Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among resettled refugees presenting to a family medicine clinic in the United States

Efficacy of a 2-week therapy with levofloxacin concomitant versus a levofloxacin sequential regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection in the Syrian population: a study protocol for randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Treating Helicobacter pylori is becoming increasingly difficult with the development of bacterial resistance to many established treatment regimens. As a result, researchers are constantly looking for novel and effective treatments. This trial aims to establish the efficacy of levofloxacin-based sequential treatment regimen and concomitant levofloxacin-based regimen as empirical first-line therapy in the Syrian population.

METHOD

This is an open-label, prospective, single-center, parallel, active-controlled, superiority, randomized clinical trial. The recruitment will target Helicobacter pylori-positive males and females between the ages of 18 and 65 to evaluate the efficacy of empirical first-line therapy in the Syrian population. We are planning to recruit up to 300 patients which is twice the required sample size. One hundred fifty individuals will be randomly assigned to undergo either a sequential levofloxacin-based treatment regimen or a concomitant levofloxacin-based regimen. High-dose dual therapy (proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin) will be the rescue therapy in the event of first-line failure. The first-line eradication rate in both groups is the primary outcome, and one of the secondary outcomes is the overall eradication rate of high-dose dual therapy in the event of first-line treatment protocol failure. Intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be used to evaluate the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori for first-line treatment protocols.

DISCUSSION

For the first time in the Syrian population, this randomized controlled trial will provide objective and accurate evidence about the efficacy of a sequential levofloxacin-based treatment regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06065267 . Registered on October 3, 2023. Prospective registered. Enrollment of the first participant has not started yet.

Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection between 1980 and 2022: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the temporal trends of Helicobacter pylori prevalence worldwide. We aimed to identify the changes in global prevalence of H pylori infection between 1980 and 2022.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, with no language restrictions, for observational studies on the prevalence of H pylori infection published between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2022. Conference papers, meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded. We divided the study timeframe into four periods: 1980-90, 1991-2000, 2001-10, and 2011-22. Summary data were extracted from each selected publication. The prevalence of H pylori and its temporal trend were analysed according to WHO region, World Bank income level, WHO universal health coverage service coverage index of the country or region, sex and age of the patient, study type, and diagnostic method. The pooled prevalence was estimated by a random-effect meta-analysis, and the significance of the associated factors was analysed by multivariable meta-regression. This study is registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY), 2022100026.

FINDINGS

Of the 56 967 records identified, 5236 were included in the quality assessment stage and 224 studies-from 71 countries or regions from all six WHO regions and including 2 979 179 individuals-were included in the final analysis. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I²=99·9%). The estimated global prevalence of H pylori infection decreased from 58·2% (95% CI 50·7-65·8) in the 1980-90 period to 43·1% (40·3-45·9) in the 2011-22 period. Prevalence was relatively static between 1991 and 2010 but declined sharply between 2011 and 2022, with the largest decline in the WHO African region. Overall, a lower prevalence of H pylori infection was reported in younger people, high-income countries, or countries with high levels of universal health coverage, and by retrospective studies. Studies based on serological diagnostic methods generally reported higher H pylori prevalence than studies based on non-serological methods (53·2% [49·8-56·6] vs 41·1% [38·1-44·2]) and fluctuated less over time.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis shows a declining trend of H pylori prevalence globally, particularly in the 2011-22 period. These results could help to inform future health policy on prevention and management of this important infection. However, a considerable degree of heterogeneity exists between studies and further population-based epidemiological studies are needed.

FUNDING

None.