Helicobacter pylori heteroresistance to clarithromycin in adults-New data by in situ detection and improved concept

Prevalence of heteroresistant Helicobacter pylori and treatment follow-up in patients in Ilam, Iran

Background

Special antibiotics are prescribed against Helicobacter (H.) pylori. However, sometimes the bacteria are not completely eliminated, or they are recurrent. Unlike most infections, it is very difficult to eliminate a H. pylori infection. Heteroresistance is defined as the phenomenon in which subpopulations of the same colony of bacteria exhibit a range of susceptibilities to a particular antibiotic. Because of heteroresistant cells, antibiotic failure and chronic infection can occur; thus, the current research aimed to investigate presence of heteroresistant cells in H. pylori collected from patients reffering to clinic in Ilam, Iran. Subsequently, patients who were infected with heteroresistant H. p ylori were treated with antibiotics effective against heteroresistant subpopulations.

Methods

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 100 patients with clinical symptoms and suspected of being infected with H. pylori were studied in private clinics in Ilam, Iran. Fiftyisolates of H. pylori accompanied by patients' information were obtained from Ilam clinics. We cultured the bacteria to identify heteroresistance and to find the cause of recurrent infection in these patients.

Results

Out of a total of 50 samples, 3 were heteroresistant to clarithromycin (6%). Levofloxacin was applied in cases of heteroresistant samples, and the effectiveness was determined after one month of follow-up of patients.

Conclusion

Patients with heteroresistance showed sensitivity to levofloxacin. After one month of follow-up, it was found that the effectiveness of this antibiotic was good. Therefore, this antibiotic was introduced as a more effective drug in patients with heteroresistant H. pylori.

Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Helicobacter pylori is a pathogenic bacterium associated with various gastrointestinal diseases, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. The increasing rates of H. pylori antibiotic resistance and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains pose significant challenges to its treatment. This comprehensive review explores the mechanisms underlying the resistance of H. pylori to commonly used antibiotics and the clinical implications of antibiotic resistance. Additionally, potential strategies for overcoming antibiotic resistance are discussed. These approaches aim to improve the treatment outcomes of H. pylori infections while minimizing the development of antibiotic resistance. The continuous evolution of treatment perspectives and ongoing research in this field are crucial for effectively combating this challenging infection.

A Mini-review on Helicobacter pylori with Gastric Cancer and Available Treatments

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most thoroughly researched etiological component for stomach inflammation and malignancies. Even though there are conventional recommendations and treatment regimens for eradicating H. pylori, failure rates continue to climb. Antibiotic resistance contributes significantly to misdiagnoses, false positive results, and clinical failures, all of which raise the chance of infection recurrence. This review aims to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying drug resistance in H. pylori and discuss novel approaches for detecting genotypic resistance. Modulation of drug uptake/ efflux, biofilm, and coccoid development. Newer genome sequencing approaches capable of detecting H. pylori genotypic resistance are presented. Prolonged infection in the stomach causes major problems such as gastric cancer. The review discusses how H. pylori causes stomach cancer, recent biomarkers such as miRNAs, molecular pathways in the development of gastric cancer, and diagnostic methods and clinical trials for the disease. Efforts have been made to summarize the recent advancements made toward early diagnosis and novel therapeutic approaches for H. pylori-induced gastric cancer.

Current paradigms in the management of refractory Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is the most prevalent chronic bacterial infection, with approximately half of the world's population estimated to be colonized. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified Helicobacter pylori as a class-I carcinogen. All main society guidelines recommend its eradication in infected individuals. The global trend indicates that eradication rates are decreasing annually and the likelihood of eradication decreases with each unsuccessful therapeutic attempt. Resistance to antibiotics in H. pylori strains is the leading cause for eradication failure. Still, drug resistance and treatment failure may be complex, multi-dimensional and associated with several other factors. Knowledge of these factors can aid in optimizing eradication rates. This review will focus on the factors associated with refractory H. pylori, with a particular emphasis on antibiotic resistance mechanisms and their clinical implications. Also, the most recent literature and recommendations available for determining an appropriate regimen after the failure of the first attempt at eradication will be discussed.

Refractory Helicobacter pylori infection in Australia: updated multicentre antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Helicobacter pylori infection is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide and eradication rates are falling globally because of increasing antimicrobial resistance. However, there is a paucity of local data to guide the choice of eradication therapy in Australia. This study aimed to evaluate current Australian rates of H. pylori antibiotic resistance in patients who had failed prior eradication therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of routine culture and antibiotic susceptibility data from two pathology laboratories servicing multiple tertiary referral hospitals in Western Australia (WA) and South Australia (SA), between 2018 and 2022, was performed. Rates of antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of multiresistant isolates in both SA and WA were calculated and comparison of temporal trends and differences between the two states was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 796 H. pylori isolates revealed a clarithromycin resistance rate of 82%, metronidazole 68%, amoxicillin 4.4% and tetracycline 0.5%. Resistance to levofloxacin was observed in 22% and rifampicin 14%. Rates of resistance to clarithromycin were lower in SA compared with WA (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.69, P = 0.0001). Multiresistant isolates were discovered in 63% of patients, with lower rates in SA compared with WA (IRR: 0.74, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This first multicentre, multistate study of H. pylori resistance in Australian patients exposed to prior therapy demonstrated high rates of antimicrobial resistance, including levofloxacin (>20%). This raises concern about recommending levofloxacin in empirical second-line therapies. Increased monitoring and awareness of current H. pylori resistance rates in Australia are needed to guide local eradication practices.

Drug-Resistant Helicobacter pylori: Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Approach

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most common chronic bacterial infection, affecting approximately half of the world's population. H. pylori is a Class I carcinogen according to the World Health Organization, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has linked it to 90% of stomach cancer cases worldwide. The overall pattern points to a yearly reduction in eradication rates of H. pylori with the likelihood of success further decreasing after each unsuccessful therapeutic effort. Antimicrobial resistance in Helicobacter pylori is a major public health concern and is a predominant cause attributed to eradication failure. As a result, determining H. pylori's antibiotic susceptibility prior to the administration of eradication regimens becomes increasingly critical. Detecting H. pylori and its antimicrobial resistance has traditionally been accomplished by time-consuming culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. The resistance of H. pylori to different antibiotics is caused by various molecular mechanisms, and advances in sequencing technology have greatly facilitated the testing of antibiotic susceptibility to H. pylori. This review will summarize H. pylori antibiotic resistance patterns, mechanisms, and clinical implications. We will also review the pros and cons of current antibiotic susceptibility testing methods. Along with a comparison of tailored susceptibility-guided regimens and empirical therapy based on the latest evidence, an evidence-based approach to such situations will be explored.

Approaches for detection of antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori: Recent research advances

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, a contagious disease, has affected approximately half of the global population. It is associated with the occurrence and development of many diseases, which seriously endangers human public health. Antibiotics play an important role in H. pylori eradication therapy, and the common regimens for H. pylori eradication contain one to three antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is one of the main reasons for the failure of H. pylori eradication. Detection of antibiotic resistance can be helpful for individualized management, reduction of drug resistance, and improvement of H. pylori eradication. Methods to detect antibiotic resistance of H. pylori primarily consist of traditional drug sensitivity tests and molecular biology methods, such as polymerase chain reaction and its related techniques, DNA sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and gene chip. This paper reviews the recent advances in approaches for detection of antibiotic resistance of H. pylori.

Molecular testing-guided therapy versus susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: two multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trials

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is an important causal factor of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease and is associated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and functional dyspepsia. In H pylori strains, point mutations in the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes are associated with clarithromycin resistance and levofloxacin resistance, respectively. Whether the efficacy of molecular testing-guided therapy is non-inferior to that of susceptibility testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of molecular testing-guided therapy and traditional culture-based susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line treatment of H pylori infection.

METHODS

We did two multicentre, open-label randomised trials in Taiwan. In trial 1 (done at seven hospitals), treatment-naive individuals infected with H pylori who were aged 20 years or older were eligible for study inclusion. In trial 2 (done at six hospitals), individuals aged 20 years or older who failed treatment after two or more eradication therapies for H pylori infection were eligible for enrolment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either molecular testing-guided therapy or susceptibility testing-guided therapy. The randomisation sequence was generated by computer using permuted block randomisation with a block size of 4. All investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence. Clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance were determined by agar dilution test for measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group, and by PCR and direct sequencing for detection of 23S rRNA and gyrA mutations in the molecular testing-guided therapy group. Study participants received clarithromycin sequential therapy, levofloxacin sequential therapy, or bismuth quadruple therapy according to the resistance status to clarithromycin and levofloxacin. The 13C-urease breath test was used to determine the status of H pylori infection at least 6 weeks after eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention-to-treat analysis. The frequency of adverse effects was analysed in patients with available data. The prespecified margins for non-inferiority were 5% for trial 1 and 10% for trial 2. The trials are ongoing for post-eradication follow-up and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03556254 for trial 1, and NCT03555526 for trial 2.

FINDINGS

Between March 28, 2018, and April 23, 2021, 560 eligible treatment-naive patients with H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 1. Between Dec 28, 2017, and Oct 27, 2020, 320 eligible patients with refractory H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 2. 272 men and 288 women were recruited for trial 1, and 98 men and 222 women were recruited for trial 2. In first-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 241 (86%, 95% CI 82-90) of 280 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 243 (87%, 83-91) of 280 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·81). In third-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 141 (88%, 83-93) of 160 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 139 (87%, 82-92) of 160 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·74). The difference in the eradication rate between the molecular testing-guided therapy group and the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group was -0·7% (95% CI -6·4 to 5·0; non-inferiority p=0·071) in trial 1 and 1·3% (-6·0 to 8·5; non-inferiority p=0·0018 in trial 2 by intention-to-treat analysis. We found no difference in adverse effects across both treatment groups in trial 1 and trial 2.

INTERPRETATION

Molecular testing-guided therapy was similar to susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line therapy and non-inferior to susceptibility testing guided therapy in third-line treatment of H pylori infection, supporting the use of molecular testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication.

FUNDING

Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, and Centre of Precision Medicine of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan.

Reassessment of the Broth Microdilution Method for Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is an infectious disease and thus the eradication treatment should be guided by susceptibility testing. This study aimed to assess the applicability of broth microdilution as a routine susceptibility testing method for H. pylori.

METHODS

Susceptibility profiles of clarithromycin (CLR) and levofloxacin (LEV) resistance in 76 clinical H. pylori isolates were simultaneously assessed using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. The correlation between the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained by the 2 methods was assessed by means of linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The correlation between the MICs determined by broth microdilution method and agar dilution method was good for both CLR (r = 0.966) and LEV (r = 0.959). The susceptibility agreement between the 2 methods was 100% for CLR and 96.1% for LEV. Using the broth microdilution method, the false resistance was found in 3.9% (3 of 76) strains for LEV susceptibility testing. No false susceptibility was found for either CLR or LEV, and no false resistance was found for susceptibility testing of CLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The broth microdilution method is suitable for routine susceptibility testing of clinical H. pylori isolates.

Prevalence of antibiotic heteroresistance associated with Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heteroresistance is a general term to describe diverse responses to specific antibiotics that can occur due to infection with either multiple bacterial strains or microevolution of a single strain during chronic infection. Due to limited information regarding heteroresistance Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, the current study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of this phenomenon.

METHODS

For this study, all potential relevant studies were collected by searching international databases such as ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Embase, DOAJ, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Google Scholar. Finally, the frequency of heteroresistance H. pylori infection was measured using the event rate corresponding to 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies met our criteria; the eligible studies were related to the years 2001-2022. Our results showed that the prevalence of heteroresistance H. pylori strains was 60.1% to clarithromycin, 61.1% to metronidazole, 46.1% to levofloxacin, 3.8% to amoxicillin, and 21.1% to tetracycline. Our literature review also showed discrepancy of antimicrobial susceptibility test in strains isolated from different anatomical sites of the stomach. Heteroresistance H. pylori infection in developing countries is mostly due to infection with multiple H. pylori strains, while in developed countries it is due to microevolution of a single H. pylori strain in response to antibiotic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Heteroresistance H. pylori infection interferes with successful therapy and eventually can lead to the treatment failure. If a biopsy is taken from only one gastric site, resistant strains of H. pylori may be underestimated. Considering the role of heteroresistance H. pylori infection in treatment failure, it is very important for gastroenterologists to improve their knowledge about this fact. Regardingly, new guidelines should be developed and designed for the management and treatment of heteroresistance H. pylori infection.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin in Tunisia

Background. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resistance to clarithromycin is increasing worldwide. Data on the prevalence of H. pylori resistance are limited in Tunisia.Gap statement. Given that H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin has not been studied in Tunisia since 2010, there was a need to determinate its prevalence and the principal mutations implicated in this resistance.Aim. The aims were to define the prevalence of H. pylori infection among symptomatic patients and to determinate the level of clarithromycin resistance among these patients and the main mutations conferring this resistance.Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study from March 2017 to February 2020 in the Hepato-Gastroenterology Department of Hedi Chaker University Hospital in Sfax that included 124 Tunisian patients who underwent gastroduodenal endoscopy with biopsies. Mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin were detected using the Allplex H. pylori and ClariR PCR Assay.Results. Out of 124 biopsies, 101 (81.5 2 %) were PCR-positive for H. pylori. Mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin were detected in 30/95 (31.6 %) of patients. The rate of primary resistance was 25.3 % and of secondary resistance 62.5 %. The most frequently detected mutation was A2143G (86, 90%) followed by A2142G (11, 36%). Seven patients had a double mutation A2143G-A2142G. The factors independently associated with resistance to clarithromycin were diabetes, high blood pressure, the presence of a bulbar ulcer on endoscopy and the presence of gastric atrophy on histology.Conclusion. Detection of more than 25 % of strains with clarithromycin resistance mutations makes the H. pylori first-line treatment with clarithromycin questionable in our setting, and a review of empirical treatment of H. pylori is urgently needed.

Heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in patients with a Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori can lead to treatment failure. Importantly, several studies have reported on heteroresistance, i.e. the presence of resistant and susceptible H. pylori populations in the same sample and/or a difference in the susceptibility patterns between biopsy samples. This meta-analysis aims to provide comprehensive data on the prevalence of metronidazole and clarithromycin heteroresistance and the approaches to their detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed after the search of MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. The study outcomes were the weighted pooled prevalence of heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in H. pylori positive samples and/or isolates with a subanalysis by continent.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies that had investigated 3852 H. pylori positive patients were included in the meta-analysis. Heteroresistance to clarithromycin was reported in 20 studies, with a weighted pooled prevalence of 6.8% (95% CI 5.1-8.6; 3654 H. pylori positive patients; the substantial heterogeneity I² = 55.6%). Heteroresistance to metronidazole was reported in 12 studies, with a weighted pooled prevalence of 13.8% (95% CI 8.9-18.6; 1670 H. pylori positive patients; the substantial heterogeneity I² = 60.9%). The weighted pooled prevalence of clarithromycin heteroresistance was similar in Asia and Europe (p = 0.174584), however, metronidazole heteroresistance was detected more often in Europe (p < 0.00001). Clarithromycin heteroresistance was detected more often by phenotype rather than by using genotyping methods (12 vs 8 studies), whereas heteroresistance to metronidazole was detected only by phenotype.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of heteroresistance to clarithromycin and/or metronidazole is not negligible and can be detected in approximately 7 and 14% of H. pylori positive samples, respectively. These findings highlight the need to raise the awareness of gastroenterologists and microbiologists to the heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in patients with a H. pylori infection.

Efficacy of Twice a Day Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Second-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is an effective treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, frequent dosing schedules of BQT regimen often compromise drug adherence and may affect treatment outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of twice-daily BQT compared to that of four times a day therapy. From August 2018 to November 2020, adult patients who failed first-line standard triple therapy and underwent BQT were eligible. Patients were categorized into two groups according to dosing schedule: (i) the BQT group (n = 213) who received standard BQT administered four times a day; and (ii) the BQTb group (n = 141) who received proton pump inhibitor, bismuth 600 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and tetracycline 1 g twice a day. The eradication rate did not differ between the BQT (92.5%) and the BQTb groups (90.1%) (p = 0.441). Adherence and adverse event rate were similar between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that current smoking was associated with eradication failure; however, dosing frequency was not associated with the efficacy of eradication therapy. This study suggested that twice a day BQT is as effective as four times a day therapy for second-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance - from biology to clinical implications

Helicobacter pylori is a major human pathogen for which increasing antibiotic resistance constitutes a serious threat to human health. Molecular mechanisms underlying this resistance have been intensively studied and are discussed in this Review. Three profiles of resistance - single drug resistance, multidrug resistance and heteroresistance - seem to occur, probably with overlapping fundamental mechanisms and clinical implications. The mechanisms that have been most studied are related to mutational changes encoded chromosomally and disrupt the cellular activity of antibiotics through target-mediated mechanisms. Other biological attributes driving drug resistance in H. pylori have been less explored and this could imply more complex physiological changes (such as impaired regulation of drug uptake and/or efflux, or biofilm and coccoid formation) that remain largely elusive. Resistance-related attributes deployed by the pathogen cause treatment failures, diagnostic difficulties and ambiguity in clinical interpretation of therapeutic outcomes. Subsequent to the increasing antibiotic resistance, a substantial drop in H. pylori treatment efficacy has been noted globally. In the absence of an efficient vaccine, enhanced efforts are needed for setting new treatment strategies and for a better understanding of the emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacteria, as well as for improving diagnostic tools that can help optimize current antimicrobial regimens.

Efficacy of Clarithromycin Depends on the Bacterial Density in Clarithromycin-Heteroresistant Helicobacter pylori Infections: An In Situ Detected Susceptibility and Quantitative Morphometry-Based Retrospective Study

The global rise in clarithromycin (Cla) resistance is considered to be the main contributor of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication failures. In nearly half of the Cla-resistant Hp infections, Cla-susceptible bacteria are simultaneously present with the Cla-resistant ones (Cla-heteroresistance). The proportion of resistant bacteria in the bacterial population (R-fraction) and its predictive role for the use of Cla-based therapies in Cla-heteroresistant infections has not yet been investigated. Our retrospective study analyzed gastric biopsy samples of 62 Hp-positive patients with Cla-heteroresistant infection. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization technique was used to visualize the coexistence of resistant and susceptible bacteria within one tissue sample. R-fraction was quantified on multichannel microimages by digital morphometry. Resistant bacteria had a patchy distribution within the whole bacterial population causing high diversity among the investigated areas. Patients were subdivided into two major groups according to whether a Cla-based eradication attempt was conducted before or after the biopsy sampling. R-fraction was significantly lower among cases having only one previous Cla-based eradication attempt vs. those that had multiple previous eradications, including at least one Cla-containing therapy (0.41 vs. 0.89, p = 0.0308). Majority of the patients without previous eradication attempt had successful eradication with Cla-containing regimen (59.26%), verified by a negative ¹³C-urea breath test or control biopsy. Multivariable model indicated that the therapeutic outcome using Cla-based regimens depended on the bacterial density rather than the R-fraction. Our study raises the potential use of Cla-containing eradication therapies in certain Cla-heteroresistant Hp infections, taking into account the possible predictive role of bacterial density.

Primary and secondary clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori and mathematical modeling of the role of macrolides

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic widely used for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, and thus resistance to this antibiotic is a major cause of treatment failure. Here, we present the results of a retrospective observational study of clarithromycin resistance (Cla-res) in 4744 H. pylori-infected patients from Central Hungary. We use immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on fixed gastric tissue samples to determine H. pylori infection and to infer Cla-res status, respectively. We correlate this information with macrolide dispensing data for the same patients (available through a prescription database) and develop a mathematical model of the population dynamics of Cla-res H. pylori infections. Cla-res is found in 5.5% of macrolide-naive patients (primary Cla-res), with no significant sex difference. The model predicts that this primary Cla-res originates from transmission of resistant bacteria in 98.7% of cases, and derives from spontaneous mutations in the other 1.3%. We find an age-dependent preponderance of female patients among secondary (macrolide-exposed) clarithromycin-resistant infections, predominantly associated with prior use of macrolides for non-eradication purposes. Our results shed light into the sources of primary resistant cases, and indicate that the growth rate of Cla-res prevalence would likely decrease if macrolides were no longer used for purposes other than H. pylori eradication.

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic widely used for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Here, Kocsmár et al. study clarithromycin resistance and previous macrolide consumption in 4,744 H. pylori-infected patients, shedding light into the sources of primary resistant cases and the role played by prior consumption of macrolides for non-eradication purposes.

Antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in an eastern German region

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial therapy is recommended to eradicate Helicobacter (H.) pylori in infected individuals. As first-line treatments are empiric, knowledge of antimicrobial resistance is key to successful eradication.

AIMS

We investigated primary resistance in an eastern German region to derive recommendations for eradication treatment.

METHODS

We used molecular genetic methods to examine Helicobacter rapid urease test (RUT) positive gastric specimens of 533 patients from Berlin and the federal state of Brandenburg with allegedly no prior eradication treatment. Tissue samples were removed from RUT and screened by real-time PCR for mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin. In addition, 182 samples out of 533 were tested for resistance to levofloxacin and tetracycline.

RESULTS

Primary resistances were 10.9% (58 out of 533) to clarithromycin; 13.7% (25/182) to levofloxacin; and 2.2% to tetracycline (4/182). Combined resistance to clarithromycin/levofloxacin was low (2.2%, 4/182). Female sex was significantly associated with clarithromycin resistance.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin may be a suitable first-line antibiotic for about 90% of outpatients. A simple molecular test may help physicians avoid prescription of an ineffective first-line regimen.

Re-assessment of the disk diffusion technique for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the disk diffusion technique against E-test as a routine antibiotic susceptibility testing method for Helicobacter pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Susceptibilities of 301 H pylori clinical isolates were simultaneously profiled by E-test and disk diffusion method for levofloxacin (5-μg disk), clarithromycin (15-μg disk), metronidazole (5-μg disk), amoxicillin (10-μg disk), and tetracycline (30-μg disk). Furazolidone susceptibility was evaluated using a 100-μg disk only. The correlation between MICs by E-test and inhibition zone diameters by disk diffusion was assessed by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Correlation between inhibition zone diameters and MICs was found for levofloxacin (r = -.932), clarithromycin (r = -.894), and to a minor extent metronidazole (r = -.820). Using the linear regression analysis, the inhibition zone diameter breakpoints were calculated to be 29 mm for levofloxacin, 41 mm for clarithromycin, and 15 mm for metronidazole corresponding to the EUCAST-recommended MIC breakpoints. The susceptibility agreement between E-test and disk diffusion for levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole was 98.6%, 96.0%, and 96.7%, respectively. The inhibition zone diameters recorded for the amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone were large (approximately 60 mm in mean), and a poor correlation was found between inhibition zone diameters and MICs for amoxicillin (r = -.594) and tetracycline (r = -.490).

CONCLUSIONS

The disk diffusion can be used as a routine H pylori susceptibility testing method for levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in clinical practice under the described technical conditions. The use of disk diffusion for amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone susceptibility testing needs to be further studied.