Migraine Treatment in Pregnant Women Presenting to Acute Care: A Retrospective Observational Study

Clinical guidance for choosing the right pharmacotherapy for migraine attacks

INTRODUCTION

Migraine as headache attacks with autonomic symptoms is a serious condition and it is important to treat a single attack effectively in order to improve not only the patient's quality of life at a given moment but also to prevent the migraine from becoming a chronic one.

AREA COVERED

The article briefly presents the guidance in selecting the most appropriate pharmacological treatment of migraine attack, indicating a personalized approach to migraine patient.

EXPERT OPINION

In this short paper, we show the implementation of new drugs into everyday clinical practice. Good cooperation between the physician and the patient and having the patient's trust is one of the elements of a personalized therapeutic approach and the key to achieving satisfaction of both the patient and the doctor.

Exploring the Connection between Migraines and Pregnancy: The Impact of Physical Activity on Symptom Management

Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life for affected individuals. The pathogenesis behind migraines is not yet fully understood, but hormonal changes, especially fluctuations in, estrogen and progesterone levels, have a significant role in the susceptibility of women to migraines. Pregnancy introduces a unique set of challenges for women who experience migraines, as they must navigate the complexities of managing their condition while safeguarding the health of both them and their unborn child. Pharmacological options for treating migraines during pregnancy are limited, and, therefore, there is a growing interest in exploring alternative approaches to migraine symptom relief and management. Physical activity during pregnancy provides a range of benefits, and it has gained attention as a potentially valuable tool for alleviating migraine symptoms in pregnant patients. This review explores the intricate relationship between migraines and pregnancy, emphasizing how physical activity and other alternative approaches may influence the frequency, severity, and overall experience of migraines during pregnancy. Through collaboration with healthcare providers and the adoption of personalized management strategies, women can strike a balance that supports both their own well-being and the healthy development of their unborn child. By examining existing research and emerging insights, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits and considerations of incorporating physical activity and other treatment options into migraine management strategies for pregnant women. Further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms linking migraines, pregnancy, and physical activity, enabling the development of more targeted interventions and guidelines.

Sex and age differences in migraine treatment and management strategies

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, especially in women younger than 50 years old. Migraine has three times higher prevalence in women than in men and tends to decrease after the menopausal transition. Migraine has different clinical features in people of different ages. Clinical symptoms and factors associated with migraine can be various in women and men. Women have special types of migraine, such as pure menstrual migraine and menstrually related migraine. Besides, clinical symptoms of migraine can change during pregnancy, postpartum and lactation. Women are significantly more often than men consulting a doctor because of migraine. These features of migraine lead to different treatment and management strategies in females and males of different ages. Migraine therefore is a disorder that demonstrates the necessity of a personalization of healthcare-ensuring the proper treatment for the right patient, at the right time. Considering all the available literature and guidelines, in this chapter several strategies for management of acute and prophylactic treatments of migraine, according to sex and age differences, are discussed. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a useful piece of information improving the treatment and management of migraine.

The Influence of Metoclopramide on Trigeminovascular Nociception: Possible Anti-migraine Mechanism of Action

Metoclopramide is widely used as an abortive migraine therapy due to the advantage of having not only antiemetic, but also analgesic properties. Despite the proven clinical efficacy of metoclopramide in acute migraine, the mechanism of its anti-cephalalgic action has not been entirely elucidated. Taking into account the key role of the trigeminovascular system activation in migraine pathophysiology, we aimed to investigate metoclopramide effects on the excitability of central trigeminovascular neurons and neurogenic dural vasodilation using valid electrophysiological and neurovascular models of trigeminovascular nociception. Extracellular recordings of the activity of second-order dura-sensitive neurons were made in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) of 16 anaesthetised rats. Cumulative metoclopramide infusion (three steps in 30 min intervals, 5 mg/kg i.v. per step, n = 8) significantly and dose-dependently suppressed both ongoing firing of the TCC neurons and their responses to dural electrical stimulation, maximally to 30%[0-49%] (median[Q1-Q3]) and 4%[0-30%] of the initial level, respectively (both p = 0.001, compared to saline (n = 8)). By contrast, the neurogenic dural vasodilation studied in a separate group of 12 rats was not significantly affected by cumulative infusion of metoclopramide (5 mg/kg i.v. per step, n = 6) compared to both baseline values and the vehicle group (n = 6) (all p > 0.05). These results provide evidence that metoclopramide is unable to affect the peripheral response to trigeminovascular activation, but it does suppress the central response, which is highly predictive of anti-migraine action. Thus, here we show the neurophysiological mechanism underlying the therapeutic efficacy of metoclopramide in migraine.

Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate to Treat Acute Headaches in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Non-traumatic headaches comprise up to 4% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Current practice is moving toward multimodal analgesia regimens that limit narcotic use.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to address the following research question: In patients with non-traumatic headaches (Population), does administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate (Intervention) compared to placebo, corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists, ergot alkaloids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, or usual care result in better pain control, lower rate of recurrence at 24 hours, lower requirements for rescue analgesia, and less adverse medication effects (Outcomes)?

METHODS

Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized clinical trial (RCT), (2) patients age ≥18 years, (3) non-traumatic headache, (4) patients treated in ED or an outpatient acute care treatment center, and (5) magnesium sulfate administered intravenously (IV). Eligible comparison groups included: placebo, conventional therapy, dopamine antagonist, NSAID, corticosteroid, ergot alkaloid, or triptans.

RESULTS

Out of 4018 identified references, 7 RCTs (545 participants) that treated migraine headaches (n = 6) and benign non-traumatic headaches (n = 1) met inclusion criteria. Pain intensity was improved with magnesium sulfate vs comparators at 60-120 minutes, but not at earlier time points. Result for the endpoint of pain reduction by 50% were conflicting as 3 studies reported that headache was improved, unchanged, and less with magnesium sulfate. Complete pain relief was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the migraine with aura (MA) subgroup in another. The need for rescue analgesia at any point was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the MA subgroup in another. Twenty-four-hour headache recurrence was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, but unchanged in a second. The intended meta-analysis was not performed due to the clinical heterogeneity among studies.

CONCLUSION

While we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the efficacy or benefit of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute non-traumatic headaches, the existing evidence indicates potential benefits in pain control beyond 1 hour, aura duration, and need for rescue analgesia.