1
|
Turan C, Kovács EH, Szabó L, Atakan I, Dembrovszky F, Ocskay K, Váncsa S, Hegyi P, Zubek L, Molnár Z. The Effect of Preoperative Administration of Glucocorticoids on the Postoperative Complication Rate in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2097. [PMID: 38610862 PMCID: PMC11012757 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Glucocorticoids may grant a protective effect against postoperative complications. The evidence on their efficacy, however, has been inconclusive thus far. We investigated the effects of preoperatively administered glucocorticoids on the overall postoperative complication rate, and on liver function recovery in patients undergoing major liver surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL in October 2021, and repeated the search in April 2023. Pre-study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021284559). Studies investigating patients undergoing liver resections or transplantation who were administered glucocorticoids preoperatively and reported postoperative complications were eligible. Meta-analyses were performed using META and DMETAR packages in R with a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2. Results: The selection yielded 11 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 964 patients. Data from nine RCTs (n = 837) revealed a tendency toward a lower overall complication rate with glucocorticoid administration (odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.31, p = 0.23), but it was not statistically significant. Data pooled from seven RCTs showed a significant reduction in wound infections with glucocorticoid administration [odds ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.92 p = 0.02]. Due to limited data availability, meta-analysis of liver function recovery parameters was not possible. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of glucocorticoids did not significantly reduce the overall postoperative complication rate. Future clinical trials should investigate homogenous patient populations with a specific focus on postoperative liver recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caner Turan
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Emőke Henrietta Kovács
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Selye János Doctoral College for Advanced Studies, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Szabó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Işıl Atakan
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fanni Dembrovszky
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Klementina Ocskay
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Szilárd Váncsa
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
- Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Zubek
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Molnár
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
This article will focus on the perioperative management of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases (CLRMs) (the liver is the dominant metastatic site for CRC) within the context of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) paradigm. It discusses the epidemiology and outcomes along with the history of hepatic resection surgery and pertinent anatomy. The discussion of the preoperative phase includes patient selection, assessment of liver functional status, and new developments in prehabilitation. The intraoperative phase details developments in surgical and anesthetic techniques to minimize liver hemorrhage and reduce the risk of postoperative hepatic failure. Newer analgesic options are included. Management of potential complications is outlined in the postoperative section followed by a description of current evidence for ERAS and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Krige
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Haslingden Road, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Leigh J S Kelliher
- Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7AS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hai HH, Aw P, Teng TZJ, Shelat VG. Perioperative steroid administration reduces overall complications in patients undergoing liver resection: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1079-1094. [PMID: 34621482 PMCID: PMC8462075 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.1079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic resection (HR) results in an inflammatory response that can be modified by perioperative steroid administration. However, it remains to be determined if this response's attenuation translates to a reduction in complications.
AIM To evaluate if perioperative administration of steroids reduces complications following HR.
METHODS A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to evaluate the effect of perioperative steroid (compared to placebo or no intervention) use in patients undergoing HR. Clinical outcomes were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS 8 RCTs including 590 patients were included. Perioperative steroid administration was associated with significant reduction in postoperative complications [odds ratios: 0.58; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.35-0.97, P = 0.04]. There was also improvement in biochemical and inflammatory markers, including serum bilirubin on postoperative day 1 [MD: -0.27; 95%CI: (-0.47, -0.06), P = 0.01], C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 [MD: -4.89; 95%CI: (-5.83, -3.95), P < 0.001], and interleukin-6 on postoperative day 1 [MD: -54.84; 95%CI: (-63.91, -45.76), P < 0.001].
CONCLUSION Perioperative steroids administration in HR may reduce overall complications, postoperative bilirubin, and inflammation. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and duration and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Han Hai
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| | - Phoebe Aw
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| | | | - Vishal G Shelat
- NTU Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore 308232, Singapore
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Onoe S, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, Igami T, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, Watanabe N, Suzuki S, Nishiwaki K, Ando M, Nagino M. Impact of Perioperative Steroid Administration in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatectomy with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:121-130. [PMID: 32578066 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08745-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, five randomized controlled trials have assessed the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration in hepatectomy; however, all of these studies involved a substantial number of 'minor' hepatectomies. The benefit of steroid administration for patients undergoing 'complex' hepatectomy, such as major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of perioperative steroid administration for complex major hepatectomy. METHODS Patients with suspected hilar malignancy scheduled to undergo major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection were randomized into either the control or steroid groups. The steroid group received hydrocortisone 500 mg immediately before hepatic pedicle clamping, followed by hydrocortisone 300 mg on postoperative day (POD) 1, 200 mg on POD 2, and 100 mg on POD 3. The control group received only physiologic saline. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative liver failure. RESULTS A total of 94 patients were randomized to either the control (n = 46) or steroid (n = 48) groups. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics; however, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of grade B/C postoperative liver failure (control group, n = 8, 17%; steroid group, n = 4, 8%; p = 0.188) and other complications. Serum bilirubin levels on PODs 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the steroid group than those in the control group; however, these median values were within normal limits in both groups. CONCLUSION Perioperative steroid administration did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications, including liver failure following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Shogo Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent developments in perioperative pathophysiology and care have documented evidence-based, multimodal rehabilitation (fast-track) to hasten recovery and decrease morbidity and hospital stay in several major surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect over time of a modified previously published fast-track programme in unselected patients undergoing open or laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS A prospective study includes the first 121 consecutive patients following an updated fast-track programme for liver resection. High-dose methylprednisolone was given to all patients before surgery, catheters and drains were systematically removed early, and patients were mobilized and started eating and drinking from the day of surgery. An opioid-sparing multimodal pain treatment was given for the first week. The discharge criteria were (1) pain sufficiently controlled by oral analgesics only; (2) patient comfortable with discharge; (3) no untreated complications. RESULTS The median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 4 days, with 2 days after laparoscopic vs. 4 days for open resections. The median LOS after major hepatectomies (≥3 segments) was 5 days. The readmission rate was 6% and the 30-day mortality zero. The LOS decreased compared to our first-generation fast-track programme with LOS 5 days. CONCLUSIONS Fast-track principles for perioperative care and early discharge are safe even after major liver resection. The introduction of high-dose steroids preoperatively might have facilitated a shorter LOS. Routine discharge on POD 1 or 2 after laparoscopic resection and on POD 4 after open liver resection has proven to be feasible.
Collapse
|
6
|
Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M, Snowden C, Prentis J, Dejong CHC, Garden OJ, Farges O, Kokudo N, Vauthey JN, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2017; 40:2425-40. [PMID: 27549599 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 378] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway developed to overcome the deleterious effect of perioperative stress after major surgery. In colorectal surgery, ERAS pathways reduced perioperative morbidity, hospital stay and costs. Similar concept should be applied for liver surgery. This study presents the specific ERAS Society recommendations for liver surgery based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus. METHODS A systematic review was performed on ERAS for liver surgery by searching EMBASE and Medline. Five independent reviewers selected relevant articles. Quality of randomized trials was assessed according to the Jadad score and CONSORT statement. The level of evidence for each item was determined using the GRADE system. The Delphi method was used to validate the final recommendations. RESULTS A total of 157 full texts were screened. Thirty-seven articles were included in the systematic review, and 16 of the 23 standard ERAS items were studied specifically for liver surgery. Consensus was reached among experts after 3 rounds. Prophylactic nasogastric intubation and prophylactic abdominal drainage should be omitted. The use of postoperative oral laxatives and minimally invasive surgery results in a quicker bowel recovery and shorter hospital stay. Goal-directed fluid therapy with maintenance of a low intraoperative central venous pressure induces faster recovery. Early oral intake and mobilization are recommended. There is no evidence to prefer epidural to other types of analgesia. CONCLUSIONS The current ERAS recommendations were elaborated based on the best available evidence and endorsed by the Delphi method. Nevertheless, prospective studies need to confirm the clinical use of the suggested protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Melloul
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael Scott
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Chris Snowden
- Department of Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James Prentis
- Department of Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center and NUTRIM School for Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - O James Garden
- Department of Clinical Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Olivier Farges
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, U.T. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss Hepato-pancreato-biliary and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|