Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver version 5 (RECICL 2019 revised version)

Systemic Drugs for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Recent Clinical Trials Reveal About Sequencing and the Emerging Complexities of Clinical Decisions?

Liver cancer was the fourth leading cause of cancer death in 2015 with increasing incidence between 1990 and 2015. Orthotopic liver transplantation, surgical resection and ablation comprise the only curative therapy options. However, due to the late manifestation of clinical symptoms, many patients present with intermediate or advanced disease, resulting in no curative treatment option being available. Whereas intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually still addressable by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), advanced-stage HCC is amenable only to pharmacological treatments. Conventional cytotoxic agents failed demonstrating relevant effect on survival also because their use was severely limited by the mostly underlying insufficient liver function. For a decade, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib was the only systemic therapy that proved to have a clinically relevant effect in the treatment of advanced HCC. In recent years, the number of substances for systemic treatment of advanced HCC has increased enormously. In addition to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antiangiogenic drugs are increasingly being applied. The combination of anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab has become the new standard of care for advanced HCC due to its remarkable response rates. This requires more and more complex clinical decisions regarding tumor therapy. This review aims at summarizing recent developments in systemic therapy, considering data on first- and second-line treatment, use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and combination with locoregional procedures.

Evaluation of Multiple Liver Cancer Scoring Systems

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and its incidence and mortality are increasing year by year. The prognosis of liver cancer depends on the stage of liver cancer, the treatment method, the liver function, and individual differences. The prognosis of liver cancer mainly worsens with the progression of the stage. The prediction and staging system of liver cancer prognosis plays a very important role in the outcome of liver cancer prognosis, providing some guidance for clinical practice and bringing benefits for patients. This article reports on the prediction models and staging systems that have been applied in the field of liver cancer in the past 5 years, objectively analyzes the advantages and disadvantages, applicable population of each model and staging system, and searches for other patient and clinical characteristics that need to be considered for successfully establishing a prediction model, aiming to improve the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of liver cancer prediction and increase the overall survival rate of liver cancer.

Impact of anticancer drugs on the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of hepatic arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using various anticancer drugs is often performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of TACE with anticancer drugs versus transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) without anticancer drugs for HCC.

Methods

Patients with HCC were randomized to either the TACE or TAE group. Up to five target nodules were treated in each patient. Lipiodol (Lp; 10 mL), contrast media (CM; 10 mL), epirubicin (40 mg), mitomycin C (10 mg), miliplatin (70 mg), and 1-2-mm 2-day soluble gelatin sponge particles (2D-SGS) were injected into the TACE group, whereas Lp (10 mL), CM (10 mL), and 2D-SGS were injected into the TAE group. Treatment effect (TE) of the target nodules was graded (TE1-TE4) and patient responses were assessed. Three months after treatment, blood tests were performed to compare tumor markers and adverse events.

Results

Fifty-four patients and 161 target nodules were included; 75 nodules in 28 patients were treated by TACE, and 86 nodules in 26 patients were treated by TAE. The number of nodules graded TE1, TE2, TE3, and TE4 was 1, 28, 7, and 39, respectively, in the TACE group and 2, 25, 7, and 52, respectively, in the TAE group. The response rates were 89% (25/28) and 73% (19/26) in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in TE, response rates, or blood test results between the two groups.

Conclusion

In hepatic arterial embolization for HCC, anticancer drugs did not have any impact on the therapeutic efficacy or side effects at 3 months after embolization.

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization with a Three-Stage Mixed Chemoembolic Regimen for Large Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to assess the treatment response, survival outcomes, and safety of a novel transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) technique with a three-stage mixed chemoembolic regimen (M-TACE) in patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring more than 5 cm in maximum diameter.

Methods

Between January 2017 and March 2023, a total of 82 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was assessed in the first month after M-TACE; progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic factors associated with patient survival were statistically analyzed by the Cox regression model. Adverse events were recorded.

Results

The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 5.3 cm to 20.0 cm (mean 10.71 cm). The objective response (OR) and disease control rates were 74.4 and 92.7%, respectively, at 1-month follow-up. The median survival time was 22 months (95% CI, 13.10-30.90 months). The OS rates were 82.0% at six months, 62.5% at one year, and 43.0% at two years. Targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy (P=0.001) and tumor response at one month (P=0.020) were protective factors for OS. In terms of safety, no major complications occurred and the only observed decrease within the normal range occurred in albumin and platelet levels one month after the embolization procedure. This decrease in levels did not show a significant relationship with the OR rates.

Conclusion

M-TACE demonstrated a promising objective tumor response, making it a viable and effective treatment option for patients with large unresectable HCC.

Report of the 23rd nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan (2014-2015)

For the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 20 889 newly registered patients and 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 516 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 23rd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 22nd survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh grade, or albumin-bilirubin grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer in the world.

Microballoon Interventions for Liver Tumors: Review of Literature and Future Perspectives

Background: Microballoon interventions (MBIs) have been proposed as useful tools to improve the efficacy of locoregional liver treatments. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the existing evidence on procedural characteristics, safety, and efficacy of MBIs. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for original research articles evaluating MBIs in patients with liver malignancies from 2012 to August 2022. Search terms employed were liver malignancies, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastases, microballoon transarterial chemoembolization, balloon-occluded trans-arterial chemoembolization, balloon-occluded selective internal radiation therapies, balloon-occluded TACE and ablation, and safety or oncological results or efficacy. Merely technical studies and animal studies were excluded. Results: Thirty-four original research studies and one abstract involving 744 patients treated with MBIs were included; 76% of the studies were retrospective, with low risk of bias and moderate-to-poor levels of evidence. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. All studies proved MBI safety, which was not inferior to non-occlusive procedures. Balloon employment ameliorates oncological results, improving time to recurrence, objective response rate, and lowers need for retreatment. Conclusions: MBIs appear to be potential game changers in the treatment of liver malignancies. Multicentric, prospective and randomized studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Durable complete response is achieved by balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

In 2013 and 2014, the development of microcatheters with balloons for the 4-Fr system and new embolization materials provided various options for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), expanding the range of treatment strategies. At our hospital, balloon-occluded TACE (B-TACE), conventional TACE (C-TACE), and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) have been actively performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compared the local recurrence-free (LRF) periods of nodules with complete necrosis (TE4) obtained using each treatment method by extracting the nodules evaluated as complete response by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We performed 580 TACE procedures between June 2013 and April 2019. Among them, 58 HCC nodules in 43 patients, 33 nodules in 30 patients, and 45 nodules in 25 patients were evaluated as having complete necrosis after C-TACE, DEB-TACE, and B-TACE, respectively. The time to local recurrence for each nodule was defined as the LRF period, and the quality of TE4 for each TACE was examined. Factors related to overall survival and the LRF period were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses, and overall survival and the LRF period were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis of the LRF period showed that B-TACE was an independent factor. The median LRF periods were 39.3, 13, and 9.1 months for B-TACE, C-TACE, and DEB-TACE, respectively. Moreover, B-TACE had a significantly longer LRF period than C-TACE and DEB-TACE. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between C-TACE and DEB-TACE. The LRF period of nodules with TE4 was the longest with B-TACE, suggesting that B-TACE should be used to achieve a radical cure in patients with HCC.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the liver version 6 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver 2021 revised version)

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, establishment of response evaluation criteria solely devoted to HCC is needed in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials of HCC treatment, such as systemic therapies, which cause necrosis of the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) was revised in 2021 by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan based on the 2019 version of RECICL, which was commonly used in Japan. The major revised points of the RECICL 2021 is inclusion of RECIST version 1.1 and modified RECIST as response evaluation criteria in systemic therapy for HCC. We hope this new treatment response criteria, RECICL, proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan will benefit the HCC treatment response evaluation in the setting of daily clinical practice and clinical trials as well, not only in Japan, but also internationally.

Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with 90Y Glass Microspheres: No Advantage of Voxel Dosimetry with Respect to Mean Dose in Dose-Response Analysis with Two Radiological Methods

Simple Summary

We confirmed that the non-uniformity of an intra-lesion dose distribution, which was introduced in calculations as voxel dosimetry, did not significantly improve the AUC values of the dose–response relationship with respect to the mean dose. This was probably derived from the strong correlations (all p < 0.0001) among all voxel-based dosimetric variables (minimum Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.67) caused by the limited spatial resolution of nuclear medicine images. Responses were assessed with mRECIST and with an experimental densitometric method with a response threshold optimized at 20% HU variation. Significant dose–response agreement was obtained only with the densitometric method and only with post-therapy 90Y-PET data. More unexpectedly, the injection of Theraspheres™ on day 8 from the reference date rather than on day 4 worsened the dose–response correlation and reduced the efficacy at high doses. This may be explained by the increased non-uniformity following the non-linear mega-clustering effect triggered by the higher number of microspheres/GBq injected on day 8.

Abstract

In this confirmatory study, we tested if a calculation that included the non-uniformity of dose deposition through a voxel-based dosimetric variable Ψ was able to improve the dose–response agreement with respect to the mean absorbed dose D. We performed dosimetry with ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and ⁹⁰Y-PET/CT in 86 patients treated 8 instead of 4 days after the reference date with 2.8 times more ⁹⁰Y glass microspheres/GBq than in our previous study. The lesion-by-lesion response was assessed with the mRECIST method and with an experimental densitometric criterion. A total of 106 lesions were studied. Considering Ψ as a prognostic response marker, having no Ψ provided a significantly higher AUC than D. The correlation, t-test, and AUC values were statistically significant only with the densitometric method and only with post-therapy dosimetry. In comparison with our previous study, the dose–response correlation and AUC values were poorer (maximum r = 0.43, R² = 0.14, maximal AUC = 0.71), and the efficacy at a high dose did not reach 100%. The expected advantages of voxel dosimetry were nullified by the correlation between any Ψ and D due to the limited image spatial resolution. The lower AUC and efficacy may be explained by the mega-clustering effect triggered by the higher number of microspheres/GBq injected on day 8.

Report of the 22nd nationwide follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan (2012-2013)

In the 22nd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 21 155 newly registered patients and 43 041 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 538 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 22nd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathologic diagnosis, recurrence status and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 21st survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, more patients with non-B non-C HCC, smaller tumor diameter and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2002 and 2013 whose final outcome was survival or death. Median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter or Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2013 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer worldwide.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis of their impact on liver function and clinical outcomes

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has high efficacy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is an accepted alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, SBRT for HCC may cause subacute liver injury leading to negative clinical outcomes. In this study, we compared changes of liver function and prognosis after SBRT or RFA in patients with single, small HCC by using a propensity-score matching analysis.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 140 patients with single ≤3 cm HCC treated with SBRT or RFA at Kurashiki Central Hospital between January 2014 and February 2019. Changes of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, local recurrence, and overall survival were compared between the propensity-score matched groups (31 patients treated with SBRT and 62 treated with RFA).

Results

The ALBI score increased modestly but significantly after SBRT, while it was unchanged in the RFA group; the intergroup difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). No local recurrence was identified in the SBRT group, whereas the cumulative recurrence incidence was 9.7% in the RFA group (P=0.023). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-2.89, P=0.401).

Conclusions

SBRT had modestly negative impact on liver function but with appraisable local control of HCC. Our findings should contribute to the selection of this modality for treatment of single, small HCC.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index is a Prognostic Risk Factor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE

Background

Mounting evidence has shown that systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), a novel prognostic biomarker based on peripheral lymphocyte, neutrophil and monocyte counts, is associated with poor prognosis for several tumors. However, the prognostic value of SIRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is elusive. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between SIRI and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

A total of 194 consecutive patients who underwent TACE were included in this study. Patients were stratified into high and low SIRI groups based on the cut-off value using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent risk factors for tumor response were analyzed using forward stepwise logistic regression. A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between low and high SIRI patients. The discriminatory power of the combination of number of tumors and SIRI in predicting initial TACE response was evaluated by ROC analysis.

Results

Patients were divided into high SIRI (> 0.88) and low SIRI (≤ 0.88) groups. High SIRI (p = 0.003) and more than three tumors (p = 0.002) were significantly related to poorer tumor response. Moreover, the low SIRI group had longer PFS and OS than the high SIRI group (both P < 0.05) before and after PSM. Combination of SIRI and number of tumors can improve the predictive ability to predict initial TACE response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.678.

Conclusion

Pretreatment peripheral blood SIRI was found to be an independent predictor of tumor response and clinical outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Patients with high SIRI may have a poor prognosis.

Report of the 21st Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan (2010-2011)

In the 21st Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 22,134 new patients and 41,956 previously followed patients were compiled from 546 institutions over a 2-year period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 21st survey were cause of death, medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 20th survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy and with radiofrequency ablation. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 1998 and 2011 whose final outcome was survival or death (excluding unknown). Cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, and Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, local ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2011 into four time-period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer.

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Early Refractoriness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives: To develop and validate a predictive model for early refractoriness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, a total of 204 consecutive patients who initially underwent TACE were included. Early TACE refractoriness was defined as patients presented with TACE refractoriness after initial two consecutive TACE procedures. Of all patients, 147 patients (approximately 70%) were assigned to a training set, and the remaining 57 patients (approximately 30%) were assigned to a validation set. Predictive model was established using forward stepwise logistic regression and nomogram. Based on factors selected by logistic regression, a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who were present or absent of early TACE refractoriness. PFS curve was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

Results: Logistic regression revealed that bilobar tumor distribution (p = 0.002), more than three tumors (p = 0.005) and beyond up-to-seven criteria (p = 0.001) were significantly related to early TACE refractoriness. The discriminative abilities, as determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, were 0.788 in the training cohort and 0.706 in the validation cohort. After PSM, the result showed that patients who were absent of early TACE refractoriness had a significantly higher PFS rate than those of patients who were present (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study presents a predictive model with moderate accuracy to identify patients with high risk of early TACE refractoriness, and patients with early TACE refractoriness may have a poor prognosis.

Potential Impact of IMbrave150 Results in the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion

A virtual expert roundtable was convened on April 16, 2020, to discuss the evolving landscape of care for treating patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and discuss questions related to patient care and treatment selection. This commentary presents highlights from this discussion and provides an expert opinion about approaches to treatment for HCC in the Americas and the European Union. We anticipate that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab will become the standard of care for advanced HCC patients. However, this approach will make decisions regarding the sequencing of treatments for second-line therapies and beyond more challenging. Therapy will require individualization based on patient characteristics and preferences, while insurance coverage decisions and requirements may also impact the options that patients can access. Additional research regarding prognostic and predictive biomarkers is needed to help better identify optimal treatment approaches for specific patient populations. Multidisciplinary tumor boards will continue to play a critical role in guiding treatment selection for individual patients. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab offers a promising new first-line therapeutic option for patients with advanced HCC, but more research is needed to optimize and individualize patient therapy.

Report of the 20th Nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan

In the 20th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 21 075 new patients and 40 769 previously followed patients were compiled from 544 institutions over a 2-year period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009. Compared with the previous 19th survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, included more female patients, included more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameters and more frequently received radiofrequency ablation as local ablation therapy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and by background characteristics for patients newly registered between 1998 and 2009 whose final outcome was survival or death. Cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, and Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment types (hepatectomy, local ablation therapy, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). Cumulative survival rates and median overall survival in patients treated by resection, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and local ablation therapy were calculated. The same values were also calculated by the registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2009 into four time period groups . The results of the analysis show that the prognosis of HCC is improving dramatically. It is expected that the data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey will contribute to advancing clinical research, including the design of clinical trials, as well as the treatment strategy of primary liver cancer in the clinical practice setting.