Potentially pathogenic circulating autoantibodies to cardiac troponin are present in hemodialysis patients

High-sensitive troponin T, suPAR and Beta-2-microglobulin changes in concentration during hemodialysis

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and death. Reliable biomarkers for risk stratification and detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are therefore pivotal. Cardiac troponins (cTn) are the preferred biomarkers for AMI. It remains unclear, if cTn concentrations changes as a consequence of HD treatment itself during dialysis. In this study, cTn was compared with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M). We performed a prospective study including 17 HD patients measuring high-sensitive cardiac troponin t (hs-cTnT), suPAR and B2M before and after a dialysis session and verified the results in a random subgroup of eight patients from the group by repeating their measurements before and after a dialysis session 15 weeks later. Biomarker concentrations after dialysis were adjusted according to hemodilution or concentration according to the hemoglobin concentration. The average hs-cTnT concentration decreased significantly by -9.9% after dialysis (95% CI: -13.6% to -6.2%). The average (paired) difference were - 6.7 ng/L (p = 0.0104) after dialysis comparing 25 HD treatment occasions. SuPAR was not significantly influenced by dialysis. B2M decreased by -58% after HD as an expected result from the molecular size of the biomarker. The hs-cTnT in average decreased by -9.9% after dialysis. This is a diagnostic challenge since the current guidelines suggest a 20% change in hs-cTnT in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Larger prospective studies investigating the different factors influencing hs-cTnT after HD are warranted. Adjusting biomarker concentrations according to hemodilution or concentration using the hemoglobin concentration, should be considered in future studies to determine more exact changes in concentrations of cTnT and other relevant biomarkers.

Home Dialysis in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases

Kidney failure with replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease are frequently comorbid. In patients with kidney failure with replacement therapy, cardiovascular disease is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Conventional thrice-weekly in-center dialysis confers risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including acute hemodynamic fluctuations and rapid shifts in volume and solute concentration. Home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD) may offer benefits in attenuation of cardiovascular disease risk factors primarily through improved volume and BP control, reduction (or slowing progression) of left ventricular mass, decreased myocardial stunning, and improved bone and mineral metabolism. Importantly, although trial data are available for several of these risk factors for home hemodialysis, evidence for PD is limited. Among patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease, home hemodialysis and PD may also have potential benefits. PD may offer particular advantages in heart failure given it removes volume directly from the splanchnic circulation, thus offering an efficient method of relieving intravascular congestion. PD also avoids the risk of blood stream infections in patients with cardiac devices or venous wires. We recognize that both home hemodialysis and PD are also associated with potential risks, and these are described in more detail. We conclude with a discussion of barriers to home dialysis and the critical importance of interdisciplinary care models as one component of advancing health equity with respect to home dialysis.