1
|
Forbat L, Macgregor A, Spilsbury K, McCormack B, Rutherford A, Hanratty B, Hockley J, Davison L, Ogden M, Soulsby I, McKenzie M. Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-134. [PMID: 39046763 DOI: 10.3310/krwq5829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Care home residents often lack access to end-of-life care from specialist palliative care providers. Palliative Care Needs Rounds, developed and tested in Australia, is a novel approach to addressing this. Objective To co-design and implement a scalable UK model of Needs Rounds. Design A pragmatic implementation study using the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Setting Implementation was conducted in six case study sites (England, n = 4, and Scotland, n = 2) encompassing specialist palliative care service working with three to six care homes each. Participants Phase 1: interviews (n = 28 care home staff, specialist palliative care staff, relatives, primary care, acute care and allied health practitioners) and four workshops (n = 43 care home staff, clinicians and managers from specialist palliative care teams and patient and public involvement and engagement representatives). Phase 2: interviews (n = 58 care home and specialist palliative care staff); family questionnaire (n = 13 relatives); staff questionnaire (n = 171 care home staff); quality of death/dying questionnaire (n = 81); patient and public involvement and engagement evaluation interviews (n = 11); fidelity assessment (n = 14 Needs Rounds recordings). Interventions (1) Monthly hour-long discussions of residents' physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs, alongside case-based learning, (2) clinical work and (3) relative/multidisciplinary team meetings. Main outcome measures A programme theory describing what works for whom under what circumstances with UK Needs Rounds. Secondary outcomes focus on health service use and cost effectiveness, quality of death and dying, care home staff confidence and capability, and the use of patient and public involvement and engagement. Data sources Semistructured interviews and workshops with key stakeholders from the six sites; capability of adopting a palliative approach, quality of death and dying index, and Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Lite questionnaires; recordings of Needs Rounds; care home data on resident demographics/health service use; assessments and interventions triggered by Needs Rounds; semistructured interviews with academic and patient and public involvement and engagement members. Results The programme theory: while care home staff experience workforce challenges such as high turnover, variable skills and confidence, Needs Rounds can provide care home and specialist palliative care staff the opportunity to collaborate during a protected time, to plan for residents' last months of life. Needs Rounds build care home staff confidence and can strengthen relationships and trust, while harnessing services' complementary expertise. Needs Rounds strengthen understandings of dying, symptom management, advance/anticipatory care planning and communication. This can improve resident care, enabling residents to be cared for and die in their preferred place, and may benefit relatives by increasing their confidence in care quality. Limitations COVID-19 restricted intervention and data collection. Due to an insufficient sample size, it was not possible to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Needs Rounds or calculate the treatment effect or family perceptions of care. Conclusions Our work suggests that Needs Rounds can improve the quality of life and death for care home residents, by enhancing staff skills and confidence, including symptom management, communications with general practitioners and relatives, and strengthen relationships between care home and specialist palliative care staff. Future work Conduct analysis of costs-benefits and treatment effects. Engagement with commissioners and policy-makers could examine integration of Needs Rounds into care homes and primary care across the UK to ensure equitable access to specialist care. Study registration This study is registered as ISRCTN15863801. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128799) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 19. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Aisha Macgregor
- Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Brendan McCormack
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Østfold University College, Norway
| | | | - Barbara Hanratty
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, England, UK
| | - Jo Hockley
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa Davison
- Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, UK
| | - Irene Soulsby
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, UK
| | - Maisie McKenzie
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, Faculty of Social Science, University of Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kirby P, Lai H, Horrocks S, Harrison M, Wilson D, Daniels S, Calvo RA, Sharp DJ, Alexander CM. Patient and Public Involvement in Technology-Related Dementia Research: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging 2024; 7:e48292. [PMID: 38437014 PMCID: PMC10949132 DOI: 10.2196/48292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology-related research on people with dementia and their carers often aims to enable people to remain living at home for longer and prevent unnecessary hospital admissions. To develop person-centered, effective, and ethical research, patient and public involvement (PPI) is necessary, although it may be perceived as more difficult with this cohort. With recent and rapid expansions in health and care-related technology, this review explored how and with what impact collaborations between researchers and stakeholders such as people with dementia and their carers have taken place. OBJECTIVE This review aims to describe approaches to PPI used to date in technology-related dementia research, along with the barriers and facilitators and impact of PPI in this area. METHODS A scoping review of literature related to dementia, technology, and PPI was conducted using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL. Papers were screened for inclusion by 2 authors. Data were then extracted using a predesigned data extraction table by the same 2 authors. A third author supported the resolution of any conflicts at each stage. Barriers to and facilitators of undertaking PPI were then examined and themed. RESULTS The search yielded 1694 papers, with 31 (1.83%) being analyzed after screening. Most (21/31, 68%) did not make clear distinctions between activities undertaken as PPI and those undertaken by research participants, and as such, their involvement did not fit easily into the National Institute for Health and Care Research definition of PPI. Most of this mixed involvement focused on reviewing or evaluating technology prototypes. A range of approaches were described, most typically using focus groups or co-design workshops. In total, 29% (9/31) described involvement at multiple stages throughout the research cycle, sometimes with evidence of sharing decision-making power. Some (23/31, 74%) commented on barriers to or facilitators of effective PPI. The challenges identified often regarded issues of working with people with significant cognitive impairments and pressures on time and resources. Where reported, the impact of PPI was largely reported as positive, including the experiences for patient and public partners, the impact on research quality, and the learning experience it provided for researchers. Only 4 (13%) papers used formal methods for evaluating impact. CONCLUSIONS Researchers often involve people with dementia and other stakeholders in technology research. At present, involvement is often limited in scope despite aspirations for high levels of involvement and partnership working. Involving people with dementia, their carers, and other stakeholders can have a positive impact on research, patient and public partners, and researchers. Wider reporting of methods and facilitative strategies along with more formalized methods for recording and reporting on meaningful impact would be helpful so that all those involved-researchers, patients, and other stakeholders-can learn how we can best conduct research together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippa Kirby
- Department of Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Lai
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Horrocks
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Helix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Harrison
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Helix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle Wilson
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Daniels
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael A Calvo
- Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Sharp
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre (UK DRI CR&T), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline M Alexander
- Department of Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daly-Lynn J, Ryan A, McCormack B, Martin S. Stakeholder's experiences of living and caring in technology-rich supported living environments for tenants living with dementia. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:62. [PMID: 36726077 PMCID: PMC9889957 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology innovation provides an opportunity to support the rising number of people living with dementia globally. The present study examines experiences of people who have dementia and live in technology enriched supported care models. Additionally, it explores caregiver's attitudes towards technology use with the housing scheme. METHODS A qualitative research design was adopted, and eight housing schemes consented to take part in the study. A technology audit was undertaken in addition to participant interviews and caregiver survey. Seven peer researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 people living with dementia. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Informal and formal caregivers were invited to complete a survey to capture their attitudes towards technology use. A total of 20 informal and 31 formal caregiver surveys were returned. All surveys were input into Survey Monkey and downloaded into excel for analysis. Closed questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and open-ended questions were organised into themes and described descriptively. RESULTS The technology audit identified that technologies were in place from as early as 2002. Technology heterogeneity of, both passive and active devices, was found within the housing schemes. Technologies such as wearable devices were reportedly used according to need, and mobile phone use was widely adopted. The themes that developed out of the tenant interviews were: Attitudes and Engagement with Technology; Technology Enhancing Tenants Sense of Security; Seeking Support and Digital Literacy; and Technology Enabled Connection. A lack of awareness about living alongside technology was a major finding. Technologies enabled a sense of reassurance and facilitated connections with the wider community. The interaction with technology presented challenges, for example, remembering passwords, access to Wi-Fi and the identification of its use in an emergency. The caregiver survey reported a range of facilitators and barriers for the use of technology within care. Both types of caregivers held relatively similar views around the benefits of technology, however their views on issues such as privacy and consent varied. Safety was considered more important than right to privacy by family caregivers. CONCLUSIONS The present study provides new insight into stakeholder's experiences of living, working and caregiving alongside technology in supported living environments. As the generation of people living with dementia become more tech savvy, harnessing everyday technologies to support care could enable holistic care and support the transition through the care continuum. Advance care planning and technology assessments are at the very core of future technology provision. It is evident that a paternalistic attitudes towards technology use could impact the multitude of benefits technology can play in both health and leisure for people living with dementia and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Daly-Lynn
- grid.12641.300000000105519715School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| | - Assumpta Ryan
- School of Nursing, Ulster University, Magee, Northern Ireland
| | - Brendan McCormack
- grid.104846.fHead of Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Scotland, UK
| | - Suzanne Martin
- grid.12641.300000000105519715School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daly Lynn J, Ramsey L, Marley J, Rohde J, McGuigan TM, Reaney A, O’Neill B, Jones A, Kerr D, Hughes C, McFadden S. Participatory peer research exploring the experience of learning during Covid-19 for allied health and healthcare science students. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276180. [PMID: 36301988 PMCID: PMC9612578 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The teaching and learning experience of allied health and healthcare science students has altered because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited research has explored the experience on the future healthcare workforce using participatory research design. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of a global pandemic on the clinical and academic experiences of healthcare student using a co-production approach with student peer researchers. METHODS A participatory research approach adopting online focus groups facilitated by students trained as peer researchers was adopted. First, second and final year students from occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, healthcare science, diagnostic radiography and imaging, radiotherapy and oncology, and speech and language therapy were recruited to six focus groups. Data generated through focus groups were analysed thematically using the DEPICT model to support a partnership approach. RESULTS Twenty-three participants took part in six focus groups. The themes identified were: rapid changes to learning; living alongside Covid-19 and psychological impact. Students preferred blended learning approaches when available, as reduced peer interaction, studying and sleeping in the same space, and technology fatigue decreased motivation. CONCLUSION Due to rapid changes in learning and the stress, anxiety and isolation created by the pandemic, managing study, personal life and placement resulted in a gap in confidence in clinical skills development for students. Students took their professional identity seriously, engaged in behaviours to reduce transmission of Covid-19 and employed a range of coping strategies to protect wellbeing. A challenge with the move to online delivery was the absence of informal peer learning and students indicated that moving forward they would value a hybrid approach to delivery. Higher Education should capitalise on innovative learning experiences developed during the pandemic however it is important to research the impact this has on student skill acquisition and learning experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Daly Lynn
- Lecturer in Psychology, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
- * E-mail:
| | - Lucia Ramsey
- Lecturer in Occupational Therapy, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Joanne Marley
- Lecturer in Physiotherapy, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Johanna Rohde
- Peer Researcher, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Toni-Marie McGuigan
- Peer Researcher, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Adam Reaney
- Peer Researcher, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Brenda O’Neill
- Lecturer in Physiotherapy, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Andrea Jones
- Lecturer in Podiatry, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Danny Kerr
- Lecturer in Physiotherapy, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Ciara Hughes
- Associate Research Director, School of Nursing and School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| | - Sonyia McFadden
- Senior Lecturer in Diagnostic Radiography, School of Health Science, Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Macgregor A, McCormack B, Spilsbury K, Hockley J, Rutherford A, Ogden M, Soulsby I, McKenzie M, Hanratty B, Forbat L. Supporting care home residents in the last year of life through 'Needs Rounds': Development of a pre-implementation programme theory through a rapid collaborative online approach. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:1019602. [PMID: 36925884 PMCID: PMC10012649 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1019602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Realist evaluation aims to address the knowledge to practice gap by explaining how an intervention is expected to work, as well as what is likely to impact upon the success of its implementation, by developing programme theories that link contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Co-production approaches to the development of programme theories offer substantial benefits in addressing power relations, including and valuing different types of knowledge, and promoting buy-in from stakeholders while navigating the complex social systems in which innovations are embedded. This paper describes the co-production of an initial programme theory of how an evidence based intervention developed in Australia - called 'Palliative Care Needs Rounds' - might work in England and Scotland to support care home residents approaching their end of life. Methods Using realist evaluation and iPARIHS (integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) we sought to determine how contexts and mechanisms of change might shape implementation outcomes. Pre-intervention online interviews (n = 28) were conducted (February-April 2021), followed by four co-design online workshops with 43 participants (April-June 2021). The online interviews and workshops included a range of stakeholders, including care home staff, specialist palliative care staff, paramedics, general practitioners, and relatives of people living in care homes. Results This methodology paper reports developments in realist evaluation and co-production methodologies, and how they were used to develop context, mechanisms, outcomes (CMOs) configurations, and chains of inference. The initial (pre-intervention) programme theory is used to illustrate this process. Two developments to iPARIHS are described. First, involving stakeholders in the collaborative co-design workshops created opportunities to commence facilitation. Second, we describe developing iPARIHS' innovation component, to include novel stakeholder interpretations, perceptions and anticipated use of the intervention as they participated in workshop discussions. Conclusions This rapid and robust co-production methodology draws on interactive collaborative research practices (interviews, workshop discussions of data, illustrative vignettes and visual methods). These innovative and engaging methods can be packaged for online processes to develop, describe and interrogate the CMOs in order to co-produce a programme theory. These approaches also commence facilitation and innovation, and can be adopted in other implementation science and realist studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha Macgregor
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
| | - Brendan McCormack
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Jo Hockley
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Liz Forbat
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Palfreyman A, Riyaz S, Rizwan Z, Vijayaraj K, Chathuranga IPR, Daluwatte R, Devindi WAT, Eranda BS, Jayalath V, Junaid A, Kamal A, Kannangara SK, Madushani KMGP, Mathanakumar L, Mubarak SI, Nagalingam V, Palihawadana S, Pathirana R, Sampath VGS, Shanmuganathan L, Thrimawithana T, Vijayaratnam P, Vithanage SL, Wathsala RKKAS, Yalini RM. Cultivating capacities in community-based researchers in low-resource settings: Lessons from a participatory study on violence and mental health in Sri Lanka. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000899. [PMID: 36962631 PMCID: PMC10021324 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Participatory methods, which rely heavily on community-based data collectors, are growing in popularity to deliver much-needed evidence on violence and mental health in low- and middle-income countries. These settings, along with local researchers, encounter the highest burden of violence and mental ill-health, with the fewest resources to respond. Despite increased focus on wellbeing for research participants and, to a lesser degree, professional researchers in such studies, the role-specific needs of community-based researchers receive scant attention. This co-produced paper draws insights from one group's experience to identify rewards, challenges, and recommendations for supporting wellbeing and development of community-based researchers in sensitive participatory projects in low-resource settings. Twenty-one community-based researchers supporting a mixed-methods study on youth, violence and mental health in Sri Lanka submitted 63 reflexive structured journal entries across three rounds of data collection. We applied Attride-Stirling's method for thematic analysis to explore peer researchers' learning about research, violence and mental health; personal-professional boundaries; challenges in sensitive research; and experiences of support from the core team. Sri Lanka's first study capturing experiences of diverse community-based researchers aims to inform the growing number of global health and development actors relying on such talent to deliver sensitive and emotionally difficult work in resource-limited and potentially volatile settings. Viewing participatory research as an opportunity for mutual learning among both community-based and professional researchers, we identify practice gaps and opportunities to foster respectful team dynamics and create generative and safe co-production projects for all parties. Intentional choices around communication, training, human and consumable resources, project design, and navigating instable research conditions can strengthen numerous personal and professional capacities across teams. Such individual and collective growth holds potential to benefit short- and long-term quality of evidence and inform action on critical issues, including violence and mental health, facing high-burden, low-resource contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Palfreyman
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lynn JD, Ryan A, McCormack B, Martin S. A Qualitative Exploration of Living with Dementia in Supported Living Environments using a Peer Researcher Approach. AGING AND HEALTH RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ahr.2022.100055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|