Sertraline can reduce uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patient: A double blind randomized clinical trial from Southern Iran

Identification and Management of CKD-Associated Pruritus: Current Insights

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a frequent and distressing problem for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. It affects around 20% of those with CKD and 40% of those with end-stage renal disease. Despite its clear association with poorer psychosocial and medical outcomes, it is often underreported by patients and frequently remains unnoticed by healthcare providers. This is likely due to uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment. Most commonly, CKD-aP could be screened with questionnaires like the KDQoL-36 and WI-NRS, chosen for their simplicity and ease of use. Prior treatment studies of CKD-aP were mostly limited by noncontrolled design and small sample size. First CKD-aP medication - difelikefalin a powerful, new therapeutic option was approved by Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021 and European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2022. Recent expert opinions, clinical trials and metanalysis identified difelikefalin and gabapentinoids as medications of choice in treatment of CKD-aP. All these findings improved current understanding and management of this condition.

Comparison Between Pregabalin and Sertraline in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Patients With Maintenance Hemodialysis

Introduction Pruritus, a medical symptom also known as itch, is characterized by an unpleasant feeling coupled with the urge to scratch. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often have symptoms of pruritus due to uremia, which has adversely affected their quality of life. The treatment protocol for CKD pruritus is still being debated due to its unclear etiopathogenesis. Pregabalin, an anticonvulsant medication, and sertraline, an antidepressant medication, have been used to treat uremic pruritus (UP) patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Objectives There are no adequate investigations comparing the efficacy of pregabalin and sertraline, particularly in under-resourced countries such as Pakistan. Method The research was a randomized trial for a period of four weeks at the nephrology department of the Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 62 patients were randomly assigned to take either pregabalin (aged 48.06±13.44) or sertraline (aged 47.45±10.97) tablet once a day, a total of 31 patients to each group. The pregabalin group was specified 25 mg for the first week, 50 mg for the second week, and 75 mg for the third and fourth week. Similarly, sertraline was prescribed 25 mg for the first week and 50 mg for the remaining three weeks. However, if the patient shows improvement on the lowest dosage, therapy with the same minimum dose was proposed to be continued. Lastly, the itching score was assessed on the 5D pruritus scale. The Visit 1 (no drug) score was evaluated against post-therapy scores at two-week intervals as Visit 2 (week 2) and Visit 3 (week 4). Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 26; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) with a significance level set at p<0.05 and 95% confidence level. Conclusion This research concluded that both pregabalin and sertraline significantly improved itching intensity in each treatment group; however, there was no significant difference between the two drugs in reducing UP based on the 5D itching scores. In each domain of the 5D pruritus scale, a significant difference was found in post-follow-up pregabalin and sertraline therapy.

Pathways for Diagnosing and Treating CKD-Associated Pruritus: A Narrative Review

Purpose of Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a common, persistent, and distressing itch experienced by patients across the CKD spectrum. Although the disorder is associated with adverse outcomes and poor health-related quality of life, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this narrative review is to offer health care providers guidance on how to effectively identify, assess, and treat patients with CKD-associated pruritus, with the goal of reducing symptom burden and improving patient-important outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL).

Sources of Information

A panel of nephrologists and researchers from across Canada and the United States was assembled to develop this narrative review based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and their clinical experiences.

Methods

A panel of nephrologists who actively care for patients with pruritus receiving dialysis from across Canada was assembled. Two researchers from the United States were also included based on their expertise in the diagnosis and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Throughout Spring 2023, the panel met to discuss key topics in the identification, assessment, and management of CKD-associated pruritus. Panel members subsequently developed summaries of the pertinent information based on the best available data, current treatment guidelines, and added information on their own clinical experiences. In all cases, approval of the article was sought and achieved through discussion.

Key Findings

This narrative review provides pragmatic guidance addressing: (1) methods for screening CKD-associated pruritus, (2) assessing severity, (3) management of CKD-associated pruritus, and (4) suggested areas for future research. The panel developed a 3-pillar framework for proactive assessment and severity scoring in CKD-aP: systematic screening for CKD-associated pruritus (pillar 1), assessment of pruritus intensity (pillar 2), and understanding the impact of CKD-associated pruritus on the patient's QoL (pillar 3). Management of CKD-associated pruritus can include ensuring optimization of dialysis adequacy, achieving mineral metabolism targets (ie, calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone). However, treatment of CKD-associated pruritus usually requires additional interventions. Patients, regardless of CKD-associated pruritus severity, should be counseled on adequate skin hydration and other non-pharmacological strategies to reduce pruritus. Antihistamines should be avoided in favor of evidence-based treatments, such as difelikefalin and gabapentin.

Limitations

A formal systematic review (SR) of the literature was not undertaken, although published SRs were reviewed. The possibility for bias based on the experts' own clinical experiences may have occurred. Key takeaways are based on the current available evidence, of which head-to-head clinical trials are lacking.

Funding

This work was funded by an arm's length grant from Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc. (the importer and distributer of difelikefalin in Canada). LiV Medical Education Agency Inc. provided logistical and editorial support.

The effectiveness of sertraline in alleviating uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Uremic pruritus (UP) is a common and distressing symptom in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Many approaches have been tested to improve UP without a clear success. We aimed to assess the effect of sertraline on UP in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

This research is a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentric randomized clinical trial which included sixty patients maintained on regular HD. Patients were allocated to receive sertraline 50 mg twice daily or placebo for 8 weeks. The Visual analogue scale (VAS) and the 5-D itch scale were used to assess pruritus before and after the course of treatment.

RESULTS

At study end in sertraline group, there was a significant decrease from baseline findings in the VAS score (p < 0.001), and the 5-D itch scale (p < 0.001). On the other hand, in placebo group the VAS score showed a slight non-significant decrease (p = 0.469), and the 5-D scale (p = 0.584) increased from baseline measurements. The percentage of patients with severe and very severe pruritus decreased significantly in the sertraline group in both scores [(VAS score: p = 0.004), (5-D itch score: p = 0.002)] with no significant change in the placebo group [(VAS score: p = 0.739), (5-D itch scale: p = 0.763)]. There was a significant positive relation between the VAS and 5-D itch scores and serum urea with p value of 0.002 and 0.001 respectively, and serum ferritin with p value of < 0.001 with both.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with sertraline had a significant improvement in pruritus as compared with those who received placebo suggesting a potential role for sertraline to treat uremic pruritus in HD patients. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05341843. First registration date: 22/04/2022.

Choosing the right chronic medication for hemodialysis patients. A short ABC for the dialysis nephrologist

BACKGROUND

Adapting drug treatments for patients on hemodialysis with multiple chronic pathologies is a complex affair. When prescribing a medication, the risk-benefit analysis usually focuses primarily on the indication of the drug class prescribed. However, the pharmacokinetics of the chosen drug should also be taken into account. The purpose of our review was to identify the drugs to be favored in each therapeutic class, according to their safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, for the most common chronic diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of the literature using Medline and Web of Science databases, targeting studies on the most commonly-prescribed drugs for non-communicable diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

RESULTS

The search identified 1224 articles, 95 of which were further analyzed. The main classes of drugs included concern the cardiovascular system (anti-hypertensives, anti-arrhythmics, anti-thrombotics, hypocholesterolemics), the endocrine and metabolic pathways (anti-diabetics, gastric anti-secretory, anticoagulant, thyroid hormones, anti-gout) and psychiatric and neurological disorders (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics and anti-epileptics).

CONCLUSION

We report on the most often prescribed drugs for chronic pathologies in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Most of them require adaptation, and in some cases one better alternative stands out among the drug class. More pharmacokinetic data are needed to define the pharmacokinetics in the various dialysis techniques.

Uremic pruritus: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatments

Uremic pruritus is one of the most common and bothersome symptoms in patients with end-stage renal disease. Most patients with uremic pruritus experience a prolonged and relapsing course and significant impairments of quality of life. The pathophysiology of uremic pruritus is not completely understood. A complex interplay among cutaneous biology and the nervous and immune systems has been implicated, with the involvement of various inflammatory mediators, neurotransmitters, and opioids. Uremic pruritus treatment outcomes are often unsatisfactory. Clinical trials have mostly been small in scale and have reported inconsistent results. Recent evidence shows that gabapentinoids, nalfurafine, and difelikefalin are effective for relieving uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology and proposed mechanisms of uremic pruritus, then highlights the manifestations of and clinical approach to uremic pruritus. Current evidence regarding treatment options, including topical treatments, treatment of underlying disease, phototherapy, and systemic treatments, is also outlined. With a better understanding of uremic pruritus, more therapeutic options can be expected in the near future.

Pruritus in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Update

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKDaP) is an often under-diagnosed and under-recognized condition, despite its considerable prevalence within the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Universally accepted guidelines are also lacking. The true prevalence of CKDaP worldwide therefore remains unknown, although its negative impact on mortality and health-related quality of life outcomes is very clear. The pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the onset of CKDaP are only partly understood. CKDaP is currently believed to be caused by a multifactorial process, from local skin changes, metabolic alterations, the development of neuropathy and dysregulation of opioid pathways, and psychological factors. Much work has been carried out towards a more systematic and structured approach to clinical diagnosis. Various tools are now available to assess the severity of CKDaP. Many of these tools require greater validation before they can be incorporated into the guidelines and into routine clinical practice. Further efforts are also needed in order to increase the awareness of clinicians and patients so that they can identify the CKDaP signs and symptoms in a timely manner. Currently established treatment options for CKDaP focus on the prevention of xerosis via topical emollients, the optimization of dialysis management, early referral to kidney transplantation if appropriate, oral antihistamine, and a variety of neuropathic agents. Other novel treatment options include the following: topical analgesics, topical tacrolimus, cannabinoid-containing compounds, antidepressants, oral leukotrienes, opioids, and non-pharmacological alternative therapies (i.e., phototherapy, dietary supplements, acupuncture/acupressure). We provide an updated review on the evidence relating to the epidemiology, the pathophysiology, the clinical assessment and diagnosis, and the management of CKDaP.

Utility of a Single Itch-Related Question and the Skindex-10 Questionnaire for Assessing Pruritus and Predicting Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus has been linked with poorer mental and physical health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients receiving hemodialysis. We used the Skindex-10 questionnaire and a single itch-related question to evaluate their prediction of HR-QOL.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, international cohort.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed data from 4,940 patients receiving hemodialysis from 17 countries enrolled in phase 5 (2013) of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

PREDICTORS

The responses to the 10 questions of Skindex-10 (0-6 scale) pertaining to itchiness in the past week were summed to create a summary score (range, 0-60). Concurrently, a single question from the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item survey asked "during the past 4 weeks, to what extent were you bothered by itchy skin?" with 5 responses, ranging from "not at all" to "extremely" bothered.

OUTCOMES

Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of HR-QOL.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

We used separate linear regression models to evaluate the predictive power, based on R2 values, for 3 models: 1 for each predictor and 1 with both predictors.

RESULTS

The correlation between the single itch-related question and the Skindex-10 score was 0.72. A 10-point higher Skindex-10 score was associated with a 1.2-point lower PCS score (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.9) and a 1.5-point lower MCS score (95% CI, -1.7 to -1.3) . The R2 value for PCS was 0.065 when the single question was used and only 0.033 when Skindex-10 was used as the predictor; the R2 value for MCS was 0.056 for the single question versus 0.052 for Skindex-10.

LIMITATIONS

Measurement bias and translation issues in the questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

The single question about the extent to which the patients were bothered by itchy skin was highly correlated with the Skindex-10 score and at least as predictive of key HR-QOL measures. In daily clinical practice, using 1 simple question about the extent to which patients are bothered by itchy skin can be a feasible and efficient method for the routine assessment of pruritus.

Clinical management of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: current treatment options and future approaches

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is an underdiagnosed yet severely distressing condition that impacts 60% of patients on dialysis and many nondialysis patients with Stages 3–5 CKD. However, despite its high prevalence, there are currently limited treatment options available for these patients and a lack of treatment guidelines for clinicians. In this manuscript, we reviewed the available literature in order to evaluate the current management and treatment options for CKD-aP, including dialysis management, topical treatments, gabapentinoids, opioids and alternative medicine. We also review the available data on CKD-aP treatments in development and propose new guidelines for managing patients with CKD-aP.

Western and complementary alternative medicine treatment of uremic pruritus: A literature review

Uremic pruritus (UP), also called chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), is a bothersome symptom that causes sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Pruritus often occurs in patients with end-stage renal disease. There is still no definite treatment for UP due to its unclear pathogenesis. We searched electronic databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) and gathered the latest clinical trials and pilot studies of Western and complementary alternative medicine (CAM) therapies for UP in English. These UP studies were separated into three main groups: systemic, topical, and others and CAM. Gabapentin, nalfurafine, acupuncture, and Chinese herbal bath therapy (CHBT) show antipruritic effects, with higher evidence grades in the meta-analysis. Emollients with additive compounds are more effective for reducing itch than emollients without additives. Supplements for deficient elements, such as zinc, omega-3, and omega-6, also show benefits for pruritus improvement. CAM therapies such as acupuncture, herbs, and herbal baths or creams all have good results for UP treatment. We summarize the treatments and suggest a treatment algorithm for UP according to severity. Some UP therapies are already supported by large-scale clinical evidence, and some new treatments can provide patients with new hope and treatment options. However, these new methods still need large population studies and further exploration.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus: A Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), also known as uraemic pruritus, is a disabling symptom for patients and a challenging condition for clinicians. Despite being common amongst end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, it remains underestimated and underdiagnosed. The exact pathogenesis remains largely elusive, which hampers the synthesis of a definite treatment approach.

SUMMARY

Chronic pruritus (lasting 6 weeks or more in duration) is a common and potentially disabling symptom in patients with advanced CKD. A unified hypothesis of pathogenesis has not yet been concluded. Studies have shown changes in the immunochemical milieu of the skin in patients with CKD-aP with several inciting stimuli identified. However, other unrecognized factors are likely to be involved. This article will review the current observations and understanding of the postulated pathogenesis of CKD-aP, as well as the evidence for current management strategies. Key Messages: CKD-aP is a common and troubling symptom amongst ESKD patients that is associated with decreased quality of life and poor prognosis. Its exact pathogenesis, at the time of writing, is not well-understood. A stepwise approach is recommended for management. Systematic reviews show the largest body of evidence was found for the effectiveness of gabapentin. Comparison is needed between newly emerging pharmacological agents such as kappa-opioid receptor agonists and more established agents, such as the gabapentinoids. Finally, renal transplantation should be considered in severe and refractory cases who are suitable transplant candidates as it has shown an excellent outcome in most cases.

Use of Sertraline in Hemodialysis Patients

Depression and anxiety are the most common psychiatric disorders in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) and may correlate with lower quality of life and increased mortality. Depression treatment in HD patients is still a challenge both for nephrologists and psychiatrists. The possible treatment of depressive disorders can be pharmacological and non-pharmacological. In our article, we focus on the use of sertraline, the medication which seems to be relatively safe and efficient in the abovementioned population, taking under consideration several limitations regarding the use of other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In our paper, we discuss different aspects of sertraline use, taking into consideration possible benefits and side effects of drug administration like impact on QTc (corrected QT interval) prolongation, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), bleeding, sexual functions, inflammation, or fracture risk. Before administering the medication, one should consider benefits and possible side effects, which are particularly significant in the treatment of ESRD patients; this could help to optimize clinical outcomes. Sertraline seems to be safe in the HD population when provided in proper doses. However, we still need more studies in this field since the ones performed so far were usually based on small samples and lacked placebo control.

Efficacy of uremic pruritus treatment in patients undergoing hemodialysis, a network meta-analysis for randomized clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Uremic pruritus is very common in hemodialysis or renal failure patients, there were lots of available treatments such as gabapentin, pregabalin, ondansetron, etc. However, there is no quantified study comparing these treatments together, it is impossible to conduct a clinical trial involving so many treatments, so we conduct a network meta-analysis to compare them.

METHOD

We collected mean difference and standard error of visual analogue scale data as outcome. In total we collected 15 articles, 15 articles, 1180 subjects and 6 treatments included to this study.

RESULTS

In these comparisons, gabapentin showed the largest effect MD: 5.19, 95%CI [3.77, 6.61], anti-histamine MD: 4.65, 95%CI [2.22, 7.07] and pregabalin MD: 4.62, 95%CI [2.71, 6.62] showed a similar effect. Opioid pathway related treatment also showed a significant but not so large effect MD: 2.45, 95%CI [0.41, 4.49]. Ondansetron and Doxepin didn't show a significant improvement among placebo, the overall quantifying heterogeneity I2=43.1%. There is no statically difference between gabapentin, pregabalin and anti-histamine treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

So we conclude that gabapentin, pregabalin and anti-histamine has a similar efficacy on pruritus control.

Determinants of the intensity of uremic pruritus in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Uremic pruritus (UP) is a common and frustrating symptom in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD). The majority of patients have mild to moderate itching of the skin, and a small percentage have severe itching, which seriously affects their quality of life and survival rate. However, little is known about factors that influence the intensity of itching in patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study on uremic pruritus in male and female patients receiving HD was conducted in September 2019. This study included 148 eligible patients who received HD at the Blood Purification Center of Xinchang County People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China from March 2019 to June 2019. We collected general data consisted of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), place of residence, educational level, diabetes mellitus status and duration of HD; as well as clinical, biochemical indicators, including serum calcium (Ca), serum phosphorus (P), serum albumin (ALB), haemoglobin (Hb), serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), pre-dialysis serum urea nitrogen (BUN), normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), urea nitrogen clearance index (KT/V), ferritin (FER) and pre-dialysis serum creatinine (sCR). We also assayed the inflammatory cytokine serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The Five-Dimensional Itching Scale (5DIS) was used to evaluate the degree of skin itching (none, mild, moderate, or severe). We used multiple logistic regression to analyze influencing factors on the degree of skin itching in patients with UP.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients, 60 had uremic pruritus (incidence rate, 40.54%). These included 22 cases of mild skin itching (14.86%), 30 of moderate skin itching (20.27%), and 8 of severe skin itching (5.41%). Compared with uremia patients without skin pruritus, patients with UP had higher levels of iPTH, Hb, BUN, nPCR, and hs-CRP. The composition ratio showed significant differences between urban and rural patients with different degrees of skin itching (P = 0.017); moreover, the difference of iPTH and hs-CRP levels were statistically significant (P = 0.009 and < 0.001, respectively). Using no itching as a reference, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that as hs-CRP level increased, the patient's risks of mild skin itching (odds ratio [OR] = 1.740; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.061-2.854; P = 0.028), moderate skin itching (OR = 2.8838 95% CI, 1.744-4.718; P < 0.001), and severe skin itching (OR = 9.440; 95% CI, 3.547-25.124; P < 0.001) all increased as well. Compared with urban residents, rural residents have a higher risk of moderate itching (OR = 3.869; 95% CI, 1.099-13.622; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Levels of hs-CRP were associated with the intensity of skin itching in patients with UP. Higher hs-CRP levels were closely related to severe skin itching. The relationship between the intensity of skin itching and the environment in maintenance hemodialysis patients needs further clarification.

Interventions for itch in people with advanced chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Itch in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, often very distressing and associated with depression, reduced quality of life, and increased death. The most common first-line treatment has been the use of antihistamines despite the lack of substantial evidence for its use for uraemic itch. Few recommendations and guidelines exist for treatment.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine: 1) the benefits and harms (both absolute and relative) of all topical and systemic interventions for the treatment of uraemic itch, either alone or in combination, when compared with placebo or standard care; and, 2) the dose strength or frequency, stage of kidney disease or method of dialysis used (where applicable) in cases where the effects of these interventions vary depending on co-interventions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 17 December 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with CKD stages 4 or 5 comparing treatments (pharmacological, topical, exposure, dialysis modality) for CKD associated itch to either placebo or other established treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently abstracted study data and assessed study quality. Data were analysed using a random effects meta-analysis design estimating the relative effects of treatment versus placebo. Estimates of the relative effects between treatments are included where possible. For continuous measures of severity of itch up to three months, mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) were used. When reported, adverse effects were tabulated. The certainty of the evidence was estimated using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-two RCTs, randomising 4466 participants were included. Fifty-eight studies (3285 participants) provided sufficient data to be meta-analysed. Of these, 30 compared an intervention to a placebo or control. The 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was the dominant instrument utilized for itch reporting and the Duo score was used in a minority of studies. GABA analogues including, gabapentin and pregabalin, reduce itch in patients with CKD (5 studies, 297 participants: 4.95 cm reduction, 95% CI 5.46 to 4.44 lower in VAS compared to placebo; high certainty evidence). Kappa opioid agonists, including nalfurafine also reduced itch in this population (6 studies, 661 participants: 1.05 cm reduction, 95% CI 1.40 to 0.71 lower in VAS compared to placebo; high certainty evidence). Ondansetron had little or no effect on itch scores (3 studies, 183 participants: 0.38 cm reduction, 95% CI 1.04 lower to 0.29 higher in VAS compared to placebo; high certainty evidence). Reduction in the severity of itch was reported with oral montelukast, turmeric, zinc sulfate and topical capsaicin. For all other interventions, the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate, and the interventions had uncertain effects on uraemic pruritus. Six studies have disclosed significant financial support from their respective manufacturers, six were affected by lack of blinding, and 11 studies have 15 participants or less. Older, smaller RCTs often failed to follow intention-to-treat protocols with unexplained dropouts after randomisation. Adverse effects were generally poorly and inconsistently reported across all RCTs. No severe adverse events were reported for any intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The RCTs of this meta-analysis contain a large array of interventions with a diverse set of comparators. For many interventions, trials are sparse. This served to make informative meta-analysis challenging. Of all treatments for uraemic pruritus, gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) were the most studied and show the greatest reduction in itch scores. Further RCTs, even of the scale of the largest trials included in this review, are unlikely to significantly change this finding. Kappa-opioid agonists (mainly nalfurafine) also may reduce itch, but indirect comparison suggests a much more modest effect in comparison to GABA analogues. Evidence for oral montelukast, turmeric, zinc sulfate, and topical capsaicin also showed an itch score reduction. However, these reductions were reported in small studies, and warrant further investigation. Ondansetron did not reduce itch. It is somewhat unlikely that a further study of ondansetron will change this result.

Current and emerging systemic treatments targeting the neural system for chronic pruritus

INTRODUCTION

Pruritus is a debilitating symptom that significantly affects the quality of life of patients who suffer from it. Many current and emerging systemic treatments targeting the neural system have been successful in treating itch of various underlying etiologies.

AREAS COVERED

A complete search of the PUBMED and Google Scholar databases was completed and literature pertinent to current and emerging systemic anti-pruritic drugs which target the neural system was compiled. The purpose of this review is to give the reader with an overview of the current and emerging systemic therapeutic options which target the neural system for chronic pruritus. The authors then provide the reader with their expert perspectives on the future of these therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Exciting new anti-pruritic therapies targeting the neural system which show promise include NK-1 inhibitors, opioid receptor modulators, and drugs targeting specific itch receptors such as Mrgpr, Na_v1.7, and PAR2, as well as selective GABA modulators. Future studies should be conducted in order to fully understand these exciting therapeutic options.

Treatments of uremic pruritus: A systematic review

Till now many treatments attempted to relieve uremic pruritus (UP) though none of them are definite treatment. In this study, we gathered all studies conducted on UP treatment since 2000-2016. We conducted a systematic review by searching the electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar). Patients were with chronic kidney disease who complained of UP. Clinical trials and pilot studies in English and Persian which were done on patients with ESRD who complained of itching between 2000 till 2016 were gathered. A total of 166 articles were collected. After excluding articles 41 articles were remaining. Then UP treatments classified into two main groups: Medical (chemical and herbal medicine) and non-medical. Most studies measured UP by VAS scoring system in which patients described the severity. This scoring system is individual dependent. There are lots of studies on UP treatment though there are lots of controversies in studies. Finding a definite cure for this unpleasant symptom can improve patients' quality of life. Conducting further studies for each treatment on larger population is essential to improve quality of life among the end stage renal disease patients.

Itch and psyche: psychiatric aspects of pruritus

Itch, also referred to as pruritus, is an unpleasant cutaneous sensation provoking the desire to scratch. It is often an uncomfortable, subjective sensation responsible for decreased quality of life in a variety of psychodermatological conditions. Comorbid psychiatric conditions, including depression and anxiety, are frequently associated with itch and scratch cycle. The reciprocal and intricate relationship between the psyche and itch has been widely studied. The neurobiology of itch involves the complexity of specific mediators, itch-related neuronal pathways, and central processing of itch. The connection between itch and the psyche can be grouped under three headings: pruritic diseases with psychosocial sequelae, pruritic diseases aggravated by psychosocial factors, and psychiatric disorders causing pruritus. Itch and pain modulation go together in most circumstances and involve various substances including histamine, interleukins, protease-activated receptors, transient receptor potential receptors, opioids, and cannabinoids. The close interaction between keratinocytes and nerve endings modulating pain and itch also play a major role. Management of itch associated with its psychosomatic components is directed at an underlying cause and adopting a holistic approach to address not only dermatologic and somatosensory aspects, but also the cognitive, emotional, and psychosocial components. An integrated multidisciplinary team consisting of a dermatologist, psychiatrist, psychologist, and social worker is vital in addressing the multifaceted aspects of pruritus.

The vicious cycle of itch and anxiety

Chronic itch is associated with increased stress, anxiety, and other mood disorders. In turn, stress and anxiety exacerbate itch, leading to a vicious cycle that affects patient behavior (scratching) and worsens disease prognosis and quality of life. This cycle persists across chronic itch conditions of different etiologies and even to some extent in healthy individuals, suggesting that the final common pathway for itch processing (the central nervous system) plays a major role in the relationship between itch and anxiety. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments that reduce anxiety have shown promising anti-itch effects. Further research is needed to establish specific central mechanisms of the itch-anxiety cycle and provide new targets for treatment.