Migraine mimics

Neuroimaging of Headache: Indications and Controversies

Headache is a common presenting symptom in the ambulatory setting that often prompts imaging. The increased use and associated health care money spent in the setting of headache have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging in this setting. Neuroimaging for headache in most cases is unlikely to reveal significant abnormality or impact patient management. In this article, reasons behind an observed increase in neuroimaging and its impact on health care expenditures are discussed. The typical imaging modalities available and various imaging guidelines for common clinical headache scenarios are presented, including recommendations from the American College of Radiology.

Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of migraine with and without aura: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Headache continues to be a common cause of emergency admissions. At first glance, primary headaches may not be distinguished from secondary headaches. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultrasonic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the clinical diagnosis of migraine patients during attack and during periods without attacks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at the emergency department and neurology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital between October 2019 and January 2020. Patients diagnosed with episodic migraine and between ages 18-60 were included in the study. Migraine diagnosis and classification were based on criteria from the 2018 International Classification of Headache Disorders. ONSD measurement was performed with ultrasonography. ONSD measurements of the same migraine patients during attack and attack-free periods were compared with measurements of healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

A total of 82 participants consisting of 42 migraine patients and 40 control subjects were evaluated. In the control group, mean ONSD of the right eye was 4.88 ± 0.31 mm and mean ONSD of the left eye was 4.86 ± 0.31 mm. Mean ONSD measurement of the left eye was 4.80 ± 0.36 mm and mean ONSD of the right eye was 4.82 ± 0.37 during the attack period of the migraine patients. There was no significant difference between the migraine patients and the control group according to right and left eye ONSD measurements (attack-free period: p = 0.200, p = 0.448; attack period: p = 0.338, p = 0.660, respectively). There was no significant difference between ONSD measurements during the attack period and attack-free period in migraine patients (right eye p = 0.32; left eye p = 0.532).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that ONSD measurements may provide clinical insight into differential diagnosis preceding neuroimaging in migraine patients. On the other hand, since our study is the first on this topic, it should be noted that further studies are needed to come to a conclusion.

Evaluation and Treatment of Primary Headaches in Adolescents

Headache is a common episodic and chronic pain syndrome in adolescents. Evaluation of headaches in primary care requires a comprehensive assessment including lifestyle behaviors and physical examination, as well as an understanding of when to pursue appropriate testing. Primary headache disorders seen in adolescents include migraine and tension-type headache. Pharmacologic management for primary headache includes both acute and prophylactic treatment strategies.

Neuroimaging for Migraine: The American Headache Society Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline

OBJECTIVE

To provide updated evidence-based recommendations about when to obtain neuroimaging in patients with migraine.

METHODS

Articles were included in the systematic review if they studied adults 18 and over who were seeking outpatient treatment for any type of migraine and who underwent neuroimaging (MRI or CT). Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials were searched from 1973 to August 31, 2018. Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence in duplicate. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 2269 publications. Twenty three articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The majority of studies were retrospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. There were 4 prospective observational studies. Ten studies evaluated the utility of CT only, 9 MRI only, and 4 evaluated both. Common abnormalities included chronic ischemia or atrophy with CT and MRI scanning, and non-specific white matter lesions with MRI. Clinically meaningful abnormalities requiring intervention were relatively rare. Clinically significant neuroimaging abnormalities in patients with headaches consistent with migraine without atypical features or red flags appeared no more common than in the general population.

RECOMMENDATIONS

There is no necessity to do neuroimaging in patients with headaches consistent with migraine who have a normal neurologic examination, and there are no atypical features or red flags present. Grade A Neuroimaging may be considered for presumed migraine for the following reasons: unusual, prolonged, or persistent aura; increasing frequency, severity, or change in clinical features, first or worst migraine, migraine with brainstem aura, migraine with confusion, migraine with motor manifestations (hemiplegic migraine), late-life migraine accompaniments, aura without headache, side-locked headache, and posttraumatic headache. Most of these are consensus based with little or no literature support. Grade C.

Migraine in young females with irritable bowel syndrome: still a challenge

Migraine without aura is frequently reported in female patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but knowledge about the relationship between these two conditions is still lacking. This study was aimed to explore the particularities of migraine without aura in young female patients with IBS in order to establish a possible link between them. From a cohort of young female patients hospitalized with IBS in the Internal Medicine Department, 30 joined this pilot study, and they were assigned into two groups on the basis of presence or absence of migraine. In this sample, 15 patients have mild to moderate migraine without aura, with a recently taken normal brain scan, and 15 were without migraine. Diseases and conditions not related to migraine and other possible specific female comorbidities were ruled out. Patients undertook a thorough clinical examination in order to assess fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic pelvic pain (CPP), Questionnaires for migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were performed. Laboratory testing of blood, urine, and stool were also performed. Optimized lymphocyte proliferation test for food allergy (FA) and a fecal microbiota (microbiological semiquantitative method) for dysbiosis (DB) assessment were performed. Based on the results, migraine-positive group displayed more severe comorbidities: FM (p=0.0002), FA (p=0.0006), CPP (p=0.026), higher scores of anxiety (GAD, p=0.0008), and more severe DB (p=0.0009). We noticed a strong positive correlation between MIDAS and GAD (r=0.83), a good positive correlation between MIDAS and DB (r=0.56), and a moderate positive correlation between MIDAS, FM, and FA (r=0.46 and 0.41). In conclusion, young female patients with IBS and migraine without aura displayed more severe associated issues - anxiety, intestinal DB, FM, FA, and CPP. The severity of migraine correlated well with anxiety range and DB magnitude and moderately with FM and FA.

Headache as a presenting symptom of glioma: A cross-sectional study

Objective

The objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence and the clinical features of headache as a presenting symptom of glioma.

Methods

We interviewed 527 consecutive adult patients with histologically confirmed glioma, admitted to the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2015. We defined four headache phenotypes: Tension-type-like headache (TTH), migraine-like headache, worsening of a pre-existing headache (WPH) and classic brain tumour headache (BTH). Logistic regression analysis was carried out to investigate potential risk factors for headache at presentation of glioma.

Results

12.5% (n = 66) of patients with glioma indicated headache as a presenting symptom of their disease. Of these, 31 patients (47%) had TTH, while BTH and WPH were reported by 28 (42%) and seven (11%) patients, respectively. We did not find any case of migraine-like headache. Infratentorial ( p = 0.038) and right-sided tumours ( p = 0.013) were more frequently associated with the presence of headache at onset. Patients with TTH were older than patients with BTH and WPH ( p = 0.035). BTH was less frequently associated with other neurological signs ( p < 0.0001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the localization of the brain tumour in the left hemisphere to be a protective factor for the development of headache.

Conclusions

Our study includes a very large series of patients with glioma, providing a description of headache phenotype at first presentation of disease and investigating possible factors that may influence the clinical features of headache.

Side-locked headaches: an algorithm-based approach

The differential diagnosis of strictly unilateral hemicranial pain includes a large number of primary and secondary headaches and cranial neuropathies. It may arise from both intracranial and extracranial structures such as cranium, neck, vessels, eyes, ears, nose, sinuses, teeth, mouth, and the other facial or cervical structure. Available data suggest that about two-third patients with side-locked headache visiting neurology or headache clinics have primary headaches. Other one-third will have either secondary headaches or neuralgias. Many of these hemicranial pain syndromes have overlapping presentations. Primary headache disorders may spread to involve the face and / or neck. Even various intracranial and extracranial pathologies may have similar overlapping presentations. Patients may present to a variety of clinicians, including headache experts, dentists, otolaryngologists, ophthalmologist, psychiatrists, and physiotherapists. Unfortunately, there is not uniform approach for such patients and diagnostic ambiguity is frequently encountered in clinical practice.

Herein, we review the differential diagnoses of side-locked headaches and provide an algorithm based approach for patients presenting with side-locked headaches. Side-locked headache is itself a red flag. So, the first priority should be to rule out secondary headaches. A comprehensive history and thorough examinations will help one to formulate an algorithm to rule out or confirm secondary side-locked headaches. The diagnoses of most secondary side-locked headaches are largely investigations dependent. Therefore, each suspected secondary headache should be subjected for appropriate investigations or referral. The diagnostic approach of primary side-locked headache starts once one rule out all the possible secondary headaches. We have discussed an algorithmic approach for both secondary and primary side-locked headaches.

Case Studies of Uncommon and Rare Headache Disorders

The following 6 case studies are presented: a 12-day migraine with recurring aura?; a migraineur with a new constant headache for 1 month; an orthostatic headache; a unilateral headache; migraine with aura and limb pain without headache; and nocturnal headaches. These cases illustrate the fascinating diversity and challenges of primary and secondary headaches that neurologists commonly encounter.