.42). Additionally, the overall effect of self-management interventions was moderate on adherence to diet in serum potassium level (P = .002, Hedges' g = -0.75) and drug management (P < .001, Hedges' g = -0.55). There was no difference between the educational and self-management interventions on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis shows that educational and self-management interventions had a beneficial effect on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management and no difference between these interventions. Therefore, these interventions can be used by healthcare professionals. It is also recommended that these interventions be well defined and transferable to routine clinical practice.

An integrative review of the methodology and findings regarding dietary adherence in end stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Dietary modification is an important component of the management of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The diet for ESKD involves modifying energy and protein intake, and altering sodium, phosphate, potassium and fluid intake. There have been no comprehensive reviews to date on this topic. The aims of this integrative review were to (i) describe the methods used to measure dietary adherence (ii) determine the rate of dietary adherence and (iii) describe factors associated with dietary adherence in ESKD.

METHODS

The Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched using the search terms 'adherence' and 'end stage kidney disease'. Of the 787 potentially eligible papers retrieved, 60 papers of 24,743 patients were included in this review. Of these papers, 44 reported the rate of dietary adherence and 44 papers described factors associated with adherence.

RESULTS

Most of the evidence regarding dietary adherence is derived from studies of hemodialysis patients (72% of patients). The most common method of measuring dietary adherence in ESKD was subjective techniques (e.g. food diaries or adherence questionnaires). This was followed by indirect methods (e.g. serum potassium, phosphate or interdialytic weight gain). The weighted mean adherence rate to ESKD dietary recommendations was 31.5% and 68.5% for fluid recommendations. Adherence to protein, sodium, phosphate, and potassium recommendations were highly variable due to differences in measurement methods used, and were often derived from a limited evidence base. Socioeconomic status, age, social support and self-efficacy were associated with dietary adherence. However, factors such as taste, the impact of the diet on social eating occasions; and dietetic staffing also appear to play a role in dietary adherence.

CONCLUSION

Dietary adherence rates in people with ESKD are suboptimal. Further research is required on dietary adherence in patients with ESKD from different social, educational, economic and ethnic groups. This research may identify other factors which may impact upon adherence, and could be used to inform the design of future strategies to improve dietary adherence. Future research that reports not just the rate of adherence to individual components of the nutrient prescription but also the overall quality of the diet would be useful.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Index

OBJECTIVE

Public understanding of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is important to ensure informed participation in CKD prevention programs. This study aimed to develop and to test the psychometric profile of the CKD Screening Index that measures patient's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CKD prevention and early detection.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was implemented and a total of 740 Jordanian patients recognized at risk for CKD were recruited by convenience sampling from out-patient departments. Development and psychometric validation of the CKD Screening Index were conducted in four phases: (1) item generation, (2) pilot study, (3) preliminary psychometric validation study to examine factor structure, and (4) final psychometric validation with 740 participants.

RESULTS

On factor analysis, 24 items categorical knowledge items loaded into one factor and yielded a Guttman Split-Half Coefficient of 0.80. In a separate factor analysis, 15 items were loaded on two attitude factors (Cronbach alpha coefficient = 0.69), and nine items loaded on two practice factors (Cronbach alpha coefficient = 0.68). The CKD Screening Index associated significantly and negatively with depressed and anxious patients compared to their counterparts.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This promising CKD Screening Index can be used for an early identification of patients at risk for CKD, thus, allowing the development of interventions to raise these patients' awareness. Future studies are needed on other populations with different cultural background to support reliability and validity of this new instrument.