1
|
Kaleeny J, Levine E, Okamoto L, McGee SA, Janis JE. Blepharoplasty Online: Critical Analysis of Content and Patient Comprehensibility. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024:10.1007/s00266-024-04083-1. [PMID: 38789805 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04083-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients frequently turn to online information for decision-making factors about aesthetic procedures. The quality of online medical content is an essential supplement to clinical education. These resources assist patients in understanding the risks, benefits, and appropriateness of their desired procedure. This study examines the breadth and readability of online blepharoplasty information, elucidating its educational utility. METHODS A depersonalized Google search was conducted using the Startpage Search Engine, investigating key phrases, "blepharoplasty decision making factors", "eye lift decision making factors", and "eyelid lift decision making factors". The first three pages of results for each search term, totaling 90 links were screened. Data were extracted for various decision-making factors, subspecialty, gender, and readability. RESULTS Twenty-six websites met inclusion for analysis. Thirteen websites were plastic surgery based, five otolaryngology (ENT), five ophthalmology/oculoplastic, one oral-maxillofacial (OMFS), and two mixed-based practices. Most blepharoplasty webpages identified were that of private practice and male surgeons. Half were subspecialties other than plastic surgery. Thirteen common decision-making factors were identified. The most common factors addressed across all texts were recovery followed by cosmetic and functional goals. The least discussed were genetic factors. Average Readability exceeded the 12th grade. There were no significant differences in readability means among subspecialties. CONCLUSION This study examines the online blepharoplasty sphere among US-based practices providing clinical education to patients. No appreciable differences among gender, subspecialty, and readability on decision-making factors were found, highlighting a consistency among surgeons. Most websites fell short of readability standards, however, emphasizing a need for clearer information to patients. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Kaleeny
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Emma Levine
- Section of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lauren Okamoto
- Department of Surgery, Robert Larner, MD, College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Shayan A McGee
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Janis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brose SF, Binder K, Fischer MR, Reincke M, Braun LT, Schmidmaier R. Bayesian versus diagnostic information in physician-patient communication: Effects of direction of statistical information and presentation of visualization. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283947. [PMID: 37285320 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communicating well with patients is a competence central to everyday clinical practice, and communicating statistical information, especially in Bayesian reasoning tasks, can be challenging. In Bayesian reasoning tasks, information can be communicated in two different ways (which we call directions of information): The direction of Bayesian information (e.g., proportion of people tested positive among those with the disease) and the direction of diagnostic information (e.g., the proportion of people having the disease among those tested positive). The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of both the direction of the information presented and whether a visualization (frequency net) is presented with it on patient's ability to quantify a positive predictive value. MATERIAL AND METHODS 109 participants completed four different medical cases (2⨯2⨯4 design) that were presented in a video; a physician communicated frequencies using different directions of information (Bayesian information vs. diagnostic information). In half of the cases for each direction, participants were given a frequency net. After watching the video, participants stated a positive predictive value. Accuracy and speed of response were analyzed. RESULTS Communicating with Bayesian information led to participant performance of only 10% (without frequency net) and 37% (with frequency net) accuracy. The tasks communicated with diagnostic information but without a frequency net were correctly solved by 72% of participants, but accuracy rate decreased to 61% when participants were given a frequency net. Participants with correct responses in the Bayesian information version without visualization took longest to complete the tasks (median of 106 seconds; median of 13.5, 14.0, and 14.5 seconds in other versions). DISCUSSION Communicating with diagnostic information rather than Bayesian information helps patients to understand specific information better and more quickly. Patients' understanding of the relevance of test results is strongly dependent on the way the information is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Frederike Brose
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Binder
- Institute of Mathematics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin R Fischer
- Institute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Reincke
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leah T Braun
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralf Schmidmaier
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alameddine M, Otaki F, Bou-Karroum K, Du Preez L, Loubser P, AlGurg R, Alsheikh-Ali A. Patients’ and physicians’ gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270700. [PMID: 36048748 PMCID: PMC9436052 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delivering patient-centered care is a declared objective of many health delivery systems globally, especially in an era of value-based health care. It entails the active engagement of the patients in healthcare decisions related to their health, also known as shared decision making (SDM). Little is known about the role of gender in shaping the perspective of patients on their opportunity for engaging in SDM in the Arabian Gulf Region. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of gender in shaping patients’ perspectives toward their opportunity for SDM in Dubai, UAE. Methods This study utilized a cross-sectional survey consisting of sociodemographic questions and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). A total of 50 physicians (25 females and 25 males), practicing at a large private healthcare delivery network in Dubai, were recruited using convenience sampling. Ten patients of every recruited physician (5 male and 5 female) were surveyed (i.e., a total of 500 patients). Statistical analysis assessed the differences in patients’ perceptions of physician SDM attitude scores by physicians’ and patients’ gender using independent t-test, ANOVA-test, and Chi-square analyses. Findings A total of 50 physicians and 500 patients (250 male patients and 250 female patients) participated in this study. The odd of patients agreement was significantly lower for male physicians, compared to their female counterparts, on the following elements of SDM: the doctor precisely explaining the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment (OR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.34–0.88, p = 0.012); the doctor helping them understand the information (OR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.23–0.97, p = 0.038), the doctor asking about preferred treatment option (OR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.35–0.77, p = 0.001), and the doctor thoroughly weighting the different treatment options (OR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.41–0.90, p = 0.013). No significant associations were observed between patients’ gender and their perception of their opportunity for SDM. Likewise, no significant associations were observed between the same or different physician-patient gender and patients’ perception of physicians’ SDM attitudes. Statistically significant associations were observed between physician-patient gender and preferred treatment option for patients (p = 0.012). Conclusion Study findings suggest that while there were no differences in patients’ perspective on SDM by the gender of patients, significant differences were observed by the gender of physicians. Female physicians, compared to their male counterparts, were more engaged in SDM, with both male and female patients. Male physician-female patient dyad received the lowest scores on SDM. This could be explained by the cultural, social, and religious sensitivities that infiltrate the physician-patient relationship in the Arab contexts. Despite the multi-cultural nature of the country, some female patients may still experience some discomfort in opening up and in discussion preferences with male physicians. For physicians, striking the right balance between assertiveness and SDM is necessary within the cultural context, especially among male providers. Offering targeted learning and development programs on the importance and practice of SDM is also necessary to ensure equitable opportunity for engagement in SDM for all patients irrespective of the gender of their provider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Alameddine
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, Research Institute of Medical & Health Sciences (RIMHS), University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Farah Otaki
- Strategy and Institutional Excellence, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Karen Bou-Karroum
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Leon Du Preez
- Cardiac Anesthesiology, The City Hospital, Dubai Health Care City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Reem AlGurg
- College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- * E-mail:
| | - Alawi Alsheikh-Ali
- College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Korger S, Eggeling M, Cress U, Kimmerle J, Bientzle M. Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference-sensitivity and personal motives. Health Expect 2021; 24:257-268. [PMID: 33517579 PMCID: PMC8077165 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivity (Study 1) and showing possible personal motives for decision making (Study 2) in addition to providing information about the treatment options. Methods Participants (Study 1: N = 117; Study 2: N = 217) were put into two scenarios (Study 1: cruciate ligament rupture; Study 2: contraception), watched a consultation video and were randomized into one of three groups where they received additional information in the form of (a) narrative patient testimonials; (b) non‐narrative decision strategies; and (c) an unrelated text (control group). Results Participants who viewed the patient testimonials or decision strategies felt better prepared for a decision (Study 1: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.43; Study 2: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.57) and evaluated the decision‐making process more positively (Study 2: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.13) than participants in the control condition. Decision certainty (Study 1: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.05) and satisfaction (Study 1: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.11; Study 2: P = .003, d = 0.29) were higher across all conditions after watching the consultation video, and certainty and satisfaction were lower in the control condition (Study 2: P < .001, ηP2 = 0.05). Discussion Decision aids that explain preference‐sensitivity and personal motives can be beneficial for improving people's feelings of being prepared and their perception of the decision‐making process. To reach decision certainty and satisfaction, being well informed of one's options is particularly relevant. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the design of DAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Korger
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marie Eggeling
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Cress
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meinhardt AL, Eggeling M, Cress U, Kimmerle J, Bientzle M. The impact of a physician's recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation. Health Expect 2020; 24:269-281. [PMID: 33274816 PMCID: PMC8077152 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study examined the influence of physicians’ recommendations and gender on the decision‐making process in a preference‐sensitive situation. Methods N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence. Results Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants’ attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants’ decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments. Conclusion This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lea Meinhardt
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marie Eggeling
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Cress
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|