Successful use of arterio-venous graft for hemodialysis in patient with hemophilia

End Stage Renal Failure Patients With Hemophilia Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis: A Case Series

Introduction

Currently, no consensus on optimal renal replacement modality has been reached for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients complicated with hemophilia. They may require infusion of coagulation factors during each hemodialysis session. In comparison, peritoneal dialysis (PD) might be preferred considering that coagulation replacement is only required for catheter placement. However, limited data on the safety and efficacy of PD for treating ESRD patients with hemophilia were reported.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. ESRD patients diagnosed with hemophilia under PD in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2021 were included and followed-up with every month. Their baseline clinical data, catheter insertion procedure, coagulation factor replacement, complications, and outcome were analyzed and compared with general PD patients.

Results

In total, 8 patients diagnosed with hemophilia were included, all-male, with a mean age of 50.3±13.3 years old. Two were acquired hemophilia A, whereas the rest were hereditary hemophilia A (HHA). Seven patients experienced significant hemoglobin (Hgb) increment after PD. Peritoneal hemorrhage only consisted of a small portion of all hemorrhage. Patients with hemophilia seemed to have lower small solute clearance despite higher baseline peritoneal permeability, and appeared to have increased peritonitis rate than other male PD patients, yet this study is not powered to prove this.

Conclusion

PD is a safe and effective choice for patients with hemophilia and ESRD requiring dialysis. More studies are required to evaluate this certain rare group of patients.

Induction of hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula in a patient with hemophilia A

An 88-year-old man with congenital hemophilia A developed end-stage renal disease due to microscopic polyangiitis. He was at risk for catheter-related infection because he was taking immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of polyangiitis. He was also unable to manipulate the peritoneal dialysis device. Therefore, hemodialysis using an arteriovenous fistula was induced for renal replacement therapy. Recombinant coagulation factor VIII (1000 IU) was administered via the venous chamber of the hemodialysis circuit 10 min before the end of each hemodialysis session, and nafamostat mesylate (25 mg/h) was employed as an anticoagulant during hemodialysis. His clotting factor VIII activity level increased to > 50% and activated partial thromboplastin time decreased to 50 s at the end of each hemodialysis session. This method allowed him to achieve hemostasis at the puncture site of the arteriovenous fistula and undergo stable hemodialysis with no complications, including bleeding. This case suggests that hemodialysis using an arteriovenous fistula with coagulation factor replacement and nafamostat mesylate in each hemodialysis session is a therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease in patients of advanced age with hemophilia at high risk of bleeding.