Assessing the utility of testing aluminum levels in dialysis patients

Aluminum overload in the reverse osmosis dialysis era: does it exist?

Background

Aluminum accumulation is a well-described complication in dialysis patients. Improvements in hemodialysis technology have possibly eliminated the occurrence of aluminum overload. Limited evidence suggests that aluminum overload may decline in the era of aluminum removal from dialysis fluids, even with the use of aluminum binders.

Methods

We examined the data from January 2014 to June 1, 2020, identified through our electronic records, to evaluate the desferrioxamine (DFO) test results for aluminum overload. The presentation and treatment of aluminum overload were recorded.

Results

Ninety-nine dialysis patients were enrolled for the DFO test. Forty-seven patients (47.5%) were identified as DFO test positive for aluminum overload, of which 14 (14/47) patients had symptoms, including one patient with an unexplained fracture, eight patients with unexplained anemia despite high-dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and five patients with hypercalcemia (serum calcium >11 mg dL^-1). None of the patients with aluminum overload developed encephalopathy. Only four of the 47 patients had microcytic anemia. Patients requiring longer treatments (>10 months versus <10 months) had similar basal serum aluminum (p = 0.219) but had an increase in serum aluminum after DFO (p = 0.041). Furthermore, the treatments decreased erythropoietin doses in the aluminum overload group, with serum total alkaline phosphatase levels <60 U L^-1 (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

We concluded that aluminum overload existed in the reverse osmosis dialysis era. In light of non-obvious symptoms, such as anemia and bone turnover change, serum aluminum in dialysis patients should be monitored in countries using aluminum-based phosphate binders, despite reverse osmosis dialysis.

Determination of aluminum concentrations in biological specimens: application in the clinical laboratory

Aluminum enters the body primarily through diet or occupational exposure, and is cleared through urine. However, this trace element may accumulate and cause toxicity in subjects with renal insufficiency, and even in dialysis patients. The mechanism of aluminum toxicity is related to increased oxidative and inflammatory stress, iron and calcium dyshomeostasis, or cholinergic dysregulation, among other. A review was conducted on the specimens and analytical methods used to determine aluminum in biological specimens and dialysis water. This paper describes the most relevant aspects related to quality assurance. This is a practical guideline for the development and implementation of a reliable method for determination of aluminum in the clinical laboratory. Serum aluminum is the main biomarker of toxicity. For cases of chronic exposure, urine testing is recommended. At present, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is the gold-standard determination method, since it has been proven to have the best quantification limits, selectivity and robustness. Clear recommendations are provided in relation to the specimens used for aluminum determination. Relevant pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical considerations are also presented.

Blood Aluminum Levels in Patients with Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Background. This retrospective observational study attempted to examine the prevalence of abnormal blood aluminum levels in dialysis patients, and to explore the association of pathogenic factors, such as demographic, clinical, laboratory as well as the use of phosphate binding drugs, drugs for secondary hyperparathyroidism and erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs with the blood aluminum levels. Methods. The study included 1175 patients (874 hemodialysis and 301 peritoneal dialysis), recruited from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in November 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups by their blood aluminum levels, as normal (<2 µg/dL, n = 1150) or abnormal (≥2 µg/dL, n = 25). Results. The patients aged 60.4 ± 13.2 years and were dialyzed for 8.6 ± 8.1 years. The average blood aluminum level was 1.0 ± 0.4 µg/dL. Patients with abnormal blood aluminum levels received more sevelamer than patients with normal blood aluminum level (p = 0.014). Patients with abnormal blood aluminum levels had higher platelet count (p = 0.001), triglyceride (p < 0.001) and total iron binding capacity (p = 0.003) than patients with normal blood aluminum levels. Moreover, the cardiothoracic ratio was higher in patients with abnormal blood aluminum levels than patients with normal blood aluminum levels (p = 0.003). Conclusions. The prevalence of abnormal blood aluminum levels was low at 2.2%. Nevertheless, the linking of cardiothoracic ratio of more than 0.5 as well as elevated blood platelet count and triglyceride level with blood aluminum levels are interesting, and warranted more researches in this area.

Dose-response relationships in aluminium toxicity in humans

INTRODUCTION

Aluminium exposure is associated with bone disease (an elevated bone content of aluminium and reduced bone formation on bone biopsy) and neurotoxicity (features of altered brain functions and/or typical spike and slow wave waveforms on electroencephalogram) in patients with elevated blood aluminium concentrations.

OBJECTIVES

To critically analyse the literature to determine the dose-toxicity relationships between aluminium exposure and related bone disease and aluminium neurotoxicity.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature with collation and analysis of individual data of human cases of aluminium exposure was conducted between 1 January 1966 and 30 December 2020. Embase, MEDLINE (OVID MEDLINE), PubMed and TOXNET were searched with the following strategies: "Aluminium AND toxicity OR aluminium AND poisoning OR aluminium AND dialysis OR aluminium AND chronic renal failure OR aluminium AND intravenous" limited to "(human)". Inclusion criteria required individual data relating to aluminium exposure in humans. Papers in which features of aluminium toxicity and analytical confirmation of aluminium exposure could not be determined in individual patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven papers were identified, which included data on 179 individuals exposed to aluminium. The sources of aluminium exposure (median duration of exposure) were: dialysis fluid (48 months) in 110 cases; oral aluminium hydroxide (20 months) in 20 cases; plasma exchange (2 months) in 16 cases; infant formula feed (minimal duration of 2 weeks) in 14 cases; intravesical exposures (2 days) in 13 oncology patients and potable water exposure in six cases.

EXPOSURE TO DIALYSIS FLUID

Of the 110 patients exposed to dialysis fluid, 99 were adults and 11 children, who were analysed separated. Of the adults, 50 with aluminium neurotoxicity had a median aluminium concentration of 467 µg/L (IQR 230 - 752), 28 with aluminium bone disease had a median aluminium concentration of 142 µg/L (IQR 46-309) and 21 with asymptomatic aluminium overload had a median aluminium concentration of 35 µg/L (IQR 26-51). Median aluminium concentrations were significantly greater in patients with aluminium neurotoxicity compared to those with aluminium bone disease (p < 0.0001) or asymptomatic aluminium overload (p < 0.0001).

ORAL ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE

Of the 20 cases, 11 were adults and nine were children. Of the 11 adults, eight with aluminium neurotoxicity had a median aluminium concentration of 682 µg/L (IQR 438-770) and three with aluminium bone disease had a median aluminium concentration of 100 µg/L (IQR 62-138) (p = 0.007). Of the nine children, five had aluminium neurotoxicity with a median aluminium concentration of 335 µg/L (IQR 229-601), one had aluminium bone disease and an aluminium concentration of 1030 µg/L and three had asymptomatic aluminium overload with a median aluminium concentration 98 µg/L (IQR 65-365).

PLASMA EXCHANGE

Three patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease developed aluminium bone disease during plasma exchange; their median blood or serum aluminium concentration was 73 µg/L (IQR 59-81). Asymptomatic aluminium overload was reported in six patients receiving outpatient plasma exchange who had a median creatinine clearance of 71 mL/min (IQR 40-106) and a median aluminium concentration of 49 µg/L (IQR 34-116), and in seven intensive care patients with acute kidney injury whose median aluminium concentration was 30 µg/L (IQR 17-35); (p = 0.02).

INTRAVESICAL EXPOSURES

All 13 intravesical exposures developed aluminium neurotoxicity and had a median aluminium concentration of 157 µg/L (IQR 45-276).

POTABLE WATER

All six patients developed aluminium bone disease and their median blood aluminium concentration was 17 µg/L (IQR 13-100).

CONCLUSIONS

Toxic aluminium exposure can result in neurotoxicity and bone disease, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease. Adults with stage 5 chronic kidney disease chronically exposed to aluminium developed aluminium neurotoxicity at higher concentrations than those with aluminium bone disease or with asymptomatic aluminium overload. Aluminium neurotoxicity was reported at lower concentrations following acute exposure to intravesical aluminium. Extrapolating the relevance of these concentrations to the general population is problematic in that the data were derived from oncology patients, however, the possibility that aluminium neurotoxicity may occur at concentrations lower that those reported historically in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease cannot be excluded.

Investigating matrix interference in the pharmacopeial limit test for aluminum in citric acid: a re-examination, for revision of the method

In many pharmacopoeias, the limit test used for determining the level of aluminum in citric acid labeled for use in the manufacture of dialysate, is based on solvent extraction using 8-hydroxyquinoline and measurement of fluorescence. However, the fluorescence intensity (F.I.) readout from the extract of citric acid samples has been found to be highly dubious, showing low value, and even lower than that of a blank solution. The aim of this work therefore was to examine what effects the matrix has on the test. The comparison of the two standard curves of aluminum solutions in water, against those prepared in citric acid solutions revealed that they differed greatly in terms of slope and y-intercept. In addition, the F.I. values on the plot of the citric acid solution were much lower than that prepared in the water. In another experiment, a decrease in the F.I. of aluminum solution was clearly seen when the co-existing concentration of citric acid was increased. The results inferred that citric acid interfered with the test due to its acidity and metal-chelating capabilities. Based on this evidence, the pharmacopeial limit test for aluminum in citric acid should be revised; otherwise, it could yield results that underestimate aluminum levels and lead to inaccurate conclusions

Aluminum Toxicity: Evaluation of 16-Year Trend Among 14 919 Patients and 45 480 Results

CONTEXT

- Annual monitoring with serum aluminum measurements is recommended for dialysis patients who are susceptible to toxic accumulation from contaminated dialysis fluid or from ingestion of aluminum-containing medications.

OBJECTIVE

- To evaluate long-term trends in serum aluminum concentrations and frequency of chronic toxicity.

DESIGN

- A retrospective observational study was conducted by analyzing serum aluminum results obtained from the Veterans Affairs corporate data warehouse. Serum aluminum concentrations of 60 μg/L or greater were considered false positives and not indicative of chronic toxicity if another specimen retested within 45 days had a concentration below 20 μg/L.

RESULTS

- A total of 45 480 serum aluminum results involving 14 919 patients and 119 Veteran Affairs facilities during a 16-year period ending in October 2016 were evaluated. The percentage of elevated (≥20 μg/L) serum aluminum results declined from 31.5% in 2000 to 2.0% in 2015. Average testing intervals changed from every 159 days in 2000 to every 238 days in 2015. Of 529 patients with serum aluminum concentrations of 60 μg/L or greater, 216 (40.8%) were retested within 45 days (average = 21 days); of these, 83 (38.4%) had concentrations below 20 μg/L after repeated measurements. Retesting rates increased with higher initial serum aluminum concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

- Aluminum toxicity, as assessed by serum levels, has substantially declined over time and is now rare. Many serum aluminum concentrations in the toxic range were not confirmed after retesting. Patients with toxic serum aluminum concentrations should be retested with another specimen before undergoing treatment or investigating sources of exposure to verify abnormal results.

Increased Serum Al Levels in Hemodialysis Patients Kept Enhanced during a 2-Year Prospective Study

The regulation of mineral homeostasis is altered in hemodialysis patients with renal insufficiency, producing increased risk for secondary diseases like cardiovascular ones. We hypothesized that risen serum aluminum (Al) concentration in hemodialysis patients kept enhanced during a 2-year longitudinal study is associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk and influenced by medical treatments. This study reports the prospective monitoring of serum Al levels in six-monthly samplings over 2 years in 116 hemodialysis patients and a control group of 50 healthy adults. The influence of other factors like sex, age, kidney transplant, disease etiology, and drug consumption was also considered. At each sampling, serum Al levels were significantly higher in the patients than in the healthy controls (P < 0.05). Levels in the patient group were statistically significantly lower at the third and fourth versus first and second samplings, which may be related to Al accumulation in tissues. Increased Al levels in patients were positively and significantly related to serum calcium (Ca) and uric acid levels. Serum Al concentrations were significantly lower in patients receiving vasodilators and diuretics. Higher serum Al levels in hemodialyzed patients administered with phosphate binders or anti-hyperkalemics are attributable to their usual Al salt content. The consumption of antianemic drugs increases Al absorption by forming more bioavailable complexes with the compounds in these drugs. In conclusion, this is the first study to indicate that cardiovascular problems associated with elevated serum Al levels in hemodialysis patients may be in part mitigated by administrating vasodilators and diuretics, which reduce these levels.