Hemodialysis catheter insertion using transrenal approach

Alternative dialysis access strategies: A case report of a patient with transrenal hemodialysis catheter due to exhausted traditional routes and review of literature

Vascular access is the primary lifeline for patients with end-stage renal disease. While arteriovenous fistulas and grafts are the conventionally favored methods for dialysis therapy, certain patients may deplete these traditional vascular access options due to various reasons. In the quest for alternatives, unconventional vascular pathways could be considered, including transhepatic, trans-lumbar and trans-renal approaches. We present a case of a 61-year-old male who exhausted all the traditional vascular access options, therefore trans-renal hemodialysis catheter placement was performed. Overall, this case highlights the challenges of securing a reliable vascular access to perform dialysis therapy and implementing unconventional methods whenever regular means are exhausted.

Transrenal Hemodialysis Catheter Insertion and Replacement in Patients with Upper Extremity Central Venous Access Exhaustion

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis may suffer upper extremity central venous access failure and require an alternative route. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transrenal hemodialysis catheter insertion/replacement in patients with upper extremity central venous access failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was made of transrenal hemodialysis catheter insertion/replacement performed between 2014 and 2020. The history of renal replacement therapy and central venous catheters and the technical details of transrenal hemodialysis catheter insertion/replacement, patency, removal and complications were obtained for all patients.

RESULTS

Six insertion and four replacement procedures involving transrenal hemodialysis catheters were evaluated in six patients (M:F = 3:3; median age, 49.5 years). Percutaneous transrenal (right:left = 1:5) hemodialysis catheter insertion was technically successful without complication in all six patients. In two patients, the tract was not lost because the safety guidewire was still in place, so no second puncture was required. The mean procedure time was 33.0 ± 9.2 min. The mean primary patency duration was 107.3 ± 70.9 days. During the mean follow-up duration of 141.2 ± 137.1 days, four hemodialysis catheter replacement procedures were successfully performed for catheter malfunction (n = 2) and dislodgement (n = 2). Catheter removal was successfully performed in four patients after confirming normal coagulation, followed by subsequent renal replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous insertion/replacement of transrenal hemodialysis catheters is feasible, safe, and effective when upper extremity central venous access is exhausted, and the catheters can be maintained for a reasonable period of time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case Series.

Systematic Review of Atrial Vascular Access for Dialysis Catheter

Introduction

The last decade has seen a steady increase worldwide in the prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Hemodialysis is the major modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 70% to 90% of patients, who require well-functioning vascular access for this procedure. The recommended access for hemodialysis is an arteriovenous fistula or a vascular graft. However, recourse to central venous catheters remains essential for patients whose chronic renal disease is diagnosed at the end stage or in whom an arteriovenous fistula cannot be created or maintained. Tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) exposure can induce venous stenosis and occlusions and can result in superior vena cava syndrome and/or vascular access loss. Exhaustion of conventional vascular accesses is 1 of the greatest challenges that nephrologists and patients have to face. Several unconventional salvage-therapy routes for TDC placement in patients with exhausted upper body venous access have been reported in the literature.

Methods

We report 2 new cases of intra-atrial TDC placement for patients with exhausted vascular access and perform a meta-analysis of cases from the literature.

Results

A total of 51 patients were included. The TDC was inserted by a cardiovascular surgeon in all cases. At the end of follow-up, 75% patients were alive. The median survival time was 25 months. Survival time of hemodialysis patients with intra-atrial TDC was lower than that observed with conventional TDC.

Conclusions

This unconventional technique is safe and functional for hemodialysis patients with exhausted venous access. Atrial vascular access for TDC placement is salvage therapy and is therefore potentially lifesaving.