Salvage treatment for local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation therapy

Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

AIM

The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline from January 2000 to May 2022 for literature comparing the efficacy of LH and PRFA in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (largest tumour diameter ≤ 3 cm, number of intrahepatic tumours ≤3, or diameter of a single intrahepatic lesion ≤5 cm. ). We assessed overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence and complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 1886 patients with small HCC were included in the 8 studies included in this study, of which 839 underwent LH and 1047 underwent PRAF. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the two groups had the same 3-year (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.47) and 5-year (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.87) OS rates, and the LH group had better 3-year (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.68) and 5-year (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.85) RFS rates. The LH group had a lower local recurrence rate (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.32), but the PRFA group had a lower complication rate (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.54).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in OS between LH and PRFA in the treatment of small HCC. LH had a higher RFS rate and a lower local recurrence rate, but PRFA had a lower complication rate. In general, the long-term efficacy of LH in the treatment of small HCC is better than that of PRFA. Considering the advantages of less trauma and a low complication rate of PRFA, a large number of RCT studies are needed for further verification in the future.

Salvage Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-established locoregional treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the optimal strategy to handle local recurrence after ablation is still debated. This study aims to investigate the role of salvage hepatectomy (SH) as a rescue therapy for recurrent HCC after RFA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2020, 1161 patients were subject to surgical resection for HCC. Among them, 47 patients who underwent SH for local recurrence after ablation were retrospectively analyzed and compared to a propensity score-matched group of controls (n = 47) who received primary hepatectomy (PH). Short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

After matching, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity rates showed no statistically significant difference. Tumors in the SH group were associated with poor differentiation (SH 9 (19.1%) vs. PH 1 (2.1%), p < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rates (31.6% vs. 73.4%, p < 0.001) and overall survival rates (80.3% vs. 94.2%, p = 0.047) were significantly lower in the SH group. In multivariable analysis, less extensive resection compared to the initial plan (hazard ratio (HR) 4.68, p = 0.024), higher grade (HR 5.38, P < 0.001), negative but close (<0.1 cm) resection margin (HR 22.14, p = 0.007), and R1 resection (HR 3.13, p = 0.006) were significant predictors for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

SH for recurrent tumors after ablation showed safety and effectiveness equivalent to primary resection. As recurrent tumors show a higher grade and more aggressive behavior, more extensive resections with wide surgical margins are necessary to prevent recurrence.

Comparison of Open versus Laparoscopic Approaches in Salvage Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation

Background and Objectives: Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is widely used as an effective local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evidence on salvage hepatectomy for local recurrence after RFA is limited. This study aims to compare open and laparoscopic approaches in salvage hepatectomy for recurrent HCC after RFA. Materials and Methods: Among patients who underwent hepatectomy between January 2004 and August 2022 at a single tertiary referral center, 55 patients who underwent salvage hepatectomy for marginal recurrence after RFA were selected. An open approach was used in 23 (41.8%) patients, while 32 (58.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Major hepatectomy was more often performed in the open group (9 [39.1%] vs. 4 [12.5%], p = 0.022). Intraoperative blood loss was also greater in the open group (450 (325-750) vs. 300 (200-600), p = 0.034). Operation time (p = 0.144) and postoperative morbidity rates (p = 0.639) were similar, and there was no postoperative mortality in either group. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the open group compared to the laparoscopy group (8 (6-11) days vs. 5 (4-7) days, p = 0.028). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates showed no difference between the two groups (44.6% vs. 62.5%, 16.5% vs. 13.5%, and 8.3% vs. 13.5%, respectively; p = 0.154). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates between the two groups were also similar (85.7% vs. 96.8%, 79.6% vs. 86.0%, and 79.6% vs. 79.4%, respectively; p = 0.480). Conclusions: Laparoscopic salvage hepatectomy shows oncologic outcomes comparable to the open approach with faster postoperative recovery rates. Considering that recurrence rates are high after RFA, the laparoscopic approach should be considered as a first-line option in selected patients.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Salvage Hepatectomy for Locally Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Therapy: A Single-Institution Experience

Surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy, including locally recurrent HCC (LR-HCC), were examined. Among 273 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC, 102 with recurrent HCC were included and retrospectively reviewed. There were 35 patients with recurrent HCC after primary hepatectomy and 67 with recurrent HCC after locoregional therapies. Pathologic review revealed 30 patients with LR-HCC. Background liver function was significantly worse in patients with recurrent HCC after locoregional therapy (p = 0.002). AFP (p = 0.031) and AFP-L3 (p = 0.033) serum levels were significantly higher in patients with LR-HCC. Perioperative morbidities were significantly more frequently observed with recurrent HCC after locoregional therapies (p = 0.048). Long-term outcomes of recurrent HCC after locoregional therapies were worse than those after hepatectomy, though there was no prognostic difference according to the recurrence patterns after locoregional therapies. Multivariate analyses showed that prognostic factors for resected recurrent HCC were previous locoregional therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0; p = 0.005), multiple HCCs (HR 2.8; p < 0.001), and portal venous invasion (HR 2.3; p = 0.001). LR-HCC was not a prognostic factor. In conclusion, salvage hepatectomy for LR-HCC showed worse surgical outcomes but a favorable prognosis.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Effectiveness of Repeated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Consideration of the Locations of Target Lesions

The present study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), including repeated SBRT, for hepatocellular carcinoma. Participants comprised 220 HCC patients treated with SBRT in Hiroshima University Hospital between December 2008 and December 2021. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 52 months (range, 45-64 months) and 17 months (range, 14-23 months), respectively. The 5-year local tumor recurrence rate was 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-6.9%). Fifty-three patients underwent repeated SBRT (twice, 53 cases; three times, 10 cases; four times, 4 cases; five times, 1 case). Median interval between first and second SBRT was 20 months. Median OS from first SBRT was 76 months (95% CI, 50-102 months). Among patients with repeated SBRT, only one case showed local recurrence after second SBRT. Albumin-bilirubin score increased significantly from 6 to 12 months after repeated SBRT, both in the same segment and in remote segments, but the increase was not significant in the same segment. Only one case of grade 3 bile duct stricture was observed in patients who were treated with repeated SBRT. In conclusion, repeated SBRT provides good local control and a low risk of side effects.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver resection (LR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are commonly used for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the optimal treatment modality remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LR vs RFA for recurrent HCC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were major complications and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 1991 patients with recurrent HCC were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS demonstrated that LR had significantly better OS than RFA in recurrent HCC (HR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95). Specifically, LR was associated with higher 2-, 3- and 4-year OS rates compared with RFA. The pooled HR for DFS showed no significant difference between LR and RFA during the whole follow-up period (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.07). However, LR was associated with significantly higher 2- to 5-year DFS rates compared to RFA. LR was also associated with more major complications (p < .001) and longer hospital stay (p < .001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that LR and RFA had similar efficacy in patients with recurrent tumors less than 3 cm or patients presenting three or fewer recurrent nodules.

CONCLUSION

LR could provide better long-term survival outcomes than RFA for recurrent HCC patients, while RFA has a higher safety profile. RFA can be a good alternative to LR for patients with small-sized recurrence or patients with a limited number of recurrent nodules. However, as tumor size increases, LR tends to be more efficacious.

Laparoscopic liver resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) play central roles to treat early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≤3 cm, 1-3 nodules, and no macrovascular involvement), although data are lacking regarding whether LLR or RFA is preferable. This study aimed to compare outcomes of both treatments for small HCCs.

METHODS

Treatment outcomes of small HCCs were compared between all the minor LLRs performed between 2005 and 2016 and RFAs performed between 2011 and 2016 at Kyoto University.

RESULTS

A total of 85 and 136 patients underwent LLR and RFA, respectively. Patients that underwent LLR had higher incidence of blood transfusions, complications, and longer hospital stay. Overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar between LLR and RFA; however, recurrence-free (49.2% vs. 22.1% at 3-year) and local recurrence-free survival rates (94.9% vs. 63.6% at 3-year) were higher after LLR. Multivariate analyses identified that multiple nodules and 65-year-old and above are predictors of disease-specific survival, and that RFA is a predictor of recurrence and local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

RFA is less invasive, although both LLR and RFA are safe and effective. LLR provides better local control with superior recurrence-free and local-recurrence free survival. These results help optimize treatment selection based on patient-specific factors.

Radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes in bipolar mode for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment: A randomized prospective comparative study

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy between bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA), using twin internally cooled wet (TICW) electrodes, and switching monopolar RFA, using separable clustered (SC) electrodes, in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatment.

Materials and methods

In this single-center, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled study, we performed a 1:1 random allocation on eligible patients with recurrent HCC after locoregional treatment, to receive TICW-RFA or SC-RFA. The primary endpoint was the minimum diameter of the ablation zone per unit ablation time. Secondary endpoints included other technical parameters, complication rate, technical success and technique efficacy, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the TICW-RFA group (n = 40) or SC-RFA group (n = 37). The two groups did not show significant differences in the primary endpoint, the minimum diameter of the ablation zone per unit ablation time was 2.71 ± 0.98 mm/min and 2.61 ± 0.96 mm/min in the TICW-RFA and SC-RFA groups, respectively (p = 0.577). Total RF energy delivery (11.75 ± 9.04 kcal vs. 22.61 ± 12.98 kcal, p < 0.001) and energy delivery per unit time (0.81 ± 0.49 kcal/min vs. 1.45 ± 0.42 kcal/min, p < 0.001) of the TICW-RFA group were less than those of the SC-RFA group. No procedure-related death or major complications occurred. Technical success was achieved in all patients in both groups, and technique efficacy rates were 100% (46/46) in the TICW-RFA group and 95.0% (38/40) in the SC-RFA group (p = 0.213). The 1-year and 2-year cumulative LTP rates were 11.8% and 24.2%, respectively, in the TICW-RFA group, and 8.6% and 18.1%, respectively, in the SC-RFA group (p = 0.661).

Conclusion

In this single-center randomized controlled study from a Korean tertiary referral hospital, TICW-RFA demonstrated similar therapeutic efficacy and safety profile for recurrent HCC after locoregional treatment compared with SC-RFA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03806218)

Local control by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent/residual hepatocellular carcinoma after other local therapies

Background: To clarify local control by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for recurrent/residual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with initial definitive SBRT for local treatment-naïve HCC.Material and methods: We retrospectively investigated HCC patients that received SBRT between July 2005 and December 2017. We classified HCC tumors as the initial definitive SBRT group (Arm-1; initial definitive SBRT, Arm-2; initial definitive planned SBRT following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) and salvage SBRT group (Arm-3; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual tumors after TACE, Arm-4; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual tumors after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Arm-5; salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual other than Arm-3 or Arm-4). Local control was evaluated by mRECIST.Results: We reviewed 389 HCC tumors of 323 patients treated by 35-40 Gy/5 fr. The median follow-up time for local recurrence of tumors was 34.8 months (range, 6.5-99.2). The cumulative local recurrence rates at 3 years of Arm-1-5 were 1.4% (95% CI, 0.3-4.4%), 5.0% (95% CI, 1.6-11.5%), 12.4% (95% CI, 5.7-21.9%), 14.8% (95% CI, 3.3-34.3%) and 7.3% (95% CI, 1.9-18.0%), respectively. The cumulative local recurrence rates at 3 years of initial definitive treatment and salvage treatment groups were 2.8% (95% CI, 1.1-5.6%) and 11.1% (95% CI, 6.3-17.3%), respectively (p=.004). On multivariate analysis, salvage treatment and the tumor diameter were significant risk factors of local recurrence (p = .02, p < .001 respectively). Estimated overall survival at 3 years for all patients in initial definitive treatment and salvage treatment groups were 71.5% (95% CI, 63.4-78.1%) and 66.1% (95% CI, 56.4-74.2%), respectively (p = .20). No treatment-related death caused by SBRT was observed.Conclusions: This analysis showed local control of salvage SBRT for recurrent/residual HCC was significantly worse than that of initial definitive SBRT for local treatment-naïve HCC. However, local control of salvage SBRT was relatively good, and salvage SBRT is one of the favorable treatment options for recurrent/residual HCC.

Endoscopic hepatic resection and endoscopic radiofrequency ablation as initial treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria

PURPOSES

The indication of endoscopic (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic) hepatic resection (HR) has been expanded in the past decade because of its low invasiveness. However, the indications of endoscopic HR and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have not yet been determined.

METHODS

Among the 906 patients hospitalized for the initial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 2000 and 2017, 77 underwent endoscopic partial HR (E-pHR), and 94 underwent endoscopic RFA (E-RFA). We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the E-pHR and E-RFA groups.

RESULTS

The patients in the E-RFA group were characterized primarily by an impaired liver function. Among the patients with liver damage B or C, the overall survival (OS) in the E-pHR group was significantly worse than in the E-RFA group (3-year OS: 36% vs. 82%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

E-RFA may be recommended for the initial treatment of HCC in patients with a severely impaired liver function. However, E-pHR should be avoided as the initial treatment of HCC in such patients.

2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.

2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.

Implication of primary tumor location for the indication of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The benefit of preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains uncertain. The aim was to clarify the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on CRLM according to the primary tumor location.

METHODS

Among a total cohort of 163 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for CRLM, 36 patients had a right-sided and 127 had a left-sided primary tumor. According to the performance of preoperative chemotherapy, survival analysis was conducted and prognostic factors were identified.

RESULTS

Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 17 patients (47.2%) with a right-sided and 74 (58.3%) with a left-sided primary tumor (P = 0.24). Among the patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar between patients with right- and left-sided primary tumors (P = 0.36 and P = 0.44, respectively). Among the patients who underwent upfront hepatectomy, the OS and DFS of patients with a right-sided primary tumor were worse than those with a left-sided primary tumor (P = 0.02 and P = 0.025, respectively). Among the patients who underwent upfront surgery, the right-sided primary tumor was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 3.44, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The existence of a right-sided primary tumor may be an indication of preoperative chemotherapy for patients with CRLM.

Liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy

AIM

Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective local treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), local recurrence is relatively frequent. We aimed to elucidate the validity of salvage liver resection for recurrent HCC after RFA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for recurrent HCC after RFA (LR after RFA) and those who underwent second liver resection for recurrent HCC (second LR) were included. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. The survival rates between the two groups were compared after propensity-score matching to adjust for the variables, including patient background, liver function, and tumor status.

RESULTS

Major resection was frequently carried out in the LR after RFA group, but there was no significant difference both in operative data and complication rate between LR after RFA (n = 54) and second LR (n = 266) groups. After a median follow-up period of 1.8 years (range, 0.2-10.5), the median overall survival was 4.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 - not applicable) and 5.6 years (95% CI, 4.5-7.3; P = 0.023) in the LR after RFA group (n = 54) and second LR group (n = 54), respectively, and recurrence-free survival was 1.3 years (0.4-2.2) and 1.2 years (0.5-1.8, P = 0.469), respectively. The only independent factor for overall survival of the LR after RFA group was local recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.73; 1.06-9.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage liver resection of recurrent HCC after RFA could be recommended due to the safety of the procedure, especially in patients without local tumor progression after RFA.

Multimodal radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria in severely cirrhotic patients: long-term favorable outcomes over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Less invasiveness is an important consideration for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) especially in patients with severe cirrhosis.

METHODS

Between April 2000 and September 2016, 100 patients with liver damage B underwent multimodal radiofrequency ablation (RFA; n = 62) or laparoscopic hepatic resection (Lap-HR; n = 38) for primary HCC as defined by the Milan criteria. We compared the operative outcomes and patients' survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

The RFA group showed worse liver functions as indicated by indocyanine green retention rate (32.9 vs. 22.4%; p < 0.0001) and serum albumin value (3.3 vs. 3.6 g/dl; p = 0.0029). As expected, RFA was less invasive, as indicated by the differences in operation time (166 vs. 288 min.; p < 0.0001) and blood loss (8 vs. 377 g; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the morbidity rate between the two groups; however, the duration of hospital stay of the RFA group was significantly shorter (7 vs. 11 days; p = 0.0002). There were no significant between-group differences regarding overall or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal RFA for HCC in patients with severe cirrhosis is associated with less invasiveness and shorter hospital stays, with no compromise in the patients' survival. In patients with severe cirrhosis, it may be time to consider changing the standard treatment for primary HCC within the Milan criteria to multimodal RFA.

Salvage hepatectomy for local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinomas offers survival comparable to that of matched patients who undergo primary hepatectomies

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of salvage hepatectomy for locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) is unclear, especially for patients with viable parts of previously multinodular tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed charts of patients who underwent initial hepatectomies between 2000 and 2014 to select those with local recurrences (LR) after non-surgical treatments. Their postoperative outcomes, including morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared with matched patients who underwent initial hepatectomies for primary HCCs (PR). Their local recurrence patterns were divided into recurrent solitary tumors (Subgroup A); and recurrent parts of multinodular tumors (Subgroup B).

RESULTS

Among 664 patients, hepatectomy for LR was performed in 62 patients. Matched 59 patients were selected as PR. Clinicopathologic profiles at initial surgery were comparable between the LR and PR groups. Incidence of major morbidity (LR vs. PR, 7% vs. 5%, P = 1.00), 5-year RFS (21% vs. 37%, P = 0.28), and 5-year OS (69% vs. 69%, P = 0.62) were comparable. In the LR group, Subgroup B showed worse 5-year RFS (A vs. B, 29% vs. 0%, P < 0.01) and 5-year-OS (80% vs. 53%, P = 0.01). Postoperative recurrence occurred in 46 patients, but local and extrahepatic recurrence was seen only in 2 patients and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Salvage hepatectomy for locally recurrent HCCs is feasible, and results in prognosis comparable with hepatectomy for primary HCCs. Although the risk of postoperative recurrence was high in Subgroup B, rare local recurrence suggests the usefulness of salvaging uncontrolled tumor by nonsurgical treatment.

Clinical significance and predictive factors of early massive recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Aims

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the most frequently applied curative treatments in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical significance of and risk factors for early massive recurrence after RFA—a dreadful event limiting further curative treatment—have not been fully evaluated.

Methods

In total, 438 patients with a single HCC of size ≤3 cm who underwent percutaneous RFA as an initial treatment between 2006 and 2009 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, overall survival, predictive factors, and recurrence after RFA were evaluated. In addition, the incidence, impact on survival, and predictive factors of early massive recurrence, and initial recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 2 years were also investigated.

Results

During the median follow-up of 68.4 months, recurrent HCC was confirmed in 302 (68.9%) patients, with early massive recurrence in 27 patients (6.2%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.4%, 84.7%, and 81.8%, respectively, in patients with no recurrence, 99.6%, 86.4%, and 70.1% in patients with recurrence within the Milan criteria or late recurrence, and 92.6%, 46.5%, and 0.05% in patients with early massive recurrence. Multivariable analysis identified older age, Child-Pugh score B or C, and early massive recurrence as predictive of poor overall survival. A tumor size of ≥2 cm and tumor location adjacent to the colon were independent risk factors predictive of early massive recurrence.

Conclusion

Early massive recurrence is independently predictive of poor overall survival after RFA in patients with a single small HCC. Tumors sized ≥2 cm and located adjacent to the colon appear to be independent risk factors for early massive recurrence.

Salvage resection for recurrent or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ablation therapy

INTRODUCTION

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of salvage resection(SR) for recurrence or metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial percutaneous ablation therapy (PAT).

METHODS

From September 2006 to September 2013, 50 consecutive patients who received SR for recurrent or metastatic HCC undergone initial PAT were enrolled. Safety and efficacy of SR for these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

No treatment-related death occurred. Curative outcome was achieved in all the patients. The median overall survival after SR was 40 months, and the 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rate after SR was 85.2%, 46.4% and 34.8%, respectively. The disease-free survival was 38.6% at 1 year and 12.1% at 3 years after SR.

CONCLUSION

SR is an effective and safe method for patients with recurrent or metastatic HCC after initial PAT treatment.

Local Recurrence after Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Treatment Choice and Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven effective for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules. However, post-RFA local recurrence is a major factor limiting prognosis. Up to now, there is no consensus on a standardized treatment strategy for these local recurrences. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of salvage treatments for RFA-related local recurrence.

METHODS

From May 2008 to June 2013, a total of 112 patients with HCC were detected with local recurrence after RFA. Among them, 94 patients received sequential treatments in our hospital, including salvage resection (SR) (n = 24), salvage liver transplantation (n = 2), repeated RFA (n = 62), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (n = 6). We evaluated the treatment outcomes of patients by salvage surgery (SS), RFA, and TACE.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 32 months. After treatment, local recurrence was eradicated in 82 of 94 patients (87.2%). The complete response (CR) rate in the RFA group was 90.3% (56/62), while it was 100% (26/26) in the SS group (P = 0.175) and 0% (0/6) in the TACE group. When analysis confined to patients with CR, the 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 57.7 and 20.2% in the SS group, and 41.7 and 28.6% in the RFA group, respectively (P = 0.640). The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.3 and 69.1% in the SS group, and 78.6 and 57.5% in the RFA group, respectively (P = 0.251).

CONCLUSION

Repeated RFA is the first treatment choice for patients with post-RFA local recurrence. SS should be considered when RFA failed or is inapplicable.

Role of hepatectomy for recurrent or initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

As a result of donor shortage and high postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation, hepatectomy is the most widely applicable and reliable option for curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because intrahepatic tumor recurrence is frequent after loco-regional therapy, repeated treatments are advocated provided background liver function is maintained. Among treatments including local ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, hepatectomy provides the best long-term outcomes, but studies comparing hepatectomy with other nonsurgical treatments require careful review for selection bias. In patients with initially unresectable HCC, transarterial chemo-or radio-embolization, and/or systemic chemotherapy can down-stage the tumor and conversion to resectable HCC is achieved in approximately 20% of patients. However, complete response is rare, and salvage hepatectomy is essential to help prolong patients’ survival. To counter the short recurrence-free survival, excellent overall survival is obtained by combining and repeating different treatments. It is important to recognize hepatectomy as a complement, rather than a contraindication, to other nonsurgical treatments in a multidisciplinary approach for patients with HCC, including recurrent or unresectable tumors.