Hepatoportal sclerosis (obliterative portal venopathy) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia in a patient with myasthenia gravis: A case report and review of the published work

Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia Is Not a Rare Condition After Liver Transplantation: Incidence, Predictive Factors, and Impact on Survival

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to evaluate incidence and to identify the risk factors of occurrence and the predictive factors of symptomatic forms of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

To identify risk factors of NRH following LT, we included 1648 patients transplanted from 2004 to 2018 and compared the patients developing NRH after LT to those who did not. To identify predictive factors of symptomatic NRH, we selected 115 biopsies displaying NRH and compared symptomatic to asymptomatic forms. Symptomatic NRH was defined as the presence of ascites, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, portal thrombosis, retransplantation, or death related to NRH.

RESULTS

The incidence of NRH following LT was 5.1%. In multivariate analysis, the independent factor of developing NRH after LT was the donor's age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P = 0.02). Symptomatic forms occurred in 29 (25.2%) patients: 19 (16.5%) patients presented with ascites, 13 (11.3%) with esophageal varices, 4 (3.5%) with hepatic encephalopathy, and 8 (7%) with portal thrombosis. The median period before the onset of symptoms was 8.4 (1.5-11.3) y after LT. The spleen size at diagnosis/before LT ratio (OR = 12.5; 114.17-1.37; P = 0.0252) and thrombectomy during transplantation (OR = 11.17; 1.48-84.11; P = 0.0192) were associated with symptomatic NRH in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NRH following LT is frequent (5.1%) and leads to symptomatic portal hypertension in 25.2% of patients. Using older grafts increases the risk of developing NRH after LT. Clinicians should screen for signs of portal hypertension, particularly in measuring spleen size.

Obliterative portal venopathy: A neglected and probably misdiagnosed disease with peculiar etiology in South America

Background and Aim

Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) is one of the causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. However, many aspects of OPV remain unclear, including the etiology, pathogenesis, and natural history. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of OPV in a series of patients in Brazil in whom OPV was diagnosed through liver biopsy.

Methods

Forty-three consecutive adult patients with OPV were retrospectively selected as a case series based on histologic criteria, defined by the presence of at least portal fibrosis, phlebosclerosis, disappearance and/or reduction of the caliber of portal vein branches, and exclusion of cirrhosis. Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Clinically significant portal hypertension was considered in the presence of esophageal varices and/or ascites.

Results

The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 44.5 ± 11 years, who were predominantly female (81%). Clinically significant portal hypertension was found in 28% of cases. The most frequent indication for liver biopsy was the elevation of liver enzymes, mostly γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) in 76% of patients, averaging 222 IU/L (upper limit of normality up to 40 IU/L) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in 64%, mean 84 IU/L (38 IU/L). One-third of our patients had exposure to medications, especially herbal medicines, at the time of enzymatic changes. Other risk factors highlighted were features of autoimmunity in 25% of patients or thrombophilia in 20%.

Conclusion

OPV can be diagnosed even before the onset of portal hypertension, ALT elevation, and especially GGT elevation in most cases. Its etiology is not defined, but autoimmune diseases, thrombophilia, and the use of medications or herbal medicines may play a role.

Identification and clinical significance of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC is frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) can occur in IBD with the use or even in the absence of thiopurine treatment. We aimed to study the significance of the presence of NRH and obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), both causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), in patients having PSC.

METHODS

Patients with PSC and concurrent NRH on liver biopsy were identified from the digital pathology database covering the period 2003-2019. Evaluation of liver biopsy and the original diagnoses were confirmed on review based on standard histological features diagnostic for NRH and OPV. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (21 male, 10 female; median age at biopsy 40.1 years) were included in the study. Twelve (38.7%) patients had OPV in addition to NRH on the liver biopsy. Nineteen (61.2%) patients had IBD including 11 with Crohn's disease (CD), 7 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1 with indeterminate colitis. Thirteen (41.9%) patients had evidence of portal hypertension, 10 (32.2%) with esophageal varices, 4 (12.9%) with history of variceal bleeding, 6 (19.3%) with ascites, and 14 (12.9%) with splenomegaly. Eleven (35.4%) patients had a cirrhotic-appearing liver on imaging. Twelve (38.7%) patients had a history of prior or current thiopurine use.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that NRH with or without OPV independently occurs in patients having PSC and may lead to NCPH, even in the absence of concurrent IBD and/or thiopurine therapy.

Obliterative Portal Venopathy Caused by Oral Contraceptive Pills: A Case Report

Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) have a known prothrombotic effect. Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) can be seen in patients with underlying hypercoagulability. We present a case of a 19-year-old female patient taking OCPs who presented with obstructive jaundice. Her main concern was pruritis. An extensive workup was done to reach a diagnosis but it came back negative. A liver biopsy showed OPV. This was thought secondary to her OCP use. Her OCPs were discontinued which resulted in a complete resolution of her symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. Cases with a direct relationship between OPV and OCP use are extremely rare. More studies are required to establish a correlation between OPV and OCPs. OPV should be considered in the differential diagnosis among patients with obstructive jaundice without an obvious cause, especially in patients taking OCPs. Treatment is stopping the OCPs with close follow-up to confirm disease resolution.

Idiopathic Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension and Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Review of Current Data

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a clinicopathologic disease entity characterized by the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of liver cirrhosis or known risk factors accountable for PH. Multiple hematologic, immune-related, infectious, hereditary and metabolic risk factors have been associated with this disorder. Still, the exact etiopathogenesis is largely unknown. The recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) scheme broadens the spectrum of the disease by also including patients without clinical PH who are found to have similar histopathologic findings on core liver biopsies. Three histomorphologic lesions have been identified as specific for PSVD to include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia and incomplete septal cirrhosis/fibrosis. However, these findings are often subtle, under-recognized and subjective with low interobserver agreement among pathologists. Additionally, the natural history of the subclinical forms of the disease remains unexplored. The clinical course is more favorable compared to cirrhosis patients, especially in the absence of clinical PH or liver dysfunction. There are no universally accepted guidelines in regard to diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD. Hence, this review emphasizes the need to raise awareness of this entity by highlighting its complex pathophysiology and clinicopathologic associations. Lastly, formulation of standardized diagnostic criteria with clinical validation is necessary to avoid misclassifying vascular diseases of the liver and to develop and implement targeted therapeutic strategies.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of de novo nodular regenerative hyperplasia in pediatric liver transplant

Liver NRH is seen in all patients age; however, more frequently in those over the age of 60 years and associated with multiple systemic diseases. In liver allograft recipients, the development of DnNRH has been linked with the use of azathioprine or vascular abnormalities. We present the clinicopathologic characteristics of 17 pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation and subsequently developed DnNRH. The patients were divided into early and late onset depending if DnNRH was diagnosed within or beyond 4 years after transplant. Eight patients (47%) presented as early onset, of which two had normal ultrasound at time of diagnosis. One patient (12.5%) with early onset lost the graft secondary to DnNRH. Nine patients (53%) presented as late onset, of which two (22%) had normal ultrasound at time of diagnosis. Two patients (25%) of the late onset lost their graft secondary to chronic rejection and DnNRH. Two patients (12%) died secondary to cytomegalovirus pneumonitis and pancolitis. Furthermore, both groups presented with symptoms differing from the adult population in prior studies and were not associated with the use of azathioprine or vascular abnormalities. Interestingly, episodes of acute cellular rejection were more common in the early-onset group compared to the late-onset group. In conclusion, DnNRH in the pediatric age group has a different clinical presentation, possibly reflecting a different pathogenesis compared to the adult population.

Idiopathic Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension: An Appraisal

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is a poorly defined clinical condition of unknown etiology. Patients present with signs and symptoms of portal hypertension without evidence of cirrhosis. The disease course appears to be indolent and benign with an overall better outcome than cirrhosis, as long as the complications of portal hypertension are properly managed. This condition has been recognized in different parts of the world in diverse ethnic groups with variable risk factors, resulting in numerous terminologies and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. Therefore, although the diagnosis of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension requires clinical exclusion of other conditions that can cause portal hypertension and histopathologic confirmation, this entity is under-recognized clinically as well as pathologically. Recent studies have demonstrated that variable histopathologic entities with different terms likely represent a histologic spectrum of a single entity of which obliterative portal venopathy might be an underlying pathogenesis. This perception calls for standardization of the nomenclature and formulation of widely accepted diagnostic criteria, which will facilitate easier recognition of this disorder and will highlight awareness of this entity.