1
|
Lie G, Ahmed N, Shah N, Eleti S, Lam S, Elsaadany A, Akhtar MR, Egan T, White W, Sivaprakasam R, Jaffer O. Adapting a Dialysis Service for Delivery of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulas. Radiographics 2022; 42:1795-1811. [PMID: 36190866 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) is an exciting and novel addition to the vascular access options available to patients with end-stage kidney disease who require dialysis. Early clinical results have been promising, with high rates of maturation and low rates of reintervention. To successfully adapt an existing hemodialysis service to include the provision of pAVF formation, it is essential to identify and align the interests of key clinical and nonclinical stakeholders. Only through strong collaboration can the service be supported. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of the planning fundamentals required, including the referral pathway, screening and clinical assessment, and practical procedural elements and considerations, as well as follow-up requirements such as cannulation, fistula surveillance, and maintenance. Key staffing requirements are highlighted, including those pertaining to vascular US screening and dialysis nurse training. A broad and structured planning approach ensures that the entire network of key stakeholder interests is included and provides a strong foundation for a compelling business plan to attract the necessary funding and managerial support for the service. The authors present a systematic framework of the essential considerations necessary to facilitate the planning, funding, and ultimately delivery of a successful pAVF service. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Lie
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Niaz Ahmed
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Nimesh Shah
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Saigeet Eleti
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Stefan Lam
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Amr Elsaadany
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Mohammed Rashid Akhtar
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Timothy Egan
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - William White
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Rajesh Sivaprakasam
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| | - Ounali Jaffer
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (G.L., N.A., N.S., S.E., A.E., M.R.A., O.J.), Anaesthesia (T.E.), Renal Medicine and Transplantation (W.W.), and Transplant Surgery (R.S.), The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom; and Department of Gastroenterology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walker RC, Howard K, Morton RL. Home hemodialysis: a comprehensive review of patient-centered and economic considerations. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 9:149-161. [PMID: 28243134 PMCID: PMC5317253 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s69340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Internationally, the number of patients requiring treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) continues to increase, placing substantial burden on health systems and patients. Home hemodialysis (HD) has fluctuated in its popularity, and the rates of home HD vary considerably between and within countries although there is evidence suggesting a number of clinical, survival, economic, and quality of life (QoL) advantages associated with this treatment. International guidelines encourage shared decision making between patients and clinicians for the type of dialysis, with an emphasis on a treatment that aligned to the patients’ lifestyle. This is a comprehensive literature review of patient-centered and economic impacts of home HD with the studies published between January 2000 and July 2016. Data from the primary studies representing both efficiency and equity of home HD were presented as a narrative synthesis under the following topics: advantages to patients, barriers to patients, economic factors influencing patients, cost-effectiveness of home HD, and inequities in home HD delivery. There were a number of advantages for patients on home HD including improved survival and QoL and flexibility and potential for employment, compared to hospital HD. Similarly, there were several barriers to patients preferring or maintaining home HD, and the strategies to overcome these barriers were frequently reported. Good evidence reported that indigenous, low-income, and other socially disadvantaged individuals had reduced access to home HD compared to other forms of dialysis and that this situation compounds already-poor health outcomes on renal replacement therapy. Government policies that minimize barriers to home HD include reimbursement for dialysis-related out-of-pocket costs and employment-retention interventions for home HD patients and their family members. This review argues that home HD is a cost-effective treatment, and increasing the proportion of patients on this form of dialysis compared to hospital HD will result in a more equitable distribution of good health outcomes for individuals with ESKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael C Walker
- School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Hawke's Bay District Health Board, Hastings, New Zealand
| | - Kirsten Howard
- School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|