1
|
Cincidda C, Pizzoli SFM, Oliveri S, Guiddi P, Pravettoni G. Toward a new personalized psycho-social approach for the support of prostate cancer and their caregivers dyads: a pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1356385. [PMID: 38646557 PMCID: PMC11027503 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1356385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer patients (PCP) often struggle with a significant emotional, physical, and social burden during the care-flow pathway. Noteworthy, PCP should not be considered a standalone patient, but someone who is connected with a relevant social environment and that is usually supported by a beloved one, the caregiver. The involvement of the caregivers through the care pathway might bring significant benefits both on the psychological and the treatment and decision-making side. The present pilot study aimed at preliminarily assessing quantitatively the psychological impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis on the degree of agreement of PCPs and their caregivers on medical decisions, coping resources and psychological distress levels. Methods 16 PCP and their caregivers were enrolled in the study and fulfilled a battery of standardized questionnaires. Results Results showed low concordance in decision making styles and preferences in patients and their caregivers and that the dyads showed similar depression symptoms levels. Relevant features of the psychological needs of the analyzed dyads, such as need for information and support, also emerged. Conclusion On the basis of these preliminary results, guidelines for the construction of tailored brief psychological support interventions for PCP dyads are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clizia Cincidda
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Science, DISS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Neurological Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Guiddi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nahm SH, Subramaniam S, Stockler MR, Kiely BE. Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:127. [PMID: 38261070 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08230-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many people with cancer (patients) want to know their prognosis (a quantitative estimate of their life expectancy) but this is often not discussed or poorly communicated. The optimal timing of prognostic discussions with people with advanced cancer is highly personalised and complex. We aimed to find, organise, and summarise research regarding the timing of discussions of prognosis with people with advanced cancer. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of publications from databases, clinical practice guidelines, and grey literature from inception to 2023. We also searched the reference lists of systematic reviews, editorials, and clinical trial registries. Eligibility criteria included publications regarding adults with advanced cancer that reported a timepoint when a discussion of prognosis occurred or should occur. RESULTS We included 63 of 798 identified references; most of which were cross-sectional cohort studies with a range of 4-9105 participants. Doctors and patients agreed on several timepoints including at diagnosis of advanced cancer, when the patient asked, upon disease progression, when there were no further anti-cancer treatments, and when recommending palliative care. Most of these timepoints aligned with published guidelines and expert recommendations. Other recommended timepoints depended on the doctor's clinical judgement, such as when the patient 'needed to know' or when the patient 'seemed ready'. CONCLUSIONS Prognostic discussions with people with advanced cancer need to be individualised, and there are several key timepoints when doctors should attempt to initiate these conversations. These recommended timepoints can inform clinical trial design and communication training for doctors to help improve prognostic understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon H Nahm
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 1450, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shalini Subramaniam
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 1450, Australia
- Bankstown Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin R Stockler
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 1450, Australia
- Concord Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Belinda E Kiely
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 1450, Australia.
- Concord Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia.
- Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu QL, Tang L. What Satisfies Parents of Pediatric Patients in China: A Grounded Theory Building Analysis of Online Physician Reviews. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 37:1329-1336. [PMID: 33601987 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1888437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is an important intermediate outcome of patient-provider encounters, linking face-to-face interactions between patients and medical professionals with patients' well-being after consultations. Today, physician review websites provide a new venue for the study of patient satisfaction, as patients are utilizing such websites to evaluate their encounters with physicians. This study examined how parents of pediatric patients in China evaluated their pediatricians and factors associated with patient satisfaction through a qualitative content analysis of reviews (n = 7230) on the "Good Doctor Website" (haodf.com), China's largest physician review platform. Reviews were chosen from all reviews of pediatricians in eight top-tier hospitals in four major cities. Three dimensions of patient satisfaction were identified: pediatricians' interpersonal manners (including friendliness, listening to patients, heartfelt encouragement, and clear explanation), ethics (including rejecting red envelopes and kickbacks and cost awareness), and medical competence/overall health outcome. This study contributes to a culturally sensitive understanding of patient satisfaction and further explains the tense physician-patient relationship in China. Practically, our findings can inform the training of pediatricians in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei L Wu
- Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rake EA, Box ICH, Dreesens D, Meinders MJ, Kremer JAM, Aarts JWM, Elwyn G. Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2860-2870. [PMID: 35659466 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Proponents of shared decision-making (SDM) advocate the elicitation of the patient's perspective. This scoping review explores if, and to what extent, the personal perspectives of patients are elicited during a clinical encounter, as part of a SDM process. We define personal perspective elicitation (PPE) as: the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or context. METHODS A search was conducted in five literature databases from inception dates up to July 2020, to identify empirical studies about SDM (with/without SDM instrument). RESULTS The search identified 4562 abstracts; 263 articles were read in full text, resulting in 99 included studies. Studies reported low levels of PPE. Integration of personal perspectives into the conversation or a future care plan was largely absent. The majority of the discussed content related to physical health, while social and psychological topics were mostly unaddressed. CONCLUSIONS PPE occurs on a very low level in efforts to achieve SDM according to evaluation studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS PPE is advocated but rarely achieved in SDM evaluation studies. Causes should be identified, followed by designing interventions to improve this aspect of SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester A Rake
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ivana C H Box
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Dunja Dreesens
- Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marjan J Meinders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan A M Kremer
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Gynaecological oncology, Amsterdam UMC University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Informal caregivers invest a significant amount of time and effort to provide cancer patients with physical, psychological, information, and social support. These challenging tasks can harm their own health and well-being, while a series of social-ecological factors may also influence the outcomes of cancer caregiving. Several instruments have been developed to help clinicians and researchers understand the multi-dimensional needs and concerns of caregivers. A growing body of evidence indicates that supportive interventions including psychoeducation, skills training, and therapeutic counseling can help improve the burden, information needs, coping strategies, physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life of caregivers. However, there is difficulty in translating research evidence into practice. For instance, some supportive interventions tested in clinical trial settings are regarded as inconsistent with the actual needs of caregivers. Other significant considerations are the lack of well-trained interdisciplinary teams for supportive care provision and insufficient funding. Future research should include indicators that can attract decision-makers and funders, such as improving the efficient utilization of health care services and satisfaction of caregivers. It is also important for researchers to work closely with key stakeholders, to facilitate evidence dissemination and implementation, to benefit caregivers and the patient.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang GM, Dionne-Odom JN, Foo YH, Chung AHM, Kamal NHA, Tan L, Yu CC, Khanh LM, Koh ARX, Teo I, Yoon S, Bakitas M. Adapting ENABLE for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers in Singapore: a qualitative formative evaluation. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:86. [PMID: 34158022 PMCID: PMC8218975 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00799-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) is a nurse coach-led, early palliative care model for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Content covered includes problem-solving, advance care planning, symptom management and self-care. The aim was to evaluate the cultural acceptability of ENABLE among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers in Singapore and identify modifications for an adapted ENABLE-SG model. METHODS Qualitative formative evaluation with a thematic analysis approach in two hospitals in Singapore, involving patients (n = 10), family caregivers (n = 11) and healthcare professionals (n = 10) who care for patients with advanced cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore (i) the main needs and challenges facing individuals with advanced cancer and their family caregivers; (ii) patient involvement in healthcare decision making; and (iii) content and delivery of ENABLE. RESULTS While physical needs were largely well met, participants expressed that psychosocial care was delivered too late in the illness trajectory. Healthcare decision making approaches varied from a patient-centred shared decision-making model to a family-centred model where patients may not know their cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The content was considered to be relevant, comprehensive and practical; financial assistance, adjustment to body image, and evaluation of complementary therapy were also recommended. Face-to-face rather than telephone sessions were preferred to facilitate rapport building. CONCLUSIONS ENABLE was broadly acceptable with some modifications, including adjusting the content to ensure it can be delivered even if the patient is not fully aware of cancer diagnosis and delivering the first session face-to-face with flexibility for subsequent sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Meijuan Yang
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | | | - Yi Han Foo
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Chou Chuen Yu
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Le Mai Khanh
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Audrey Rui Xuan Koh
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang WFZ, Chan YH, Griva K, Kuparasundram S, Mahendran R. Lifestyle and Symptom Management Needs: A Network Analysis of Family Caregiver Needs of Cancer Patients. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:739776. [PMID: 34616323 PMCID: PMC8488172 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.739776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous research on the needs of family cancer caregivers (FCCs) have not elucidated associations between specific caregiving needs. Network analysis, a statistical approach that allows the estimation of complex relationship patterns, helps facilitate the understanding of associations between needs and provides the opportunity to identify and direct interventions at relevant and specific targets. No studies to date, have applied network analysis to FCC populations. The aim of the study is to explore the network structure of FCC needs in a cohort of caregivers in Singapore. FCCs (N = 363) were recruited and completed a self-report questionnaire on socio-demographic data, medical data on their loved ones, and the Needs Assessment of Family Caregivers-Cancer scale. The network was estimated using state-of-the-art regularized partial correlation model. The most central needs were having to deal with lifestyle changes and managing care-recipients cancer-related symptoms. The strongest associations were between (1) having enough insurance coverage and understanding/navigating insurance coverage, (2) managing cancer-related pain and managing cancer-related symptoms, (3) being satisfied with relationships and having intimate relationships, and (4) taking care of bills and paying off medical expenses. Lifestyle changes, living with cancer, and symptom management are central to FCCs in Singapore. These areas deserve special attention in the development of caregiver support systems. Our findings highlight the need to improve access to social and medical support to help FCCs in their transition into the caregiving role and handle cancer-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winson Fu Zun Yang
- Department of Psychological Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.,Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Rathi Mahendran
- Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang WFZ, Liu J, Chan YH, Griva K, Kuparasundram S, Mahendran R. Validation of the Needs Assessment of Family Caregivers-Cancer scale in an Asian population. BMC Psychol 2020; 8:84. [PMID: 32787927 PMCID: PMC7424999 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-00445-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Needs Assessment of Family Caregivers- Cancer (NAFC-C) scale is shown to have adequate psychometric properties in assessing family caregiver needs during the cancer journey and its psychometric properties have been studied only in Western populations. This study sought to validate the NAFC-C in an Asian population for wider applicability. METHODS Participants (n = 363) completed questions on sociodemographics, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Zarit Burden Interview, the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer scale, and the NAFC-C. RESULTS Results revealed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity of the NAFC-C. Confirmatory factor analysis did not demonstrate a good fit of the NAFC-C in our sample. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a similar factor structure in this study's population. Further reliability and validity analyses with the EFA factor structure demonstrated similar reliability and validity assessments. CONCLUSIONS The NAFC-C is shown to be applicable in an Asian population. It would be a useful instrument for determining family caregivers' needs and to inform future interventions to address those needs and improve or maintain quality of life in both patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winson Fu Zun Yang
- National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074 Singapore
- Department of Psychological Science, Texas Tech University, Box 42051, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051 USA
| | - Jianlin Liu
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Mental Health, 10 Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park, Singapore, 539747 Singapore
| | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Dean’s Office, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Imperial College & Nanyang Technological University, 59 Nanyang Drive, Experimental Medicine Building, Singapore, 636921 Singapore
| | - Sangita Kuparasundram
- SingHealth Residency, Ministry of Health Holdings, 1 Maritime Square, Singapore, 009253 Singapore
| | - Rathi Mahendran
- National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074 Singapore
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Academic Development Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malhotra C, Kanesvaran R, Barr Kumarakulasinghe N, Tan SH, Xiang L, Tulsky JA, Pollak KI. Oncologist-patient-caregiver decision-making discussions in the context of advanced cancer in an Asian setting. Health Expect 2019; 23:220-228. [PMID: 31682064 PMCID: PMC6978867 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Patient involvement in treatment decisions is recommended in clinician‐patient encounters. Little is known about how oncologists engage patients in shared decision making in non‐Western countries. We assessed the prevalence of shared decision making among Singaporean oncologists and analysed how they discussed prognosis. Methods We audio‐recorded 100 consultations between advanced cancer patients and their oncologists. We developed a coding system to assess oncologist encouragement of patient participation in decision making and disclosure of an explicit prognosis. We assessed patient and oncologist characteristics that predicted these behaviours. Results Forty‐one consultations involved treatment discussions. Oncologists almost always listed more than one treatment option (90%). They also checked patient understanding (34%), discussed pros and cons (34%) and addressed uncertainty (29%). Oncologists discussed prognosis mostly qualitatively (34%) rather than explicitly (17%). They were more likely to give an explicit prognosis when patients/caregivers asked questions related to prognosis. Conclusion Oncologists in our sample engaged their patients in decision making. They have areas in which they can improve to involve patients at a deeper level to ensure shared decision making. Findings will be used to develop an intervention targeting oncologists and patients to promote patient involvement in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Sing-Huang Tan
- OncoCare Cancer Centre, Gleneagles Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ling Xiang
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James A Tulsky
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|