Metanephric adenoma and solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma: common and distinctive features

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evolving Classification by Combined Morphologic and Molecular Means

Papillary renal cell carcinoma classification has evolved as a result of attentive morphologic observations by pathologists coupled with specific immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical data. Refinement of this relatively common diagnostic category of renal neoplasia has resulted in the parsing out of specific renal cell carcinoma subtypes that no longer belong in the papillary renal cell carcinoma category and can have distinct familial and prognostic implications (eg, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas). In addition, evolving classification has enabled more accurate diagnosis by surgical pathologists (through the description of recognizable morphologic variants). In many cases, molecular findings have aided and confirmed morphologic categorization. The combination of morphologic and molecular findings continues to provide important prognostic information for patients and their clinicians.

Molecular mechanism of formation and destruction of a pseudo‑capsule in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The process and molecular mechanisms underlying the formation and destruction of a pseudo-capsule (PC) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are poorly understood. In the present study, the PCs of surgical specimens from primary tumors and metastatic lesions in 169 patients with ccRCC, and carcinogen-induced ccRCC rat models were semi-quantified using the invasion of PC (i-Cap) score system. This was based on the relationship among the tumor, PC and adjacent normal tissue (NT) as follows: i-Cap 0, tumor has no PC and does not invade NT; i-Cap 1, tumor has a complete PC and does not invade into the PC; i-Cap 2, tumor with focal absences in the PC, which partially invades the PC but not completely through the PC; i-Cap 3, tumor crosses the PC and invades the NT; i-Cap 4, tumor directly invades the NT without a PC. The study suggested that PC formation was not observed without physical compression, and also revealed that tumor invasion into the PC was a prognostic factor for postoperative oncological outcomes. Higher i-Cap, Fuhrman grade and tumor size were independent poor prognostic factors for postoperative disease-free survival. mRNA expression arrays generated from carcinogen-induced ccRCC rat models were used to explore genes potentially associated with the formation and destruction of a PC. Subsequently, human ccRCC specimens were validated for four genes identified via expression array; the results revealed that collagen type 4A2, matrix metalloproteinase-7 and l-selectin were upregulated alongside the progression of i-Cap score. Conversely, endoglin was downregulated. In conclusion, the present study provides insights into the formation and destruction of a PC, and the results may aid the treatment and management of patients with ccRCC.

Biphasic papillary (biphasic squamoid alveolar) renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 17 renal cell carcinomas including 10 papillary adenomas

Biphasic papillary renal cell carcinoma (synonymous with biphasic squamoid alveolar renal cell carcinoma) is considered within the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). With < 70 reported cases of biphasic PRCC, there is limited data on the pathologic spectrum and clinical course. Seventeen biphasic PRCC cases and 10 papillary adenomas with similar biphasic morphology were assessed. The mean age of the biphasic PRCC patients was 62 years (male to female ratio of 1.8:1), from 10 partial nephrectomies, 6 radical nephrectomies, and 1 biopsy. The mean tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 1.6-8 cm), with 24% showing multifocality. Fifteen out of 17 cases were limited to the kidney (one of which was staged as pT2a but had lung metastases at diagnosis) and 2/17 cases were staged as T3a. All tumors showed typical biphasic morphology with an extent of squamoid foci widely variable from 10 to 95%. Emperipolesis was identified in 88% of cases. All biphasic PRCC tested exhibited positivity for PAX8 (16/16), keratin 7 (17/17), EMA (15/15), AMACR (17/17), and vimentin (12/12) in both large and small cells; cyclin D1 was only expressed in the large cells (16/16). The 10 papillary adenomas showed a similar immunoprofile to biphasic PRCC. NGS testing performed on 13 biphasic PRCC revealed 4 (31%) harboring MET SNVs. In 1/5 (20%) papillary adenomas, a pathogenic MET SNV was identified. Biphasic PRCC is rare with a generally similar immunoprofile to "type 1" PRCC but with notable strong positivity for cyclin D1 in the large cell component. Although most of the biphasic PRCC cases were of small size, low stage, and with an indolent behavior, one patient had metastatic disease and one patient died of the disease.

Case Report: MRI, CEUS, and CT Imaging Features of Metanephric Adenoma with Histopathological Correlation and Literature Review

The metanephric adenoma is an extremely rare, benign, embryonal-epithelial neoplasm of the kidney and has a good prognosis with appropriate treatment. It can present at any age and is often asymptomatic. Histologically, the lesion is well established; however, there have been only a few cases described with available detailed imaging findings, most of them with large renal masses typically depicted by computed tomography (CT). This case report includes imaging of contrast-enhanced MRI, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and CT, and thus adds to the information available, potentially promoting a nephron-sparing clinical pathway. We report on the clinical presentation, imaging, histopathological diagnosis, and treatment data of a 27-year-old female, in whom an incidental, symptomatic kidney tumor was detected. CT, CEUS, and MRI showed a suspicious unifocal renal lesion with inhomogeneous enhancement, which was indistinguishable from renal cell carcinoma. After laparoscopic resection, a metanephric adenoma with microscopically partially glandular, partially nest-like solid growth and without distinctive atypia was diagnosed pathohistologically. Immunohistochemistry results were positive for Wilms Tumor 1 and CD57 and negative for EMA and CK7: 2–3% positive cells in MIB1 coloring. At 3-month and 1-year follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and imaging showed no recurrence of renal masses or metastases.

The Morphological Spectrum of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Prevalence of Provisional/Emerging Renal Tumor Entities with Papillary Growth

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a heterogeneous disease, encompassing an increasing number of tumor subtypes. Post-2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognized that the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma is evolving and has long surpassed the dichotomic simplistic "type 1 versus type 2" classification. The differential diagnosis of pRCC includes several new provisional/emerging entities with papillary growth. Type 2 tumors have been cleared out of several confounding entities, now regarded as independent tumors with specific clinical and molecular backgrounds. In this work we describe the prevalence and characteristics of emerging papillary tumor entities in two renal tumor cohorts (one consisting of consecutive papillary tumors from a single institute, the other consisting of consultation cases from several centers). After a review of 154 consecutive pRCC cases, 58% remained type 1 pRCC, and 34% type 2 pRCC. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (1.3%), biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC (1.3%), and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC (4.5%) were rare. Among 281 consultation cases, 121 (43%) tumors had a dominant papillary growth (most frequently MiT family translocation RCCs, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary RCC). Our data confirm that the spectrum of RCCs with papillary growth represents a major diagnostical challenge, frequently requiring a second expert opinion. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity, biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC, and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC are rarely sent out for a second opinion, but correct classification and knowledge of these variants will improve our understanding of the clinical behavior of renal tumors with papillary growth.

Metanephric Adenoma: A Case Report of a Rare Benign Renal Tumor

Introduction: Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign kidney tumor with an excellent prognosis, which is usually diagnosed incidentally with no symptoms. The mean age of patients with MA is about 41 years, ranging from 5 months to 83 years in previous studies. Case Presentation: In this study, we present the case of a 29-year-old woman with a diagnosis of MA after nephrectomy. The ultrasound study showed a hyperechoic mass. The intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan showed a hypodense mass. Based on the results of pathological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (positive vimentin, WT1, and PAX8), the diagnosis of MA was established. Conclusions: The diagnosis of MA is commonly based on pathological findings. Therefore, if MA is suspected, renal biopsy, partial nephrectomy, or follow-up of the patient can be used. However, further studies are needed to differentiate MA from papillary renal cell carcinoma and nephroblastoma before taking aggressive measures.

Key Renal Neoplasms With a Female Predominance

Renal neoplasms largely favor male patients; however, there is a growing list of tumors that are more frequently diagnosed in females. These tumors include metanephric adenoma, mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, juxtaglomerular cell tumor, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, Xp11.2 (TFE3) translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, and tuberous sclerosis complex (somatic or germline) associated renal neoplasms. The latter category is a heterogenous group with entities still being delineated. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is the best-described entity, whereas, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor is a proposed entity, and the remaining tumors are currently grouped together under the umbrella of tuberous sclerosis complex/mammalian target of rapamycin-related renal neoplasms. The entities described in this review are often diagnostic considerations when evaluating renal mass tissue on biopsy or resection. For example, Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma is in the differential when a tumor has clear cell cytology and papillary architecture and occurs in a young or middle-aged patient. In contrast, tuberous sclerosis complex-related neoplasms often enter the differential for tumors with eosinophilic cytology. This review provides an overview of the clinical, gross, microscopic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and molecular alterations in key renal neoplasms occurring more commonly in females; differential diagnoses are also discussed regardless of sex predilection.

MET alterations in biphasic squamoid alveolar papillary renal cell carcinomas and clinicopathological features

Biphasic squamoid alveolar papillary renal cell carcinoma (BSA-PRCC) is a recently studied lesion considered a morphologic variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), more closely related to type 1. Considering the role of proto-oncogene MET in both sporadic type 1 papillary RCC and hereditary papillary RCC, we aimed to explore the role of MET activation in the oncogenesis of BSA-PRCC. We identified 17 patients with either unique (n = 14) or multiple (n = 3) BSA-PRCC, all localized, and performed an integrative analysis of MET status in 18 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors combining next-generation sequencing analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Trisomy 7 was found in 86% of tumors (14/16) without MET amplification at 7q31 (15/15). A pathogenic MET genetic variant was identified in 60% (9/15) of cases, at the germline level in 57% (4/7) of tested patients or at the somatic level (5/11). MET expression was observed in all tumors with a higher value of combined score in large cells (mean 97%, range 80-100%) than in small cells (mean 74%, range 10-100%) and was lower in two cases without MET copy number gain. In conclusion, our study provides additional evidence to consider biphasic squamoid alveolar papillary RCC as a morphological variant of type 1 papillary renal RCC. Our data strongly suggest that MET represents a major oncogenic driver gene in BSA-PRCC, harboring a higher frequency of MET mutation that encourages to further explore the benefice of anti-MET targeted therapies for aggressive BSA-PRCC.

KANK1-NTRK3 fusions define a subset of BRAF mutation negative renal metanephric adenomas

Background

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign renal neoplasm. On occasion, MA can be difficult to differentiate from renal malignancies such as papillary renal cell carcinoma in adults and Wilms̕ tumor in children. Despite recent advancements in tumor genomics, there is limited data available regarding the genetic alterations characteristic of MA. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of metanephric adenoma cases exhibiting cytogenetic aberration t (9;15)(p24;q24), and to investigate the association between t (9,15) and BRAF mutation in metanephric adenoma.

Methods

This study was conducted on 28 archival formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from patients with pathologically confirmed MA. Tissue blocks were selected for BRAF sequencing and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for chromosomal rearrangement between KANK1 on chromosome 9 (9p24.3) and NTRK3 on chromosome 15 (15q25.3), which was previously characterized and described in two MA cases.

Results

BRAF^V600E mutation was identified in 62% of our cases, 9 (38%) cases were BRAF^WT, and 4 cases were uninformative. Of the 20 tumors with FISH results, two (10%) were positive for KANK1-NTRK3 fusion. Both cases were BRAF^WT suggesting mutual exclusivity of BRAF^V600E and KANK1-NTRK3 fusion, the first such observation in the literature.

Conclusions

Our data shows that BRAF mutation in MA may not be as frequent as suggested in the literature and KANK-NTRK3 fusions may account for a subset of BRAF^WT cases in younger patients. FISH analysis for KANK1-NTRK3 fusion or conventional cytogenetic analysis may be warranted to establish the diagnosis of MA in morphologically and immunohistochemically ambiguous MA cases lacking BRAF mutations.

Experience of diagnosis and management of metanephric adenoma: retrospectively analysis of 10 cases and a literature review

Background

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign tumor with only several hundred cases reported worldwide to date. Herein, we retrospectively summarized the experience of diagnosis and management of ten MA cases.

Methods

A total of ten MA patients were included in this study definitely diagnosed by postoperative immunohistochemistry at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to January 2019. Clinical characteristics, image features, therapeutic procedures, histological diagnosis and outcomes of them were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Characteristics of the patient population were nine females and one male with age of 36.8±17.5 years. The mean tumor size was 33.6 mm (range from 35.0 to 70.0 mm). Among them, nine cases were asymptomatic and one case showed acute flank pain. All ten cases underwent plain and enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) was performed in seven cases and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) was applied in the other three cases. Postoperative routine pathology results confirmed that seven cases were MA. However, two patients were misdiagnosed with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and another was misdiagnosed with Wilms’ tumor. Further immunohistochemistry eventually confirmed all these ten cases as MA. During a mean follow-up of 58.3 month, all ten patients were alive with no local recurrences nor metastases.

Conclusions

In summary, MA is a rare benign tumor with no distinct clinical symptoms. The definite diagnosis depends on the postoperative pathological findings. Fortunately, due to its non-malignant nature, patients always have a good prognosis.

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma with a novel PLEKHA7-ALK translocation and metanephric adenoma-like morphology

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma is a provisional entity in the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. The reported fusion partners included VCL, TPM3, EML4, STRN, and HOOK1. Herein, we present a peculiar renal cell carcinoma morphologically resembling metanephric adenoma and harboring a novel PLEKHA7-ALK fusion. Microscopically, the tumor is composed of bland epithelial cells with scant to moderate amount of amphophilic cytoplasm, round and uniform nuclei, delicate chromatin, and inconspicuous nucleoli, arranged in tightly packed small acini and angulated tubules. Papillary formation, intraluminal glomeruloid tufts, microcysts, and solid nests were focally observed. Psammomatous calcifications were evident. The tumor cells were diffusely reactive for CK7, AMACR, PAX8, and ALK, while non-reactive for WT1, BRAF V600E, CD57, carbonic anhydrase IX, TFE3, and cathepsin K. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed breaking apart of ALK. A novel PLEKHA7exon18-ALKexon20 fusion was detected using ArcherDX FusionPlex next-generation sequencing panel and was further confirmed with reverse-transcriptase PCR. Our case demonstrates that in contrast to prior cases showing high-grade tumor cells, ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma may also present as a low-grade renal tumor mimicking metanephric adenoma. Immunohistochemistry and molecular testing are helpful to identify this tumor, which may be eligible for ALK inhibitor-targeted therapy.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma with prominent spindle cell stroma - tumor mimicking mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of 6 cases

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is currently a well-studied type of RCC. In addition to PRCC type 1, there are a number of other subtypes and variants of PRCCs which have been reported. We describe a series of 6 PRCCs with papillary, micropapillary and/or tubulopapillary architecture and prominent spindle cell stroma, resembling stroma in mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) or sarcomatoid RCC. Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features were analyzed. All patients were males with an age range of 44-98 years (mean 65.3, median 65.5 years). Tumor size ranged from 2.4-11.4 cm (mean 5.8, median 4.5 cm). Follow-up data were available for 4 patients, ranging from 3 to 96 months (mean 42.75, median 36 months). Epithelial cells were mostly cylindrical with eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing nuclear grade 2 and 3 (ISUP/WHO). In all cases, loose to compact prominent stroma composed of spindle cells, without malignant mesenchymal heterologous elements was detected. No atypical mitoses were found, while typical mitoses were rare in both epithelial and stromal components. Epithelial cells were positive for CK7, AMACR, and vimentin in all cases, while negative for TFE3, HMB45, desmin, CD34, and actin. The stroma was positive for vimentin, actin and focally for CD34, while negative for CK7, AMACR, TFE3, HMB45, and desmin. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were completely negative. FH and SDHB expression was retained in all analyzable cases. Proliferative index was barely detectable in stromal component and low in epithelial component, ranging 0 to 5% positive stained cells/high power field. Copy number variation was variable with no distinct pattern. No mutations in CDKN2A, BAP1, MET were detected. PRCC with MESTK-like features is a distinct variant of PRCC mimicking MESTK. Our findings add to the body of literature on ever expanding variants of PRCCs. Both epithelial and stromal components lacked true Müllerian features, which was also proven by immunohistochemistry.

"Atrophic Kidney"-like Lesion: Clinicopathologic Series of 8 Cases Supporting a Benign Entity Distinct From Thyroid-like Follicular Carcinoma

Renal mass lesions with a follicular architecture resembling atrophic kidney have been described, but their distinction from thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney remains controversial. We collected 8 cases of this purported "atrophic kidney"-like lesion to fully describe their clinical and histologic spectrum, their possible etiology, and to discuss their distinction from other renal neoplasms. Eight total cases were identified with patient ages ranging from 9 to 48 years (mean: 29 y; median: 28.5 y). Four patients were female and 4 were male. The tumors were unifocal and size ranged from 1.6 to 4.9 cm (mean: 3.4 cm; median: 3.4 cm). All 8 tumors had a remarkably similar histology. Each was enveloped by a smooth muscle rich capsule and had an overall low power "follicular" architecture. The luminal spaces of the "follicles" (or cysts) contained eosinophilic secretions and the lining epithelium was often flattened and atrophic, but some had more rounded cells with a distinctive hobnail arrangement. Many cysts contained discohesive round cells floating within the eosinophilic material, and some contained small intraluminal tufts with features of markedly atrophic glomeruli. Periodic acid-Schiff stains highlighted basement membrane material extending into these glomerular-like tufts, and some contained small distinct capillaries surrounded by endothelial cells, interspersed mesangial-like cells, and rare surrounding podocyte-like cells, providing additional evidence for glomerulocystic structures. Scattered calcifications were present within cysts (or within cyst walls) in varying numbers and were characterized by 2 types: psammoma body-like or more amorphous deposits. The tissue between cystic glomeruli contained predominantly small atrophic tubular structures, but collagenized stroma and smaller collapsed glomeruli were also present. The 2 tumors from the oldest 2 patients (48 and 39 y) had a more striking degree of stromal hyalinization. Immunohistochemically, the cyst lining cells had a predominant WT-positive/PAX-8 negative/CK7-negative phenotype, while tubules were typically WT-1 negative/PAX-8 positive/CK7-positive. Upon comparison to a control group of 10 kidneys containing incidental non-mass-forming glomerulocystic change, the morphologic features and immunophenotype were identical. To date, no patient has had any recurrence or aggressive clinical behavior based on follow status in 7 of 8 cases (follow-up range: 9 to 168 mo; median: 24 mo; mean: 40 mo). In summary, we describe the clinicopathologic features of 8 unique, benign "atrophic kidney"-like lesions that may simply represent a non-neoplastic form of organizing tubular atrophy and glomerulocystic change, and emphasize their distinction from thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney.

Distinct Genomic Copy Number Alterations Distinguish Mucinous Tubular and Spindle Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney From Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma With Overlapping Histologic Features

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) of the kidney is a rare type of renal cell carcinoma that frequently exhibits histologic and immunophenotypic features overlapping with type 1 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). To clarify molecular attributes that can be used for this difficult differential diagnosis, we sought to delineate the genome-wide copy number alterations in tumors displaying classic histologic features of MTSCC in comparison to the solid variant of type 1 PRCC and indeterminate cases with overlapping histologic features. The study included 11 histologically typical MTSCC, 9 tumors with overlapping features between MTSCC and PRCC, and 6 cases of solid variant of type 1 PRCC. DNA samples extracted from macrodissected or microdissected tumor areas were analyzed for genome-wide copy number alterations using an SNP-array platform suitable for clinical archival material. All cases in the MTSCC group exhibited multiple chromosomal losses, most frequently involving chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22, while lacking trisomy 7 or 17. In contrast, cases with overlapping morphologic features of MTSCC and PRCC predominantly showed multiple chromosomal gains, most frequently involving chromosomes 7, 16, 17, and 20, similar to the chromosomal alteration pattern that was seen in the solid variant of type 1 PRCC cases. Morphologic comparison of these molecularly characterized tumors identified histologic features that help to distinguish MTSCC from PRCC, but immunohistochemical profiles of these tumors remained overlapping, including a marker for Hippo-Yes-associated protein signaling. Characteristic patterns of genome-wide copy number alterations strongly support MTSCC and PRCC as distinct entities despite their immunohistochemical and certain morphologic overlap, and help define histologic features useful for the classification of questionable cases.

Emerging entities of renal cell neoplasia

The current classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was formulated at the meeting of the World Health Organization Renal Tumor Panel in 2015, with the results published in the fourth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs Bluebook in 2016. At that meeting a number of tumor types were designated as emerging or provisional entities as it was felt that they were insufficiently characterized to merit inclusion as a recognized type of RCC. One tumor type included in this designation was thyroid-like follicular RCC. Since the publication of the 2016 classification this tumor type has been further characterized and in addition to this, detailed studies on three other types of RCC (multifocal oncocytoma-like tumors associated with oncocytosis, eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC and biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC) have been published. It is now apparent that these four tumors are unique morphotypes and genotypes of RCC, and are likely to be included in the next edition of the World Health Organization classification of renal tumors. Multifocal oncocytoma-like tumors associated with oncocytosis is a benign process characterized by the presence of hundreds to thousands of oncocytic tumors in a single kidney. These tumors occur sporadically and are unrelated to the tumors of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC is characterized by a solid and cystic architecture with tumor cells consisting of bulky eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm with intracytoplasmic vacuolation. Thyroid-like follicular RCC occurs in younger patients with a female predominance. The tumor bears a striking resemblance to follicular carcinoma of the thyroid with follicles containing intraluminal proteineacous material resembling thyroglobulin. Immunostains for thyroid markers are negative. Finally, biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC consists of aggregates of large cells with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm usually arranged in a glomeruloid/alveolar pattern and surrounded by a border of basophilic cells with scanty cytoplasm. The genotype of the tumor, as well its recorded association with typical papillary RCC, has led to the suggestion that it is related to type 1 papillary RCC.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (PRCC): An Update

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the second most common type of renal carcinoma following clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is usually divided histologically into 2 types namely, type 1 and type 2. This classification, however, is unsatisfactory as many of papillary carcinoma are unclassifiable by the existing criteria. In recent years there has been a remarkable progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of PRCC. These studies have revealed that type 2 PRCCs represent a heterogenous group which may be subdivided into additional subtypes based on the genetic and molecular make up of these tumors and reflecting different clinical course and prognosis. Some of the molecular features such a hypermethylation of CPG islands in the promotor regions of genes and over expression of the antioxidant pathways within tumor cells have been recognized as markers of poor prognosis. Targeted therapies for papillary carcinoma in the past have been unsuccessful because of lack of clear understanding of the molecular basis of these tumors. It is hoped that recent progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of various subtypes of PRCC, effective targeted therapies will eventually emerge in due course.

Imaging of Unusual Renal Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal masses are a wide entity and a common finding in clinical practice. Detection of these masses has increased in the last years, yet mortality rates have slightly decreased.

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the World Health Organization classification, there are 8 types, 51 subtypes, and a lot more subsequent subclassifications of renal tumors. Histopathological analysis should always be assessed for final diagnosis of theses tumors. However, imaging can be an important diagnostic guidance. The most common diagnoses of renal tumor are clear cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and transitional cell carcinoma. Nonetheless, a considerable variety of particular tumors can arise from the kidney, challenging the expertise of radiologists and urologists on this subject. The awareness of these unusual entities is vital for professionals working at a complex medical facility with greater volume of patients. We hereby present uncommon renal tumors and its pathological and radiological features.

Novel clinicopathological and molecular characterization of metanephric adenoma: a study of 28 cases

Background

Metanephric adenoma is a rare, benign renal neoplasm with occasional misdiagnosis. However, its molecular characterization is not fully understood.

Methods

In this study, we use the hybrid capture-based Next-Generation Sequencing to sequence a panel of 295 well-established oncogene or tumor suppressor genes in 28 cases of MA patients in China. Novel clinicopathological markers associated with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in metanephric adenoma were detected by immunohistochemistry.

Results

It was found that except for BRAF (22/28) mutations (c.1799 T > A, p.V600E), NF1 (6/28), NOTCH1 (5/28), SPEN (5/28), AKT2 (4/28), APC (4/28), ATRX (3/28), and ETV4 (3/28) mutations could also be detected. Meanwhile, a novel and rare gene fusion of STARD9-BRAF, CUX1-BRAF, and LOC100507389-BRAF was detected in one MA patient. In addition, although MEK phosphorylation was normally activated, the phosphorylation level of ERK was low in metanephric adenoma cases. Highly expressed p16 and DUSP6 may have contributed to these results, which maintained MA as a benign renal tumor.

Conclusions

This study provides novel molecular and pathological markers for metanephric adenoma, which could improve its diagnosis and increase the understanding of its pathologic mechanism.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13000-018-0732-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Biphasic papillary renal cell carcinoma is a rare morphological variant with frequent multifocality: a study of 28 cases

AIMS

To further characterise biphasic squamoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a recently proposed variant of papillary RCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 28 tumours from multiple institutions. They typically showed two cell populations-larger cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and higher-grade nuclei, surrounded by smaller, amphophilic cells with scanty cytoplasm. The dual morphology was variable (median 72.5% of tumour, range 5-100%); emperipolesis was found in all cases. The male/female ratio was 2:1, and the median age was 55 years (range 39-86 years). The median tumour size was 20 mm (range 9-65 mm). Pathological stage pT1a was found in 21 cases, pT1b in three, and pT3a and pT3b in one each (two not available). Multifocality was found in 32%: multifocal biphasic RCC in one case, biphasic + papillary RCC in two cases, biphasic + clear cell RCC in three cases, biphasic + low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis in one case, and biphasic + Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in one case. Positive immunostains included: PAX8, cytokeratin (CK) 7, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase, epithelial membrane antigen, and vimentin. Cyclin D1 was expressed only in the larger cells. The Ki67 index was higher in the larger cells (median 5% versus ≤1%). Negative stains included: carbonic anhydrase 9, CD117, GATA-3, WT1, CK5/6, and CK20; CD10 and 34βE12 were variably expressed. Gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 were found in two evaluated cases. Follow-up was available for 23 patients (median 24 months, range 1-244 months): 19 were alive without disease, one was alive with recurrence, and one had died of disease (two had died of other causes).

CONCLUSIONS

Biphasic papillary RCC is a rare variant of papillary RCC, and is often multifocal.

Chromosomal numerical aberration pattern in papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review article

Traditionally, papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs) have been divided in two subgroups - type 1 and type 2. Based on recent molecular and genetic developments in the understanding of RCCs, it seems that this traditional classification may not be adequate and that the spectrum of PRCCs is much wider than initially proposed. Small series of distinct types of PRCC which do not fit into the above mentioned categories have been described in the literature. Published studies investigating molecular genetic changes in various types of PRCCs have shown that the molecular genetic features are remarkably heterogeneous across the whole spectrum of PRCCs. Of all PRCC subtypes/variants, PRCC type 1 seems to be a genetically uniform group, while other types showed different degrees of heterogeneity. Among different molecular-genetic features, chromosomal numerical aberration status is one of the most frequently studied features so far. It is becoming more evident that tumor type-specific chromosomal numerical aberration status in PRCCs may not exist. In this review, we present the most current knowledge concerning chromosomal numerical aberration status in PRCCs.

The findings of CT and MRI in patients with metanephric adenoma

Background

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a benign renal tumor that is difficult to distinguish from a malignant tumor via traditional radiography. The diagnosis of MA is often dependent on postsurgical histopathological examination. In the present report, the imaging features of MA on computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively evaluated.

Methods

Eight MA patients, 17–67 years of age, were pathologically confirmed and recruited between April 2009 and November 2014. Four of the eight patients were female. All patients underwent CT scanning, and one patient underwent MRI scanning. Three patients underwent CTA of the renal arteries. All patients underwent resection surgery (radical nephrectomy in five and nephron-sparing surgery in three patients).

Results

The average tumor size was 44.0 ± 23.6 mm. The lesions in 87.5 % cases were located both in the renal cortex and medulla and exhibited exophytic growth. Plain CT showed that MA tumors were solid, and the average CT value was 37.9 ± 6.7 HU. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT revealed that enhanced degrees of MA tumors in the renal cortex, renal parenchymal, and pelvic phase were all lower than that of normal renal parenchyma. A slight enhancement in the renal cortex phase and an even higher enhancement in the renal parenchymal phase were observed in seven of the cases. Progressive enhancement in the pelvic phase was found in five cases and a slight decreased enhancement in the pelvic phase in two cases. MRI revealed that MA tumor was isointense on T1WI and isointense on T2WI with some slightly hyperintense areas in the center. CTA of the renal arteries revealed the nutrient artery in one patient and no nutrient artery in two. Immunohistochemical experiments demonstrated that most tumor cells were positive for vimentin, CK, and EMA.

Conclusions

MA is a rare benign renal neoplasm. Detailed knowledge of the CT and MRI characteristics of MA plays an important role in MA diagnosis and treatment.

Biphasic Squamoid Alveolar Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Distinctive Subtype of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma?

Biphasic squamoid alveolar renal cell carcinoma (BSARCC) has been recently described as a distinct neoplasm. Twenty-one cases from 12 institutions were analyzed using routine histology, immunohistochemistry, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Tumors were removed from 11 male and 10 female patients, whose age ranged from 53 to 79 years. The size of tumors ranged from 1.5 to 16 cm. Follow-up information was available for 14 patients (range, 1 to 96 mo), and metastatic spread was found in 5 cases. All tumors comprised 2 cell populations arranged in organoid structures: small, low-grade neoplastic cells with scant cytoplasm usually lining the inside of alveolar structures, and larger squamoid cells with more prominent cytoplasm and larger vesicular nuclei arranged in compact nests. In 9/21 tumors there was a visible transition from such solid and alveolar areas into papillary components. Areas composed of large squamoid cells comprised 10% to 80% of total tumor volume. Emperipolesis was present in all (21/21) tumors. Immunohistochemically, all cases were positive for cytokeratin 7, EMA, vimentin, and cyclin D1. aCGH (confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization) in 5 analyzable cases revealed multiple numerical chromosomal changes including gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 in all cases. These changes were further disclosed in 6 additional cases, which were unsuitable for aCGH. We conclude that tumors show a morphologic spectrum ranging from RCC with papillary architecture and large squamoid cells to fully developed BSARCC. Emperipolesis in squamoid cells was a constant finding. All BSARCCs expressed CK7, EMA, vimentin, and cyclin D1. Antibody to cyclin D1 showed a unique and previously not recognized pattern of immunohistochemical staining. Multiple chromosomal aberrations were identified in all analyzable cases including gains of chromosomes 7 and 17, indicating that they are akin to papillary RCC. Some BSARCCs were clinically aggressive, but their prognosis could not be predicted from currently available data. Present microscopic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic data strongly support the view that BSARCC is a distinctive and peculiar morphologic variant of papillary RCC.

Renal cell carcinoma in kidney allografts: histologic types, including biphasic papillary carcinoma

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for malignancy, with about 5% incidence of cancer in native end-stage kidneys. Carcinoma in the renal allograft is far less common. Prior studies have demonstrated a propensity for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) of papillary subtypes in end-stage kidneys, and perhaps in allograft kidneys, but most allograft studies lack detailed pathologic review and predate the current classification system. We reviewed our experience with renal carcinoma in kidney allografts at 2 academic centers applying the International Society of Urological Pathology classification, informed by immunohistochemistry. The incidence of renal allograft carcinoma was about 0.26% in our population. Of 12 allograft carcinomas, 6 were papillary (50%), 4 were clear cell (33%), 1 was clear cell (tubulo)papillary, and 1 chromophobe. Two of the papillary carcinomas had distinctive biphasic glomeruloid architecture matching the newly named "biphasic squamoid alveolar" pattern and were difficult to classify on core biopsies. The 2 cell types had different immunophenotypes in our hands (eosinophilic cells: RCC-/CK34betaE12+ weight keratin +/cyclin D1+; clear cells: RCC+/cytokeratin high molecular weight negative to weak/cyclin D1-). None of the patients experienced cancer recurrences or metastasis. Our study confirms the predilection for papillary RCCs in kidney allografts and highlights the occurrence of rare morphologic variants. Larger studies are needed with careful pathologic review, which has been lacking in the literature.

Metanephric adenoma with diffuse calcifications: A case report

Metanephric adenoma is a rare and benign renal neoplasm originating in the epithelial cells of the kidney. The tumor has a benign course and a characteristic histopathological appearance, typically exhibiting a solid and poorly-demarcated margin with rare cystic components or calcifications. However, it is often difficult to distinguish metanephric adenoma from malignant neoplasms prior to surgical resection. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of metastasis to the lymph nodes has been described in the literature thus far. The present study retrospectively analyzed one case of surgically and pathologically-confirmed atypical metanephric adenoma. Clinical and pathological analysis, as well as computed tomography scans, revealed a mass with a clearly defined margin and diffuse calcifications. The mass was subsequently resected and the patient recovered well following the procedure.

A metanephric adenoma of the kidney associated with polycythemia: A case report

Metanephric adenoma (MA) of the kidney is a rare and frequently benign tumor with a favorable prognosis that is often diagnosed following surgical treatment. In the present study, a 54-year-old female patient presented with complaints of intermittent right-flank pain and anterior abdominal pain occurring over 2 years and sporadic gross hematuria occurring over 3 months. Ultrasonography and computerized tomography imaging revealed a neoplasm lesion localized in the right kidney. Successful open approach radical nephrectomy was performed and post-surgical histopathological examination verified the lesion as a MA of the kidney. Radical nephrectomy, cryoablation or radiofrequency may used to treat MA and a selective panel of immunostains, including WT1, EMA and AMACR, may be useful for diagnosis.

Metanephric adenoma: the utility of immunohistochemical and cytogenetic analyses in differential diagnosis, including solid variant papillary renal cell carcinoma and epithelial-predominant nephroblastoma

Metanephric adenoma is a benign renal neoplasm that overlaps in morphology with the solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma and epithelial-predominant nephroblastoma. To aid in resolving this differential diagnosis, we investigated the utility of immunohistochemical and molecular analyses in distinguishing between these entities; the first study, to our knowledge, to use a combined approach in analyzing all three tumors. We analyzed 37 tumors originally diagnosed as metanephric adenomas (2 of which we reclassified as papillary renal cell carcinomas), 13 solid variant papillary renal cell carcinomas, and 20 epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas using a combination of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assessing for trisomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 and loss of Y. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for CK7, AMACR, WT1, and CD57. The combination of CK7-, AMACR-, WT1+, and CD57+ was considered characteristic of metanephric adenoma. Most of the tumors originally diagnosed as metanephric adenomas (31/37) showed the expected staining pattern of metanephric adenoma (CK7-, AMACR-, WT1+, and CD57+). Of the six tumors with discordant immunophenotype, two tumors were reclassified as papillary renal cell carcinoma after cytogenetic workup. It is recommended that all adult cases histologically resembling metanephric adenoma have WT1, CD57, CK7, and AMACR immunohistochemical staining performed. If the staining pattern is characteristic for metanephric adenoma (CK7-, AMACR-, WT1+, and CD57+, including membranous staining), then no other diagnostic tests are indicated. However, if there is a different immunostaining pattern, then we recommend FISH analysis.

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of papillary renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on subtyping

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), a morphologically and genetically distinct subtype of RCC, is morphologically separated into 2 subtypes for therapeutic and prognostic purposes. Type 2 tumors are generally believed to have a poorer prognosis than type 1 tumors. In spite of multiple studies, many clinicopathological issues about PRCC remain vague. We studied the clinicopathological features associated with type 1 versus type 2 PRCC, and we compared the immunohistochemical profiles in both subtypes of PRCC. We identified a total of 144 cases (74 type 1, 46 type 2, and 24 mixed), 29 female and 115 male. Mean age was 56 years for type 1 and 59 years for type 2. Mean tumor size was 3.6 cm for type 1 and 4.6 cm for type 2. Type 1 tumors were more likely to have nuclear grade 2 and less, whereas type 2 tumors were more likely to have nuclear grade 3 and above (P = .0001). There was no significant association between tumor type and renal sinus fat invasion, invasion of muscular branches of renal vein, perinephric fat invasion, microvascular angiolymphatic invasion, and main renal vein invasion. Type 2 tumors have higher nuclear grades than type 1 tumors. Based on long follow-up data, both subtypes appear to have excellent prognosis when diagnosed at early stage. The immunohistochemical profiles of both types 1 and 2 PRCC are essentially the same. The similar immunohistochemical profile suggests that PRCC is one entity with divergent histologic features.

CT imaging spectrum and the histopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the radiopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma (MA) and explore whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.

METHODS

18 consecutive MA cases (age range, 18-66 years; 9 males and 9 females) were pathologically proven and recruited in our study between January 2004 and June 2014. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT were performed and correlated with corresponding pathological findings to differentiate between MA and other renal tumours. The enhancement pattern, lesion contour and presence of calcifications were evaluated.

RESULTS

On unenhanced CT scan, the most common (n = 15, 83.3%) CT imaging characteristics were the presence of homogeneity and well-defined solid renal masses; the minority (n = 3, 16.7%) were heterogeneous or centrally located low-attenuation masses. Contrast-enhanced CT image revealed hypoattenuating heterogeneous masses with varying degrees of contrast enhancement in 16 (88.9%) cases, in contrast to those without increased attenuation in 2 (11.1%) cases. Scattered calcification was found only in one case (5.6%). Pathological results revealed that a total of 6 (33.3%) cases had concomitant malignant carcinoma components; 2 (11.1%) patients had malignant MA; and pure MA was found in 10 cases, with a surprisingly high proportion of malignant tumours.

CONCLUSION

The positive-predictive values of "high" enhancement seemed relatively characteristic for the diagnosis of malignant and composite MA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Radiopathological features of adult MA and exploring whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.

Cadherin 17 is a sensitive and specific marker for metanephric adenoma

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign renal neoplasm that shares morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with epithelial-predominant Wilms tumor (e-WT) and with the solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (s-PRCC). Cadherin 17 (CDH17) is expressed primarily in the normal intestine and digestive tract tumors and has not been detected in tumors from other sites including the kidney. We investigated the diagnostic utility of CDH17 in differentiating between MA, e-WT, and s-PRCC. Immunohistochemical analysis for CDH17, CD57, AMACR, WT-1, and CDX2 was performed on 17 e-WTs, 15 s-PRCCs, and 21 MAs and assessed on the basis of a combined score of extent and intensity. Normal adult kidney parenchyma was negative for CDH17 staining. CDH17 was expressed in the late stages of fetal kidney development at the junction of the glomerular space and proximal nephron. The majority of MAs (81%) demonstrated membranous CDH17 immunoreactivity in all components (acinar, tubular, and papillary), whereas all cases of e-WTs and s-PRCCs were negative (P<0.0001). WT-1 was negative in s-PRCC and was positive in all cases of e-WT and MA. All MAs were strongly positive for CD57; however, this marker was also moderate to strongly positive in 6 (35%) e-WTs and 2 (13%) s-PRCCs. AMACR was strongly positive in all s-PRCCs, but moderate reactivity was seen in 3 (17%) e-WTs and 2 MAs (10%). CDH17 is a sensitive (81%) and highly specific (100%) marker for MA and should be considered in the immunohistochemistry panel for distinguishing MA from its mimics.

Molecular and immunohistochemical characterization reveals novel BRAF mutations in metanephric adenoma

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign renal tumor comprised of a neoplastic proliferation of primitive metanephric tubular cells. A previous study identified BRAF V600E mutations in approximately 90% of MA and found that similar BRAF exon 15 mutations are exceedingly rare in other common renal tumors, including renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A recent follow-up study has validated mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detection of BRAF V600E mutations in a small cohort of MA. Here, we extend these findings to a larger, independent cohort of MA, demonstrating an overall 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity for BRAF V600E IHC. In addition, we report 2 cases of MA with novel BRAF exon 15 mutations, including a V600D missense mutation and a compound V600D and K601L missense mutation. Finally, we evaluate BRAF V600E IHC in a large tissue microarray cohort of common renal tumors and find no significant expression in several renal cell carcinoma subtypes. These data support a role for BRAF V600E IHC in diagnostically challenging cases of MA and expand the spectrum of BRAF exon 15 mutations in this uncommon but unique renal neoplasm.

Characterization of Fibromuscular Pseudocapsule in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been described but little is known about its prevalence and extent. Pseudocapsule was analyzed in 105 RCCs (44 clear cell, 44 chromophobe, 17 papillary). Pseudocapsule was graded as follows: grade 1, thickness comparable to adjacent muscular arteries; grade 2, thickness more than twice the diameter of adjacent muscular arteries; grade 3, grade 2 findings with vasculopathy. Tumor size, tumor regression, and International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) nucleolar grade were recorded. Cases with grade 3 pseudocapsule were stained with elastic silver stain, Alcian blue, smooth muscle actin, and CD31. More clear cell RCCs had pseudocapsule (89%, 39/44) than chromophobe (30%, 13/44) and papillary (35%, 6/17). Average tumor size with pseudocapsule was 3.9 cm; average tumor size without pseudocapsule was 3.8 cm (P = .77). Grade 2 pseudocapsule was common in clear cell RCC (56%, 22/39). Chromophobe and papillary RCC had grade 1 pseudocapsule in 77% (10/13) and 83% (5/6) of cases. Grade 3 pseudocapsule was only seen in clear cell RCC (10%, 4/39). No correlation was noted between degenerative tumor changes, tumor size, ISUP nucleolar grade, and presence and grade of pseudocapsule. Smooth muscle actin and CD31 showed abundant smooth muscle component and rich vasculature within the pseudocapsule. Arterial elastic membrane disruption and/or fibrointimal mucin deposits were present in grade 3 pseudocapsule. Thus, pseudocapsule is rather characteristic and more prominent in clear cell, less frequent in chromophobe, and rare in papillary RCC. Its presence may be evaluated radiologically or in biopsy specimens with scant tumor fragments.

Papillary or pseudopapillary tumors of the kidney

Papillary architecture is one of the most common morphological patterns in renal cell neoplasms. Many renal cell neoplasms can also exhibit, diffusely or focally, papillary growth pattern. This article reviews all the renal cell neoplasms with papillary or pseudopapillary architecture, with an emphasis on recently described new histological types. New insights into the "old" entities, including their immunohistochemical and genetic features, will also be discussed.

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma and solid variant papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic comparative analysis of four cases with similar molecular genetics datum

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSC) was first recognized as a specific entity in the World Health Organization 2004 classification. The “classic” tumor presentation includes an extracellular blue-gray mucinous/myxoid matrix accompanying the typical tubular and spindle cell epithelial components. Tubules are lined by cuboidal to columnar cells with bland nuclei, central small to medium sized nucleoli, and few to no mitoses. By expanding the histologic spectrum, a number of studies highlighted the distinction between MTSC and solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (sPRCC), although controversy still exists. Here, we evaluated two cases of MTSC and compared two cases of sPRCC by light microscopy, special staining, immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We found that morphologic and immunophenotyping features showed more overlap between MTSC and sPRCC. In addition, gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 and loss of Y, which are characteristic of PRCC, were observed in two cases of sPRCC and one case of MTSC, suggesting that MTSC is similar to sPRCC or may be a subtype of PRCC.

Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_194

Evaluation of cytopathology fellow performance for rapid on-site evaluations of fine-needle aspirates over a 6-year period

INTRODUCTION

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of fine-needle aspirates is an invaluable teaching tool for a cytopathology (CyP) fellowship. The ability of fellows to accurately perform ROSEs without direct attending supervision is not well documented in the literature. This study reviewed ROSEs performed independently by CyP fellows and focused on diagnostic discrepancies with managerial implications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All fine-needle aspirates with ROSE documentation performed at the University of Virginia from October 1, 2007 to March 31, 2013 were reviewed and compared with the final diagnosis. Cases were only included if a CyP fellow performed the ROSE. Discrepancy between ROSE and final diagnosis was categorized according to the change. Numbers of false positive (FP) and false negative diagnoses, organ site, and recurrent interpretative pitfalls were noted.

RESULTS

CyP fellows performed 6815 ROSEs in 6 years. An attending cytopathologist was present 8% of the time. Of ROSEs without direct attending supervision (6224 fine-needle aspirates), the preliminary and final diagnoses were identical in 95% of cases. FP rate was 1.06%. The most frequent categorical change occurred from ROSE of "atypical" to final diagnosis of "malignant." The most common sites involved in FP diagnoses were pancreas/biliary tract, lung, and lymph node. Experience gained over the fellowship year did not significantly affect the FP rate. Errors encountered are known interpretative challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study addressing discrepancies between ROSE and final diagnosis and the first study examining CyP fellow performance. Our results affirm that fellows perform extremely well when performing ROSEs independently.