Transarterial chemoembolization plus a PD-1 inhibitor with or without lenvatinib for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with or without camrelizumab for the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and camrelizumab or with sorafenib alone in patients with intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 78 patients with intermediate or advanced HCC who were treated at our centres between January 2018 and December 2021. Twenty-six of them received sorafenib and camrelizumab plus TACE (the TACE + Sor + C group), while 52 received TACE and sorafenib (the TACE + Sor group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the factors affecting survival.

RESULTS

The median OS (22 vs 10 months, P < .001) and median PFS (11 vs 6 months, P = .008) of the TACE + Sor + C group were significantly higher than those of the TACE + Sor group. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with TACE + Sor + C, TACE + Sor increased the risk of all-cause mortality and tumour progression. For grade I and II AEs, the incidence of skin capillary hyperplasia and hypothyroidism in the TACE + Sor + C group was significantly higher than that in the TACE + Sor group. For serious AEs (grade III or IV), there was no significant difference in any adverse reaction between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with intermediate or advanced HCC appeared to benefit more in terms of survival from TACE + Sor + C than from TACE + Sor, and the AEs were tolerable.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

(1) Subgroup analysis demonstrated that TACE + sorafenib + camrelizumab could benefit HCC patients regardless of whether they had portal vein tumour thrombosis, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B or C, or CHILD A or B; (2) We reported the immunotherapy-related AEs occurred with a significantly higher incidence in triple treatment, but all the AEs are tolerable.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Purpose

Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has shown significant efficacy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the therapeutic efficacy of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (TACE + Atez/Bev) compared to TACE alone.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted across three centers in China, encompassing 155 patients at the intermediate-stage of HCC. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias, with a ratio of 1:1. Primary outcomes were TACE-specific Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Adverse events (AEs) related to treatment were analyzed to evaluate safety.

Results

Before PSM, the TACE + Atez/Bev group demonstrated extended median OS (not reached vs 20.3 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (20.0 months vs 9.8 months, P = 0.029) compared to the TACE-alone group. The TACE + Atez/Bev group also had a higher ORR (60.9% vs 41.3%, P = 0.026) and DCR (89.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001) than the TACE-alone group. After applying the PSM, the study included 42 pairs of patients. Compared to the TACE-alone group, the combination therapy group also showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs 21.4 months, P = 0.008) and PFS (21.7 vs 9.7 months, P = 0.009). The combination therapy group also had a higher ORR (66.7% vs 38.1%, P = 0.009) and DCR (92.9% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). AEs in the combination therapy group were mostly manageable, with the most common being elevated liver transaminase.

Conclusion

In treating intermediate-stage HCC, the survival benefit of combining TACE with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was significantly higher than TACE alone, and the treatment was well-tolerated.

Comparison of tumor response and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after multimodal treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well-defined. We performed a meta-analysis to characterize tumor response and survival associated with multimodal treatment of HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched (1990-2022). Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of treatment modalities. Odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (4170 patients) met inclusion criteria. Triple therapy regimen (ICI + TKI + TACE) had the highest overall disease control rate (DCR) (87%, 95% CI 83-91), while ICI + radiotherapy had the highest objective response rate (ORR) (72%, 95% CI 54%-89%). Triple therapy had a higher DCR than ICI + TACE (OR 4.49, 95% CI 2.09-9.63), ICI + TKI (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.63-5.82), and TKI + TACE (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.61-5.20). Triple therapy demonstrated improved overall survival versus ICI + TKI (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.37-1.07) and TKI + TACE (SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.70-1.48) (both p < 0.05). Triple therapy had a greater incidence of adverse events (AEs) compared with ICI + TKI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02), but no difference in AEs versus ICI + TACE or TKI + TACE (both p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ICIs, TKIs and TACE demonstrated superior tumor response and survival and should be considered for select patients with advanced HCC.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

The study aims to evaluate the benefits and potential adverse effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A systematic literature search of several databases for relevant studies, published from inception up to May 2023, was performed. Clinical trials investigating TACE combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors compared with other treatment regimens for advanced HCC were included. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Trial sequential analysis was used to determine whether the study results were sufficiently conclusive. Totally thirteen cohort studies comprising 1279 patients were included. The combined use of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) compared with other treatment regimens. The incidences of all-grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Prognostic factor analysis identified treatment options, portal vein tumor thrombus, extrahepatic metastasis, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage as independent prognostic factors for OS. Extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh score, and hepatic vein invasion emerged as independent prognostic factors for PFS. TSA suggested that the available data were adequate for drawing numerical conclusions regarding ORR and DCR. An approach combining TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors appeared to offer significant improvements in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in patients with advanced HCC without significantly increasing the risk for all-grade adverse events.

Effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 antibodies in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A treatment with Chinese characteristics

Therapies for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) are currently popular. Current first-line standard-of-care treatments for uHCC are systematic therapies. However, treatments that combine locoregional therapy with systemic therapy are widely accepted in China and have demonstrated high rates of tumor response and conversion to resection with manageable toxicity. A literature review was performed by searching published literature in PubMed and Web of Science up to December 2023 for relevant articles on the use of triple therapy (transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies) in uHCC. This review concentrates on the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with Chinese characteristics in patients with uHCC and describes the outcome of conversion surgery, degree of pathological necrosis, and effect prediction. This article will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the role of triple therapy with Chinese characteristics in patients with uHCC.

Prognostic nomogram model for selecting between transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib, with and without PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To establish and verify a prognostic nomogram model for selecting in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib (TACE-L) with or without PD-1 inhibitor.

METHODS

Data of 241 uHCC patients who underwent TACE-L (n = 128) and TACE-L plus PD-1 inhibitor (TACE-L-P, n = 113) were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in tumour responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) between two groups were compared, and a prognostic nomogram model was established based on independent clinical-radiologic factors and confirmed by Cox regression analysis for predicting PFS and OS. The treatment selection for uHCC patients was stratified by the nomogram score.

RESULTS

Compared to TACE-L, TACE-L-P presented prolonged PFS (14.0 vs. 9.0 months, P < .001), longer OS (24.0 vs. 15.0 months, P < .001), and a better overall objective response rate (54.0% vs. 32.8%, P = .001). There was no significant difference between the rate of AEs in the TACE-L-P and the TACE-L (56.64% vs. 46.09%, P = .102) and the rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs (11.50% vs. 9.38%, P = .588), respectively. The nomogram model presented good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.790 for predicting PFS and 0.749 for predicting OS. Patients who underwent TACE-L and obtained a nomogram score >9 demonstrated improved 2-year PFS when transferred to TACE-L-P, and those with a nomogram ≤25 had better 2-year OS when transferred to TACE-L-P.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE-L-P showed significant improvements in efficiency and safety for uHCC patients compared with TACE-L. The nomogram was useful for stratifying treatment decisions and selecting a suitable population for uHCC patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Prognostic nomogram model is of great value in predicting individualized survival benefits for uHCC patients after TACE-L or/and TACE-L-P. And the nomogram was helpful for selection between TACE-L-P and TACE-L among uHCC patients.

Efficacy and safety analysis of TACE + Donafenib + Toripalimab versus TACE + Sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Donafenib and Toripalimab versus TACE combined with Sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), aiming to guide personalized treatment strategies for HCC and improve patient prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 169 patients with unresectable advanced-stage HCC who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. Based on the patients' treatment strategies, they were divided into two groups: TACE + Donafenib + Toripalimab group (N = 81) and TACE + Sorafenib group (N = 88). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups' tumors. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The TACE + Donafenib + Toripalimab group showed higher ORR and DCR compared to the TACE + Sorafenib group (66.7% vs. 38.6%, 82.6% vs. 68.2%, P < 0.05). The TACE + Donafenib + Toripalimab group also demonstrated longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) (10.9 months vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001) and median overall survival (mOS) (19.6 months vs. 10.9 months, P < 0.001) compared to the TACE + Sorafenib group. When comparing the two groups, the TACE + Sorafenib group had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 hypertension (14.8% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.041), higher incidence of diarrhea (all grades) (18.2% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.042), and higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome (all grades) (26.1% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with Donafenib and Toripalimab demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in treating unresectable HCC patients. This combination therapy may serve as a feasible option to improve the prognosis of unresectable HCC patients.

Comparable Clinical Outcomes Between Transarterial Chemoembolization or Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and PD-1 Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

81 unresectable HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 30 or 51 patients treated with either TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors combined with TACE (TTP) or HAIC (HTP), respectively. Tumor response and survival outcomes were compared.

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.525; HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.7 months in the TTP group and 9.9 months in the HTP group (P = 0.160; HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.42-1.16). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), the mOS was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 18.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.644; HR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.56-2.58). The mPFS was 6.4 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.028; HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.93). The disease control rate in overall response (90.2% vs 76.7%, P = 0.116, before PSM; 91.7% vs 75.0%, P = 0.121, after PSM) and intrahepatic response (94.1% vs 80.0%, P = 0.070, before PSM; 91.7% vs 79.2%, P = 0.220, after PSM) were higher in the HTP group than in the TTP group.

Conclusion

Though including more advanced tumors, the clinical outcomes of HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors are comparable to TACE-based combination therapy for unresectable HCC. Nevertheless, HTP significantly improved the PFS benefits in HCC patients with with large tumor burden or vascular invasion.

Application and Resistance Mechanisms of Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Lenvatinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is one of the preferred targeted drugs for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Since the REFLECT study showed that lenvatinib was noninferior to sorafenib in overall survival (OS), lenvatinib monotherapy has been widely used for aHCC. Moreover, lenvatinib combination therapy, especially lenvatinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has shown more encouraging clinical results. However, drug development and comprehensive treatment have not significantly improved the prognosis, and lenvatinib resistance is often encountered in treatment. The underlying molecular mechanism of lenvatinib resistance is still unclear, and studies to solve drug resistance are ongoing. The molecular mechanisms of lenvatinib resistance in patients with aHCC include the regulation of signaling pathways, the regulation of noncoding RNAs, the impact of the immune microenvironment, tumor stem cell activation and other mechanisms. This review aims to (1) summarize the progress of lenvatinib in treating aHCC, (2) delineate the known lenvatinib resistance mechanisms of current therapy, and (3) describe the development of therapeutic methods intended to overcome these resistance mechanisms.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor with or without transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical benefit and tolerability of triple therapy of lenvatinib, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

Between October 2018 and September 2021, patients with unresectable HCC who received triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE or dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor participated in this study. The efficacy was evaluated by survival and therapeutic response, and the tolerability was evaluated by the frequency and severity of key adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In total, 118 eligible patients with unresectable HCC who received combination therapy were included in this study. Among them, 60 patients received triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE (L-P-T group), and 58 eligible patients received dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (L-P group). Patients who received triple therapy had better overall survival (OS) [median, 29.0 vs. 17.8 months, p < 0.01] and progression-free survival (PFS) [median, 16.2 vs. 10.2 months, p < 0.01] than those who received dual therapy. The objective response rate (76.7 vs. 44.9%, p < 0.01) and disease control rate (96.7 vs. 75.9%, p < 0.01) in the L-P-T group were higher than in the L-P group, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the treatment option and BCLC stage were independent prognostic factors for OS, while treatment option and tumor number were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The incidence and severity of AEs in the L-P-T group were comparable to those in the L-P group (any grade, 95.0 vs. 94.8%, p = 1.00; grade ≥ 3, 30.0 vs. 27.6%, p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE may achieve more favorable survival benefits than dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable HCC patients with manageable safety profiles.

Blood biomarkers predict outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint Inhibitors: A pooled analysis of 44 retrospective sudies

OBJECTIVE

We conducted the first meta-analysis to identify the predictive significance of baseline blood biomarkers (such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), AFP, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), protein induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR)) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Eligible articles were retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar by November 24, 2022. Clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and hyperprogressive disease (HPD).

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles with 5322 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with high NLR levels had significantly poorer OS (HR: 1.951, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.632, P < 0.001), lower ORR (OR: 0.484, P < 0.001) and DCR (OR: 0.494, P = 0.027), and higher HPD (OR: 8.190, P < 0.001). The patients with high AFP levels had shorter OS (HR: 1.689, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.380, P < 0.001), and lower DCR (OR: 0.440, P < 0.001) than those with low AFP levels, however, there was no difference in ORR (OR: 0.963, P = 0.933). We also found that early AFP response was correlated with better OS (HR: 0.422, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.385, P < 0.001), higher ORR (OR: 7.297, P < 0.001) and DCR (OR: 13.360, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Besides, a high ALBI grade was significantly related to shorter OS (HR: 2.440, P = 0.009) and PFS (HR: 1.373, P = 0.022), lower ORR (OR: 0.618, P = 0.032) and DCR (OR: 0.672, P = 0.049) than those with an ALBI grade 1.

CONCLUSION

The NLR, early AFP response, and ALBI were useful predictors of outcomes in HCC patients treated with ICIs.

Real-world efficacy and prognostic factors of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in 378 unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION

Combining lenvatinib with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been explored for the treatment of un-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy of and prognostic factors for survival associated with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor treatment in a large cohort of Asian uHCC patients even the global LEAP-002 study failed to achieve the primary endpoints.

METHODS

Patients with uHCC treated with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors were included. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic factors for survival were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 378 uHCC patients from two medical centers in China were assessed retrospectively. The median patient age was 55 years, and 86.5% of patients were male. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (89.9%) was the dominant etiology of uHCC. The median OS was 17.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.0-21.6) months. The median PFS was 6.9 (95% CI 6.0-7.9) months. The best ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 19.6% and 73.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Child‒Pugh grade, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, involved organs, tumor burden score, and combination with local therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS. A total of 100% and 57.9% of patients experienced all-grade and grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor treatment demonstrated long survival and considerable ORRs and DCRs in uHCC patients in China. The tolerability of combination therapy was acceptable but must be monitored closely.

Cholesterol and C-reactive protein prognostic score predicted prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors based interventional therapies for intermediate-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Serum cholesterol (CHO) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been successfully used as prognostic predictors for several malignancies, respectively. However, the clinicopathological significance of CHO and CRP levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICIs-based hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. Serum CHO and CRP levels were measured for a total of 152 HCC patients that had been treated with ICIs-based HAIC from February 2019 to April 2020. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival. The median OS was not reached in the CHO-low subgroup and 17.7 months in the CHO-high subgroup (P = 0.015). The median OS was not reached in the CRP-low subgroup and 20.0 months in the CRP-high subgroup (P = 0.010). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that both serum CHO and CRP levels were independent risk factors for the OS of HCC patients treated with ICIs-based HAIC (P < 0.05). Moreover, Cox regression analysis after Propensity Score Matching showed the similar results. CHO and CRP prognostic score (CCPS) combining CHO and CRP levels could significantly stratify HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups (P < 0.001). Patients in the risk subgroups reported similar disease control rates (P = 0.121) and significantly different overall response rates (low- vs intermediate- vs high-risk groups: 70.6 % vs 46.6 % vs 44.1 %, respectively, P = 0.038) according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The results of this study support the association between CCPS high risk with the response and OS for HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC.

An overview: Management of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has constituted a significant health burden worldwide, and patients with advanced HCC, which is stage C as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, have a poor overall survival of 6-8 months. Studies have indicated the significant survival benefit of treatment based on sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab with reliable safety. In addition, the combination of two or more molecularly targeted therapies (first- plus second-line) has become a hot topic recently and is now being extensively investigated in patients with advanced HCC. In addition, a few biomarkers have been investigated and found to predict drug susceptibility and prognosis, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the clinical benefits of current therapies. In addition, many therapies other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors that might have additional survival benefits when combined with other therapeutic modalities, including immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, hepatectomy, and chemotherapy, have also been examined. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of disease management and summarizes current challenges with and future perspectives on advanced HCC.

Hepatectomy After Conversion Therapy for Initially Unresectable HCC: What is the Difference?

Purpose

Conversion therapy gives some patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) access to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy after conversion therapy and how it differed from those who undergoing direct hepatectomy.

Patients and Methods

From January 2018 to April 2022, 745 patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients of unresectable HCC underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy. A demographically and clinically comparable cohort was created from the remaining patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching.

Results

The median duration of conversion therapy was 108 (42-298) days, 8 patients achieved complete response (CR) and 33 achieved partial response (PR). Conversion therapy resulted in some degree of myelosuppression, but liver function index remained good. Compared with the direct hepatectomy group, the conversion group had more blood loss (600 mL vs 400 mL, p=0.015), longer operative time (270 min vs 240 min, p=0.02), higher blood transfusion rates, and longer hospital stay (8 days vs 11 days, p<0.001). Patients in the conversion group had significantly more complications of any grade (82.9% vs 51.2%, p=0.002) and grade 3/4 (26.8% vs 4.9%, p=0.013), and 6 patients developed post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). There were no deaths in either group. All patients achieved R0 resection, 6 (6/41, 14.6%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR), 14 achieved major pathologic responses (MPR). During a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 14 patients in the conversion group experienced recurrence or metastasis, no deaths.

Conclusion

Hepatectomy after conversion therapy was more difficult than direct hepatectomy, but accurate preoperative assessment could ensure the safety of the surgery. The damage of liver function after conversion therapy was more severe than expected, PHLF should be prevented and treated. Hepatectomy was effective and necessary, postoperative pathological examination could provide guidance for adjuvant therapy.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib with or without programmed death-1 inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

Purpose

We conducted a retrospective study to compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with TACE plus lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

Patients with HCC were analyzed from January 2018 to January 2022 in three hospitals. Patients received TACE plus lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors (TACE+L+PD-1 or TACE+L, respectively). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) of the two groups were compared. Adverse events in the two groups were analyzed.

Results

A total of 166 patients were evaluated (TACE+L+PD-1, n = 75; TACE+L, n = 91). Before PSM, OS was prolonged in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (p = 0.010), but PFS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.18). ORR was higher in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (p = 0.047). After PSM, estimated OS rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 97.9%, 84.6%, and 74.1%, respectively, in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (n = 48) and 93.1%, 66.1%, and 43.4%, respectively, in the TACE+L group (n = 48). Estimated PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.9%, 61.8%, and 30.9%, respectively, in the TACE+L group and 95.7%, 82.1%, and 68.4%, respectively, in the TACE+L+PD-1 group. OS, PFS, and ORR were improved in the TACE+L+PD-1 group compared to the TACE+L group (p = 0.030; p = 0.027; p = 0.013). The safety of the TACE+L+PD-1 regimen was acceptable.

Conclusions

The addition of PD-1 inhibitors to TACE+L significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC. Side effects were manageable.

Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A review

Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)have become the first choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that are unsuitable for TACE. Sorafenib plus TACE therapy for patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) achieved positive results. However, Lenvatinib plus TACE appeared to achieve a more advantageous result for these patients based on the phase 3 REFLECT trial. Both TACE and lenvatinib therapy have immune-stimulating effects, so would lenvatinib plus TACE and immune checkpoint inhibitors be an advantageous therapy for unresectable HCC (uHCC)? Thirteen articles from PubMed were explored to determine the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus TACE with or without PD-1 inhibitors therapy. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were manageable. Lenvatinib plus TACE therapy was superior to lenvatinib monotherapy with intermediate stage HCC especially beyond up-to-seven criterion and was superior to TACE monotherapy in patients with uHCC or sorafenib plus TACE therapy in patients with PVTT. Objective response rates (ORRs) of 53.1%–75%, median progression free survival (PFS) of 6.15–11.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 14.5–18.97 months were achieved in the lenvatinib plus TACE group. Levatinib plus TACE and PD-1 inhibitors achieved ORRs of 46.7% –80.6%, median PFS of 7.3–13.3 months, and median OS of 16.9–24 months. Control studies also confirmed the triple therapy was superior to lenvatinib plus TACE in patients with uHCC. Overall, the triple therapy is a promising treatment for patients with uHCC, including main PVTT and extrahepatic metastasis. Lenvatinib plus TACE therapy was also preferable for intermediate stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criterion and for patients with PVTT.