Early cannulation arteriovenous graft (Acuseal) versus standard arteriovenous graft in patients with end-stage renal disease

Outcomes of early cannulation arteriovenous graft versus PTFE arteriovenous graft in hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Arteriovenous graft (AVG) is an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage renal disease when their permanent vascular accesses fail. Since the last decades, the most widely used materials in these patients have been polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-AVGs. Recently, several studies have reported that early cannulation (EC)-AVG can be an alternative to PTFE-AVG. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of EC-AVG and PTFE-AVG in HD patients. We searched the Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the relevant studies published from 01.01.2000 to 19.12.2022 by keywords and free words. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies comparing EC-AVG with PTFE-AVG were included. Ten studies were included in analysis: one RCT, six retrospective cohort studies, and three prospective cohort studies. The results showed shorter cannulation intervals (four studies, 1116 participants: mean difference -23.62 days, 95% CI [-32.03, -15.21], p < 0.05) and less central venous catheter (CVC) usage (four studies, 733 participants: OR 0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.92], p < 0.05) for EC-AVG compared with PTFE-AVG, while comparable outcomes of primary patency (eight studies, 1712 participants: HR 0.89, 95% CI [0.70, 1.12]), primary assisted patency (five studies, 1355 participants: HR 1.13, 95% CI [0.70, 1.84]), secondary patency (nine studies, 1920 participants: HR 0.93, 95% CI [0.66, 1.31]), and infection risk (four studies, 640 participants: HR 1.12, 95% CI [0.48, 2.58]). When compared to PTFE-AVG in HD patients, EC-AVG seems to exhibit shorter cannulation intervals, less CVC usage, and comparable outcomes of graft patency, and infection risk.

Delamination of Acuseal arteriovenous graft: Two case reports

Acuseal arteriovenous graft is an early cannulation graft having a tri-layered structure with an elastomeric middle layer. However, delamination of Acuseal grafts has been reported recently. This article describes two cases with different characteristics of Acuseal delamination. In case 1, the delamination occurred 1 month after a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); therefore, the PTA was suspected to be a trigger. The delamination was located between the outer expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) layer and the elastomeric middle layer. On the other hand, in case 2, the delamination was located between the luminal ePTFE layer and the elastomeric middle layer. A surveillance ultrasound examination detected the delamination unexpectedly in the uneventful course; however, the delaminating location corresponded to the cannulation puncture site and the intraoperative findings suggested the involvement of mis-needling as a possible cause. Interestingly, for the purpose of continued use on hemodialysis, specific treatments were required against the delamination itself in both cases. As we identified Acuseal delamination in 5.6% (2/36) of cases, concerns arise that numerous cases of Acuseal delamination may have been overlooked in general. Understanding and recognizing this phenomenon are important for adequate use of Acuseal graft.

Medical Adjuvant Therapy in Reducing Thrombosis With Arteriovenous Grafts and Fistulae Use: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hemodialysis is required for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that require arteriovenous (AV) grafts or fistulas for vascular access. These access points are prone to thrombosis. To determine the effect of medical adjuvant therapy on AV graft/fistula patency among patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Adhering to the PRISMA 2020 statement, a systematic search was conducted until August 20, 2021, with keywords including arteriovenous graft, fistula, patency, thrombosis, hemodialysis, adjuvant treatment. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane. A random-effects model was employed using Review Manager 5.4 for data analysis. The meta-analysis pooled in 1985 participants with 1000 (50.4%) in the medical adjuvant treatment group. At a snapshot, medical adjuvant therapy reduced the risk for graft thrombosis (RR = 0.64, P = .02). Notable medications included aspirin for graft thrombosis (RR = 0.36, P = .006) and ticlopidine for fistula thrombosis (RR = 0.53, P = .01). Certain antiplatelet therapies (aspirin and ticlopidine) reduced the number of patients with AV fistula/graft thrombosis among patients with high heterogeneity among the trials. Other therapies (fish oil, sulfinpyrazone, clopidogrel, and aspirin/dipyridamole) did not demonstrate significant improvement but may be promising once concrete evidence is available. Potential benefits of anti-platelet therapies may be explored to maintain the potency of AV grafts/fistulas through well-designed placebo-controlled trials and long-term follow-up.