Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir: how should we choose among these two latest and probably the last regimens?

A Comprehensive Review of Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C: The Long Journey from Interferon to Pan-Genotypic Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs)

The treatment landscape for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has transformed over the past few decades, evolving from the limited efficacy of interferon (IFN) monotherapy to the highly successful pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) used today. Initially, alpha-interferon monotherapy, introduced in the 1990s, was the standard treatment, yet it provided low sustained virological response (SVR) rates and caused significant adverse effects, limiting its utility. The development of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) improved the pharmacokinetic profile of IFN, allowing for less frequent dosing and modestly improved response rates. When combined with ribavirin, peg-IFN achieved higher SVR rates, especially in non-genotype 1 HCV infections, but the combination also brought additional side effects, such as anemia and depression. The advent of the first-generation DAAs, such as telaprevir and boceprevir, marked a significant milestone. Combined with peg-IFN and ribavirin, these protease inhibitors boosted response rates in patients with genotype 1 HCV. However, high rates of adverse effects and drug resistance remained challenges. Second-generation DAAs, like sofosbuvir and ledipasvir, introduced IFN-free regimens with improved safety profiles and efficacy. The most recent advances are pan-genotypic DAAs, including glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, which offer high SVR rates across all genotypes, shorter treatment durations, and fewer side effects. Current pan-genotypic regimens represent a cornerstone in HCV therapy, providing an accessible and effective solution globally.

Natural history and clinical features of hepatitis C virus infection during childhood: A nationwide, observational survey in Japan

AIM

Few data on spontaneous clearance rates of cases of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection are available in Japan. Furthermore, the treatment courses of interferon-based and direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) therapies for children are also unclear. Our aim was thus to clarify the long-term natural progression of HCV infection and the treatment outcomes of children in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a combined multicenter, observational survey involving 65 pediatric institutions in Japan. Pediatric HCV infection cases with patients born between 1973 and 2021 were collected over the 11-year period from 2012 to 2022. A total of 563 patients were enrolled, with 190 excluded for having insufficient laboratory data or treatment information, resulting in 373 eligible cases.

RESULTS

Of 328 cases of mother-to-child infection, 34 (10.4%) had spontaneous clearance, with a median time to spontaneous clearance of 3.1 years (range 0.9-7.2 years). Of the total 373 eligible cases, 190 received antiviral therapy (interferon-based therapy, 158; DAA therapy, 32). Sustained virologic response rates after first-line treatment were 75.3% (119/158) and 100% (32/32) for interferon-based therapy and DAA therapy, respectively, with the DAA group showing a shorter time from therapy initiation to viral negativity (2.7 vs. 1.0 months; p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 10% of Japanese children infected by mother-to-child transmission achieve spontaneous resolution of HCV infection. Our findings indicate that DAA therapy is safe and highly effective in Japanese children, achieving higher sustained virologic response rates and shorter time to clearance of the virus compared with interferon-based therapy.