Immunohistochemical analysis of the monoclonal antibody 4B5 in breast tissue expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (HER4)

Development of a highly specific HER2 monoclonal antibody for immunohistochemistry using protein microarray chips

HER2 is an orphan receptor tyrosine kinase of the EGFR families and is considered to be a key tumor driver gene [1]. Breast cancer and gastric cancer with HER2 amplification can be effectively treated by its neutralizing antibody, Herceptin. In clinic, Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used as the primary screening method to diagnose HER2 amplification [2]. However, recent evidence suggested that the frequently used rabbit HER2 antibody 4B5 cross reacted with another family member HER4 [3]. IHC staining with 4B5 also indicated that there was strong non-specific cytoplasmic and nuclear signals in normal gastric mucosal cells and some gastric cancer samples. Using a protein lysate array which covers 85% of the human proteome, we have confirmed that the 4B5 bound to HER4 and a nuclear protein ZSCAN18 besides HER2. The non-specific binding accounts for the unexpected cytoplasmic and nuclear staining of 4B5 of normal gastric epithelium. Finally, we have developed a novel mouse HER2 monoclonal antibody UMAB36 with similar sensitivity to 4B5 but only reacted to HER2 across the 17,000 proteins on the protein chip. In 129 breast cancer and 158 gastric cancer samples, UMAB36 showed 100% sensitivity and specificity comparing to the HER2 FISH reference results with no unspecific staining in the gastric mucosa layer. Therefore, UMAB36 could provide as an alternative highly specific IHC reagent for testing HER2 amplification in gastric cancer populations.

HER4 expression status correlates with improved outcome in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant Trastuzumab treated invasive breast carcinoma

Prognostic and predictive markers utilized in invasive breast carcinoma are limited and include ER, PR, Ki67, and ERBB2 (HER2). In the case of HER2, over-expression or amplification serves as eligibility for anti-HER2 based therapy, including trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Genentech). While clinical trials have shown trastuzumab improves overall survival and time to progression, an individual's response to anti-HER2 based therapy is highly variable. This suggests that, in a “uniform” HER2 positive population, additional markers could help in predicting patient outcome to therapy. Here we utilized a recently validated high-specificity HER4 antibody (E200) and generated a standard clinical HER4 scoring algorithm (HER4 H-Score) utilizing two breast carcinoma cohorts: 1) patients receiving neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n=47) and 2) patients receiving trastuzumab for metastatic disease (n=33). Our HER4 H-Score showed significant correlation with high sensitivity RT-qPCR performed on matched patients (p=<0.0001). In addition, patients with HER2/HER4 co-over-expression status showed a significant delay in development of metastasis after neo-adjuvant trastuzumab therapy (p= 0.04) and showed a significant improvement in progression free survival after adjuvant trastuzumab therapy (p=0.03). These findings suggest HER4 IHC, used in conjunction with a standard HER2 testing algorithm, could aid in predicting clinical outcome and help identify patients likely to show improved response to trastuzumab therapy.

Distinguishing score 0 from score 1+ in HER2 immunohistochemistry-negative breast cancer: clinical and pathobiological relevance

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and pathobiological significance of distinguishing score 0 and score 1+ within the group of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-negative invasive breast cancers.

METHODS

We studied HER2 status using both IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 150 consecutive breast tumors submitted to our laboratory after a negative IHC result in local testing centers.

RESULTS

We were able to discern a group of score 0 tumors that had a lower HER2 copy number than the group consisting of score 1+ tumors. In contrast with the group of score 1+ tumors, HER2 FISH was consistently negative for both copy number-based and ratio-based tumors without equivocal results.

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting with stringent quality assurance, score 0 and score 1+ tumors emerge as distinct and clinically important subgroups within the HER2 IHC-negative population.