Assessing people with dementia participating in cognitive stimulation activities-A qualitative pilot video analysis exploring the importance of facilitating the participation

A feasibility and pilot study of a "lifelong learning" intervention for people with dementia

BACKGROUND

Developing evidence for the use of psychosocial interventions for people with dementia is a research priority. This pilot study aimed to provide variability estimates for a set of outcome measures that would inform the development of a more extensive controlled study. The larger study will seek to explore the effect of attending a lifelong learning intervention for people with dementia compared to receiving treatment as usual. This pilot and feasibility stage also analysed how data collectors and researchers evaluated the use of the outcome measures in a sample of people with mild to moderate dementia.

METHODS

Before initiating the pilot study, a participant consultation was conducted with people with dementia, who attend a lifelong learning service known as a dementia school, and their teachers. From this consultation, the research outcomes identified were the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Quality-of-Life Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), Rosenberg self-esteem scale, and the Friendship scale. The following study was divided into two steps. In step 1, participants were people with dementia attending a dementia school (intervention group) or usual services (control group). The participants were tested at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. Data were collected between November 2018 and July 2019. In step 2, feasibility and acceptability issues with the recruitment of participants, data collection process, and outcome measures, identified in step 1, were evaluated through a data collector focus group.

RESULTS

Fifty-five people with dementia were included in the analysis. Step 1 provided estimates of changes from baseline to follow-up, and ancillary standard deviations were supplied for all outcome measures. Step 2 provided reflections on the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, data collection, and outcome measures. This included views on how people with dementia experience participating in a test situation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided estimates of change and variability in the outcome measures. Additionally, issues regarding data collection were identified and should be addressed in future studies. The project demonstrated how to support people with dementia to participate in research that is meaningful to them.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

According to national legislation, registration with a database of clinical studies was optional, as the study evaluated existing activities rather than a clinical intervention.

Observations on strategies used by people with dementia to manage being assessed using validated measures: A pilot qualitative video analysis

BACKGROUND

Analysis of video data was conducted of validated assessments with people with dementia as part of a feasibility control study comparing a lifelong learning service with other dementia services.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to provide a new perspective on what occurs during the assessment process when using validated measures in research and explore which strategies people with dementia use to manage their participation.

DESIGN

Video recordings were made of pre- and postintervention assessments of people with dementia. An initial pilot analysis of 10 videos of the pre-assessments was conducted.

SETTING

Lifelong learning services and other dementia services situated in six municipalities in Northern Denmark took part in this study, with 55 people with dementia participating.

RESULTS

The themes identified were: 'State of mind' and 'Mental resources', showing how these aspects influenced the participants' reactions and the strategies they used.

DISCUSSION

The results are discussed in relation to how individual personality traits influence the assessment process and the way a person with dementia will manage the situation.

CONCLUSION

The assessment situation is complex and can be influenced by the strategies adopted by individuals with dementia as they try to manage the assessment process.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

People with dementia supported the decision-making for the choice of validated measure used within this study.

Assessing people with dementia participating in cognitive stimulation activities-A qualitative pilot video analysis exploring the importance of facilitating the participation

BACKGROUND

This pilot video analysis was part of a feasibility control study, which aimed to gain information about the size and variability of the changes in outcome measures to plan a substantive effect study. It compared a cognitive stimulation programme named Lifelong Learning with other existing dementia services.

OBJECTIVE

The pilot video analysis explored how facilitation is performed, when assessing people with dementia with standardized measures, to ensure their participation in research.

DESIGN

A test battery of five measures (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD), General Self-Efficacy Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Hawthorn Friendship Scale) was used. Each assessment was video-recorded. The findings from a microanalysis of 10 videos are presented in this article.

SETTING

The study involved 55 active participants with mild-to-moderate dementia in six municipalities in Northern Denmark.

RESULTS

The identified themes related to supportive facilitation: Positive facilitator strategies; Creating a safe and comfortable environment; and to dilemmas in facilitation: Balancing multiple dilemmas and Balancing the MMSE test.

DISCUSSION

Results are discussed in relation to using standardized measures.

CONCLUSION

The quality of facilitation when using standardized measures is of great importance as it may influence the participant, the assessment and the answers given. The facilitation role needs to be thoroughly planned and executed with ethical consideration to improve the participation of vulnerable groups in research and ensure a person-centred approach.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The identified measures were chosen based upon previous qualitative results and user-involvement workshops with people with dementia.